ML17209B182

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 810309-20
ML17209B182
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/1981
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML17209B179 List:
References
50-389-81-04, 50-389-81-4, NUDOCS 8106100006
Download: ML17209B182 (4)


Text

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power and Light Company St. Lucie 2 Docket No. 50-389 License No. CPPR-144 As a 'result of the inspection conducted on March 9-20,

1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violations were identified.

A.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by FP5L Topical Quality Assurance Report Number 5.0, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings

and, shall be accompli'shed in accordance with these instructions, procedures or drawings.

Quality Control instructions were not being followed for concrete inspection as described below.

l.

Quality Control Instruction QI 10.4 requires that concrete repair activities be inspected.

Contrary to this requirement, no inspection was performed during placement of concrete in an area being repaired on the exterior surface of the primary shield wall at azimuth 0~, elevation 36, on March 12, 1981.

2.

Quality Control Instruction QI 10.71 states that water is not to be added to any concrete batch after making in-process tests for slump, air unit weight and compressive strength.

Contrary to this requirement, water was added to concrete which was placed in reactor building struts

53. D-F, and 54 C-D after making the in-process tests. for air, unit-weight, and compressive strength.

The inprocess tests were not repeated after addition of the water.

3.

QC Instruction QI 10.71 states that concrete compressive strength speciments are to be tested in accordance with ASTM C-39.

ASTM-39 requires that the rate of loading during testing of the concrete cylinders be applied within the range of 20 to 50 psi per second.

Contrary to this'requirement, during testing of concrete cylinder numbers 6796 through 6798, the rate of loading was applied in the range of 60 to 70 psi per second; 4.

QC Instruction QI 10.4 requires that concrete surfaces be inspected after the concrete forms are removed and be documented in Part III of the Post Placement Concrete Inspection Report (Attachment 1 to QI 10').

81 6 1.0 O 006

Florida Power and Light Company otice of Violation Docket No. 50-389 License No. CPPR-144

> Contrary to this requirement, an informal method was used to document post placement inspections on pour numbers 4,

5, 6,

8A, 8B, 12 and 13 in the Diesel Oil Storage Structure.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II.E.).

B.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by FPKL Topical guality Assurance Report number 5.0, requires that activities affecting quality shal.l be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings and shall be accomplished in accordance. with these instructions, procedures or drawings.

Pipe support and valve drawing requirements were not being followed as descr ibed below.

1.

Pipe support drawing SI-2407-40, Rev. 4, requires the installation of structural member piece 4; requires the rigid shock arrestor, piece 6, be within 3 of perpendicular to the wall; and requires, the instal-lation of fasteners for piece 1.

Contrary to these requirements; piece 4 was not installed, piece 6 was installed at least 5'ff prependicular, and. a piece 1 fastener had insuf-ficient thread engagement.

This support had been inspected by

(}C and accepted.

2.

Pipe support drawing SI-2412-31, Rev.

3, requires 1/16" clearance between the box type pipe support and the top and both sides of the pipe..

Contrary to these requirements, pipe support SI2412-31 had no clearance on, the west side of the pipe, 3/32" clearance on the east. side, and 3/16" clearance on top of the pipe.

This support had been inspected by gC and accepted.

3.

Pipe support drawing CC-2063-22, Rev. 2, requires a

12. to 9 slope for structural member piece 4 and a

1 to 1 slope for structural member piece 5.

Contrary to these requirements, piece 4 of pipe support CC-2063-22 had approximately a

6 to 4 slope and piece 5 had approximately a 5.3 to 4.6 slope.

This support had been inspected by gC and accepted.

4.

Fisher control valve drawing 52A8659D requires chemical and volume control valve 2500 to have a

604 internal counterbore on the valve nozzles.

P I

~ p

Florida Power and Light Company

~

~

Notice of Violation Docket No. 50-389 License No ~ CPPR-144 Contrary to this requirement, valve 2500 had a 90O counterbore on the bottom nozzle.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II.E.).

C.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires that activities affecting quality be performed in accordance. with established procedures.

FP&L QA Topical Report supplements this requirement and established Site Quality Procedure 17,,

Design Control, which requires changes in design requirements to be accomplished through field change requests.

Contrary to the

above, the requirements of SQP 17 were not met in that seismic class I cable tray restraint 1336 was modified to permit instal-lation of a

non safety-related cable tray without a field change request being prepared.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II.E.)'.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written state-ment or explanation in reply, including:

(1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective t

steps which have. been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of

1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

Dat,. APR15 1981