ML17187A773

Forwards Matl Presented During 970131 Meeting Conducted at Region III Office to Discuss Progress in Completing Actions Outlined in CAL-RIII-96-16.W/list of Attendees & Viewgraphs

ML17187A773
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	02/10/1997
From:	Hiland P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Jamila Perry COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
CAL-RIII-96-16, NUDOCS 9702140276
Download: ML17187A773 (45)

Text

\\,_

Mr. J. S. Perry Site Vice President Dresden Station Commonwealth Edison Company 6500 North Dresden Road Morris. IL 60450 February 10, 1997

SUBJECT:

DRESDEN CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER CCAL) MEETING

Dear Mr. Perry:

This refers to the meeting conducted in Region III on January 31. 1997. This meeting was to discuss your progress in completing actions outlined in the Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) No. RIII-96-016. Topics discussed included your progress in completing the actions outlined in the CAL and other improvement initiatives.

Attached to this letter are the materials your staff presented during the meeting.

Your staff indicated that on the slide titled. "PIFs:

Potential Discrepancies." the bull et that stated. "The Number of Cells for 250 V Batteries Different in TSUP and UFSAR." should instead state. "The Number of Cells for 250 V Batteries Different in DBD and UFSAR."

In accordance with Section 2. 790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice." Part 2.

Title 10. Code of Federal Regulations. a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

We appreciated your cooperation in this matter.

If you have any questions regarding this meeting, please contact me at 630/829-9603.

Docket Nos:

50-237: 50-249 License Nos:

DPR-19: DPR-25

Enclosures:

1. Attendance List

2.

Licensee Presentation Sincerely,

/s; P. L. Hiland Patrick L. Hiland. Chief Reactor Projects Branch 1 DOCUMENT NAME:

A:\\MMINJAN.WPD

\\

To receive a copy of this document. indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" =

No co y OFFICE RII I NAME DATE

,: 9702140276 970210

• PDR ADOCK 05000237

~P.

PDR RIII Hiland PJ.t}

)

J. cc w/encl:

T. J. Maiman. Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations Division D. A. Sager. Vice President.

Generation Support H. W. Keiser. Chief Nuclear Operating Officer T. Nauman. Station Manager Unit 1 M. Heffley, Station Manager Units 2 and 3 F. Spangenberg. Regulatory Assurance Manager I. Johnson. Acting Nuclear Regulatory Services Manager Richard Hubbard Nathan Schloss. Economist Office of the Attorney General State Liaison Officer Chairman. Illinois Commerce Commission Document Control Desk-Licensing Distribution:

Docket File w/encl PUBLIC ~

w/encl OC/LFDCB w/encl SRI LaSalle. Dresden.

Quad Cities w/encl RACl ( E -Mai l)

W. L. Axelson. w/encl Project Manager. NRR w/encl DRP w/encl RI II PRR w/ encl CAAl w/encl (E-Mail)

A. B. Beach. w/encl H. B. Clayton. w/encl

_:.,ti

'J Attendance List Licensee Personnel K. Frehafer. Dresden Engineering Assurance Group (DEAG) Supervisor J. Heffley. BWR Vice President. Dresden R. Freeman. Engineering Manager F. Spangenberg. Regulatory Assurance Manager. Dresden D. Winchester. Site Quality Verification Director E. Connell. Design Engineering Superintendent R. Renuart. Chief Engineer. Configuration Management and Engineering Assurance R. Scott. Supervisor. Independent Safety Engineering Group NRC Personnel P. Hiland. Chief. Projects Branch 1. DRP. RIII R. Gardner. Chief. Engineering Specialists 2. DRS. RIII K. Riemer. Senior Resident Inspector. Duane Arnold W. Kropp. Chief. Engineering Specialists 1. DRS. RIII J. Gavula. Senior Engineering Specialist Inspector. DRS. RIII R. Capra. Director. Project Directorate III-1. NRR G. Grant. Director. DRS, RIII D. Roth. Resident Inspector. Dresden

• .J~-:"L*'

1 r r_ *..,

ENCLOSURE *2 DRESDEN STATION Dresden January CAL Status Meeting RuSs Freeman, Site Engineering

.*Manager.*

ComEd

• CAL Status DRESDEN STATION

~~~~~!N~~~~~'!/111it~~~d£~~~~~.Jh~~t~l.r~~lYJftfi~~PJft~~lf~?~tli:)~~I~ft:il~t~~~;;:;~,1tl~

• DEAG Status

• Twelve System Parameter Review Status

• SQV Audit Status

• Corporate Involvement.

e

• Calculation Training Complete*

I I

.

• Design Basis Discrepancy PIP Training

• • Complete*

• ComEd DRESDEN STATION ftilf+-Ji!.$-llflJ~l@~~~~~?JK@.!~~~"1'it~ti!G@;gJril1t~~~'fil.W~~.I~:Jtr~:ii:WffJ~~il'.'tr1*'!$!:})1~'.m.~~,t~A~i>JD%1~i&fil.illm~"'tJ}Sifu~.iil'~

".j I

l"

_;;)

'.1

_/

Dresden Engineering Assurance Group

• Kenrieth Frehaf er

• DEAG Supervisor

• ComEd DEAGStatus DRESDEN STATION //

• Fully Implemented *

• Twelve System Parameter Screening Review

- Assisted in,.detertnining Key Parameters.

• Modification Review Planned *

- Partially Implemented Modification Backlog.

• e. *

~ D3R14 Modifications I

I

~,,.

• DEAG Involved with Resolution ofISI Instrument Uncertainty Issues

• c*oordinated 50.54f Resp9rise

ComEd

. DEA G Status DRESDEN STATION

e.

• Over 31 Engineering Products Reviewed *

. ~*Emergency License Amendment Activities:

- The HPCI Operability Close-Out Issues

- Control Room/TSC Operability Issues *

• - AEER Operability Issues.

• Thirteen Products Required Re-Work

- Unverified Inputs

~ Omissions.

ComEd DEAGStatus DRESDEN STATION

• *. Two PIFs Initiated for Significant Issues

. -*Review of_ECCS PUJ?P NPSH.Safety Ev~luation

.* Most Limiting PCT Scenario Not Evaluated

• Corrected as *Part of License Amendment

~ Review of Load *Reject/Turbine Trip Bypass

• e

• . Setpoint Change * -

I

(

• TSUP Setpoint Based on Rated Thermal Power

• Instea4 of First Stage Turbine Pressure

. *. Setpoint Calculation Corrected to Develop Setpoint Based on Rx Power

ComEd

. DEA G Status DRESDEN STATION e

• Positive ObserVations

_ Engineering-Initiating More Equipm*ent *Related PIFs *

• Areas for Improveinent

• . - Engineering Intra-*Discipline Communications

• *e for Emergent Issues

• - Attention to Detail I

l~

,~

/

ComEd DRESDEN STATION*

• A--.~-m:1r,;o:"""'"ll"~'""**l'.l'":.1'!~""'~P"<--.J~~~~11""':r.r.il'~".:i' row* '"'~'f>'"*"**~ "m..,._':'.'J4W~'"""">>"~ *-1 **~ *-"'"""~ '-'"l:l":t*.,,,...*,,,..,,. *

~"**~;

• 1*.,,.,r~.<-m1=.1*.-~

~~U"".rtl~ff:!lm2*~~W.4J

.. *~~*;?JJ~j.¥:-~k"il~.:i~~~t;:~~*~M~\\;f;Q~jk~~W~rj~,~.!YP:

... ~~1bitl~:r:11~~~crutt13.M::f~f~~~t~i::q,.;iii:~~.Jti*,,!:1kur~T~~;;:t*:*:.:~;.~:~\\*" ~*

1 t*t:.lil!.';.";: ~. j 't.~~!."t-~tL:r~ *; ":~f~:*.;1.~<:~*:,*~ci-~~~l.ifJ I

.

• SCREENING OF KEY

. PARAMETERS FOR TWELVE

• RISK SIGNIFICANT

~

• sYSTEMS

. E. C. Conn*ell, III..

9esign

• Engine~ring* Superinteiid~nt

....~*

ComEd ComEd Commitments DRESDEN STATION

&U~'.limti.!im~

.. i;;,M~mEl'J:.'llli:~.wi:m;a&~w0*ir~im,~4:!Ji:J~.~if~~~~~1?lj~~~r~m.{~*1:~Tu~!~!~~~-~~~Jr~~1

• Screening of key operating parameters on the twelve systems most.important from a.risk perspective to verify that calculations ~xist to supportthose parameters by February 28,*J997. *

