ML17201J593

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-237/88-17 & 50-249/88-18 on 880705-0902.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Response to Diagnostic Evaluation Team Findings & Review of Previous Insp Items
ML17201J593
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/07/1988
From: Ring M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17201J550 List:
References
50-237-88-17, 50-249-88-18, NUDOCS 8809130052
Download: ML17201J593 (9)


See also: IR 05000237/1988017

Text

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Report Nos. 50-237/88017{DRP); 50-249/88018(DRP)

Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249

Licensee:

Commonwealth Edison Company

P. 0. Box 767

Chicago, IL

60690

License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25

Facility Name:

Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3

Inspection At:

Dresden Site, Morris, IL

Inspection Conducted:

July 5 through September 2, 1988

Inspectors:

S. G. Du Pont

P. D. Kaufman*

Approved By:

M. A. Ring, Chi'~uO"'v£7*

-

Reactor Projects Section lB

Inspection Summary

Nine previously identified Diagnostic Evaluation Team findings remain open.

Of these, 8 will be reviewed by Regional inspections in the areas of IST

implementation and maintenance activities~

qqn9130052 aso9o7 _

  • F~*[-11S*

ADOCK n~0002~7

,

--

PDC

G!

1.

DETAILS

Persons Contacted

Commonwealth Edison Compan.r *

  • E. Eenigenburg, Station Manager

J; Wujciga, Production Superintendent

  • C. SchroederJ Services Superintendent

L. Gerner, Superintendent of Performance Improvement

T. Ciesla, Assistant Superintendent - Planning

D. Van Pelt, Assistant Superintendent - Maintenance

J. Brunner, Assistant Superintendent - Technical Services

J. Kotowski, Assistant Superintendent - Operations

R. Christensen, Unit 1 Operating Engineer

G. Smith, Unit 2 Operating Engineer

W. Pietryga, Unit 3 Operating Engineer

J. Achterberg, Technical Staff Supervis6r

R. Geier, Q.C. Supervisor

D. Adam, Radiation Chemistry Supervisor

J. Mayer, Station Security Administrator

D. Morey, Chemistry Supervisor

D. Saccomando, Radiation Protection Supervisor

E. Netzel, Q.A. Superintendent

  • Denotes those attending one or more exit interviews conducted on

September 2, 1988, and informally at various times throughout the

inspection period.

The inspectors also talked with and interviewed several other licensee

employees, including members of the technical. and engineering staffs,

reactor and auxiliary op~rators, shift engineers and foremen, electrical~

mechanical and instrument personnel, and contract security personnel.

2.

Review of Previous Diagnostic Evaluation Team (DET) Items (92701)

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-01 and 249/88018-01):

DET Item 2.2.1.1,

Evaluate Dresden procedures for draining and changing control rod drive

hydraulic control units (HCU).

The inspector verified that Dresden

ope rat i hg procedures .DOP 300-6, "Contra 1 Rod Drive System Accumulator

Charging," and DOP 300-11, "Control Rod Drive System Accumulator Water

Removal" were revised to include the caution during closure of HCU valve

305-111 which could render a HCU inoperative. This item is considered

to be closed.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-02 and 249/88018-02):

Evaluate non-license

training for adequate training on procedures DOP 300-6 and DOP 300-11 for

HCU operations.

The DET observed an operator closing HCU valve 305-111 during evolutions

per DOP 300-6.

A review of DOP 300-6 revealed that the procedure did not

require closure of the valve and it was believed that the operator error

2

was due to inadequate training on DOP 300-6.

However, the inspector's

review of the training received by the operator concluded that it was

adequate which the ope~ator further demonstrated by correctly answering

the training test associated with charging HCU accumulators.

Additionally, the inspectors' review revealed that the root cause of

the operator error was associated with the lack of adequate transition

between the charging (DOP 300-6) and draining (DOP 300-11) procedures.

The licensee also determined that the cause of the error was due to an

inadequate procedure instead of operator error or inadequate training

and revised the procedures to provide the correct transition~

(Closed) Unresolved Items (237/88017-03 and 249/88018-03):

DET item

2.2.1.1, determine compliance of HCU draining evolution.

As noted above,

the actual root c_ause was due to inadequate transition between procedures

for charging (DOP 300-6) and draining (DOP 300-11) HCU accumulators.

The licensee adequately identified the actual root cause and provided

corrective actions prior to the issuance of the DET report. This item is

considered closed.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-04 and 249/88018-04):

DET item 2.2.1.2,

the control room had uncontrolled piping and instrumentation diagrams

(P&ID) and electrical schematics whith wete used routinely by plant

operations personnel.* At the time of the DET it had been Dresden's

policy to have available uncontrolled P&IDs for "information only" and

require controlled P&IDs issued from the Central File for safety related

activities.

The licensee revised administrative procedure OAP 3-5, "Out

of Service" to state that "only controlled reference material may be

utilized when determi~ing isolation points for an OOS.

Additionally,

the licensee eliminat.ed the "For Information Only" prints, both P&ID and

electrical schematics, from the control room and shift engineer's

office.

The inspector has verified the elimination of uncontrolled

reference material by several.direct inspections of the control room and

shift engineer's office between January and July 1988.

This item is

considered to be closed.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-05 and 249/88018-05):

DET item 2.2.1.3,

the poor physical appearance of the control room represented a poor

working environment.

During the DET inspectiQn in August 1987, the

licensee had commenced modification (M12-2/3-86-68) of the control room.

The modification included several human factors revisions, installing

new lighting and changing the overhead and ventilation to reduce noise

and improve lighting of the control room.

The inspectors reviewed the

modification and verified that adequate administrative controls were

in place. Since the activities associated with M12-2/3-86-68 are included

in the routine inspection efforts by the resident inspectors and are being

continuously monitored, this item is considered to be administratively

closed. Additionally, the progress of M12-2/3-86-68 is currently 80%

complete and expected to be complete by September 1988.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-06 and 249/88018-06):

DET item 2.2.1.4,

the use of formal overtime by Nuclear Station Operators (NSOs) was

routine, and in a number of cases exceeded station limits. This item

resulted in a Notice of Violation in the resident inspectors' reports

3

..

237/87026 and 249/87025.

Additionally, the inspectors have ~erified

that the licensee's corrective actions have prevented recurrence since

August 1987.

This item is considered to be closed.

(Open) Open Items (237/88017-07 and 249/88018-07):

DET item 2.2.1.5, NRR

to evaluate Technical Specification Table 3.1.1 for adequacy of APRM/IRM

Companion requirements while in the RUN mode of operation.

The inspectors

verified that the licensee has submitted a request for change to Technital

Specification Table 3.1.1 and NRR is evaluating the Technical adequacies

of the request.

(Open) Open Items (237/88017-08 and 249/88018-08):

DET item 2.2.1~5, NRR

to evaluate Technical Specification Surveillance (TS) 4.5.C.1 for adequacy

of testing the High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) system at reactor

pressures between 1150 to 150 psig.

The inspectors verified that the

license~ has submitted a request for change to TS 4.5.C.l.

(Closed) Unresolved Items (237/88017-09 and 249/88018-09):

DET item

2.2.1.6, determine compliance of requal.ification training cycles to

10 CFR 55.

The inspectors verified that the licensee~s requalification

training program had been revised to require mandatory attendance of

all training cycles by all license holder~. This jtem is considered to

be closed.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-10 and 249/88018-10):

DET item 2.2:1.6,

verify that a mechanism* exists for evaluation of NSO comments .on training

by the training department.

The inspector verified that the "Training

Inquiry" process was being utilized during training cycle 3 and that the ,

Training Department Policy #14 requires every effort for instructors to

respond to student comments by an assigned ~ate. This item is considered

to be closed.

(Closed) Ope~ Items (237/88017-11 and 249/88018-11):

DET item 2.2.1.7,

the team found that Shift Engineers (SE)* and Shift Control Room Engineers

  • (SCRE) were not routinely informed about the schedule of maintenance

activities during their shift. The inspectors have verified through

direct observations and interviews that.maintenance and testing ~ctivities

are being adequately communitated between the Maintenance Department and

the SEs and SCREs.

Additionally, the licensee has issued Policy Statement

  1. 19, "Maintenance/Operations Communication Requirements" which contained

clear instructions for informing operations of maintenance activities and

a seven-day rolling schedule of testing activities. Both of these

programs have been effective and, ftS such, this item is considered to be

closed.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-12 and 249/88018-12):

DET item 2.2.1.9,

the team found that the NSOs believed that lack of a preventive main-

tenance program contributed significantly to a lack of trust in the

reliability of plant equipment.

For example, recent*modifications to the

Feedwater Control System (FWCS) had resulted in numerous oscillations

within the system.

During September and October 1987, the licensee

aggressively tested the Feedwater System and found that the. oscillations

4

...

in the system were due to the Feed-Regulating Valve Actuator design and,

as such, both the NSOs and DET were mistaken in believing that the FWCS

modifications contributed to the oscillations.

The inspectors witnessed

the Feedwater system testing and observed that the operators trust of the

FWCS increased during the testing activities. However, the licensee's

preventive maintenance program has recently been significantly revised and

the effectiveness of this revision is planned to be evaluated by Region

III prior to February 1989, and, as such, this item is administratively

closed.

{Open) Open Items (237/88017-13 and 249/88018-13):

DET item 2.2.1.10,

the team observed that there were considerable activities at Dresden to

improve the performance of the facility, but few long-lasting changes.

The inspectors noted several existing long-lasting changes such as,

personnel errors decreasing from 56 in 1986 to 24 in 1987 and less than

14 for the first half of 1988, scrams reducing from 15 in 1987 to only

one during the first half of 1988, less than 100 days of dual unit

continuous operation increasing to a CECo record of 155 days and an eight

month improving trend on 86 of 88 major performance indicators.

However,

this item will remain open until December 1988 to verify that the improve-

ment trends are maintained for greater than 12 months.

{Open) Unresolved Items (237/88017-14 and 249/88018-14):

DET item

2.2.2.1, 17 drywell MOVs us.ing MOBIL MOBILUX EP-0 grease should be

evaluated. This item is planned to be evaluated by Regi-0n III inspectors

prior to December 1988.

(Closed) Unresolved Items (237/88017-15 and 249/88018-15):

DET item

2.2.2.1, safety related MOV torque switch settings were not based upon

expected d~sign differential pressures and the settings of MOV limit

switches were inconsistent with the procedure guidance. This item is

being tracked by Region *III Open Item Listing 249/87032-01 and, as such,

is administratively closed.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-16 and 249/88018-16):

DET item 2.2.2.2,

licensee's root cause analysis program for equipment failures should be

evaluated.

Region III currently is evaluating the program and has

assigned an OIL 249/87008-01, as such, these items are administratively

closed.

(Closed) Unresolved Items (237/88017-17 and 249/88018-17):

DET item

2.2.2.2, the team noted that the HPCI room cooler fan did not have a

preventive maintenance procedure associated with the fan belts such as

DMP 5700-3 for the LPCI room cooler fan belts. The licensee initiated

a preventive maintenance activity to inspect the fans every refueling

outage to ensure fan blades are secured to the shaft, to align drive

belt pulleys and sheaves, to replace the drive belts a*nd to inspect

bearings for wear.

This activity was completed during the Spring 1988

Unit 3 outage and has resulted in no failures of the Unit 3 room cooler

through August 1988.

In addition, the activity has been included in

the General Surveillance Program for future performance during outages

on both units, including the scheduled Fall 1988 Unit 2 outage.

Additionally, fan failures were included in the equipment failure

5

analysis per Chapter 16 of the Corporate Conduct of Maintenanc~. This

item is considered to be closed.

(Closed) Unresolved Items (237/88017-18 and 249/88018-18):

DET item

2.2.2.3, maintenance procedures DMP 040-15, 16, 19 and 23 should be

evaluated to verify that guidance is provided for the removal and

installation of MOV motors and pinion gears.

The licensee.deleted the

current procedures of the DMP 40 series and initiated riew electrical

procedures (DEP) for the October 29,* 1988 Unit 2 refueling outage. A

review of the procedures (DEP 040-9, DEP 040-11, DEP 040-17-and DEP

040-18) revealed adequate instructions for removal, installation and

inspection of the motor pinion gear, including a clear drawing showing

the pinion arrangement for SBMs 000-0, 1, 2, 3 & 4. -This item is

considered to be closed.

  • (Closed) Unresolved Items (237/88017-19 and 249/88018-19):

DET item

2.2.2.3, maintenance procedures should be evaluated to verify that all

safety related (non-EQ) MOV de motors are encompassed i*n the MOV program.

The licensee initially revised procedure DMP 040-9, "Limitorque Valve

Operator Maintenance," in December 1987, to include safety related,

non-safety related and environmentally qualified de motors by inspecting

brushes and commutator and measuring the motor armature, series and shunt

field megger data.

In addition, a*new procedure, DEP 040-9 was issued to

replace DMP 040-9.

The inspector verified that DEP 040-9 incorporated

the revision to DMP 040-9 and included verification of motor brushes spring

tension. This item is considered to be closed.

(Clos.ed) Open Items (237/88017-20 and 249/88018-20):

DET item 2.2.2.3,

verify that procedure DMP 040-11 is revised to contain a caution statement

to ensure that a valve is back-seated at its normal operating temperatur~.

The inspector verified that procedure DMP 040-11, Electrical Back-seating

of Limitorque Operated Valves," was revised in October 1987 and that

adequate caution statements were included; These c~µtions included

administrative tracking of back-seated valves. This item is considered

closed.

(Open) Unresolved Items (237/88017-21 and 249/88018-21):

DET item

2.2.2.3, corrective maintenance procedures are not established for all

safety-related *and Balance of Plant (BOP) system equipment components.

This item is expected to be resolved prior to August 1989.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-22; 237/88017-23; 249/88018-22 and

249/88018-23):

DET item 2.2.2.4, the Work Request trending should be

evaluated for effectiveness of equipment failure trending.

These items

are administratively closed since Region III is currently evaluating

the program per item 249/87008-01.

(Open) Open Items (237/88017-24 and 249/88018-24):

DET item 3.2.3,

measurement and testing equipment (M&TE) should be verified to be

controlled, including logged per DMP 100-2.

No action taken on this

item during this inspection, the item is documented here for tracking

purposes.

6

(Open) Open Items (237/88017-25 and 249/88018-25):

DET item 2.2.2.5,

the maintenance staffing should be evaluated to verify that adequate

personnel are available, including maintenance engineers for procedure

writers and work analysis.

No action taken on this item during this

inspection, the item is documented here for tracking purposes.

(Open) Open Items (237/88017-26 and 249/88018-26):

NRR should review the licensee's second 10 year IST

taken or. this item during this inspection, the item

for tracking purposes.

DET item 2.2.3.1,

program.

No action

is documented here

(Open) Un~esolved Items (~37/88017-27 and 249/88018-27):

DET items

2.2.3.3, 3.3.1, 3.3 .. 2 and 2.2.3.6, verify the adequacy of the IST

program; including comparison of Technical Specifications and ASME to*

the IST program, administrative procedures are in place to control IST,

that all ASM~ XI valves contained in the program are tested, that IST

procedures record "as found" and "as left" values, that all required

testing are performed, evaluated and trended and that the HPCI pumps are

being tested at the standard reference value as required by ASME XI.

No action taken on this item during this inspection, the item is

documented here for tracking purposes.

(Open) Unresolved Items (237/88017-28 and 249/88018-28):

DET item

2.2.3.5, the team found that the pump test results for LPCI and diesel

generator cooling water were outside the acceptance criteria without

corrective actions and documentation.

