ML17212B439

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Minutes of 820219 Meeting W/Util & C-E Re Dual Licensing of Reactor Operators.Attendance List & Slide Presentation Encl
ML17212B439
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/10/1982
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Miraglia F
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-82-85, NUDOCS 8203160380
Download: ML17212B439 (37)


Text

1

'I S

REGULATORY FORMATION DISTRIBUTION SY

.M (RIDS)

ACCESSIO~

NBR:8203160380 DOC.DATE: 82/O3/10 NOTARIZEO; NO FACIL:50-389 St. Lucie Planti Unr~t 2, Flor ida Power 8 Light Co.

AUTH ~ NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION UHRIGg R ~ E, Florida Power 8 Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MIRAGLIAr F ~ J ~

Licensing Branch 3

SUBJECT:

Forwards minutes of 820219 meeting w/util F

C-E re dual l,icensing of reactor operators, Attendance list 8 slide presentation encl'OCKET

¹ 05000389 DISTRIBUTION CODE:

B001S 'COPIES 'RECEIVED:LQR I

ENCL,,)

TITLE: PSAR/FSAR AMDTS and Related Correspondence NOTES:

SIZEo RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME A/D LICENSNG LIC BR ¹3 LA INTERNAL: ELD IE/DEP/EPDB 35 MPA NRR/DE/EQB 13 NRR/DE/HGEB 30 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 NRR/DE/SAB 24 NRR/DHFS/HFEB90 NRR/DHFS/OLB 30 NRR/DSI/AEB 26 NRR/DSI/CPB 10 NRR/DSI/ETSB 12 NRR/DSI/PSB 19 NRR B

23 04 EXTERNAL: ACRS 41 FEMA~REP DIV 39 NRC PDR 02 NTIS COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

0 1

0 1

0 1

1 1

0 3

'3 2

'2 1

1 1

1 1

1, 1

1 1

1

,.1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

10 10 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME LIC BR ¹P BC NERSESeV

~

01 IE 06 IE/DEP/EPLB 36 NRR/DE/CEB 11 NRR/DE/GB 28 NRR/DE/MEB 18 NRR/DE/QAB 21 NRR/DE/SEB 25 NRR/DHFS/LQB 32 NRR/DHFS/PTRB20 NRR/DS I/ASB 27 NRR/DSI/CSB 09 NRR/DSI/ICSB 16 NRR/DS I/RAB 22 NRR/DST/LGB 33 RGN2 BNL(AMDTS,ONLY)

LPDR 03 NSIC 05 COPIES LTTR ENCL 0

1 1

1 1

"3 3

1 1

2 2

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 56 ENCL,51

4 II 4

E

'I 1

C

'b h

X F'

P.O. BOX 529100 MIAMI,FL 33152 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY March 10, 1982 L-82-85 Mr. Frank J. Miraglia Chief, Licensing Branch 83 Division of'icensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 RE:

St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 FPL/NRC Meeting of February 19, 1982 On Dual Licensin Oj e~~ >98Z~

hag g ~

6

Dear Mr. Miraglia:

Attached are minutes of the meeting we held with your staff on February 19, 1982 to discuss dual licensing of St. Lucie operators.

We appreciated the time you allowed us to discuss this topic and we look forward to further dialogue in the future.

Very truly yours, Ro rt E. Uhrig 1ce President Advanced Systems and Technology REU:EWD:ga Attachments t

aaosiYasso "aios Eo PDR ADOCK 05000389 A

,, PDR PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

Minutes of meeting held on February 19, 1982 in Bethesda, Maryland between FPL and NRC to discuss dual licensing of St. Lucie Power Plant operators.

Attendees:

See attached list.

(1)

FPL (G. Boissy) presented a review of the history of FPL's dual licensing program and an overview of the meeting presentations.

See attached slide.

(2)

FPL (K. Harris) presented a discussion of the operational philosophy that FPL intends to employ for the safe operation of St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 with operators that are licensed on both units.

(3)

FPL (J.

Barrow) discussed development of emergency operating procedures for St. Lucie 2 and the schedule for upgrade of Unit 1 procedures.

See attached slide.

NRC commented on the narrow time period available for emergency operating procedure revision followed by operator training and examination.

FPL stated that they were confident that this concern would not impair operator performance on the license exam.

NRC also noted a concern about the rapid incorporation of the SPDS systems into the plant hardware and the slow response of the various NSSS owners groups to emergency operating procedure upgrading.

