ML17250A746
| ML17250A746 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 03/26/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17250A742 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-244-80-02, 50-244-80-2, NUDOCS 8011110404 | |
| Download: ML17250A746 (2) | |
Text
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Rochester Gas and Electric Company Docket No. 50"244 Based on the results of NRC inspection conducted on February 19'22, 1980, it appears that one of your activities was not conducted in full compliance with the conditions of your NRC Facility License No.
DPR-18, as indicated below.
This item is categorized as a deficiency.
Technical Specification 6.8. l. a states that written procedures shall be estab-
- lished, implemented and maintained covering the activities of the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33.
Plant Procedure CP-2.5.1, "Rod Position Indication System "A" Bank at Power Alignment", paragraph 5.5 states the following:
"5.5 When all rods have been aligned as per step 5.3 compare the control board indicators for the "A" bank and record on the system data sheet."
Plant Procedure A-1202, "Calibration of Process System Instrumentation",
para" graph 3.5 states in part the following:
"All calibration data shall be recorded on (procedure) calibration data sheets which shall include... I&C foreman review."
Contrary to the above, it was observed that:
For rod alignment of Bank "A" performed on December 20, 1979 rod posi-tion data was not recorded for seven of eight rods as required by CP-2. 5. 1 paragraph
- 5. 5.
For rod alignment of Bank "A" performed on August 7, 1979 individual rod position data was recorded from computer data rather than from Control Board indicators as required CP-2.5. 1 paragraph 5.5.
For calibration of the low flow alarm setpoint for Containment Spray Pumps Cooling Water Outlet Flow, FT-649, performed on November 8, 1979, the low flow setpoint was recorded as 11.5 inches of water.
The data sheet specifies 10 inches of water as the required setpoint with no tolerance given.
The instrument and control supervisor, who reviewed the data sheet, stated the tolerance for such data is plus or minus one percent unless otherwise specified in a procedure or on the data sheet and that the'ow flow setpoint recorded was out of tolerance.
In each of the instances identified above, supervisory procedure review was inadequate, in that each data sheet was reviewed and signed by a supervisor who did not note the discrepancies.
0
\\