ML17251A667
| ML17251A667 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna |
| Issue date: | 05/09/1986 |
| From: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Kober R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8605190354 | |
| Download: ML17251A667 (46) | |
See also: IR 05000244/1986002
Text
MN Oo 1986
Docket No. 50-244
Rochester
Gas
and Electric Corporation
ATTN:
Mr. Roger
W. Kober
Vice President
Electric and
Steam Production
49 East Avenue
Rochester,
14649
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Enforcement
Conference
Report for Inspection
86-02
This refers to the Enforcement
Conference
held at the
NRC Region I office on
March 27,
1986 with you and other
Rochester
Gas
and Electric personnel
to dis-
cuss:
(1) The findings of NRC Inspection
Report 50-244/86-02
conducted
on
January
27
31,
1986
and documented
in the enclosure
to our letter dated
March 11,
1986,
and (2) Both interim and long term actions you have planned
or taken to improve the effectiveness
of the implementation of your Quality
Assurance
and Quality Control Programs.
At this conference,
you discussed:
(1) Your actions to address
and resolve
the
violations, unresolved
items
and inspector's
observations
identified during
NRC
inspection
50-244/86-02,
and (2) The actions you have planned
and taken to im-
prove the quality and effectiveness
of your Quality Assurance
and Quality Con-
trol Program implementation.
The slides you used for this presentation
are pro-
vided as Attachment
1 to this letter.
Attachment
2 provides
a list of personnel
who attended this enforcement
conference.
We found the actions discussed
during
this conference
to be adequate
and responsive
to our concerns.
We expect that Rochester
Gas
and Electric Corporation will regularly monitor
and assess
the progress
and effectiveness
of the implemenation of'our QA and
QC programs at the working level
and provide periodic reports of these
assess-
ments to this office.
While no reponse
to this letter is required,
you are still required to respond
in writing to the Notice of Violation attached
to our letter dated
March 11,
1986.
The effectiveness
of your Quality Assurance
and Quality Control programs
will continue to be the subject of future routine
NRC inspections.
Your cooperation with,us in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Q~g r '.t q e 'I P gg ~(> Pp g
Divi,sion of Reactor Safety
Attachments:
1.
Licensee's
slides presentated
during the conference
2.
List of Attendees
8605190354
860509
ADOCN 05000244
. 8
P..DR.
OFFICIAL RECORD
COPY
PK414
0001.0.0
05/08/86
'I
II
h
cc w/enclosures:
Harry H. Voigt, Esquire
Central
Records
(4 copies)
Director,
Power Division
Public Document
Room (PDR)
Local Public Document
Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center
(NSIC)
NRC Resident
Inspector
State of New York
bcc Q/enc 1 s:
Region I Docket
Room (with co'ncurrences)
DRP Section Chief
RI
R
RI: DRP
Minters
Eapen
Gallo
Bettj.nhausen
~Ebneter
$~~6
~/ye&
PK414
0002.0.0
04/16/86
o lins
OFFICIAL RECORD
COPY
I
P
RI:DRS
WIRE
'y
ATTACHMENT I
LICENSEE
'
SLIDES
PRESENTED AT THE ENfORCEMENT CONFERENCE
FOR
INSPECTION NO. 86-02
k
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTENDANCE LIST FOR THE ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE
REPORT
FOR
INSPECTION 86-02
1.
Rochester
Gas
and Electric Cor oration
C. Anderson
Manager, guality Assurance
J.
Bodine - Manager,
Nuclear Assurance
R. Kober - Vice President,
Electric and Steam Production
R. Smith
Chief Engineer
B.
Snow
Superintendent,
Nuclear Production
S. Spector - Superintendent,
Ginna Production
2.
Nuclear
Re viator
Commission
L. Bettenhausen
Chief, Operations
Branch,
S. Collins, Chief, Projects
Branch
No. 2,
W.
Cook
Senior Resident
Inspector
P.
K. Eapen
Chief, guality Assurance
Section,
OB,
R. Gallo - Chief, Reactor Projects
Section
2A,
W. Johnston
Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety
T.
