ML17249A895

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Issuance & Availability of Amend 32 to License DPR-18
ML17249A895
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/1980
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML17249A891 List:
References
NUDOCS 8005130237
Download: ML17249A895 (6)


Text

8p OSZ 302~~

590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET NO. 50-244 ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO PROVISIONAL OPERATING LICENSE The U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has issued Amendment No. 32 to Provisional* Operating License No.

DPR-18, to Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (the licensee),

which revised the license and its appended Technical Specifications for operation of the R.

E. Ginna Plant (facility) located in Wayne County, Hew York.

This amendment is effective as of its date of issuance.

The amendment authorizes the licensee to oossess and use four mixed oxide fuel assemblies.

The application for the amendment complies with the standards and re-quirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations.

The Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment.

Prior public notice of this amendment was not required since the amendment does not involve a-significant hazards consideration.

The Commission has determined that the issuance of this amendment will not result in any significant environmental impact and that pursuant to 10 CFR 351.5(d)(4) an environmental impact statement or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with issuance of this amendment.

7590-01 For further details with respect to this action, see (1) the appli-cation for amendment dated December 14, 1979 (transmitted by letter dated December 20, 1979) and supplements thereto dated February 20, 1980 and March 5, 1980, (2) Amendment No. 32 to License No. DPR-18, and (3) the Comoission's related Safety Evaluation.

All of these items are avail-able for public inspection at the Commission s Public Document

Room, 1717 H Street, N. W., Washington, D.

C.

and at the Rochester Public Library, 115 South Avenue, Rochester, New York 14627.

A copy of items (2) and (3} may be obtained upon request addressed to the U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.

C.

20555, Attention:

Director, Division of Operating Reactors.

Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 15th day of April, 1980.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I /'I

.--4.L':)UI

. (,

l f.(.(i,'~..~-.

'Darrell G. Eisenhut, Acting Director Division of Operating Reactors

klliam O. Hiller, Chief License Fee Hanagement

Branch, ADM Amended Form Date

~

~

~

'-':-::-::,:AGILITYANENDNENT CLASSIFICATION - DOCKET NO(S}.

fl

~ g f/

Licensee:

6 W~ J P- ~

Plant Name and Unit(s):

License No(s):

Mail Control No:

a/ j Request Dated'.

/

'LO Fee Remitted: Yes~ No Assigned TAC No:

/ A i

bJect:

Amendment No.

Gate 'of Issua ce.

~

~

~

~

ha, This request has been reviewed by DOR/DPN in acco dance with Wc~ion 170.22 of"Part l70 and is,properly categorized.

I'.

This request:is incorrect Fy 'classified and.should be properly categoriz--d as Class Justification for classification or reclassification:

gg S.

0 u

~

is re uired to ro erly cate orize th request:

4.

is reques is a Class t p oT action an is exempt from fees because (a) was filed by.a nonprofit educational institution, (b) was filed by a Government agency=and is not for a poller reactor, (c) is for a Class (can only be a I, II, or III) amendment which results from a written Comumiission request dated for the application and the amendment is c.o simplify ol

. lari,y license or technical specifications, has only minor safty significance, and is being issued for the convenience of he Commission, or (d) other (state reason therefor):

'ZfwJ 0

-Division of Operating Reactors/Project Managemen-THE It'ITIAL FEE DETERMINATION HAS BEE.'( REASSESSED AND IS HEREBY AFFIR;~ED The above request has been reviewed and is exempt from fees.

Wi]liam 0. t"iiller, Chief LFY1B 6/7 License Fee Hanagemen".

Bra ray ~M. ~ Z~/1-O/VF ~

Date

/a4~ eC

~~~ w~xs g

p o4PQ'w,. g

f

Docket No. 50-244 Mr. Leon D. White, Jr.

Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas 5, Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649 JAN p 3 1980

Dear Mr. White:

Local PDR ORB 82 REading NRR Reading HJRDenton EGCAse RHartfield, MPA HHHH)XNX GBennington, MPA RHVollmer LShao WGammill BGrimes JMilier DLZiemann Qgg, f,g 3.I 0+

DISTRIBUTION IN Docket NRC PDR JJShea HSmith OELD OI8IE (3)

BJones (4)

SCharf (10)

ACRS (16)

OPA (CMiles)

NSIC TERA Secretariat (SECY)

JOlshinski CNelson DVerrelli The CommIission has issued the enclosed Shou Cause Order for the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

Your submittals of October 17, 1979, November 19, 1979, and December 13, 1979, regarding implementation of the short-term lessons learned requirerrents indicate, that you do not intend to implement some of the "Category A" requirements until after January 31, 1980.

We have determined that implementation of the "Category A" requirements by January 31, 1980, is necessary to provide continued assurance of public health and safety.

The Shots Cause Order requires that you implement, by January 31, 1980, the "Category A" requirements of NUREG-0578 regarding short-term lessons

learned, as supplemented by our. letters of September 13, and October 30, 1979; or sliei cause why you should not.

Because this Order is imaediately effective it also requires that the "Category A" requirements be implemented by January 31,

1980, or the plant be shut down.

A provision regarding equipment availability problems is included.

In your submitta'Is, you did indicate that many of the "Category A" requirements wouId be implerrented by January 1, 1980. It is not the Commission's intent, in issuing this Order, to encourage delays in implementation of those RCategory A" items you currently have scheduled to complete by January 1, 1980.

Therefore, you should still submit, on or shortly after January 1, 1980, a

description of the methods used to implement the RCategory A" requirements completed by that title.

"Category BR lessons learned requirements, those scheduled for implementation by January 1, 1981, viill be the subject of future correspondence.

A copy of this Order is being filed with the Office of the Federal Register for Publication.

E eeTPN@R

""""""'0/0y-C/6IPI9/I9.

DOR:ORB 92 OIIIII)2/$I/79

"'P OPPICR~

dURNAMR~

n JJS DLZi an D '/SEP o lmer e,

$l...

%pj,

.......!1988 d...a,.d...u 0 fice of N BOB>

e PRR: D/DIR glygBeIon NRR PPR HRD4fton NRC PORN 918 (9-76) NRCM 0240 4 VI0 OOVRRNMRNT PRINTINO OPPICEI IOT0 020 024

4 4'

4 rer 4 Elf 4 ~

II 4 5'" 545

'I

~

4444 5 4

5 4

fl 44

~

4

)

~

r

~\\'f w

~ 4 4

er, 5 ~

'I ~

I 5

~

I

~4

'=

I 4 k

~ 4 KE p

I r

~

I I

L I

I E

e

~ I 4

RC'5t'4>'Yyp Ilf p

I'

(,E,X P

4 4LEE44'5 K

4 K

LEE