ML17221A538
| ML17221A538 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie |
| Issue date: | 12/01/1987 |
| From: | Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17221A537 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-335-87-23, 50-389-87-22, NUDOCS 8712070389 | |
| Download: ML17221A538 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power and Light Company St. Lucie Units 1 and 2
Docket Nos.
50-335 and 50-389 License Nos.
DPR-67 and NPF-16 During the Nuclear Regulatory Coranission (NRC) inspection conducted on October 19-23,
- 1987, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
The violation involved failure to follow document control procedure by performing safety-related activities with a superseded procedure.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part ", Appendix C (1986), the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V require activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with procedures.
FP&L Procedure q16-PR/PSL-1, Revision 1",,
"Document Control", requires that procedures be implemen~ed within 30 days of the approval date of the'procedures, thus providing a 30 day grace period prior to the mandatory implemented date.
Contrary to the above, activities were not accomplished in accordance with procedures as evident by the following:
four examples were identified where the licensee performed safety-related activities with superseded procedures 48 to 202 days after the mandatory implementation date of the next rev'.sion of the procedure.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant
+o the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Florida Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit to this Office within 30 days of the da+e of the letter transmitting this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply including:
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results
- achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Dated at Atlanta, Georgia
~
~
this fy day of Q
~1987 8712 5OOO335 7 1202 ADocv a pDR 8
Sera a 5. $ 1~+
~c Alan R. Herdt, Chief Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety