ML17202U852
| ML17202U852 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 10/18/1990 |
| From: | Ring M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17202U851 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-237-90-21, 50-249-90-21, NUDOCS 9010260033 | |
| Download: ML17202U852 (1) | |
Text
Con1111unwea 1th Edi son Company Dresden Station Units 2 dnd 3.
),
Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249 Licens~s N6. DPR-19; No.
DPR~25 As.a'result. of the inspectiori*conducted on August 21-22, 27-28, September 17-21,
- and OctOber Jl, 1990, and in accordance 'with the*"General Statement of Policy an~ P~ocedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR P~rt 2, Appendix C, (1990)
(Enforcement Policy) the.following vio.lation was identified:
- 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B~ Criterion XVI, as implemented by. CECo.Topic.al Report CE-lA, "Qua 1 i ti Assurance Program for *Nucleei.'r Generating Stat ions; 11 and.
CECo Qual.ity*Assurance Manua.l, Nuclear Gener.ating.. Stations, "Quqlity Requirements~"
. reqµires that conditions adverse to quality be *promptly id~n_tifie9 and corrected..
- contrary to the above,' corrective: actions taker-1' to address the findings fro[Tl
- the Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance:Audit*12..:s8-33, dated September 14, 1988, were inade.quate in t_he following areas:
- a.
The corrective actions.did riot assure:: that Defi'ciency,Repohs were.
- initiated for com~onent sup~orts that required engineering e~aluation in
- .accord~nce with SPPM VT~3/4-l.
b..
The correc~ive actions did not prbiid~ sp~ciff~ critetia for evaluations of component supports requiring corrective action when operability of the
- sy_stem was in qu~stion.
- This is Ci*Sevf:rity Level I.V violation (Supplem~nt 1).
Pursuant to the provis.ioA? of 10 CFR 2.201, you. are ~equired to submit to this office within thirty days' of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, includirig for each violatiori: *(l) the corrective steps
- hat have been taken and the results achieved~ (2) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid *furth~r v~olations; and (l) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Consid~ration*may b~ given to extending your response ti~e for good cause shown.
Dated
- 90102600~33 901018 PDR ADOCK 05000237 Q
PNU
~w~
M. A. Ring, Chtef Engineering Br nch