ML17206A650
| ML17206A650 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1979 |
| From: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7902090336 | |
| Download: ML17206A650 (4) | |
Text
I REGULAQQ<~Y INFORMATION DISTRISUTIONQYSTEM (RIDS>'CCESSION NBR,s7902090336 D()C.DATE s 79/02/OJ NOTARIZED.c NO 0
FACIL>50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit I, Florida Power 8 Light Co.
AUTH.NAME AUTH()R AFFILIATI.ON UHRIG,R.F.
Florida Power 8, Light Co.
0 RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION REID, R. IV.
Operating Reactors Branch
-4 DOCKET 8 85.000335 SUBJECT> Suppl to 790305 ltr. Informs of Antenna to Justify unlimited 0
purging of conta.inment during operation.Evaluatien to be completed.790801.Number 8, duration of purges will be minimized.No.interim limi,t,on purging es.tablished.
DISTRIBUTION CODE.:
AOOIS,, COPIES RECEI VED.!LTR + ENCL ~
SIZEs TITLE~
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION FOR AFTER ISSUANCE OF OPERATING LIC NOTES,I RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME 0 ACTION>
05 BC dff8 ~W I NTERNALt 0 REG F I L 0
1.2 15 CORE PERF BR 17 ENGR BR 0
19.PLANT SY8 BR
.21 EFLT. TRT SYS 0 EXTERNALS 03 LPDR 23 ACRS COPI ES LTTR ENCL I
.I 2
.I I
I I
.I I
.16 I
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME 02 NRC PDR
.14 TA/EDO 16 AD SYS/PROJ 18 REAC SFTY BR 20 EEB 22 BR INKMAN 04 NSIC COP I ES LTI'R ENCL
,I
,I I
I I
I gZ>p:
2 &'lmss z.7g Pl
/I'LL/h'QZ54
+7'gS 3S Q78 0
TOTAL NUMBER.OF COPIES REQUI BEDs LTTR 38 FNCL
f 0
P.O. BOX 529100, MIAMI,FL 33152 yQVbg 4A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. R.
W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch N4 Division of Operating Reactors U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHTCOMPANY February 1, 1979 L-79-30
Dear Mr. Reid:
Re:
St. Lucie Unit 1 Docket No. '50-335 Containment'Pur in This letter is submitted in response to your',letter of November 29,
- 1978, and is a follow-up to Florida Power G
Light Company letter L-79-3 of January 5,
1979.
We plan to pursue Option (3) of your November 29 letter, namely to justify unlimited purging of containment during operation.
Under the present
- schedule, we will complete our evaluation by August 1, 1979.
Our review to date indicates that the evaluation will justify unlimited purging, without requiring any facility modifications.
Although we plan to justify unlimited purging of contain-,
ment during operation, we intend to continue our current.
practice of minimizing the number and duration of puiges.'s a result of this practice, the majority of containment purging is performed when the plant is at or below the hot standby condition.
Based on the foregoi:ng information, and on the fact that an unwarranted restriction on containment purging would have a
negative effect on the working environment in containment, we have not established an interim limit on purging.
We will review our containment purging practices again when we have completed our evaluation.
Very truly yours, REBULATORY DOCKET F(LE COPy g
Advanced Systems and Technology REU/MAS/ms cc:
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire Q, p4"W PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE (7
-t
'tl M
I Ill t