ML17254A571

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Submittal of Tech Spec Amend to Perform Periodic Purge/Vent Valve Seal Leakage Tests Not Required. Amend Would Be Required If New Purge/Vent Sys Not Installed
ML17254A571
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/08/1985
From: Zwolinski J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Kober R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
References
LSO5-85-10-014, LSO5-85-10-14, NUDOCS 8510100167
Download: ML17254A571 (3)


Text

October 8, 1985 Docket No. 50-244 LS05-85-10-014 Mr. Roger W. Kober, Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas 5 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr. Kober:

DISTRIBUTION Doc et i e NRC PDR Local PDR HThompson OELD EJordan BGrimes JPartlow JClifford JKelly CJamerson JZwolinski ACRS (10)

PKapo

SUBJECT:

PURGE/VENT VALVE SEAL PERIODIC LEAK TESTS Re:

R.

E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant In our Safety Evaluation Report for the Ginna plant, dated June 21,

1984, the staff presented that the Ginna plant would be required to propose technical specifications for performing periodic purge/vent valve seal leakage tests.

You responded with a submittal dated October 30, 1984 in which you presented the fact that only one test would be performed prior to the installation of a new system.

The increased safety resulting from doing this single test is not justified and therefore the staff agrees that you will not be required to submit a technical specification amendment at this time.

However, in the event that the new purge/vent system is not installed in accordance with the above schedule, the staff will require you to formally commit within 30 days to either:

(1) propose a technical specification amendment requiring periodic valve seal tests; or (2) supply historical data from Type C tests which demonstrate that valve seal deterioration is not a

problem and hence the periodic valve seal tests are unnecessary.

It should also be noted that the staff will require you to have a technical specification amendment requiring periodic valve seal tests in place before the reactor is started up following the installation of the new purge/vent system.

Sincerely, cc:

See next page O~lefn'a? sip~

~ "y!

John A. Zwolinski, Chief Operating Reactors Branch ¹5 Division of Licensing DL:ORB¹5 CJamerson g/$ /85 DL:ORB¹5 3K JKelly:jg

/0/ t /85 DL:ORB¹5 JZwolinski lo/8/85 PDR ADOCK 050 DR" I

- PDR P

C II

~

rt y

C 1

I U

~

g n

l

Hr. Roger W. Kober Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation R.

E. Ginna Nuclear-Power Plant CC:

Harry H. Voigt, Esquire

LePoeuf, Lamb, Leiby and MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue,.N.W.

Suite 1100 Washington, D.C.

20036 Ezra Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection. Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Resident Inspector R.E.

Ginna Plant c/o U.S.

NRC 1503 Lake Road

Ontario, New York 14519 Stanley B. Klimberg, Esquire General Counsel New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza
Albany, New York 12223 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Supervisor of the Town of Ontario 1850 Pidge Road
Ontario, New York 14519 ilay Dunkleberger Division of Policy Analysis 8 Planning New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza
Albany, New York 12223