ML17187B120

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-237/97-08 & 50-249/97-08 & Nov. Commitments & Corrective Actions Completed & Have Satisfied NRC Requirements
ML17187B120
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/25/1997
From: Grobe J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Jamila Perry
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML17187B121 List:
References
50-237-97-08, 50-237-97-8, 50-249-97-08, 50-249-97-8, NUDOCS 9710010393
Download: ML17187B120 (3)


See also: IR 05000237/1997008

Text

  • -

Mr. J. S. Perry

Site Vice President

Dresden Nuclear_ Power Station *

Commonwealth Edison Company

6500 North Dresden Road

.Morris, IL 60450-9765 _

September 25, 1997

SUBJECT:

NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-237/97008(DRS); 50-249/97008(DRS)

AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Dear Mr. Perry:

This letter refers to the special inspection conducted on March 31, 1997, through May 14, 1997,

and June 16, 1997, through July 8, 1997, at the Dresden Nuclear facility. The purpose of the

inspection was to determine whether commitments and corrective actions identified by

Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) No. Rlll-96-016, dated November 21, 1996, were completed

in accordance with NRC requi~ements. At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were

discussed with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

As a result of this inspection we have determined that, except for those activities associated

with the Dresden Engineering Assurance Group (DEAG), the CAL commitments and corrective

?Ctions were completed and have satisfied NRC requirements. In addition, those CAL activities

that remained on-going were determined to satisfy the intent of the CAL. The inspectors'

observations indicated that initial DEAG implementation was not effective as an oversight

organization. Although recent changes have demonstrated some improvement in this area, due

to the weaknesses observed, we have decided that the CAL will remain open until effective

DEAG performance has been demonstrated. The continuation of the monthly CAL meetings,

however, will be discontinued and replaced with quarterly meetings. The intent of the quarterly

meetings will be to discuss the status and findings of the DEAG activities, the effectiveness of

recommended corrective actions, overall engineering performance improvement, and nuclear

/

steam supply system supplier and architect engineer audits. The first quarterly meeting will be I ;

1

held on October 15, 1997, at the Region 111 Offices.

/ /

The DEAG was established to provide oversight of key engineering activities and was to ensure

soundness of current engineering performance. Although no significant safety-related technical

deficiencies were identified during the inspection, the administrative weaknesses observed in

the implementation of the DEAG raise concerns regarding the overall effectiveness of the

DEAG. In addition, problems with lost or misplaced documents within the performance

improvement process raise concerns that root cause(s) may not be properly identified and

associated corrective actions implemented for all known problems.

9710010393 970925

'

..

i

PDR

ADOCK 05000237 :

L _/ __ a~------- _________ PDf! ____ _

~*

\\1111111 \\RI \\l~I !1111!\\ml 11~1 !I~ II~

J. S. Perry

2

September 25, 1997

Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation of

NRC requirements as specified in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The circumstances

surrounding the two violations are described in detail in the subject inspection report. The

violations are of concern because they demonstrated weaknesses in procedure adherence and

the performance improvement process as implemented by the DEAG and your engineering

organization.

The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the second violation, the

corrective actions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence, is already

adequately addressed in the subject inspection report. Therefore, you are not required to

respond to the violation concerning DEAG procedure adherence unless the description therein

does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you

choose to provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the

enclosed Notice.

However, you are required to respond to the first violation discussed in this letter and should

follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan

to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed

corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further

NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2. 790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the

enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning these inspections.

Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249

License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25

Sincerely,

original signed by J. A. Grobe

John A. Grobe, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation

2. Inspection Report 50-237/97008(DRS); 50-249/97008(DRS)

See Attached Distribution

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\DRS\\DRE97008.DRS

OFFICE

E

Rlll:DRS

NAME

Gardner/Ring

DATE

09/'1, 197

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

J. S. Perry

3

cc w/encls:

R. J. Manning, Executive Vice President,

Distribution:

Generation

M. Wallace, Senior Vice President,

Corporate Services

E. Kraft, Vice President, BWR Operations

Liaison Officer, NOC-BOD

D. A. Sager, Vice President,

Generation Support

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

Services Manager

I. Johnson, Licensing Operations Manager

Document Control Desk - Licensing

T. Nauman, Station Manager, Unit 1

M. Heffley, Station Manager, Units 2 and 3 *

F. Spangenberg, Regulatory Assurance

Manager

Richard Hubbard

Nathan Schloss, Economist,

Office of the Attorney General

State Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission

Docket File w/encl

PUBLIC IE-01 w/encl

OC/LFDCB w/encl

DRP w/encl

SRI, Dresden, w/encl

C. Pederson, Rill w/encl

LPM, NRR w/encl

A. B. Beach, Rill w/encl

DRS w/encl

RI 11 PRR w/encl

J. L. Caldwell, Riii w/encl

Riii Enf. Coordinator, w/encl

September 25, 1997

R. A. Capra, NRR w/encl

TSS w/encl

CAA1 w/encl

DOCDESK w/encl