ML17258A408

Forwards Evaluation of SEP Topic III-8.A Re Loose Parts Monitoring & Core Barrel Vibration Program.Need to Implement Loose Parts Monitoring Program Will Be Determined During Integrated Assessment

ML17258A408
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	12/28/1981
From:	Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Maier J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
References
TASK-03-08.A, TASK-3-8.A, TASK-RR LSO5-81-12-083, LSO5-81-12-83, NUDOCS 8112310401
Download: ML17258A408 (10)

Text

SUBJECT:

Forwards evaulation of SEP Topic III-8 '

<<re loose tparts monitaring L core barrel vibration program. Need <<to implement loose parts mani)toring progr am will be dqtormined dur ing inte'grated assessment, DISTRIBUTION <<CODE:

SEQQS

~COPIES >RECEI VED tL'TR,

ENCL, SIZEs, T/TLE:

SEP Dist.(Draf~t or -Final SER)

NOTES:1 eePy:SEP 'Sect, Lde.

QL.<<<<ee g Ae<<f 05000244 i

REGULATOR INFORHAITION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEH

('RIDS)

AOCBSSION NBR:8112310401 DOC ~ DATE: 81/12/28 NOTARI'ZED; NO DOCKET FACIL:50 244 Rober t Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant~

Uni~t ig 'Rochester G

05000244 AUTH'AME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

.CRUTCHF IELDe D ~

Operating Reactor s Branch 5

<<RBC IP ~ NAHE RECIPIENT AFFIL'IATION HAIERe J ~ E.e Rochester Gas 5 Electric Carp.

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME ACTION:,

AD/SA ORB 05 LA IN T<<E R N AL ~

AE O 0 IE NRR/DL DEPY NRR/DL/ADL NRR/DL/SEPB

'Sl NRR5/DL/SEPB RF EXTERNAL: ACRS DIST EX (2/00)

NRC PDR NTIS

~COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 3

1>3 1

1 1

1

?

'2 1

1 10 10 11 11 1

1 1

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME ORB 05 BC

<<SNA IDER g R ~

ELD NRR 'CNALINA NRR/DL D IR NRR/DL/SEPB

/, /SE<<PB PF REG F'IL DIST EX (2/ e Pe e )

LPDR NSIC COPIES LTiTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

?5

'25 1

1 1

1 gt;N p7 198K

<<TOTAL NUHBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

UTTR M ENCL

~

~ r

~

December 28,-1981 Docket No. 50-244 LS05-81-12-083 Nr. John E. Maier, Vice President Electric and Steam" Production Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, Hew 'York 14649 8KCIjVEy e

0<<30tS8>~

~

IIC@tegggy~

CQ@ggg@

SUBJECT:

SYSTEIIATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC III-B.A, LOOSE PARTS IlONITORING AND CORE BARREL VIBRATION PROGfVN - R.

E.

GINNA Enclosed is a copy of our evaluation of Systematic Evaluation Program Topic III-8.A.

You are requested to examine the facts upon which the staff has based its evaluation and respond either by confirming that the facts are correct, or by identifying errors and supplying the corrected informa-tion.

IIe encourage you to supply any other material that might affect the staff's evaluation of this topic or be significant in the integrated assessment of your facility.

The need to actually implement a Loose Parts Monitoring Program will be determined during the integrated safety assessment.

Your response is requested as soon as possible.

If no're'sponse is received by the time the next phase of the integrated assessment of your facility

begins, we will assume that you have no comments or corrections.

Sincerely,'nclosure:

As stated cc w/enclosure:

See next page Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.

5 Division of Licensing aggggi040i SQQapp4

$'~y i 8ii228 PDR ADOCK p

'ps~(<j OFFICE/

SURNAMEQ DATE 5 SEPB:DL ~

~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~

AWang:dkQ@"

..></16./a~........

S PB:DL SE B'Dl~

i:~i/3iiii::::::

WRusse11

~ ~ II ~ ~ ~

~ 0 ~ 0+1

~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~

~ ~

...1.2/.6/8.1.....

O IZ 0

4

~ ~t $0

~tstttO ~ ~ I ~ OL ~ ~

1 L70C5

..1ZP.7./.8>.......