• The NRC will be immediately informed if critical

• parairieters on any of the twelve systems are*

/

. discovered to be outside of normal accepta11ce values.

• Results of the screening \\\\fill be provided to the NRC on a monthly basis through a meeting and docketed. response..

ComEd DRESDEN STATION.

E.Connell A. K. Singh F. Fischer

/

I. Uddin R. Kalita A. Ostenso J. Neurauter N. Weber C. Johnson*:

R. Engel..

J.. Reda

• .Project Team ComEd Project Owner Team Leader Electrical Electrical * *. -.

Instrumentation and c;ontrol Instrumentation and Control

• Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical (Support).

CornEd ComEd Project Support*

DRESDEN STATION

~&'#'&t.WJ\\!!m'.~Jiliil!:~*ir!fifiilW~~W'lMt!ffilWtnmreW~~Sl~tOO~iill~~M~~~~t'~im;t~~~;J,it:~iifiJJ;~lf~~~~~i A*

',.l

/'

B. Tsai.

L.Raney/R.Johnson J. Dawn S. Tutich J.. Tietz.

D. Evans D. Spencer J. Sword Nuclear Fuel Service..

Probabilistic Safety Analysis

• Mechanical. Design Engineering Electrical Design *Engineering

. *.System Engineering

• syste111 Engineering System Engineering*

Systen;i Engineering

?

ProjeCt Milestones DRESDEN STATION t!tM!MMl~~mm~:*J@~H~2~~:@1'i~~m~8JWij,".*lmZ~~E~~~r~~B1itl~f!Fzj~DJf;~1{1?\\\\Fl.~~~u'.~~li*~11;;1,:.**'F+/-l~'Jg~~~fi~~l'!i~~t~~

Task Name Project Duration

-=-==---'--~-**---------

Project Milestones.*

---

con1Pieteoes*k top'Tnsfructlons -*--*-----------.. :-..

-* -*****00ve1ofiusfof"Key Parameters-**--*-----*---------.-* -**.. -**-.. -

• • • • - *--oetermlnevaTuesTor*-i<eY-*F>-aramefers--***--* -----**-*-** -- *

---

lderitlfy *calculations:supportirig"Key Parameters-----*

... **--i<eY-F>a-ramefer-5veriew *t>YoE'AG------.,...----*--*

Verify calcufatioris support Key Para.meters---*-*:--**...

• -* *--*-co*m-pleteTri'dependent*-;:0vr0w--*-------------*--*----------**

• • -***-*complete Draft Repcfrf ___________ *-* --------*----

---

* --Re!vTew-ofrei>-ort by 15EAG _______ *

• • • -*----*---*-***---*~--'----*

-- ---compfeteReport~suiJmTffo NR~~---*----. ----------

• 00 "f/6 00 1/13 00 1/20

.127

.127 2/10, :

2/17

• 26

ComEd

. Scope of Work DRESDEN STATION

e.

• Twelve Selected System *

• Key Parameter Identification.Process

• Typical Key Parameters

• Calculation Basis* Verification

• NRC Dis-crepancy Notification Process

• • eomEd Twelve, Systems Selected DRESDEN STATION

• . Safety-Related 125/250 Vdc System

• Low Pressure Coolant Injection (LPCI)/Containment *

. *. Cooling Service Water (CCSW} System *

• Feedwater/ Condensate System

• Turbine Building Clos~d Co*oli~-g Water (TBCCW) e System

• Main Steam ~afety"and Relief-Valves.

• Service Water (SW} System..

• *Automatic Depres~urization System (ADS)

ComEd. ** *. Twelve Systems Selected DRESDENSTATION (Continued).

• 4 kV/480Vac Allxiliary.Powef (e~cluding Diesel Generators) SysteII1

• . IsolationCondensef System (including

. Makeup Water)_.. *

• . Offsite Power System **.

. e -

~

• Etnergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) *

.* Initiation Logic _.* *.

~

. l'

