ML17201J408
| ML17201J408 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 08/18/1988 |
| From: | Wright G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17201J409 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8808290004 | |
| Download: ML17201J408 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000237/1988012
Text
Docket No. 50-237
Docket No. 50-249
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
Senior Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL
60690
Gentlemen:
AUG 1 8 19SB
SUBJECT:
.. EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE TEAM INSPECTION (NRC COMBINED
TEAM INSPECTION REPORTS NO. 50-237/88-12 AND NO.
50~249/88-14)
This refers to the inspection of Dresden Emergency Operating Procedures
by an NRC team led by Mr. Donald J. Florek on May 31 through June 8, 1988,
of activities at Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 authorized
by NRC Operating Licenses No. DPR-19 and No. DPR-25 and to the discussion
of our findings with Mr. E. Eenigenburg and others of your staff at the
conclusion of the inspection ..
The enclosed copy of bur inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection .. Within these areas, the inspection cons1sted of a selective *
examination of procedures and representative reco~ds, observations, and
interview with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appear to be in violation
of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice.
A written response
is required.
In addition, this report identifies additional findings and
observations in the Dresden Emergency Operating Procedures relating to
technical issues, human factor issues, and management control issues.
At the exit meeting, your staff described the short and long term actions
that will be taken to correct the items.
We request that you formally
transmit your plans and corrective actions related to the inspection findings
within 30 days of the date of this letter.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2. 790, of the Commission
1 s regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance-procedures of the Office of Management and Budget
as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511..
8808290004 880818
-CR
A~1c11~v o_~_.n_r.>0237
P I '
i.; - -*r*.
P[IC
Q
- .*. \\
AUG 1 s 1989
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-237/88012(DRS); and
No. 50-249/88014(DRS)
cc w/enclosures:
H. Bliss, Nuclear
Licensing Manager
J; Eenigenburg, Plant Manager
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, Riil
Richard Hubbard
J. W. McCaffrey, Chtef, Public
Utilities Division
bee w/enclosures:
W. Regan, NRR/LHFB
~
Lavy
'1{15188
Sincerely,
0
4 r* "('11 .. J :1 f
,
,
- t\\i.~ii~~'" S.:~~£p .~!~. GEOffiiE'f c.., wrucwr
.... *- .... ****-*---***-* ...
Geoffrey C. Wright, Chief
Operations Branch
Commonwealth Edison Company
CZ:
Gallo
~;\\ /88
RI:DRP
Wright
71
88
2
l.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II I
Report Nos.
50-237/88-12
50-249/88-14
Docket Nos.
50-237
50-249
Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company
P.O. Box 767
Chicago, Illinois 60690
License
Facility Name:
Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2* and 3
Inspection At:
Dresden Site, Morris, Illinois
Inspection
Team Leader: *
Inspectors:
Senior Operations Engineer
h, DRS, Region I
R. Evans, Reactor Engineer, Region IV
P. Kaufman, Dresden Resident Inspector
C. Sisco, Operations Engineer,. Region I
A. Sutthoff, Human Factors Specialist
W. Hansen, Consultant, NRC
Nos.
- Approved by: .~Jk
. 8/2188
Robert M. Gallo, Chief
Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Region I
Date
Inspection Summary
Inspection on May 31, 1988 through June 8, 1988
(Report *Nos. 50-237/88-12; 50-249/88-14
Areas Inspected: . Special announced team inspection of Dresden Emergency
Operating Procedures (OEOPs) to include a comparison of the DEOPs with the BWR
Owners Group Emergency Procedure Guidelines (EPGs) for technical adequacy,
review of the OEOPs by control room and plant walkdowns, evaluation of the
DEOP~ on the plant simulator, human factor analysis, review of the validation
verification program, review of the on-going evaluation program of DEOPs, QA
measures in the DEOP program, and an assessment of the containment venting
provisions.
Results:
See executive summary in report.