ML17228B165
| ML17228B165 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/1995 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17228B164 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-389-95-05, 50-389-95-5, NUDOCS 9506190441 | |
| Download: ML17228B165 (1) | |
See also: IR 05000320/2004028
Text
e
Florida Power
& Light Co.
St.
Lucie Nuclear Plant Unit 2
Docket Nos.
50-389
License
Nos.
During an
NRC inspection
conducted
on March
20 - April 28,
1995,
a violation
of NRC requirements
was identified.
In accordance
with the "General
Statement
of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C,,the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, as
implemented
by Florida Power
and
Light (FPIEL) Topical Quality Assurance
Report
(FPLTQAR 1-76A), Revision 38,
requires,
in part,
design control
measures
which assure
the suitability of
application of materials
and parts that are essential
to the safety-related
functions of the structures,
systems,
and components.
Plant
change
and modification
(PC/M) package
039-294,
required that overload
heaters
with the model
number
123F114C
be installed in motor control center
(MCC) 2A5, Compartment
No.
DR3, for Battery Charger
2AA.
Contrary to the above,
as of April 26,
1995, design control measures
did not
assure
that the required overload heaters
were installed in that,
overload
heaters
with the model
number
123F104C
were installed in
MCC 2A5, Compartment
No.
DR3 for Battery Charger
2AA instead of the required
model
number
123F114C.
The installed overload heaters
were less conservative
than the model
number,
required
by the
PC/M.
This is
a Severity Level
IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant
to the provisions of 10
CFR 2.201, Florida Power
8 Light Co. is
hereby required to submit
a written statement
or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission,
ATTN:
Document Control
Desk,
D.C.
20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator,
Region II, and
a copy to the
NRC Resident
Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice,
within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation
(Notice).
This reply should
be clearly marked
as
a "Reply to
a Notice of
Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the
violation, or, if contested,
the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the
corrective steps that
have
been taken
and the results
achieved,
(3) the
corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations,
and
(4) the
date
when full compliance will be achieved.
Your response
may reference
or
include previous docketed
correspondence if the correspondence
adequately
addresses
the required
response.
If an adequate
reply is not received within
the time specified in this Notice,
an order or Demand for Information may be
issued
as to why the license
should not be modified, suspended,
or revoked,
or
why such other action
as
may be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause
is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response
time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia
this
6
day of May 1995
Enclosure
1
950hi9044i
950606
ADQCK 05000389
8