ML17207A509
| ML17207A509 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 10/05/1979 |
| From: | Jun Lee Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910290228 | |
| Download: ML17207A509 (10) | |
Text
Distribution Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR TIC LWR 82 File NRR Reading H. Denton E.
Case H. Berkow R. Mattson R.
DeYoung D. Muller D.
Ross D. Vassallo D. Skovholt F. Williams J. Stolz
- 0. Parr L. Rubenstein S.
Varga P. Collins T. Speis W. Haass C.
Heltemes ACRS (16)
L. Crocker B. Kirschner Project Manager - R. A. Birkel
- Attorney, ELD -
S.
J.
Lee L. Soffer J.
Knight S.
Hanauer R. Tedesco S. Pawlicki F. Schauer K. Kniel T. Novak Z. Rosztoczy R.
Bosnak R. Satterfield W. Butler F.
Rosa V. Moore W. Kreger M. Ernst R. Denise R. Ballard B. Youngblood W.
Regan G.
Chi pman R. Houston J. Collins T. Murphy G. Lear
'M. Spangler V. Benaroya R. Jackson L. Hulman H. Ornstein J.
LeDoux, IE Principal Staf D. Scaletti R. Baer OPA f
Participants:
7910290 4~
U I
OCT 05879 DOCKET NOS. 50-389 APPLICANT:
FLORIDA POHER AND LIGHT COMPANY FACILITY:
ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NO. 2
SUBJECT:
'EETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 26, 1979 At the request of the applicant, a meeting was held on September 26, 1979 in
- Bethesda, Maryland to discuss the schedule and format for submittal of the application for an operating license for the St. Lucie Plant Unit 2.
The attendees are listed in'the Enclosure.
Ihe applicant stated that it plans to submit the Final Safety Analysis Report and Environmental Report in March 1980 and that its projected fuel load date is October 1982. 'he plant is estimated to be about 355 complete at the present time.
The applicant stated that the Final Safety Analysis Report
( FSAR) will be sub-mitted in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.70, Revision 3.
However, for cer' tain documents that are coo+on to St. Lucie Plant Units 1 and 2 (e.g.,
emergency plan and industrial security plan), the applicant proposed that the St. Lucie 2 FSAR would contain only references to indicate that the information has been submitted on the Unit 1 docket,.'he staff stated that the information-should be submitted on the Unit 2 docket in order to make the Unit 2 docket complete; Tt>e staff indicated that it would be acceptable for a document to be submitted simultaneously on both the.Unit,l and Unit 2 dockets.
The Environmental Report is to 'be submitted in accordance with Regulatory Guide 4.2, Revision 2.
The applicant plans to r eference the EnvironmentaT Report-Construction Permit stage (ER-CP) for those matters that are still applicable, addressing only those matters that have changed and those new matters that are not addressed in the ER-CP stage.
Since the ER-OL stage will contain limited information, the applicant agreed to provide up-to-date copies of the ER-CP stage as required by the staff to conduct the review.
The staff i ndicated that it would like a copy of the National Pollutant Di s-charge Elimination System (NPDES) permit prior to issuance of the Draft Environ-mental Statement.
Although the Environmental Protection Agency has issued an NPDES permit for Unit 1, the applicant expects to obtain a second permit for Unit 2.
The staff indicated that it relies on the limits contained in the NPDES permit in the environmental review and development of the environmental p~
the orrica~
process.
OVRHAl4a W
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P OATa+
~
~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~
. ',('~~~JQ'(~
~<
a L
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
t, P
I ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 02CO R U,O OOVallHMCIICHIINTINOOPrICCI llt0 RO ~
1 ~ 0
lit t,
~) t ~ A J
~.
Y I
OCT 0
5 19'5 II
.The staff advised the applicant to review and respond to the short-term and
'ong-term requirements to be implemented bp the Corrmission as a result of the accident at Three Mile Island Unit 2.
Yereover, the staff. suggested that it hight be appropri'ate to address the near-term requirements'in the ESAR.
These requirements are discussed'n recent letters to applicants and licensees and in NUREG-0578, "TNI-2.Lessons Learned Task Force Status Report and Short-Term Recommendations."
The applicant questioned whether there has been a change in requirements for financial data submitted by applicants.
The staff indicate'd that it was unaware of any changes, but would consult with the appropriate staff reviewers and so advise the applicant.
Subsequently, we consulted with the financial staff and were informed that there has been no change in the requirements for financial in format ion.
Original Signed '4<
Enclosure:
Attendance List Jean Lee, Licensing Assistant Light Mater Reactors Branch Yo. 2 Division of Project Management ccs w/enclosure:
See next page OFFICE OVIINANRW OAVC~
- Ll<R
¹2
" ab"'"'"
1
/79 DPIIi:LIIR ¹2 QBirkel 10/7/79 DPM:LHR P2 RLBaer 10/g/79 BRC'PORbf 518 (9 76) NHChC 0240
- UoSo OOVCINMCNT NIH'AMINO OPPICCC IO) ~
R ~ 0 70 ~
~
c c
1 l ~
,,r r
c rtr/r
'f
~P
~
1
~ ~
Dr. Rober t E.+Uhrig Vice President of Nuclear and General'ngineering Florida'ower 8 Light Company P.
0... Box 529100 Niami, Florida 33152 OOT 0 5 19l9 CC:
Jack R.
Newman, Esq.
Lowenstein,
- Neman, Reis 8 Axelrad 1025 Connecticut
- Avenue, N.
W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Norman A. Coll, Esq.
McCarthy, Steel, Hectory 6 Davis 14th Floor, First National Bank Building Mi ami, Florida 33131 Nr. Martin H. Hodder 1131 N. E. 86 Street Miami, Florida
-33138 Edward Luton, Esq.,
Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S.
Nuclear Regulatory Coranission Washington, D. C.
20555
'Dr. David L. Metrick Pr ofessor of Nuclear Engineering The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 Dr. Frank F.
Hooper School of Natural Resources University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ni chigan 48104
ENCLOSURE OCT O.S igyg ATTENDANCE LIST FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CON'ANY MEETING SEPTEMBER 26 1979 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY J. E.
Moaba E.
W. Dotson M. Villar EBASCO ENVIROSPHERE N. J. Wilding M. Horrell C0%USTION ENGINEERING A. S. Jameso NRC - STAFF R. A. Bi rkel D. Scaletti J.
Lee R. Baer