ML17212B439

Forwards Minutes of 820219 Meeting W/Util & C-E Re Dual Licensing of Reactor Operators.Attendance List & Slide Presentation Encl

ML17212B439
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	03/10/1982
From:	Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-82-85, NUDOCS 8203160380
Download: ML17212B439 (37)

Text

'I 1

S REGULATORY FORMATION DISTRIBUTION SY .M (RIDS)

ACCESSIO~ NBR:8203160380 DOC.DATE: 82/O3/10 NOTARIZEO; NO ¹ FACIL:50-389 St. Lucie Planti Unr~t 2, Flor ida Power 8 Light Co. 05000389 AUTH ~ NAME UHRIGg R ~ E, RECIP.NAME MIRAGLIAr F ~ J

SUBJECT:

~

encl'OCKET AUTHOR Florida AFFILIATION Power 8 Light Co.

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Licensing Branch 3 Forwards minutes of 820219 meeting w/util F C-E re dual l,icensing of reactor operators, Attendance list 8 slide presentation DISTRIBUTION CODE: B001S 'COPIES 'RECEIVED:LQR I ENCL,,) SIZEo TITLE: PSAR/FSAR AMDTS and Related Correspondence NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL A/D LICENSNG 1 0 LIC BR ¹P BC 0 LIC BR ¹3 LA 1 0 NERSESeV ~ 01 1 1 INTERNAL: ELD 1 0 IE 06 1 1 IE/DEP/EPDB 35 1 1 IE/DEP/EPLB 36 "3 3 MPA 1 0 NRR/DE/CEB 11 1 1 NRR/DE/EQB 13 3 '3 NRR/DE/GB 28 2 2 NRR/DE/HGEB 30 2 '2 NRR/DE/MEB 18 1 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 1 1 NRR/DE/QAB 21 1 1 NRR/DE/SAB 24 1 1 NRR/DE/SEB 25 1 NRR/DHFS/HFEB90 1 1, NRR/DHFS/LQB 32 1 1 NRR/DHFS/OLB 30 1 1 NRR/DHFS/PTRB20 1 NRR/DSI/AEB 26 1 1 NRR/DS I/ASB 27 1 1 NRR/DSI/CPB 10 ,.1 1 NRR/DSI/CSB 09 1 1 NRR/DSI/ETSB 12 1 1 NRR/DSI/ICSB 16 1 1 NRR/DSI/PSB 19 1 1 NRR/DS I/RAB 22 1 1 NRR B 23 1 1 NRR/DST/LGB 33 1 04 1 1 RGN2 1 1 EXTERNAL: ACRS 41 10 10 BNL(AMDTS,ONLY) 1 1 FEMA~REP DIV 39 1 1 LPDR 03 1 1 NRC PDR 02 1 1 NSIC 05 1 1 NTIS 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 56 ENCL,51

4 II 4

E 'I 1 C

'b h

X F'

P.O. BOX 529100 MIAMI,FL 33152 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY March 10, 1982 L-82-85 Mr. Frank J. Miraglia Chief, Licensing Branch 83 Division of'icensing Oj Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 6

e~~~

hag g >98Z~

RE: St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 FPL/NRC Meeting of February 19, 1982 On Dual Licensin

Dear Mr. Miraglia:

Attached are minutes of the meeting we held with your staff on February 19, 1982 to discuss dual licensing of St. Lucie operators. We appreciated the time you allowed us to discuss this topic and we look forward to further dialogue in the future.

Very truly yours, Ro rt E. Uhrig 1ce President Advanced Systems and Technology REU:EWD:ga Attachments aaosiYasso "aios Eo PDR ADOCK 05000389 t A ,, PDR PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

Minutes of meeting held on February 19, 1982 in Bethesda, Maryland between FPL and NRC to discuss dual licensing of St. Lucie Power Plant operators.

Attendees: See attached list.

(1) FPL (G. Boissy) presented a review of the history of FPL's dual licensing program and an overview of the meeting presentations. See attached slide.

(2) FPL (K. Harris) presented a discussion of the operational philosophy that FPL intends to employ for the safe operation of St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 with operators that are licensed on both units.

(3) FPL (J. Barrow) discussed development of emergency operating procedures for St. Lucie 2 and the schedule for upgrade of Unit 1 procedures. See attached slide.

NRC commented on the narrow time period available for emergency operating procedure revision followed by operator training and examination. FPL stated that they were confident that this concern would not impair operator performance on the license exam.

NRC also noted a concern about the rapid incorporation of the SPDS systems into the plant hardware and the slow response of the various NSSS owners groups to emergency operating procedure upgrading.

(4) FPL (J. Harrow) presented the status of the normal operating procedure development. See attached slides.

(5) FPL (D. Sager) identified the progress to date on Technical Specification development and expected submittals. See attached slide.

(6) FPL (J. Spodik) explained'he work that has been completed for identification of system differences. This discussion included how the identified system differences were incorporated into the training program. See attached slide.

(7) FPL (D. Sager) presented the proposed manpower needs for licensed operators assuming single and/or dual licensing. See attached slide.

(8) Concluding remarks on the presentation were made by G. Boissy.

NRC responded to the presentation with the following points:

0 (a) The NRC has no problems with the concept of dual licensing of supervisory personnel and, in fact, encourages this

-practice.

(b), The NRC defines supervisory personnel as the operations supervisor and the nuclear plant supervisor.

(c) The NRC is primarily concerned with the on-shift control room operators during the startup of Unit 2. They are concerned that an extensive demand on the use of Unit 1 operators for Unit 2 startup testing on a daily and over-time basis may necessitate transfer between units often.

This transferring between units would occur at a time when the plant conditions may likely be quite different from one plant to the other.

(d) The NRC would like FPL to consider a condition that limits transfer of operators between Unit 1 and' during power ascension testing. This condition would be relaxed after testing is complete, after technical specifications are verified as similar and after the emergency operating procedures are verified as similar. This verification would be closely coordinated with. NRC Region II I&K.

(e) NRC requested FPL to identify to them in an application for o'perator license exam how FPL would prefer to establish the conditions that preclude transfer of operators between Unit 1 and Unit 2 until such time. that the transfer restrictions are relaxed.

(f} The NRC will issue a letter to FPL with a description of the NRC's position on dual licensing.

MEETING FPL/NRC ON 2/J.9/82 RE: DUAL OP. LICENSING V. NERSES NRC/DL/LB 83 JOHN BARROW FPL W.G. KENNEDY NRC/DHFS/PTRB D.A. SAGER FPL-OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR J. Spodik FPL TRAINING STAFF HUGff THOMPSON NRC/DHFS BRUCE WILSON NRC/DHFS DON H. BECKHAM NRC/DHFS/OLB JOHN SHEETZ FPL POWER PLANT ENGINEERING ERROLL DOTSON FPL >s tl II K. N. Harris FPL G. J. Boissy FPL M. J. Harris C-E MALT WINDECKER FPL M. B. DERRICKSON FPL

0 ST. LUCIE PLANT DUAL LICENSAHILITY INTRODU CTION TOPICS OF DISCU SS ION:

o OPERATIONS PHILOSOPHY A

NORMAL

~ EMERGENCY ) OFF PFIOCEDURES TECHNICAL SPECI FICATlONS CONTROL ROOM $ SYSTEMS DESIGN DIFFERENCES o STAFF lN G

OB JECTlVE TO OPERATE .ST.

lN AS SAFE A MANNER -AS POSSIBLE

' I,.I' 't' I

.I:.I 4~ 4 ~ ~ >>

el >>  ;.;I? I

~ '

>> ~ t ~~ a E GEM.Cs Y.: :.:OP)

!I DU E I

~ ~

..::.;3:-;!

ii.'3:;:

~

4 ~ ~ 4 till! i lit ~

~ ~

':.ll!;::i ~ ~

' -:!3" I~~ PREPARE IMPL. PL'AN ~~

~~ I ~"

~ ~ ~

~ ~ Itt'li! a I'.ii/L"l '.Illjjij !;;Is

~ ~ ~

I i". "ACRS I', Iit. :s:.'ll

~

.GEOG .:-".:-'3 iIIi >>" i'if ::':I-:

~ ~ ~ ~

,:.;i-.', .

>>4 TING ET ~~ ~

'.": I:. !I 'I silt ii:j ie

~

~ I

~

!~

>> ~

I  : I I! ~ee ill!) I- ~

Il,t .:I;I.::;-t(  :.::.! I::.:.; ji;3 ~

~ ~

t iill ijii '.i!i jliil I'l

~ ~

>>M I I,

'.3' 4

NUR EG..O 99 Rli ERST>>PP UlIDE;,.I lt:J:t II

~ ~ ~ ~ tlr.