Kim Reactor
Engineer,
Ginna,
J. Linvilie - Chief, Reactor Projects
Section
2C,
G.
Napuda
Lead Reactor
Engineer,
F. Paulitz - Reactor
Engineer,
R. Starostecki
- Director, Division of Reactor Projects
R. Winters
Reactor Engineer,
IR 86-02
QA Effectiveness
Enforcement
Conference
King of Prussia,
March 27,
1986
10:30 a.x.
Intraductory Remarks:
Inspection Report ResPonse
Violation A
Violation B
Violation C
Violation D
Other Items
RWK
5 min.
10 min.
5 min.
5 min.
5 min.
5 min.
Action Plan
Background
Progress to date
Future Actions
10 min.
10 min.
10 min.
RWK
5 min.
I
I
INSPECTION REPORT
NO ~ 86-02
VIOLATION A
VIOLATION:
HELD INSPECTIONS
ON SPECIAL LIFTING DEVICES
MELD INSPECTIONS
NOT PBRFORMBD AS REQUIRED
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSB
TO AUDITS 84-15
AND
85-11
INADEQUATB TO PRECLUDE RECURRENCE
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
RESPONSIBILITY FOR
PERFORMANCE OF VISUAL INSPECTIONS
ASSIGNED TO MHE
DIRECTION PROVZDED TO DEFINE PREVIOUSLY INACCESSIBLE
VERTICAL HBLDS AS NON REQUIRING INSPECTION
MHE PROCEDURE 1100-1
REVISED TO ADD AmtD TO CLARIFY
REQUIREMBNTS AND TO REQUZRB DOCUMENTATION OF VZSUhf
E XAMS
MHE INDIVIDUALRESPONSIBLE
FOR INSPECTIONS
TRAINED ON
THE PROCEDURE
REQUIREMENTS
ALL REQUIRED VISUAf INSPECTIONS
PERFORMED
PRIOR
TO FIRST
~ USE
DURING 1986
REFUEf ZNG OUTAGE
INSPECTION REPORT
NO. 86-02
VIOLATION A
WELD INSPECTIONS
ON SPECIAL LIFTING DBVICES
FUTURE CORRECTIVB ACTIONS:
CONTINUED
PERFORM ADDITIONAL REVXEWS OP REFUELING PROCEDURES
TO
ASSURB
ADEQUATB QA HOLD POINTS RBLATIVB TO
MHE 1100-1
REVISE MATERIALS ENGINEERING Qh PROCEDURES
TO RBQUIRE
MANAGERS'PPROVAL OF
MHE INSTRUCTIONS AND/OR PROCEDURES
SIMILAR TO NDE AND WBLDING PROCEDURBS
REQUIRB ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
ANY NBW
INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
WHEN NEEDED
SUBMIT EVALUATION TO NRR SEEKING RELIEF FROM NDE OF
WBLDS WHICH ARE INACCESSIBLE FOR
INCLUDE SPECIAf
LIFTING DEVICES IN COMPUTERIZED DATA
BASES OF INSERVICE INSPECTION
PROGRAM UNDER MAINTENANCE
ZSI
AND MHE REQUIREMENTS
EVALUATE NEED TO DELINEATE SPECIAL LIFTING
'DEVICES'NSPECTIONS
IN OUTAGE PROJECT ZI PROGRAM
ESTABLISH APPROPRIATE PRIORITY WITHIN AUDXT SEVERXTY
f EVBL SYSTEM AND REVISE AUDIT REPORT
PROCEDURES
FOR
REPEAT FINDINGS
ESTABLISH FORMAL TRAINING PROGRAM
FOR
NEW MHE PERSONNEL
CONDUCT TRAINING OF
PERSONNEL
TO ENSURB EFFECTIVE
VERIFICATION PROCESS
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
i
BOTTOM LUGS TO
SUPPOSE
PLEDE WELD
BOTTOM LUG
SIDE LUG
OIA. CLEVISPIN
SUPPORT
PIPE
ab
d" OIA. LIFTINGPIN
SIDE PLATE
43/8" DIA. PIN
LOADCELL
4-3/8" 0IA.