• -High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI)

~.

. System- **

,--~

ComEd DRESDEN STATION Safety. Analysis Inputs Reload Analysis Inputs Systematic Evaluation Program Commitments NRC Imposed Requirements

./

Plant Commitments Identification of Key Parameters Current Safety Analysis H

Technical Specifications Dresden Admin.

Tech. Requirements KEY PARAMETERS

.. 0........ -......

Critical

~

~

Parameters Technical Specification Parruneters 1f DATR

-~

Parameters These Parameters Must Be Maintained or the Plant is in an Unanalyzed Condition Technical Specification Parameters are Derived from Safety Analysis in Accordance with I OCFRS0.36 These Parameters are Administratively Controlled by the Plant

I I

I ComEd

• Typical Key Parameters DRESDEN STATION

• Mechanical

- System Flow, Tempera11:Jre and Pressures System Performance (Head Vs. Flow}

- Heat Exchanger Heat Transfer, Flow and inlet. Temperatures

/'

Volume of Tanks

- Valve Opening and Closing Times Pump NPSH Requirements"

- Maximum Area Temperatures "Analytical" or "Process Limits for instrument-setpoints

.Minimum Voltage at Terminals of Motor Driven Components

I

-l_.,

ComEd DRESDEN STATION Typical KeyParameters (Continued)

• Nuclear

- -Safety Analys_is Analytical Model and Analysis Inputs

- Accident An(:\\lysi.s M<?del and.Analysis Inputs

- AnticiI?atedAcciden_ts Without Scram (ATWS) _

Analysis Assumptions Containment Analytical Models.and-Analysis Inputs

- Stati.on Blackout Analysis_Assumptio11s Safe Shutdown Analysis for Fire Protection Analy~is Assumptions

--*~

CornEd

.//

Typical Key Parameters (Continued)

DRESDEN STATION

• Electrical and Instrumentation*and Control

- System Voltage Limits

- Battery Sizing Requirements Electrical Protection and Coordination Short Circuit Current Levels at Supply Buses Equipment Ambient. Temperatures

- "Analytical" or "Process" Limits for instrument setpoints Initiation Permissives

• Initiation Timing Funct~ons Channel Actuatiol). Logic

e.

/

DRESDEN STATION Calculation Basis*

.*Verification Activities ComEd

• Identify t4e Supporting calculations and establish that calculations support the key parameters *

• initiate Performance Improvement Forms (PIFs) f Of missing or incomplete calculations Of* out of limit parameters.*

• initiate PIFs for variance between the UFSAR, TSUP and other Documents

ComEd

l.

DRESDEN STATION Discrepancy Identified KPST Initiate PIF Review PIF KPST-Lead PIF Disposition DE-Lead NRC Discrepancy Notification Process Screen PIF for Reportability *

, SM Perform Significance

. KE.Y Revise KPST Yes Perform Operability KPST: Parameter Screening Team DE : Design Engineering SM : Shift Manager RA : Regulatory Assurance ESC: Event Screening C.ommittee No Yes Inform NRC Monthly KPST - Lead lnform NRC Inform 1-----1..i lmmediately Re Assurance DE-Lead RA - Lead

r

.. 'l' ComEd *

• P IFs:. Missing* Calculations**

DRESDEN STATION m11'K~~'~F:lltl!mE11~.ta~~3mi&&~~~~~~~:Ji2:~~~~~n;~,it~11;;:,;t~:~:n*.'.:t::*~.1r..;ri2~r~i\\1~~~~K~~1

• Missing Calculittions for IC*..