(4)

FPL (J.

Harrow) presented the status of the normal operating procedure development.

See attached slides.

(5)

FPL (D. Sager) identified the progress to date on Technical Specification development and expected submittals.

See attached slide.

(6)

FPL (J.

Spodik) explained'he work that has been completed for identification of system differences.

This discussion included how the identified system differences were incorporated into the training program.

See attached slide.

(7)

FPL (D. Sager) presented the proposed manpower needs for licensed operators assuming single and/or dual licensing.

See attached slide.

(8)

Concluding remarks on the presentation were made by G. Boissy.

NRC responded to the presentation with the following points:

0

(a)

The NRC has no problems with the concept of dual licensing of supervisory personnel and, in fact, encourages this

-practice.

(b),

The NRC defines supervisory personnel as the operations supervisor and the nuclear plant supervisor.

(c)

The NRC is primarily concerned with the on-shift control room operators during the startup of Unit 2.

They are concerned that an extensive demand on the use of Unit 1 operators for Unit 2 startup testing on a daily and over-time basis may necessitate transfer between units often.

This transferring between units would occur at a time when the plant conditions may likely be quite different from one plant to the other.

(d)

The NRC would like FPL to consider a condition that limits transfer of operators between Unit 1 and' during power ascension testing.

This condition would be relaxed after testing is complete, after technical specifications are verified as similar and after the emergency operating procedures are verified as similar.

This verification would be closely coordinated with. NRC Region II I&K.

(e)

NRC requested FPL to identify to them in an application for o'perator license exam how FPL would prefer to establish the conditions that preclude transfer of operators between Unit 1 and Unit 2 until such time. that the transfer restrictions are relaxed.

(f}

The NRC will issue a letter to FPL with a description of the NRC's position on dual licensing.

MEETING FPL/NRC ON 2/J.9/82 RE:

DUAL OP.

LICENSING V.

NERSES JOHN BARROW W.G.

KENNEDY D.A.

SAGER J.

Spodik HUGff THOMPSON BRUCE WILSON DON H.

BECKHAM JOHN SHEETZ ERROLL DOTSON K. N. Harris G. J. Boissy M. J. Harris MALT WINDECKER M. B.

DERRICKSON NRC/DL/LB 83 FPL NRC/DHFS/PTRB FPL-OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR FPL TRAINING STAFF NRC/DHFS NRC/DHFS NRC/DHFS/OLB FPL POWER PLANT ENGINEERING FPL

>s tl II FPL FPL C-E FPL FPL

0

ST.

LUCIE PLANT DUAL LICENSAHILITY INTRODUCTION TOPICS OF DISCU SS ION:

o OPERATIONS PHILOSOPHY A

~ EMERGENCY )

OFF NORMAL PFIOCEDURES TECHNICAL SPECI FICATlONS CONTROL ROOM SYSTEMS DESIGN DIFFERENCES o

STAFF lNG

OB JECTlVE TO OPERATE

.ST.

lN AS SAFE A

MANNER -AS POSSIBLE

~

4

~

4I,

~ ~

~' I ~"

~

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~

>>4 EG..O NUR

!I 99 E

I,.I' GEM.Cs Y.:

t

~

4 I

iCEOG I

I t.

I;.

. 't' E

.I:.I

.:OP)

DU I

~ t 4 ~

I

~ ~

~

4

-:!3" PREPARE IMPL. PL'AN I

~

~ ~ ~

.:-".:-'3

,:.;i-.',

'.":I:. ~

i"."ACRS TING

.GEOG ET

~ ~ ~

! ~

>> ~ I

.::.!I::.:.;

lt:J:t

~

~ ~

~ II

.:I;I.::;-t(

Ul Il,t Rli ERST>>PP IDE;,.I tg>>,i!I I 3,:i;.':

t'll 'ljj ill:,:.I:I

!. NR "iiili...

>>lit

sll I:;s

-L

'.:I

~ -

~ ~

~

.::..;."':tt

~ ~ ~ I I>>

~

~

=::;I':-':

2:I.EO

~ ~I UNlT

~

~

I

~

~

L...

! 3 3-:'ll atIj;:333

'I!: 'le t ~

~

~

I I

~

ISED>>C li 3':"

I

,tt!

~!II sl >>: '..ll

[!

I I

~ t I litt "!

