ML17258A340

Requests Attendance of Senior Mgt at 811217 Meeting to Discuss Performance,Program Schedules & Major Milestones to Completion of Integrated Plant Safety Assessment for Each SEP Plant

ML17258A340
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	11/20/1981
From:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Maier J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
Shared Package
ML17258A338	List: ML17258A337 ML17258A340
References
TASK-***, TASK-RR LSO5-81, NUDOCS 8112010524
Download: ML17258A340 (7)

Text

Docket No. 50-244 LS05-81 t1r. John E. Haier, Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

SUBJECT:

SEP REDIRECTION AND TOPIC COMPLETION SCHEDULES-R. E.

G INNA By letter dated July 7, 1981, the staff indicated a concern regarding the success of the redirected SEP program.

Our concern was based on the quantity of licensee topic assessments received versus that which was promised by June 30, 1981, and the quality of those topic assessments.

In that letter we requested a meeting with licensee manaqement to assure that the owners are providing sufficient re ources to support SEP redirection and to assure that licensee topic safety analysis reports (SARs) would be completed according to proposed schedules.

At that meeting the staff requested that each licensee provide their schedules, if different from the staff' proposed schedules, for the completion and submittal of the remaining SEP topic SARs for their facilities.

Your response dated August 13, 1981, provided your schedules.'s of November 13,

1981, we have not received an evaluation for Topic III-4.C, "Internally Generated t1issiles" or your r esponse to the'raft evaluation of Topic VI-4, "Containment Isolation" as promised.

Enclosure 1 is a graph (from NUREG-0845, SEP Status Summary Report) of your actual submittals by month and your scheduled submittals.

Enclosure 2 is the similar graph for all SEP licensees.

As shown by these enclosures, delays are occurring and a continued effort on your part is required to minimize further delay.

Therefore, we are requesting that your senior management attend a meeting with other SEP licensee senior management and NRC senior management planned f'r December 17, 19&1, at which the performance, program schedules and-major mile-stones to completion of the Integrated Plant Safety Assessment for each of the SEP plants will be discussed.

Sincerelv,

• See previous ye w for additional concurrences RB85:BC A ':DL D:DL DCrutchfield GL its DEisenhut 11/40/81 11/+81 11/

/81 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing OFFICEI SURNAME/

DATE$

.......EI 81120106p4 ggii>>i PDR ADDCN 0500024'4 PDR pa9~'""

SEPB:DL AWang:dk" 1 1 /1 9/81 SEPB:DL GCwalina~

~ ~ ~ ~ I

~ 0 ~ I ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ i' 1 1/ 1 9/81 SEPB:DL, WRussell"

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

1 1/ 1 9/81 ORB//5: Pl'.

JShea"

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~I 1 1 / 1 9/81

~ ~ ~ ~i ~I ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~

F 0

'RC FORM 318 t10-80) NRCM 0240 OFF!C1AL RECORD COPY US0PO: 19S1-335 960

~

t

~

0 e

Docket No. 5Q-244 LS05 Mr. John E. Maier, Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corporation S9 East Avenue Rochester, Hew York 14649

SUBJECT:

SEP REDIRECTION AND TOPIC COMPLETION SCHEDULES-R. E.

GIHHA By letter dated July 7, 1981 the staff indicated a concern regarding the success of the redirected SEP program.

Our concern was based on the quantity of licensee topic assessments received versus that which was promised by June 30, 1981 and the quality of those topic assessments.

In that letter we requested a meeting with licensee management to assure that the owners are providing sufficient resources to support SEP redirection and to assure that licensee topic safety analysis reports (SARs) would be completed according to proposed schedules.

At that meeting the staff requested that each licensee provide their schedules, if different from the staff's proposed schedules, for the completion and submittal of the remaining SEP topic SARs for their facilities.

Your response dated August 13, 1981 provided your schedules.

As of November 13, 1981 we have not received an evaluation for Topic III-4.C, "Internally Generated tlissiles" or your response to the draft evaluation of Topic VI-4, "Containment Isolation" as promised.

Enclosure 1 is a graph (from NUREG-0845, SEP Status Summary Report) of your actual submittals by month and your scheduled submittals.

Enclosure 2 is the similar graph for all SEP licensees..As shown by these enclosures, delays are occurring and a continued effort on your part. is required to minimize further delay.

Therefore, we are requesting that your senior management attend a meeting with other SEP licensee senior management and NRC senior management planned for December 17, 1981 to discuss your performance, program schedules and major milestones to completion of R. E. Ginna Integrated Plant Safety Assessment.

Sincerely, ORB85:BC AD:SA:DL DCrutchfield

'Lainas 11/

/81 11/

/81 D:DL DEisenhut ll/

/81 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Directo~

Division of Licensing OFFICEI SURNAME$

DATE Q nc osure:

~ ~

~

~ ~ ~

cc w/enclose s s e

~

~

~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~

re:

See nex paqe

~ p 9I ~ ~ ~ ~\\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0

'EPB: IAPM AWang:dk+

11/t '9/81

~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ O ~ ~

~ ~tn\\o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

SEPB:D

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

g

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

GC na AORS

~ ~

~

~I~ 0 ~ OHO i1(/3ta1......

SEB:C WRussell

...1.1 J. gJBL....

~11/..../8........

ORB//5:PM

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ 0 ~ ~ ~i

~

~

JShea

~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

jd NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFtCIAL RECORD COPY

C fl

Mr. John E. Maier

,CC Harry H. Yoigt, Esquire

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby and MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N. M.

Suite 1100 Washington; D. C.

20036

. Mr. Michael Slade 12 Trailwood Circle

'ochester, New York 14618 Ezra Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department, of Law 2 Morld Trade Center New York, New York 10047 New York State Energy Office Swan Street Building Core 1, Second Floor Empire State Plaza

Albany, New York 12223 Director, Bureau of Nuclear Operations State of New York Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza

Albany, New York 12223 Rochester Public Library 115 South Avenue Rochester, Hew York 14604 Supervisor of the Town of Ontario 107 Ridge Road Mest

Ontario, Hew York 14519 Resident Inspector R. E. Ginna Plant c/o U. S.

NRC 1503 Lake Road

Ontario, Hew York 14519 Mr. Thomas B. Cochran Hatural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

1725 I Street, N. M.

Suite 600 Washington, D. C.. 20006

~ ~

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II Office ATTN:

Regional Radiation Representative 26 Federal Plaza Hew York, New York 10007 l

Herbert Grossman, Esq.,

Chairman Atomic Safety and.'Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Mashington, D. C.

20555 Dr.

Emmeth A. Luebke Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Washington, D. C.

20555

TARGET QSHLTTALS 48 LICENSEE SUBNITTALS GtHHA Enclosure 1

ACTUAL 15 5

'UN JUL AUG SEP OCT HOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HQ JUN JUL PER MONTH CUMULATIVE Target Actual

'arget Actual 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

4 0

0 ~

0 0

0 4,

0, r'4 I

Enclosure 2

LICENSEE TOPiC SUBYiITTALS Stoma@

JtL gC SKP AT MP CEC Jljlt FEB

=-

WAR

'PR NAY JLN JLL PER MONTH CUMULATIVE Target Actual Target Actual 31 21 2

r 33 23 65 98 124 65

~ 44 171 175

- 8 183 187 187 187 188 188