~

j!

~ ~

~ I

a>> ~

>>lit ill:,:.I:I I'I'at tg>>,i!I t

jj!~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Tjit

~

I 4

-L I 3,:i;.': I t'll 'ljj

~ ~~ :sll

'-'.i'll!

'.:I I>> ~

~

.GOL

~

~ ~~

I

=::;I':-': I:;s

~ - ~ ~ ~

!. NR IN AL'RIG

. LICEN S /ORE ~ I UNlT 2

I.EO ~

I

~

.::. .;."':tt "iiili...

~

Is t.t  ! E/A ,L'OA0

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

".: t:I: t~ ,tt! !II ~ ~

L...

~

>>jj!

ill 4 )1 i:..I:. ~ ~

sl >>: '..ll I+I ~

!3 3-:'ll it!

~ ~

I

~

I ~ I tl ~

~ ~ II 3

iij

~ ~ ~

• .;.::;I ~ ~

atIj;:333 I ~

~ ~

j I',

[!

I I

~

tI I

lii tel Is i s:s:

i I'.t teil I: f"

<< ~

litt "!

iCEOG ",GUlD 4

.: I:.;Il 'I!: 'le REV ISED>>C OG'.iG ID lt ', ta 'I >> ~ ~ ~ erat I,",;

i', ;4[

iii iljj:!ii 4

.I! I'"

I>> 3 3

'.,'3 I Je I >> ~ '>> ~

it a>> li 3':" litt tfjt Ij~t Il'I I.'l ".', I:ti fl! 4  ;"'.IIS I~

'- NRC ::CON I ~ t !ww

\~

I .. t~

I I 3 EffN :I ~ ~

4 II'

. ~ I I.!::!I.t." .t

. '..""..I 4

~

I I

t. >>

>>UNI T..l EOP REVlSEg( EW!". TAN DP RP s.! I ITRAi

! ~"

~ ~ ~~ ~

.. =OO I:lil:.

! I;. >>

~ I f ~ ~

I I I ~ >>

s, I OPERATOR

~

'IVI t

E>>a>>>>t-( EO UIDES)

I 4 I"

~

I I I .t 44 4 .!I =." -- I

>> ~ I t

r  :.L .3 I a ~ I ~

s '-344 I

l 1 T  ::.:3: I >>-

I I

>> ~

~

. I QS (DS:. ~ ~

i'i ~

I I I t ". 3' l I

'.I,(

I :tl

'I l,: l2-I, I-,I;.2

~ ~

I s ~

t. ..I,. 9'-l ' -l i2-'i I ~: l-6'.-I  ?-I 8-I 9-1 IO-I I IL ..0, S-l.>> 6;:I";!'.I?- l. 8-I

~

I98I ~= ~  ! l982 I

ya

) ~

~ I N5S

%RES .,

Qgg@Q~ ~~~~QQ~~K~~

SRRSR .,

~

~

~ $

0 C t

C C 4 I ~

ST. LUCIE PLANT-UNIT 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS I. REVIEW BY FLORIDA POWER $ LIGHT C

. SIGNIFIGANT..INPUT. BY. OPERATING. PERSONNEL o UTILIZING UNIT I TEG.H .SPECS A8 BASI$

2. 3-PARTY REVIEW (.FPL,.EBASCO,.GE)

3. SUBMITTAL TO NRC 0

4. REVIEW AND NEGOTIAT.IONS .

V

~

5. ISSUANCE OF UNIT 2 TECHNICAL. SPECIFICATIONS =

EXPECT THAT UNIT 2 TECH SPECS %ILL BE VERY SIMILAR TO THOSE OF UNIT I.

ll CONTROL ROOM OPERATIONAL DESIGN E VALUATION

h

'I

~

• c CONTROL ROOM DESIGN OPERATIONAL DIFFERENCES ANALYSIS

~ REVIEW COMPATABILITY OF UNITS I ( 2 DESIGN MAJOR .

CONTROL AREAS EMERGENCY CONTROLS g INDICATIONS AUXILIARY CONTROLS ( INDICATIONS

~ )DENTIFY AREAS GF CONCERN FOR NOR MAL OP E RAT ION EMERGENCY RESPONSE

~

EVALUATE OPERATIONAL SIGN) FICANCE I

I EVALUATI.O N OF OPERATIONAL SIGNIF ICANCE

.IS IT SAFETY RELATED USED FOR IMi>IEDIATE OR SUBSEQUENT ACTION IS IT MANUAL.OR AU.TOMATIC.