3 tfjt Ij~t

I

".:t:I:

it!

~

'-'.i'll!

I ~ I tl ~

j I',

4[

I>>

litt

~ ~

  • .;.::;I
.: I:.;Il

.I!

I'"

a>>I ~

'- NRC

~

~

~ ~ ~

4 4

<< ~ >>

i', REV

",GUlD OG'.iG ID 3

CON EffN I

4 I

RP s.!

I.!::!I.t.".t

~. '..""..I

. ~

TANDP T..l EOP REVlSEg(

>>UNI EW!".

~ '. I '.

I I

I

.!I =."

t

~

t s,

I OPERATOR 'IVIE>>a>>>>t-( EO I

s 1

. I

~

QS 44 4

a ~

Il I

T r (DS:.

I

>> ~

t

~

~

I el

~ '

~ ~ a

..::.;3:-;!
ii.'3:;:

I'.ii/L"l I',Iit.

ii:j ie till!

Itt'li!

i ':.ll!;::i

s:.'ll a

~ I

'I ~

iIIi

!I~ I

II!

ji;3

>>MI'l tlr.

iill

~ j!

~ ~

ijii '.i!i

~ I

~ t

~ ~

jj!~

~

~ ~ ~

.GOL

. LICEN

!E/A

/ORE

,L'OA0

~ ~ ~

~ ~

S IN AL'RIG

~ Ist.t

)1 i:..I:.

II 3

I+I~

Is i s:s:

iljj:!ii

>>jj! ill

~ ~

~ ~

4

~

~

I

'.,'3

".', I..

i I'.t

>> ~ ~ ~

I

lii tel ta

'I

iii 3 lt Il'I

~ tI.'l

!ww

\\ ~

~

~

I I

ITRAi

~ ~

~ ~ ~

I:lil:.

.. =OO

! ~"

I I

UIDES) f

~ ~

I

.L.3
.:3:

I i'i

~ I 3.I,(

~

~

I

~

'-344 4 ~ ~ >>

.;I? I lit~

~

~

~ ~!;;I s

'.Ill i'if silt

~ee jjij ill!)

~ ~

~

jliil I ~ ~

a>>

~

Tjit

~ I I'I'at iij teil erat I,",;

Je I

I:ti t

~

4

>> ~

fl!4 I:f"

~it

"'.IIS II'

~

~.t I

~

4 I"

I I

I l

I I

tl
':I-:

I-~

'.3' I

s

~

6'.-I

?-I 8-I 9-1 IO-I'I I

l,: l2-I, I-,I;.2

~ I98I IL..0,

~ =

~

! l982 S-l.>> 6;:I";!'.I?-

t...I,.

l.

8-I 9'-l '

i2-'i I

-l

~: l-I

ya

)