No action taken on this item

during this inspection, the item is documented here for tracking purposes.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-29 and 249/88018-29):

DET item 2.2.4.1,

the retraining classes for licensed and non-licensed operators should be

separated.

The inspector verified that the retraining cycles 1 through

3 had separated the attendance by licensed and non-licensed personnel.

This item is considered to be .closed.

(Open) Open Items (237/88017-30 and 249/88018-30):

DET items 2.2.4.1,

2.2.4.2, 2.2.4.3, 2.2.4.4 and 3.4.2, the team identified training

problems.

These include inadequate plant experience in the training

department, poor classroom instructional practices, inadequate emphasis

on indepth job required knowledge and significant differences between

the GE simulator and Dresden actual systems.

No action taken on this

item during this inspection, the item is documented here for tracking

purposes.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-31 and 249/88018-31):

DET item 2.2.5.1,

the Quality Assurance department appears to be understaffed for routine

QA surveillance.

The inspectors have reviewed the QA staffing plan and

evaluated the effectiveness of the QA department.

Although many of the

QA departments are used for non-routine evaluations, the inspectors found

that the QA department has significantly improved in identifying problems

at Dresden, such as failure to follow procedures and resulted in

corrective actions. This item is considered administratively closed since

this item is routinely verified by the inspectors.

7

..

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-32 and 249/88018-32): * DET item 2.2.5.2,

the QA department appeared to have little active or direct participation

in the development of the Dresden station improvement plan (DSIP)~ The

inspector verified that the QA department directly participates in

monitoring the DSIP through surveillance and audit~ of the various DSIP

action plans.

This item is closed.

(Closed) Unresolved Items (237/88017-33 and 249/88018-33):

DET item

2.2.5.3, Dresden improvement initiatives are fragmented without a

centralized followup or tracking function.

The licensee initiated the

Dresden Station Improvement Plan (DSIP) in October 1987 and implemented

the DSIP action plans.

The action plans contain description of the

plans, goal, and actions to be taken by the implementing department and

measurement standards for completion.

The inspector reviewe*d the DSIP

and found it adequate in controlling and tracking the improvement plans.

Additi6nally, the licensee. assigned the DSIP responsibilities to the

Superintendent of Performance Improvement to ensure centralized control.

This item is considered to be closed.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-34 and 249/88018-34):

DET item 2.2.5.4,

ver1fy that the lessons .learned from the Safety System Functional

Inspecticn (SSFI) have been applied to other .systems.

Since the Division

of Reactor Safety is currently monitoring the SSFI efforts at all CECo

facilities, including application of lessons learned, these items are

considered to be administratively closed.

(Open) Open Items (237/88017-35 and 88018-35):

DET item 2.2.5;6, the

Regulatory Assurance Department's internal and external commitment*

tracking system did not adequately address internal discrepancy and

deviation reports.

No action taken on this item during this inspection,

the item is documented here for tracking purposes.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-36 and 249/88018-36):

DET item 2.2.6.2,

verify that the backshift Radiation/Chemistry Foremen are providing

adequate job planning, infield support and directing job coverage.

Regional based rad/chem specialist inspectors verified through direct

observation that the backshift foremen adequately provided support during

both normal operating cycles and outages. This item is considered closed.

(Closed) Open Items (237/88017-37 and 88018-37):

DET item 2.2.6.4,

evaluate the acceptance criteria (fit factor of 50) of respirator fit

te~ting. Regional based inspectors evaluated the respirator fit testing

program and found the program to be adequate, including the fit factor.

This item is considered to be closed.

N6 viola~ions or deviations were identified.

3.

Exit Interview ___ (30703)

The inspectors m~t with licensee representatives (denoted under Persons

Contacted) on September 2, 1988, and informally throughout the inspection

period, and summarized the scope and findings of the inspection activities.

8

.

J

The inspectors also discussed the likely informational content of the

inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed by the

inspector during the inspection.

The licensee did not identify any such

documents/processes as proprietary. *The licensee acknowledged the

findings of the inspection.

9