REMOVABLEPIN
SLING LEG
8E
NO TO
%SPORT
PlPI,'ELOS
'PREADER
LUG
3C
34
CI.EVIS
SPREADER
SRKADER 70
LUG BOLTS
OG ~~~~
OUTER TUSE TO
LM
g
ASSEMBLY
4a
SPREADER LUG TO
3b
~ LEG ASSEMB Y
~3
FILLET WELOS
tTYP. 5-PLACES)
RING
GIRDER
LEG ASSEMBLY
O~
OUTER TWES TO
ADAPTERS WELOS
5b
OUTER TUBE TO
GUiDE SLEEVE
S
WELDS
(TYP. S PLACES)
ENGAGING
SCREW
REACTOR VESSEL
INTERNALS LIFT RIG
Fiaure
3
~ ~
E
C
F~ A.BOTTOM tlN
SLING aNaNWV Le@
l"OIA CLEVIStlN
38
FSII" DIA.HOOK tlN
Lle >INRtt ATE
LlNK LUG
UttKR CLEVIS
0s
sLDEI assweLT
lM(LUGW
WELDS
2c
Qb
ARhl
MTTeNCI.KVIS
i"DIA.CLEVIStIN
QgfORT LUG
SuPPerr
Lue
Qg TD ISNG SRDER
FLLKT WELOS
foapeeod
area)'b
RING GIRDER
LEG
I
LEG FILLET WELD
Q.EVlS PtATE IQ
SEE
D
VIEW OF
SHELO SUPPORT
4c
a
CLEVIStLATK
3" OIACLKVNtlN
- 1b
REACTOR VESSEL NEAO L1FT RIG
Figure
10
P
Ins ection
Re ort No. 86-02
Procurement
of Stainless
Steel
Wire Ro
e
Violat.ion Bl
Purchased
from a supplier not evaluated
and qualified as
required
by quality assurance
manual
Was acceptable
without performing
a receipt inspection
to
verify that chemical
composition
and
the breaking strength
two attributes
important to safety,
were traceable
from
product to reports
provided
by the supplier
Correction Action
QA Program is being clarified with regard to need for and
use of- manufacturer
test reports
to augment receipt inspection
for commercial
grade, items
Additional training will be provided
on procurement of
commercial
grade
items
Improvements
in receipt
and storage
control are
being
investigated
and corrected
Note - follow up discussions
appear appropriate
to achieve
resolution of other aspects
of the stated violation
J';
I
NRC Ins ection
Re ort No. 50-244 S6-02 Violation 82
Procurement
of
H draulic Tor ue Wrenches
Violation B2
Calibration services
for direct read out gauges for HY 10SL
Hydraulic Torque Wrenches
were purchased
from a supplier
who was
not evaluated
by Ginna Station<
General
Maintenance>
Quality
Assurance
and Electric Neter and Laboratory.
Corrective Action
RG&E agrees
with the violation as stated.
A nonconformance
has
been written for placing wrench
on hold
Extent and impact of problem has
been evaluated
and verified
to be minimal
Supplier will be evaluated
by QA and Ginna Station personnel
h
4
I
C J
INSPECTION REPORT
NO. 86-02
VIOLATION C
CIRCUIT SCHBDULBS
VIOLATION.
SEVERAL CIRCUIT SCHEDULES.,WERE
PRBPARED
AND REVIEWED BY
THB SANE INDIVIDUAL
CORRBCTION ACTION:
ENQINEBRS
HAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED AND THE NANAQER ENSURES
THAT CIRCUIT SCHEDULES
ARE NO LONQER PREPARED
AND
REVIEWED BY THE SANE INDIVIDUALS
QE 303'HICH DOES
NOT
NOW EXPLICITLY ADDRESS CIRCUIT
SCHBDULESi WILL BE REVISED
TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC
INSTRUCTIONS.
C
SvA~~.b ..
