ML17256B176

Requests Review of Existing Fes,Dtd Dec 1973 to Determine Feasibility of License Conversion.Comments Re Significant Changes to Facility or Environs Should Be Submitted within 30 Days of Receipt of Ltr

ML17256B176
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	08/06/1982
From:	Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Maier J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8208110100
Download: ML17256B176 (6)

Text

"C August 6, 1982 Docket No. 50<<244 Mr. John E. Maier Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas

& Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

SUBJECT:

ENVIRORKNTAL REVIEW POR LICENSE CONVERSION Distribution Docket NRC PDR Loca1 PDR ORB Rdg NSIC DCrutchfield HSmith JLyons OELD OI&E ACRS (10)

SEPB In preparation for the ASLB hearing on the conversion of Provisional Operating License NO ~ DRP-18 for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant to a Pull Term Operating License, the NRC staff will shortly begin W~

assessment of the existing Pinal Environmental Statement (PES), dated December 1973, to determine what updating of the information containeA in the PES willbe necessary.

Accordingly, you are requested to revi'ewe the existing PES for significant changes to the Ginna facility or the enviro'ns that would affect the conclusions reached in December 1973.

Your response is requested within 30 days of the date of this letter.

Sincerely, Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 85 Division of Licensing cc'ee next page 1

8208ii0100 820806 PDR ADOCK 05000244 D

PDR OFFICE 0 SURNAME/ t l0/82 DATE Q

.......DL B/g JL ns

~ ~ eQ DCr chfield

--'(7P8'Z'

~ F 0'

~ 0 ~ ~i~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~

NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981-33&980

I r

v Mr. John E. Maier August 6, 1982 CC Harry H. Voigt, Esquire

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby and MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.

W.

Suite 1100 Washington, D. C.

20036 Mr. Michael Slade 12 Trailwood Circle Rochester, New York 14618 Ezra Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047

'I

~

V V

Resident Inspector R. E. Ginna Pl.ant c/o U. S.

NRC 1503 Lake Road

Ontario, New York 14519 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II Office ATTN:

Regional Radiation Representative 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10007 Herbert Grossman, Esq.,

Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

.U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Ronald C. Haynes, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I 631 Park Avenue

.King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Director, Bureau of Nuclear Operations

, State of New York Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza'lbany, New York 12223 Supervisor of the Town of Ontario 107 Ridge Road West

Ontario, New York 14519 Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Atomic Safety and L'icensing Board U; S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

0

'A~

~

Docket No. 50-244 Mr-Leon D. White, Jr.

Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue'ochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr-White:

@@o RE:

ENVIRONtiiENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT R.

E ~ GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Reference 1:

Guidelines for evaluating environttental qualification af Class lE Electrical Equipment in operating reactors-Enclosure 1 to NRC letter to licensees, dated February 15, 1980.

I Reference 2:

Guidelines for identification of that safety equipment of SEP operating reactors for which, environmental qualification is to be addressed - Enclosure 2 to NRC letter to licensees dated February 15, 1980.

In our meeting of February 21, 1980 regarding the subject

program, we indicated that an accelerated review schedule was being developed for this program.

The schedule is attached as Enclosure 1, which includes the required date for your submittal showing conformance to the qualification guidelines of reference 1.

The information to be provided in your submittal, as required by references 1

and 2, is summarized in Enclosure 2.

Where you have previously submitted some of the required information, it is sufficient to incorporate information already an the docket by specific reference.

It is not necessary to resubmit.

However, an orderly organization of the information should be maintained.

For example, if any previously submitted table is changed, revised pages should be submitted.

Enclosure

'I does not show submittal dates for Palisades and Oyster Creek, since the scheduled site visits for these plants precede any practical submittal date.

Material provided for these tvto plants will be upgraded to the level of other plant submittals through a question-and-answer process.

goal i,eFFICE SORNAME OATEN I

1

~

~ ~

NRC FORM318 (9.76) NRCM 0240

~ " .

4

<<4U8. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE'..19'l9-289.369

- i

~

> "~ -'

II I

A A

v r

4 C I C