~

N5S

%RES Qgg@Q~

SRRSR

~

I

~~~~QQ~~K~~

~

~

~

0 C

t C

C 4

I

~

ST. LUCIE PLANT-UNIT 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS I. REVIEW BY FLORIDA POWER

$ LIGHT C

. SIGNIFIGANT..INPUT.BY.OPERATING. PERSONNEL o UTILIZING UNIT I TEG.H.SPECS A8 BASI$

2. 3-PARTY REVIEW (.FPL,.EBASCO,.GE)
3. SUBMITTAL TO NRC 0
4. REVIEW AND NEGOTIAT.IONS.

V

~

5. ISSUANCE OF UNIT 2 TECHNICAL. SPECIFICATIONS

=

EXPECT THAT UNIT 2 TECH SPECS

%ILL BE VERY SIMILAR TO THOSE OF UNIT I.

ll

CONTROL ROOM OPERATIONAL DESIGN E VALUATION

h

'I

~

c CONTROL ROOM DESIGN OPERATIONAL DIFFERENCES ANALYSIS

~ REVIEW COMPATABILITY OF UNITS I ( 2 DESIGN MAJOR

. CONTROL AREAS EMERGENCY CONTROLS g

INDICATIONS AUXILIARY CONTROLS (

INDICATIONS

~ )DENTIFY AREAS GF CONCERN FOR NOR MAL OP E RATION EMERGENCY

RESPONSE

~ EVALUATE OPERATIONAL SIGN) FICANCE I

OPERATIONAL I

EVALUATI.O N OF SIGNIF ICANCE

.IS IT SAFETY RELATED USED FOR IMi>IEDIATE OR SUBSEQUENT ACTION IS IT MANUAL.OR AU.TOMATIC.

.FREQUENCY OF,USE'.

I EFFECT OF MIS -OPERATION

'SSIGN SIGNIFICANCE CATEGORY

I

1

'IGNIFICANCE CATEGORIES h

I..HIGH RISK OF ERROR IN SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITY

2. MODI:-RATE., RISK OF ERROR IN. SAFETY-RELATFD ACTIVITY 3.

LOVIt RlSK O.F ERROR IN SAFETY"RELATED ACTIVITY 4.

HIGH RISK GF ERROR IN NON SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITY 5.

LOW RISK OF ERROR IN NON SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITY

WEEKS I THRU: 5 UNIT I $ 2.SYSTEM COMPARiSONS AND DIFFERENCES TRAiNiNG WEEKS 6 AND 7 REACTOR THEORY REVIEW THERMODYNAMCS HEALTH PHYSICS

'EEKS 8 AND 9 PROCEDURES TBANDILNT ( P-CCII3I:.NT ANAIY"I5 WEEKS 10 THRU l2 SYSTEM. TRACING REVIEW g EXAMINATION

P 1

CONCLUSION.S (

RECOMMENDATIONS C

t r

'k't

'UAL LICENSE IS ACCEPTABLE AND SAFE IMPLEMENT. DIFFERE/CES, TRAINING PROGRAM I

BASED ON. EVALUATIONI FIN,DINGS CONTINUE TO INPUT ',CHANGES AND MODIF ICATION S INTO TRAIN I N6 PROGRAM

0

0 ST. LucIE PLANTuNITS I g 2 OPERATIoNs sTAFFING (DUAL LIcENsE)

OP. ERATIONS SUP. ER.V IS OR NUCLEAR.PLANT SUPERVISOR UNIT I NUCLEAR.

NATCH ENGINEER UNIT 2 NUCLEAR V/ATCH.ENGINEER UNIT I REACTOR CONTROL OPER.

UNIT I REACTOR CC'NTAOL OPER.

UNIT 2 REACTOR CONTROL OPER.

UNIT 2 REACTOR CONTROL OPER.

UNIT UNIT 2

Q Q

0 J

~

g

~

j 4 a f

0 0"

0

~

e o

0 4

t o ~

~

0

~

~

~

~

I a ~

i

ST. LUCIE PLANT OPERATIONS/TRAINING SCHEDULE I>rk>lkr It OkrNk!

10 IS IO tS IS I'I IO IN Orr III I'0 SS

>>Ori 10 IS

.'0 SNS

'I 10 I\\

IO jjkt 10 II 5, IS S

10 IS 10 >I

>IIOVit

'10 1$

10 1$

11>I!IN!0 10 II iO SS OOSOOI 0 10 IS

.0 lrQVSVOt0 10 I'1

.0 a avss0 10 IS,O 5:ihh R.

P.h Jrj-'I=J iH Hi:".:C hl.!

15 15..

'+ -"

5 5"':I

. jhi

!ifi

!Pi 151 hJ j!jj'i I ':.

I!I!.I i I!i:.

h hi <iird hiji

!51

":iL 51 5!i

'hph'

iiil 5.,)ia irJF

=-..)5 RAT

"" 5!.I

!IF) 51'.'ll'Q pJ i;I

,=.Li CL

==.:I:.'..~Q

)1SKj Jhi J) 51

!11 ii iiHH:IF 5

jlh

~

.I: i

i:

i'h Ph

'I:I "p

Hl'l Fail r.hd i-:HI hl!I 55)

Fh'I:

."". !15 Jdt 5

'5:

, ja.h, 51

.'5 t!: 15 hit IP! 5!

":555j 51!rhi 51 S5J.

ii ro hl SE"5 P, Rjt0 i: hhl:a ir::-:::: d-::I:.

L" 'S HJII!rdf SL.:!i%