I
lt
INSPECTION REPORT NO. 86-02
VIOLATION D
G
ON
THE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE
FOR
CIRCUXT BREAKERS DID NOT
SPECI F Y ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR
MEASURING THE RESISTANCE
OF THE CIRCUIT BREAKERS ~
THE
PERSONNEL
INVOLVED IN THIS ACTIVITY FAXLED TO VERIFY
THE CALIBRATION STATUS
OF THE INSTRUMENT PRXOR
TO USE,AND
USED AN INSTRUMENT WHOSE
CALIBRATION HAD EXPIRED ON APRIL
27,
1984.
IV
ON
APPROPRIATE
MEASURES
WXLL BE
INSTITUTED TO
CONTROL THE
ACCURACY OF MEGGAR TESTING EQUIPMENT.
OTHER MEASURING AND TESTING
EQUIPMENT NOT
INCORPORATED
INTO OUR QUALITY PROCEDURES
WILL BE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE
THE NEED FOR SIMILAR CONTROLS.
APPROPRIATE
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA WILL BE
INCORPORATED
XNTO
PROCEDURES
REQUIRING THE USE OF THIS EQUIPMENT.
THESE 'ONTROLS
SHALL BE
REVIEWED WITH THE
PERSONNEL
INVOLVED XN THESE
CHECKS
THROUGH TRAINXNG.
QUALITY CONTROL PERSONNEL SHALL RECEXVE TRAINING TO ENSURE
AN EFFECTXVE VERIFICATION PROCESS.
~
~
~
r
~,
4t
INSPECTION REPORT 86-02
OTHER ITEMS
RESPONSIBLE
GROUP
UNRESOLVED
ITEM
INSPECTOR
FOLLOW
INSPECTOR
FOLLOW
UNRESOLVED
ITEM
UNRESOLVED
ITEM
MAINTENANCE
SUPT
TECHNICAL-
TECHNICAL
-,
TECHNICAL-
PURCHASING
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
BATTERY SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE
TO
INCLUDE LEVEL AND TEMPERATURE AND
CONNECTION RESISTANCE
RAD
SHIPMENT
SIGNED
OFF
BY
PERSON
WHO DIDN'T CONDUCT WORK
SIGNED
OFF
HOLD POINT WITHOUT
VERIFYING ACCEPTANCE AND ACCURACY
OF INSTRUMENT READINGS
TRACKING, OF
OUT
OF
STATION
AFCAR'S
(AND CARS)
REVIEW OF CONTRACTORS RF PROCEDURE
TO
ASSURE
OUR
REQUIREMENTS
INCORPORATED
(OR
HAVE ZN-PLANT
INITIALCONDITION PROCEDURE)
SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES
ALLOW
-25%'ND 3.25
FOR
3
A-1104
DOES
NOT INCLUDE S-15'1
BACKSHIFT QC
COVERAGE
SEGREGATION
OF
HOLD ITEMS IN
STOCKROOM
(SOME ITEMS NOT CLEARLY
MARKED HOLD)
KEEPING TRACK OF ROTATING ASSEMB-
LIES
MORE
FORMALITY ON
MECHANICAL
MAINTENANCE MEASUREMENTS
VENDOR MANUAL CONTROL
QC -
QC -
QC INVOLVEMENT IN RAD WASTE
~
~
GENERAL QUESTIONS
GENERATED BY THE OTHER ITEMS
1 ~
CAN THE CONDUCT OF
QC SURVEILLANCE BE IMPROVED?
'S
THERE SUFFICIENT
MANAGEMENT INPUT AND DIRECTION TO THE
QC SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM?
3 ~
ZS OUR PROCEDURE
ADHERENCE PROGRAM ADEQUATE?
1
I ~
1
I
RGE ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE
KING OF PRUSSIA
MARCH 27, 1986
BACKGROUND
THE WHEELS NOT BROKEN
MAC REPORT
1985 SALP REPORT
TASK FORCE OBJECTIVES
l.
IDENTIFY MEANS TO IMPROVE MANAGEMENTUTILIZATION
OF THE QA/QC PROGRAM.
2.
TO PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF THE QA/QC PROGRAM WITH
RESPECT TO THE RESPONSIVENESS
OF THE AUDITED
ORGANIZATIONS.
3.
TO REVIEW CONCERNS OF THE AUDITED ORGANIZATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO QA/QC PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS.