.FREQUENCY OF,USE'.

I EFFECT OF MIS -OPERATION

'SSIGN SIGNIFICANCE CATEGORY

I 1

'IGNIFICANCE CATEGORIES h

I..HIGH RISK OF ERROR IN SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITY

2. MODI:-RATE., RISK OF ERROR IN. SAFETY-RELATFD ACTIVITY

3. LOVIt RlSK O.F ERROR IN SAFETY"RELATED ACTIVITY

4. HIGH RISK GF ERROR IN NON SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITY

5. LOW RISK OF ERROR IN NON SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITY

WEEKS I THRU: 5 UNIT I $ 2 .SYSTEM COMPARiSONS AND DIFFERENCES TRAiNiNG WEEKS 6 AND 7 REACTOR THEORY REVIEW THERMODYNAM CS HEALTH PHYSICS 8 AND 9 PROCEDURES

'EEKS TBANDILNT ( P-CCII3I:.NT ANAIY"I5 WEEKS 10 THRU l2 SYSTEM. TRACING REVIEW g EXAMINATION

't P

1 CONCLUSION.S ( RECOMMENDATIONS C

t r

'k

'UAL LICENSE IS ACCEPTABLE AND SAFE IMPLEMENT. DIFFERE/CES, TRAINING PROGRAM I

BASED ON. EVALUATIONI FIN,DINGS CONTINUE TO INPUT ',CHANGES AND MOD IF I CAT ION S INTO TRAI N I N 6 PROGRAM

0 0

ST. LucIE PLANT uNITS I g 2 OPERATIoNs sTAFFING (DUAL LIcENsE)

OP. ERATIONS SUP. ER.V I S OR NUCLEAR.PLANT SUPERVISOR UNIT I NUCLEAR. UNIT 2 NUCLEAR NATCH ENGINEER V/ATCH .ENGINEER UNIT I REACTOR UNIT I REACTOR UNIT 2 REACTOR UNIT 2 REACTOR CONTROL OPER. CC'NTAOL OPER. CONTROL OPER. CONTROL OPER.

UNIT UNIT 2

Q Q 0 J

~  % g

~

j f 0 0" 0 ~ e o 4 a 0 4 t o ~

~ 0 . ~

~ ~ ~

I a

~

i

ST. LUCIE PLANT OPERATIONS/TRAINING SCHEDULE jjkt lrQVSV Ot 0 a avss0 10 I>rk>lkr IS IO tS It OkrNk!

IS I'I IO III IN I'0 Orr SS 10

>>Ori IS .'0 'I 10 SNS I \ IO 10 I I 5, IS S 10 IS 10 >I '10

>IIOVit 1$ 10 1$

11>I!IN!0 10 I I iO SS 10 OOSOOI IS 0

.0 10 I'1 .0 10 IS,O

!ifi j!jj 'i I ': . !51 hl.! !Pi I!I! .I i I!i:.

15 ..  ::. jhi hi ji 'hph' Hi:".:C '+ -"

iH 15 5 5"':I 151 :iiil R. P.h 5!i 5.,)ia 5:ihh Jrj-'I=J hJ h hi <iird  :":iL irJF 51

=-..)5 RAT "" 5!.I !IF) pJ 51 jlh ~

Fail i-:HI hl!I Fh'I: 55) i;I !11 .I: i51'.'ll'Q i'h Hl'l r.hd

==.:I:.'..~Q Jhi 5 :i: Ph "p

,=.Li CL )1SKj J) ii iiHH:IF 'I:I

'5: .'5 t!: 15

":555 j 51!rhi

."". !15 Jdt 5 , ja.h, 51 hit IP! 5!

..5 :5: hdtH:) 5:I S5J. SE"5 P, i:

Rjt0 hhl:a i!I ih Oi'ii'i! 33CENS

j

'i:L! ': 5 JNL"-irh'I'"'"r.-&

-ra:p-'I:!

=hp-'t 51 ii hl HJII!rdf ir::-:::: d-::I:.

'S it! 'Ih iP I '!!ib .1!55)5 lf"c'P ,,:I)IP ro SL.:!i%L" 115 Kl rlii,.! ii:": ~ Lj !5:l E.

