ML17213A565
| ML17213A565 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1982 |
| From: | Nerses V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8210180268 | |
| Download: ML17213A565 (10) | |
Text
Docket Nos.:
50-389 OCT 1 $82 APPLICANT:
Florida Power and Light FACILITY:
St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2
SUBJECT:
SUtliiiARY OF SITE VISIT BY CASELOAO FORECAST PANEL I
On June 8-10, 1982, the Caseload Forecast Panel made a visit to the St. Lucie plant site to assess construction progress.
(A previous visit was made in October 1980).
The visit initially included a presentation of construction status by the applicant (the Agenda is shown in Enclosure
- 1) followed by a tour of the construction site.
A summary of the Panel visit is presented bel ow.
Summary The applicant made a presentation on the status of construction.
The presenta-tion covered each of the Agenda items shown in Enclosure 1.
At the meeting, the applicant continued to project a fuel load date of October 28, 1982.
However, the applicant stated that it was in the process of reassessing its schedule to integrate the construction activities and the testing and startup phases into an overall schedule.
The applicant expected to complete this assessment in a few weeks.
After the presentation, we toured the facility.
As a result of the presentation and tour, we learned the following:
As of Hay 1982, overall construction was about 885 complete.
Power cable installation was about 88% while terminations were about 90%,
60%,
and 32% complete respectively.
Construction activities were still in progress in the control room.
Of the 305 subsystems in the plant, 241 had been transferred from construction to prerequisite testing.
Seventy-four of the systems had been released to startup (for preoperational testing).
The total number of preoperational procedures required for fuel load are 170.
Of thes'e 125 were approved for use.
Fifteen of the 170 preoperational tests had been completed.
OFFICE/
e
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
SURNAME/, epfpf8p2$ 8 82gppg
~ ": aoi' >
~ ~ a ~'
~ ~ ~ ~ "'
""'i'4'"""""'mm mmocx omooomm9 POR OFF ICIAL R ECO R D COPY NRG FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 USOPO: 1991~960
IIeeting Summary Subse uent Actions After returning to Bethesda, we performed an assessment of the status of construction and informed llRR management of our findings.
Based on this assessment, we concluded that the fuel load date for Unit 2 would be later than the applicant's projected date.
This conclusion was based primarily on the status of the preoperational test program.
Upon completion of our assessment, we verbally informed the applicant of our findings.
He further note that on April 14, 1982, the President of FP8L announced at the stockholders annual meeting that the schedule for Unit 2 may slip by a few months.
At the end of June 1982, the applicant's schedule for Unit 2 shows a slip of 14 weeks as reported in their "St. Lucie Unit 2 Construction/
Startup tlonthly Status Report" which was transmitted to the IIRC by FP8L letter L-82-356 dated August 16, 1982.
V. IIerses, Project Hanager Licensing Branch Ho.
3 Oivision of Licensing Encl osure:
As stated cc:
See next page OFFICE)
SURNAME)
DATE Q PL1~>R >
A
~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~I~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~oui ~ ~
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 498i~~960
1 h
N
) te
ST.
LUCIE Dr. Robert E. Uhrig, Yice President Advanced Systems and Technology Florida Power 8 Light Company
'P.
0.
Box 529100 Miami, Florida 33152 Harold F. Reis, Esq.
Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad 8 Toll 1025 Connecticut
- Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Norman A. Coll, Esq.
Steel Hector
& Davis 1400 Southeast. First National Hank Building
'Miami, Florida 33131 Mr. Martin H. Hodder 1131 N.
E. 86th Street Miami, Fl orida 331)8 Resident Inspector St. Lucie Nuclear Powr Station c/o,U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coamission 7900 South AlA Jensen Beach, Florida 33457 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission 101 Marietta Street Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
ST.
LUCIE 2 CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL SITE VISIT MEETING AGENDA Encl.osure 1
Overview of project construction schedule including progress and major milestones completed, current problems and any anticipated problem areas that may impact the current projected fuel load date.
2.
Detailed review and current status of design and engineering effort (by major discipline) including any potential problems that may arise from necessary rework.
3.
Detailed review and current status of procurement activities including valves,
- pipe, instruments,
- cable, major components, etc.
4.
Actual and proposed craft wo'rk force (by major craft), craft availability, productivity,.potential labor. negotiations and problems.
. 5.
Detailed review and current status of all large and small bore pipe hangers,,restraints,
- snubbers, etc., including design, rewo'rk, procurement, fabrication, delivery and installation.
6.
Det'ailed review of project schedule identifying critical path
- items, near critical items, amount of float for various activities, the current critical path to fuel loading, methods of implementation of corrective action for any activities with negative float, and provisions for contingencies.
The estimated project percent complete as of,.
7.
Detailed review and current status of bulk"quantities includinq current estimated quantities, 'quantities iiistalled to date, quantities scheduled to date, current percent complete for
- each, actual v'ersus forecast installation rates, and basis for figures.
(a)
Concrete (CY)
~
(b)
Process Pipe (LF)
Large Bore Pipe (2 1/2" and larger)
Small Bore Pipe (2" and smaller)
(c)
Yard Pipe (LF)
(d)
Large Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints, Snubbers (ea)
I
(e)
Small Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints (ea)
(f)
Cable Tray (LF)
(g)
Total Conduit (LF),
(h)
Total Exposed Hetal Conduit (LF)
(i)
Cable (LF)
Power Control Security Instrumentation Plant Lighting I
(j)
Terminations (ea)
Power Control Security Instrumentation Plant Lighting (k)
Electrical Circuits (ea)
Power Control Security (l)
Instrumentation (ea) 8.
Detailed review and current status of preparation of preop and acceptance test procedures, integration of preop and acceptance test acti'vities with construction
- schedule, system turnover schedule, preop and acceptance tests
- schedule, current and proposed preop and acceptance tests program manpower.
(a)
Total number of procedures required for fuel load.
(b)
Number of draft procedures not started.
(c)
Number of draft procedures being written.
(d)
Number of p'rocedures approved.
(e)
Number of procedures in rev'iew.
(f)
Total number of preop and acceptance tests
~ required for fuel load.
(g)
Number of preop and acceptance tests completed.
(h)
Number of preop and acceptance tests currently in progress.
(i )'umber of systems turned over to start-up.
9.
Detailed discussion of potential schedular influence due to changes attributed to NUREG-0737 and 'other recent licensing requi rements.
10.
Discussion of schedular impact, if any, regarding potential deficiencies reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e).
ll.
Overview of current construction management organization 12.
Site tour and observation of cons ruction activities.
ENCLOSURE 2
ATTENDEES OF THE ST.
LUCIE 2 CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL YISIT ON JUNE 8-10, 1982 FPAL G. Smith G. Baissy H. Derrickson E.
Dotson NRC V. Nerses M, Lovelace
t'iEETING SUh'PRY y
y/document Control (50=389-)~....,.
NSIC LB-;3 Rdg'.
J.
Lee Project flanager VNerses Atto rn ey,. 0ELD E.
L. Jordon Regional Administrator, Pegion J.
H. Taylor PARTICIPANTS (NRC):
VNerses WLovelace
+e
0
~
p h,h lf
~
tO