ML17250A804

Corrected Pages 1 & 9 to 801105 Revision to Inservice Insp Program for 1980-89

ML17250A804
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	11/10/1980
From:	Anderson C ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17250A803	List: ML17250A802 ML17250A804
References
NUDOCS 8012090280
Download: ML17250A804 (4)

Text

'

REV. PAGE t

QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL 4 1 DF 21 GINNA STATION EFFECTIVE DATE)

'ovember 10,t 1980 ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIO SIGIIATURE DATE TITLE

'," 'APPENDIX B QUALITY,.

Ginna Station "'SSURAIICE A 0

Inservice Inspection Program REVIEW ~ ~4,~g l~/0 For the .1980-1989 Interval corrected ll/10/80 APPROVED SY(

%/m R'ro ram Table of Contents introduction: Discussion Program: ISI 1.0 ScOpe and Responsibility ISI 2.0 Xnspection Intervals t

ISI 3.0 Extent and Frequency XSX 4.0 Examination Methods XSI 5.0 Evaluation of Examination Results ISI 6.0 Repair Requirements XSI 7.0 System Pressure Testing ll XSI 8.0 Records and Reports ISI 9.0 Exemptions

References:

Tables: ISI 1.1 Quality Group A Components, Parts and Method of Examination ISX 1.2 Quality Group B Components, Parts and Method of Examination Attachment A Quality Groups A, B, and 0 Exemptions

4 42 ORC ~

TITLE DATE QUALj. TY APPENDIX B 11/10/80 ASSURANCE Ginna Station MANUAL Inservice Inspection Program PACE GINNA STATION For the 1980-1989 Interval 9 OF 21 f'.3.1 The evaluation of the visual examination results shall be in accordance with Article IWA-5000 of Reference 1.

5.4 High Energy Piping l f 5.4.1 The evaluation "of nondestructive examination results shall be in accordance with Reference 9.,

5.5 Indications that were recorded in previous pre-service or inservice inspections and'hich were not characterized as. propagating'laws are acceptable for continued service".,'

5.6 The evaluation of any corroded area shall be performed in accordance with Article,IWA-5000 of Reference 1'1, f 5.7 Steam Generator Tubes 5.7.1 The evaluation of nondestructive examination results shall be as follows:

5.7.1.1 Plant operation may resume when all 'tubes are within acceptable wall thickness criteria and the conditions of (a) or (b)-are met:

(a) When less than 10 percent of previously, defect-free tubes examined, (i.e. g 20% of wall penetration) have developed detectable wall penetrations of greater than. 20%, or f

corrected (b) When previously degraded tub~s exhibit

'l/10/80 further wall penetration. of+ 10%;

f NOTE: An acceptable tube, wall thickness is one which can sustain a'LOCA in combination with,a:seismic occurrence, for which the

. plant is designed to'ontinue operation,

.without a loss of function to Class 1 systems, Reference- 8. For a maximum of ten.",tubes, sleeves, may be used to provide an acceptable tube.'

'1

~ >

p

~,