115 Kl rlii,.! ii:":

..5 :5:

i!I it!

~Lj

'Ih IiP ih

'!!ib

!5:l Oi'ii'i!

lf"c'P hdtH:) 5:I 33CENS

'i:L!:j

.1!55)5

,,:I)IP E.

': 5JNL"-irh'I'"'"r.-&

-ra:p-'I:!

=hp-'t 1ii:..':!::p)

.: I:5 :.:: 5 5.::::"

-::.::::.5:I;i!i i:":: iii

"":Lah U)I'I

!i:::-:-.di:

5E'51 Ji).J!

TOR IJ:

55,'!

5:t 5

5 hd Llh

~

"'l6:-". h""

r;rh SSI 15

'!H-

-:Uf kj4 iii!iii!

.ii:. I L!

)5i.I!

5!

=..f!

RA 15:f.

!ii..

"hi Sill 51 hl Hf 5R Hi).-.QR ljh

'Sl

.:!!I

'Qi:i::.

hi!fhp i!L'iii

!:I:!!!I

!Sit.

Ug Hf'.:

51 "ihfhh)5!5 ph:rl f."Hj."H vQ

!Hdh!-.:8!H"""

.-':"= ll..<JJ:":.=.."==Jr r.J ""F.

HIHO.....)55F q

'ujiiT'iiiiT

H::"!

!:i'hi

!5:j

5!f HJ P.
dii !i il:i::I

)REVIQ 5!:5! 55 Ih Aj j)JOB fVijL",j'i!

Lh!

i!i:

Sj ih:

'lil I iihbd L: 5:I 1!!

I: 55

'Ei! Il!i 15!IH:

)H:.I i:d! i ht

'd)

-'hihhi 5 hi!5

'+ hi

'H;:i.d P !J I!I 55.",:

!5!'

II: 5.

hj:FI

ii) hh li:":INJ L','l!

j:.I!

F:..

I'

'!51:

IPi) 5:I HHIL !

!i:I!i!i!

iiiPRO

I "

E.>jj)R,

'li!i:i!i jj'!

Tf Hitlj hii ih:"

'i!i:ip :ii i'!IIH

!rlhl hr

." !hi 55:

rh 5

5:

!iii !'!)'I) i:

.NI 15; hl:;:.

5 55 H iiiiihi Fl NJ

".'h'h iiPf Hi

!.j'li.

!L".

5

i::!

5:I hL l,l ilh lhl hh rh)I I'! ::!i!:F)

I!;::;.,:

hl

'I 5

j! I 51'I hli 'ld

IJ '!)'I IJII )i!i Ih 51 LJ :5 ii:I:d hiiihh Ih:

rl Ih I':): d!F I-5tl

!:!)hi i!jhl Id!i hl P >5 Il 5:(I pii 5:Ii J!II 551

ih i!i!

15 Ih! "

ih L'i iid i!i H

Hjf

:I ih: :5

.d

II Ih I 51,)

~:lh 15.

.d 5:

-ll lllll!Il 'I!I 51: 55.;:! IIF hli 1.'!

IP.

i!:IH I::h)

":;+ "", hh hh 15 55

.j:! 5I 5,1
Ih th:di!'!h I

I

~

I

~

I

~

'=

IS 0

ri

~

I'

~

'r

- ~

I ls I, 0

10

~ ~ s vrs

>N>%1 NMvrk ~

OSrae

~

strrINN0

~Nr

~fvk V VV

~ Iwl' ~

V

FLORIDA POWER 8I LIGHT COMPANY INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE TO Rich Kaminsky,Nuclear Affairs LOCATION DATE ECEIVED MAR -6 1982

<<cleat licensing EPM-PSL2-82-095 G,

O. Building Miami, Florida February 25, 1982 FROM susJEcT:

FPL/NRC MEETING ON DUAL LICENSING Erroll Dotson Power Plant Engineering COPIES To U. B. Derrickson G, J. Boissy C. M, Hethy

'P.

H. Rogers, Jr Attached is a draft letter to the NRC to document a meeting that was held on February 19, 1982 in Bethesda to discuss dual licensing of St. Lucie plant operators.

Please issue the attached letter to indicate FPL's concurrence with these'meeting minutes.

SS JES/sm Attachment PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE FORM 1008 REV. 1178

"J $

4

4 DRAFT Mr. Frank J. Miraglia Chief, Licensing Branch

$/3 Division of Licensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, j).C.

20555, RE:

ST.

LUCIE UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-389 FPL/NRC MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1982 ON DUAL LICENSING

Dear Mr. Kiraglia:

Attached. are minutes of the meeting we held with your staff on February 19, 1982 to discuss dual licensing of St. Lucie operators.

We appreciated the time you allowed us to discuss this topic and we look forward to further dialogue in the future.

Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems and Technology

(

q 1

I

)I rl y

1 li I

f