ML17221A665
| ML17221A665 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1988 |
| From: | Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17221A664 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-335-86-08, 50-335-86-8, 50-389-86-07, 50-389-86-7, NUDOCS 8803160271 | |
| Download: ML17221A665 (3) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power'and Light St. Lucie Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 License Nos.
DPR-67 and NPF-16 During the Nuclear Regulatory to April 4,
- 1986, violations accordance with the "Genera1 Enforcement Actions,"
IO CFR listed below:
Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on March 31 of NRC requirements were identified.
In Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Part 2, Appendix C
( 1988),
the violations are A.
10 CFR 50.49 Paragraph (J) requires in part, that a record of the qualification, including documentation in Paragraph (D) of this section must be maintained in an auditable form to permit verification that each item of equipment important to safety is covered by this section is:
(I) qualified for its application
- and, (2) meets its specified performance requirements when it is subjected to the conditions predicted to be present when it must perform its safety function.
Contrary to the above, at the time of the inspection and as far back as November 30,
- 1985, the following environmental quaIification (EQ) files did not adequately demonstrate qualification of various equipment.
The data contained in the EQ files were inauditable in that the information was not documented and organized so as to be readiIy understandable and traceable.
Additionally, the data did not permit independent verification of inferences or conclusions based on the documented information for the following equipment:
Rockbestos coaxial cable -
EQ File No. 6.3 (Unit 2)
ITT Barton 763 and 764 Pressure Transmitters EQ File No. 9.2 (Unit 2)
TEC Acoustic Flow Monitoring Systems EQ File Nos.
22.0 and 23.0 (Unit');
EQ File No. 8.5 (Unit 2)
Rome Cable -
EQ File No.
190 (Unit I)
Garret Solenoid Valves -
EQ File No. 35.9 (Unit 2)
General Cable -
EQ File No. 8.0 (Unit 1)
Victoreen Radiation Monitoring System -
EQ File No. 26.0 (Unit I)
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
8803160271 880225 PDR ADOCK 05000335 G
'DR
Florida Power and Light St. Lucie Docket Nos.
50-335 and 50-389 License Nos.
10 CFR 50.'-49 (f) states inpart that each item of electric equipment important tomafety shall be qualified by testing of, or experience with, identical or similar equipment, and qualification shall include supporting analysis to show that the equipment to be qualified is acceptable Contrary to the
- above, at the time of the inspection, environmental qualification (Eg) File No. 39. 1 (Unit 2) did not adequately demonstrate qualification of RDF Resistance Temperature Detector (RTD), in that data required to support a qualified life of the RTV sealant used in the detectors were not included in the file.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, FPSL is hereby required to submit a
written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control
- Desk, Washington, DC
- 20555, with a
copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a
copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, St. Lucie, within 30 days of the date of the letter'ransmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include [for each violation]:
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results
- achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. "
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Dated at lanta, Georgia this ay of February 1988 Alan R.
erdt, Chief Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety