ML17251B087
| ML17251B087 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1988 |
| From: | Russell W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Snow B ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17251B088 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8805200061 | |
| Download: ML17251B087 (10) | |
See also: IR 05000244/1986099
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:, <ACCEIZRATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM 4g REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS) ACCESSION NBR:8805200061 DOC.DATE: 88/05/12 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION" RUSSELL,W.T. Region 1, Ofc of the Director RECIP NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION SNOW,B.A. Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp. - SUBJECT: Forwards final SALP Rept 50-244/8'6-99 for June 1986
Nov 1987.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE40D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: Systematic 'Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Report NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). DOCKET 05000244 .R I 05000244 ~ RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 LA STAHLE, C INTERNAL: AEOD BAILEY,B AEOD/DSP/TPAB DEDRO NRR/DLPQ/HFB 10 NRR/DOEA/EAB 11 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 NRR/DRIS/RSGB 9 NRR/DRIS/SIB 9A NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC 15-B-18 RGN1 FILE Ol EXTERNAL: H ST LOBBY WARD NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 PD AEOD/DOA COMMISSION NRR MORISSEAUiD NRR/DLPQ/PEB 11 NRR/DREP/EPB 10 NRR/DRIS DIR 9A NRR/DRIS/SGB 9D NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE LIEBERMAN,J 02 LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR.ENCL 1 ' 1 5 1'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ D S A TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 32 ENCL 30
Docket No. 50-244
Rochester
Gas
and Electric Corporation
ATTN:
Mr. Bruce A.
Snow
Superintendent
Nuclear Production
49 East Avenue
Rochester,
New York
14649
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Systematic
Assess'ment
of Licensee
Performance
(SALP) Report
No.
50-244/86-99
This letter transmits
the final
SALP Report for the
R.
E. Ginna Nuclear
Power Plant.
We conclude that overall your facility is*operated
in a safe
manner.
The effec-
tiveness of your working level staff and first line supervisors
is reflected in
the good operating
record
and performance
exhibited during the
SALP period.
How-
ever,
the recommendations
made
by the previous
SALP Board continue to be deficien-
cies in this
SALP period.
We are concerned that
gA and
gC organizations
are not
effectively utilized as
management
tools and the operations-engineering
interface
does not always result in timely problem resolution.
We will monitor your process
and progress
in this area
as well as the others identified in the
SALP Report.
Thank you for your letter dated April 21,
1988 wherein you presented
a detailed
'response
to the
SALP Report for the period June
1,
1986 through
November 30,
1987
as
a followup to our March 23,
1988 meeting.
We appreciate
the efforts you are
making to address
our concerns
and will monitor the implementation of your initi-
atives.
Your response
was reviewed
and changes
were
made
where appropriate.,
The
amended
SALP Report
and your response
are enclosed
and will be placed in the Public
Document
Room.
In summary,
we felt the report,
our meeting,
and your response
letter resulted
in
a constructive
assessment
of the performance at the Ginna Nuclear
Power Plant.
Your cooperation
is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Pl
~
<< -{"~-nc~.3. QnneQ p+
William T. Russell
Regional Administrator
8~~~ >52000&1 8805 1 P
PD(i
ADOCK 05000244
9
.
DCFFICIAL
RECORD
COPY
DL50-244/86-99FINAL 0001.0. 0
05/06/88
Rochester
Gas
and Electric Corporation
2
MAY i 8 1988
Enclosures:
1.
SALP Board Errata
Sheet
2.
Systematic
Assessment
of Licensee
Performance
(SALP) Report
No. 50-219/86-99
3.
March 23,
1988
SALP Management
Meeting Attendees
4.
RGEE Letter from B. A.
Snow dated April 21,
1988
cc w/encls:
Roger
W. Kober, Vice President,
Electric
Harry H. Voigt, Esquire
Central
Records
(4 copies)
Director,
Power Division
Chairman
Zech
Commissioner
Roberts
Commissioner Bernthal
Commissioner
Carr
Commissioner
Rogers
K. Abraham,
PAO,
RI (ll copies)
Public Document
Room (PDR)
Local Public Document
Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center
(NSIC)
NRC Resident
Inspector
State of New York
bcc w/encl:
Region I Docket
Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant,
DRMA (w/o encl)
J. Taylor,
DERO
W. Russell,
RI
F. Congel,
DRSS
W. Johnston,
DRS
R. Brady,
DRP
J.
Lieberma),
OE
W. Oliveira)
DRS
D. Holody,
ES
SALP Management
Attendees
DRP Section Chief
and
Steam Production
RI: DRP
RI: DRP
~
~
Banerjee/meL
Cowgill
5/6/88
RI
DRP
e tenhausen
a
lWer
gRP
RI'~DRA
RI: A
(p SF
kllan
Ru sell
OFFICIAL RECORD
COPY
DL50-244/86-99FINAL - 0002.0.0
05/06/88
ENCLOSURE
1
SALP
BOARD ERRATA SHEET
PAGE
LINE
NOW READS
SHOULD READ
12
34,
35
An ALARA checklist for engi-
neering modification has
been
in development for a
few years but is not issued.
An ALARA checklist for engineer-
ing modification was under de-
velopment for the past several
years
but was not issued until
September
1987.
Basis:
Wording changed
to reflect that the che'cklist was issued prior to the
end
of the
SALP period.
PAGE
LINE
NOW READS
SHOULD READ
12
36,
37
There are
no procedures
available for routine air
sampling in the plant or use
of the
SRM-100 personnel
frisker.
Procedures
were not available
during most of the report period
for calibration of the
SRM-100
personnel
frisker or for. routine
air sampling.
Basis:
The wording was changed
to reflect the fact that the required procedures
existed prior to the
end of the
SALP period.
PAGE
LINE
NOW READS
SHOULD READ
13
1
2
There is no method to high-
light changes
to procedures
for personnel
who most imple-
ment the procedures.
Delete, this sentence.
Basis:
This capability exists
and
was overlooked
by the staff.
PAGE
LINE
NOW READS
SHOULD READ
29
27
...without the licensee
per-
forming the analysis
and
calculations...
...without the licensee
perform-
ing
a complete analysis
and cal-
culations...
29
29,
30
...with the
IEB 79-02 re-
quirements.
...with the
IEB 79-02 require-
ments.
Portions of the Service
Water System
and the Standby
Auxiliary Feedwater
System
were
omitted from this analysis.
29
...after several
NRC
requests.
..after
a written
NRC request.
Basis:
Wording changed
to reflect that only a portion of the required analysis
and
calculation
was not performed.
Enclosure
1
PAGE
LINE
NOW READS
SHOULD READ
29
39
The personnel
training was
The audit program
was marginal...
inadequate,
the audit pro-
gram was mar-...
Basis:
The training of personnel
was not the problem as the
Eg work was accomp-
lished by a contractor.
Lack of licensee
resource availability was the
major problem.
PAGE
LINE
NOW READS
SHOULD READ
30
5
...later corrected.
...corrected prior to turnover
for use.
Basis:
Mording was changed
to reflect more accurately
when the problem was cor-
rected.
}}