4.
DEVELOP AN IMPLEMENTATIONPROGRAM TO INSTITUTE
ANY CHANGES REQUIRED.
~
~
All
QA/QC Task Force
Recommendations
Recommendation
Status
Responsible
Person
QA Manager have accountability to the
Executive Vice President and Chairman of
the NSARB with day-to-day direction from
Chief Engineer.
Complete
2.
3.
4.
5.
Establish a formal objectives program for QA Group.
Establish a severity system for audit findings.
Maintain this Task Force as a subcommittee of the
NSARB to review and report to the Board on QA/QC
matters.
(This Group would address
Items 2 and 3
of Page I Objectives on an ongoing basis).
Simplify paper system streamline reporting
requirements.
Complete
Complete
Complete
I
In Progress
C. R. Anderson
J.
C. Bodine
6/I/86
Develop education and information program on the
importance of QA/QC (Communications) .
In Progress
C. R. Anderson
5/I/86
7.
8.
Formalize the Interface between Divisions.
Specify the responsibility for the program and its
implementation.
In Progress
Complete
R. E. Smith
4/I/86
9.
Review manpower requirements
and establish a
program to provide the proper people to do the job.
In Progress
QA/QC Subcommittee
Ongoing
Revised 3/24/86
R. %. Rober
~
~
~
~
IR 86-02
gA Effectiveness
Enforcement
Conference
King of Prussia,
March 27,
1986
Future Actions:
o
Results to be achieved
o
Action plan to achieve these results
BAS
l
ZR 86-02
QA Effectiveness
Enforcement
Conference
King of Prussia,
March 27,
1986
Results to be achieved:
0
Zmmediate
awareness
of quality responsibilities
down to
the worker level.
0
0
o
0
Zmproved understanding
of responsibility
and
awareness
of Quality program at all levels.
User responsive Quality Program.
Zmproved Quality Control Surveillance Effectiveness.
Quality Worker Performance.
BAS
3/2~6
~
~
ZR 86-02
QA Effectiveness
Enforcement
Conference
King of Prussia,
'arch
27,
1986
Action Plan:
Immediate Awareness'
Xnitiate immediate Communications
Program
5/1/86
o
Continue "Back-to-Basics" Training
BAS
3/2'/86
c
g
p%
I
t
J
~
~
r
ZR 86-02
QA Effectiveness
Enforcement
Conference
King of Prussia,
March 27,
1986
Action Plan:
Zmproved Quality Control Surveillance Effectiveness
o
{}C Assessment
Surveillance effectiveness
Conduct of surveillance
Personnel
performance
6/1/86
o
Plan to address
concerns of assessment
7/1/86
o
Zmplement Plans
Define accountability
Training
As determined
o
Perf'ormance
Feedback
System - development
Inprogress
BAS
i"
0
IR 86-02
QA Effectiveness
Enforcement
Conference
King of Prussia,
- March 27,
1986
Action Plan:
Overall - Assessment
Phase
o
Station Management
Assessment
Concerns analysis
6/1/86
o
Plan to address
concerns of assessment
7/1/86
o
Implement Plans
As determined
o
Iden"if'y and 1mplement
any
immediate actions
As determined
BAS
IR 86-02
QA Effectiveness
Enforcement Conference
King of Prussia,
March 27,'986
Action Plan:
Overall - Implement Plan
o
Improve Accountability Definitions
Set goals
and obgectives
Management input
8/1/86
o
.
Impxoved Training
Accreditation
Interim Tx'aining as identified
Augmented to meet our assessment
Quality Module for all levels
'2/1/86
BAS
3/2Ey%6
a
'1
'I ~
P
IR 86-02
gA Effectiveness
Enforcement
Conference
King of Prussia,
March 27,
1986
Action Plan:
Overall - On-going Phase
o
Improved Performance
Monitoring/Feedback
Corporate level system
(looking at INPO categories)
Department level system
Individual performance
12/86
o
Feedback to Management
-BAS
3/2'/86
1 r
gg .~
Il gg~
tw~q~
'
e
~ >v