RB¹5:BC

~

0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~I

~

t;rukahfia

....1.aPR48>--

A S

DL deeeoGL ol ase

~ ~ ~

---4Q)g)8l-l 0 ~ 4 ~ 0 ~

~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~

~ ~ ~

0 ~ 0 ~

~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~I~ 0 ~ ~ ~

~

~ 0 ~ 0 NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD OPY USOPO1 1981-33

~ I E

~ E 4

~

eI 4 44 4

~ '

PE IE

AS AEQII (4

4 0

C Cy r+n 0

+>>*<<+

Docket No. 50-244 LS05 12-083 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM(SStON WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 December 28, 1981 Mr. John E. Maier, Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue

'Rochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr. Maier:

SUBJECT; SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC III-8.A, LODSE PARTS MONITORING AND CORE BARREL VIBRATION PROGRAM <<R.

E.

GINNA Enclosed is a copy of our evaluation of Systematic Evaluation Program Topic Iran-.8.A, You are requested to examine. the facts. upon which the staff has based its evaluation and respond either by confirming that the facts are correct, or by tdentifying errors and supplytng.the corrected informa-

tion, We encourage you to supply any other material that migh't 'affect the staff's evaluation of this topic or be significant in the integrated assessment of your facility, The need to actually implement a Loose Parts Monitoring Program will be determined during the integrated safety assessment, Your response is requested as soon as possible, If no response is received by the time the next phase of the integrated assessment of your facility

begins, we will assume that you have no comments or corrections, Sincerely, ennis M,

Cr utchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.

5 Division of Licensing Enclosure; As stated cc w/enclosure; See next page

Mr. John E. Maier

'C Harry H. Voigt, Esquire LeBoeuf'amb, Leiby and MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue N. W.

Suite 1100 Washington D. C.

20036 Mr. Michael Slade 12 Trailwood Circle Rochester, New York 14618 Ezra Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade. Center New York New York 10047 Resident Inspector R. E. Ginna Plant c/o U. S.

NRC

-1503. Lake Road

Ontario, New York 14519

3irector, Bureau of Nuclear Operations State of New York Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza

Albany, New York 12223 Rochester Public 'Library 115 South Avenue Rochester New York 14604 Supervisor of the Tow'f Ontario 107 Ridge Road West

Ontario, New York 14519 Dr.

Emmeth A. Luebke Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and.Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II Office ATTN:

Regional Radiation Representative 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10007 Herbert Grossman Ksq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

0 SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM T

IC III-8.A GINNA TOPIC:

III-8.A, LOOSE PARTS MONITORING AND CORE BARREL VIBRATION PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The purpose of this topic is to review the inservice suryeHlance program to detect loose parts and excessive motion of the main core support structure.

The objective is to detect loose parts ov'xcessive vibra-tion before they can cause flow blockage or mechanical damage to the fuel or other safety related components, REVIEW CRITERI'A h

Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 4.4., Regulatory Guide (R.G.) 1.133.

III.

RELATED SAFETY TOPICS AND INTERFACES

'-1 Compliance with codes and standards (10 CFR 50.55a),

IV.

REVIEW GUIDELINES See Evaluation.

V..

EVALUATION 1.

LOOSE PARTS MONITORING:

R.G. 1.133, "Loose-Part Detection Program for the Primary System of Light-Water-Cooled Reactors,"

Revision 1, describes features for monitoring loose parts within the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB).

These features include sensors strategically located on the exterior surface of the RCPB capable of detecting acoustic disturbances, specificati'ons for system sensitivity, alert levels, data acquisition modes and other system and pr'ocedural require-ments.

Ginna does not have a loose parts monitoring program that meets the criteria of this guide.

2, CORE BARREL VIBRATION:

This concern is only for plants built by Combustion Engineenng and has been resolved generically,

~l

'V '

VI.

CONCLUSION l.

A Loose Parts Monitoring Program, (i,e., detection system and.

procedures as specified in Section C.2 and C.3 of R.G. 1.133, Rev.

1) as currently required for new facilities does not exist at the Ginna facility.

2.

This issue is deleted for Ginna, The need to actually implement a Loose Parts Monitor ing Program will be determined during the integrated assessment.

e