ML17227A677
| ML17227A677 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 12/24/1992 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17227A676 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9301040203 | |
| Download: ML17227A677 (4) | |
Text
~Q REQ(g
~C"
~o np Vlp Cy o~
IP ++*++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COIVIIVIISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 SAFETY EVALUATION BY. THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NOS.
118 AND 60 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
DPR-67 AND NO.
NPF-16 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ET AL.
ST.
LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.
1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS.
50-335 AND 50-389
- 1. 0 INTRODUCTION By letter dated August 21, 1992, Florida Power
& Light Company (FPL, the licensee) requested various changes to the Technical Specifications (TS) for the St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos.
1 and 2.
The licensee proposed to make administrative changes and achieve consistency throughout the TS by removing outdated material, making minor text changes and correcting errors.
- 2. 0 EVALUATION St.
Lucie Unit 1
TS onl The licensee proposed the following minor changes in text:
(1)
On page III change "pump" to "pumps".
(2)
On page 3/4 0-3 add a period after the word "Requirements".
(3)
On page 3/4 1-12 change "PUMP" to "PUMPS".
(4)
On page 3/4 3-41 add a period after the word "OPERABLE".
(5)
On page 3/4 4-lb replace a period with a comma after the word lIpump ll (6)
On page 3/4 4-14 add a title "SURVEILLANCE RE(UIREMENTS" before section 4.4.6.2.
(7)
On page 3/4 8-6b change "accummulated" to "accumulated" (8)
On page 3/4 11-2 delete a dash from the page number.
(9)
On page 3/4 11-10 change "measureable" to "measurable".
930>040Z03 mama PDR ADQCK 05000335 P
(10)
On page 3/4 12-10 change "Specification 6.9.1.11" to "Specification 6.9. 1.8".
(ll) On page B 3/4 1-4 add subscript "r" to the term "F" with superscript "t".
(12)
On page B 3/4 7-5 change "Criteria 10" to "Criteria 19",
(13)
On page B 3/4 9-3 change the word "exceed" to "excess" and the word "insure" to "ensure".
(14)
On page 6-24 replace a period with a comma after the word "systems".
a.
The staff has reviewed the proposed changes and determined that they correct
- grammar, spelling, syntax and improve the consistency of the TS format.
For that reason the staff finds the proposed changes acceptable.
b.
On page 3/4 4-8 the licensee proposed to change Surveillance Requirement 4.4.5.5a to read, "Within 15 days following the completion of 'each inservice inspection of steam generator
- tubes, the number of tubes plugged in each steam generator shall be reported to the Commission in a Special Report pursuant to Specification 6.9.2".
In addition, to change Surveillance Requirement 4.4.5.5b to read, "The complete results of the steam generator tube inservice inspection shall be submitted to the Commission in a Special Report pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within 12 months following completion of the inspection."
These changes do not alter the intent of these reporting requirements.
They only make them consistent with the corresponding reporting requirements of Unit 2 TS.
For that reason, the staff finds these changes acceptable.
C.
On pages 3/4 6-5, 3/4 6-20 and 3/4 6-21, the licensee proposed to delete new valve numbers and any reference to them.
These new valve numbers were approved by Amendment 95 issued on June 17, 1988 in anticipation of physical modification to the plant.
Subsequently, the licensee determined that the modification was not justified economically and cancelled the modification.
The proposed change returns the TS to its original form which reflects the existing valves.
In support of this change, the licensee provided the following explanation, "FPL is returning to the Technical Specifications that existed prior to the proposed modification described in FPL letter L 123.
The modificattion was planned as an enhancement to the Breathing Air System to save time and provide operational flexibilityduring a
refueling outage.
The penetration is isolated during normal operation.
It has been determined that this modification is economically
unjustified.
No detrimental effects to the Breathing Air System will result and the system will remain as originally designed."
The staff finds the above explanation reasonable and the changes acceptable.
St. Lucie Unit 2 TS onl The licensee proposed the following minor changes in text:
(1)
On page 2-4 add reference note "(1)" after the word "pressure" in Table 2.2-1 part 4.
(2)
On page 2-5 add reference note "(1)" after the word "low" in Table 2.2-1 part 14.
(3)
On page 3/4 2-9 replace a period with a comma after the word "loading."
(4)
On page 3/4 3-2 add reference note "(a)" after the "2" and before
"(d)" in Table 3.3-1 part 4, and reference note "(a)" after the "2/SG" in Table 3.3-1 part 14.
(5)
On page 3/4 3-13 close parenthesis
")" after the word "buttons" in Table 3.3-3 part 4a.
(6)
On page 3/4 6-2 delete the word "of" and add the word "to" in item 3.6.1.2c.
(7)
On page 3/4 6-26 replace the words "set points" with the word "setpoints" in item 3.6.5.
(8)
On page 3/4 8-7 delete the close parenthesis
")" at the end of paragraph 7.
(9)
On page 3/4 9-9 delete the comma "," after the words "Amendment No.
48" at the bottom of the page.
(10)
On page 3/4 11-10 replace the word "measureable" with the word "measurable" in item e.
(11)
On page 3/4 replace referenced Specification "6.9. 1. 11" with "6.9.1.8."
(12)
On page 6-23 in item 6. 13.2. la replace the word "suport" with "support."
The staff has reviewed the proposed changes and determined that they correct grammar, spelling, syntax and improve the consistency of the TS format.
For that reason the staff finds the proposed changes acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commissions regulations the Florida State Official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendments.
The State Official had no comments.
- 4. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION These amendments change administrative procedures.
The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding (57 FR 47130).
Accordingly, these amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed
- above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: J.
A. Norris Date:
December 24, 1992