"":Lah iii! iii! 51 ljh "ihfhh)5!5  :!Hdh!-.:8!H"""

5 hd .ii:. I L! hl ph:rl .-':"= ll..<JJ:":.=.."==Jr r.J ""F.

1ii:..':!::p) Llh ~

r;rh SSI 15 )5 Sill"hi IJ:

55,'!

"'l6:-". h"" i.I! Hf Hf'.:

5E'51 !i:::-:-.di: . 5 5! 'Qi:i::. 51 f."Hj."H 5:t 5R hi!fhp

'!H- vQ

.: I:5  :.:: 5 5 .::::"

-::.:::: .5:I;i!i i:":: iii U)I'I Ji).J!

TOR 5!:5! 55

-:Uf kj4 15: f. :=..f!

!ii..RA Hi).-.QR

'Sl

.:!!I i!L'iii !Sit.

!:I:!!!IUg L: 5:I 1!! 15!IH:

HIHO.....)55F q

'd)

H::"! Ih Aj j)JOB Lh! iihbd )H:.I

!:i'hi ih:

'lil I i:d! i

!5:j HJ :dii !i il:i::I:5!f fVijL",j'i! i!i: :I: 55 -'hihhi

'u jiiT'iiiiT

5:I P.

'+ )REVIQ hi HHIL

'H;:i.d P

!J I!I 55 .",:

!5!'

!i:I!i!i! :I "

II: 5.

hj:FI

ii) li:":INJ hh

'li!i :i!i jj'! hii ih:"

Sj i'!IIH L','l!

j:.I!

F:..

I'

'Ei!

Il !i 55:

'!51:

IPi) rh ht 5 hi!5 E .>jj)R, Tf !rlhl hr iiiPRO Hitlj 'i!i:ip :ii ." !hi

.NI rh)I 'I ii:I:d I':): d!F P >5 5 :5: 15; hl:;:.  ! L". 5 I-5tl Hi ;5: i::! l,l ilh lhl hh . I'! ::!i!:F) j! I hli 'ld Ih :5 hiiihh Ih: rl  !:!)hi Il

!iii !'!)'I) i: ;5 55 ".'h'h 51'I LJ H iiii ihi Fl NJ iiPf  !.j'li. 5:I hL I!;::;.,: hl  : IJ '!)'I IJII )i!i 51 Ih i!jhl Id!i hl 5:(I 5:Ii :ih Ih! " iid ih: :5 :II I 51,) .d 5: -ll llll l!Il 'I!I IP. :i!:IH ":;+ "", hh

.j:! 5I i!i 51: 55 .;:! IIF pii J!I I i!i! H .d Ih 15. hh th:di!'!h 551 ih :I Hjf hli 1.'!

15 I::h)

L'i ~:lh 15 55 5,1

Ih

~ I

~ I wl ' ~

~ '= IS 0 V VV ~ fvk ~

ri Nr

~ I' ~ 'r

>N>%1

- ~ I ls st rr I NN 0 I, 0 10 I OSrae ~

I ~

NM vrk ~

I

~~s vrs V

ECEIVED MAR -6 1982

<<cleat licensing FLORIDA POWER 8I LIGHT COMPANY INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE EPM-PSL2-82-095 G, O. Building LOCATION Miami, Florida TO Rich Kaminsky ,Nuclear Affairs DATE February 25, 1982 FROM Erroll Dotson Power Plant Engineering COPIES To U. B. Derrickson G, J. Boissy susJEcT: FPL/NRC MEETING C. M, Hethy ON DUAL LICENSING 'P. H. Rogers, Jr Attached is a draft letter to the NRC to document a meeting that was held on February 19, 1982 in Bethesda to discuss dual licensing of St. Lucie plant operators. Please issue the attached letter to indicate FPL's concurrence with these'meeting minutes.

SS JES/sm Attachment PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE FORM 1008 REV. 1178

"J $ ,

4

4 DRAFT Mr. Frank J. Miraglia Chief, Licensing Branch $/3 Division of Licensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, j).C. 20555, RE: ST. LUCIE UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-389 FPL/NRC MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1982 ON DUAL LICENSING

Dear Mr. Kiraglia:

Attached. are minutes of the meeting we held with your staff on February 19, 1982 to discuss dual licensing of St. Lucie operators. We appreciated the time you allowed us to discuss this topic and we look forward to further dialogue in the future.

Very truly yours,

( q Robert E. Uhrig 1 Vice President Advanced Systems and Technology I

)I rl y

li 1

I f