ML17219A349
| ML17219A349 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1987 |
| From: | Tourigny E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8702180721 | |
| Download: ML17219A349 (5) | |
Text
FEB 1 tj 1987 Docket Nos.
50-335 and 50-389 Mr.
C ~ 0.
Woody Group Vice President Nuclear Energy Florida Power 8 Light Company P.
0.
Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408
Dear Mr. Woody:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - ITEMS 2.1 AND 2.2 OF GENERIC LETTER 83 SALEM ATWS EVENT In conducting our review of your November 8, 1983 and October 2, 1986 submittals relating to the above subject, we have determined that we will need additional information identified in the enclosure to continue our review.
In order for us to maintain our review schedule, your response is requested within 60 days of your receipt of this letter.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than 10 respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P. L.96-511.
Please contact me at (301) 492-8007 if you have any questions concerning this letter.
Enclosure:
Request tor Additional Information cc w/enclosure:
See next page Sincerely, 4rtglnaf agned by E.
G. Tourigny, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate ¹8 Division of PWR Licensing-B PBD¹8 tzer
/p /87 PBD¹8~~
ETour)gny;cf 2/y/87 87021807Z1 870210 PDR ADOCK 05000335 I
P.
PDR DIST N
et NRC PDR L PDR PBD-8 Rdg FMiraglia OGC-Bethesda EJordan PBD¹8 ATPadani 2)O/87 ACRS-10 BGrimes JPartlow ETourigny PKreutzer Gray File NThompson AToalston
0 e
}I ll A
f
~
'I
L Mr., C.
0.
Woody Florida Power 8 Light Company St.
Lucie Plant CC:
Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Resident Inspector c/o U.S.
NRC 7585 S.
Hwy AlA Jensen Beach, Florida 33457 State Planning 8 Development Clearinghouse Office of Planning 8 Budget
. Executive Office of the Governor The Capitol,Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Harold F. Reis, Esq.
Newman 8 Holtzinger 1615 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Norman A. Coll, Esq.
McCarthy, Steel, Hector and Davis 14th Floor, First National Bank Building Miami, Florida 33131 Admini s trator Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. Weldon B. Lewis, County Administrator St.
Lucie-County 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 104 Fort Pierce, Florida 33450 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington - Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.
7910 Woodmont Avenue
- Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Mr. Allan Schubert, Manager
.Public Health Physicist Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Executive Director for Operations 101 Marietta Street N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
RE VEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ITEM 2.1 (PART 1 AND 2.2 PART 1 OF GENERIC LETTER 83-28 UIPMENT CLASSIFICATION AND VENDOR INTERFACE'T.
LUCIE PLANT UNITS 1 2 Review of the licensee's responses dated November 8, 1983 and October 2, 1986 for Items 2. 1 (Part 1) and 2.2 (Part 1) of Generic Letter 83-28, discloses the need for additional information as follows:
A.
Item 2. 1 (Part 1) "E ui ment Classification Reactor Tri S stem Com onents Based on the licensee's submittal, we find that the licensee's program for component classification is not functional on the component level for reactor trip components.
The licensee's
- response, therefore, does not meet the requirements of Item 2. 1 (Part 1) of Generic Letter 83-28 and is unacceptable.
This item requires licensees to confirm that all components whose functioning is required to trip the reactor are identified as safety-related on documents, procedures and information handling systems used in the plant to control safety-related activities, including maintenance, work orders, and parts replacement.
The licensee needs to state that their equipment classification program conforms with the above staff position.
If all safety-related components are not desig-nated as safety-related on the relevant documents, the licensee should specifically describe the exceptions and provide a justification for such exceptions for staff review.
B.
Item 2.2 (Part 1)
E ui ment Classification Pro rams For All Safet -Related Com onents 1.
Item 2.2. 1 - Pro ram The licensee s responses do not confirm that all safety-related components are designated as safety-related on plant documents such as procedures, system descriptions, test and maintenance instructions, operating procedures, and in information handling systems so that personnel performing activities that affect such safety-related components are aware that they are working on safety-related components and are guided by safety-re'1ated procedures and constraints.
The licensee needs to state that their equipment classification conforms with the above staff position.
If all safety-related components are not designated as safety-related on the relevant documents, the licensee should specifically describe the exceptions and provide a justification for such exceptions for staff review.
Item 2. 2. 1. 2 - Information Handl in S stem The 'licensee's responses do not confirm that the information handling system includes a list of safety-related equipment and that procedures exist which govern its development and validation.
The licensee needs to state that their equipment classification program conforms with the above staff position.
Item 2.2. 1.5 - Desi n Verification and Procurement The licensee's responses do not confirm that their procurement specifications require that the appropriate design verification and qualification testing be provided by the supplier.
The licensee needs to state that their procurement specifications conforms with the above staff position.