• .~*Time Delay Setpoinf forlnitiation of IC System

- Makeup.Flow Rate.to IC. HX-.

~

• Missing Ca.lcul_ations for.. TBC

.. CW * :.....

- TBCCW HX Capability... " *

- TBCC Hydraulic Modef *- *. _ * * * *

• Missjng Calculations* for CCSW *

- NPSH Calculations

-~. '

/

• ~

\\.....

l'

~

DRESDEN STATION PIFs: Potential Discrepancies ComEd

/'I

,'-"'*~

~"

• Usable Rating of125Vdc Battery Listed in the lTFSAR is Not Applicable

• Min Electrolyte Temp of 60 F in TSUP Inconsistent

. with 65 F in UFSAR and.Design Cales *

• .)

• The Number of Cells for 250 v. Batteries Different in TSUP an*d UFSAR

• NPSH for LPCI Pumps Different Bet.ween.DBD and Pump Curves

.

• Minimum Water Level fqr CCSW Suction Bay

.

• Different Between TSUP and DA TR

~

c*..

e

.. P/Fs: Potential Discrepancies ComEd

/iC

• - 1*.

d'~..

DRESDEN STATION

~ ~. on znue '/.*.

m~~m'~~~&ti¥&1:§i!}iffili'4~~~~&m.~1'1m~~~r~~~?..*g11>-:.i:t.:;,1J,1;2:;YJ:;:~.:~";tr~::.~r1~,,~~1-~~~3Iim1 w

J;;

,..,.._, :..-~

.~

--~*

• .(,,,,..::,..;;....-*~.......,.~

• No Requirements for Onsite Storage of

- Water for C.ontinued Operation of IC * *

.7

~

• Inconsistencies**in IC DBD _.*** *

. *

• HPCI: The Pressure Range of the Steam

/

• . Supply to the Turbine Differs between the

• .Technical Specifications and DOS 2300-03.

• ECCS Initiation Revised *setpoints Not Implemented

• 1**

CornEd.

Project Summary J -),

• J t

,:1.

DRESDEN STATION

~

• Project Team and Desk Top Instructions in Place

/

.

• Key Parameters and Calculations Identified

• 4 Missing Calculations and 9 Potential

• Discrepanc.ies Identified

• Calculation Review Initiated * *

-

• Project on Schedule**

• • ~.. ~.

ComEd DRESDEN STATION Corrective Actions Sargent & Lundy Audit Robert Scott Supervisor Independent.Safety Engineering Group Dresden Station

-~:..-*

.ComEd Audit Findings DRESDEN STATION

. ~m~i\\t11f!ff~~'::t,mr;;~i!~~~

m~

]l~tm&~~~:r11rr~:,~~~~tl~t'.11;.rt~1;;~:1r~~1~.rt~:tt~&.rti1~W~l~

• CAR AE~96-17-0.1.,**

. -** Sargen~ & Lundy Failed to Repo~, Via a Memorandum, a design. input error

• CORRECTIVE ACTIONS..

- Sargent & L~ndy.CARs Issued

- Additional Calculations and*NDIT Logs Reviewed

- Traini;ng Conducted

. ~

.'!*:.*r**

. **f.~1 ComEd SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL

~*

"I DRESOEN STATION

• Significance Level

• Description.

~ 0.

• Editorial *'.:

~ 1

~ 2

- 3 No Impact on Design Margin

• P.otential Inipact on:Design Margin Des,ig*n Margin Erod.ed

- 4

• • Design Margin Exceeded :

,,:~

ComEd DRESDEN STATION.

Area Observation 10,,0..:-54-19-1, Kev. U 10,,0..:-1 r-19-1, Rev. O 111911.:-64-19-2, Rev. o IM 12-3-95-003 15:>0.. 19-1, Kev. u 11..::>o-11-19-1, KeV. U

>::>119-31-19-1, Rev.1 VK-10, Kev. 1 VK-1 r. Kev. o Mr-cu 9i;.:1-9:>-uu, Kev. u t'McU 11911;l-b;l*U;t, KeV. U U::>91-;s11r-uu.., Rev. 2 vr<t95-0134, Kev. 0 1-'McU """" 11.:-u1. Kev. u 9215-111-02, Rev. o U351l>

111rut1-05-1:u-s. Rev.. 7 1119uu-.15-1:u-s, Rev. 4 IDRt-Muv-5, Kev. o IMl-'tU 9tlOl1-1UU-UU, Kev. u t:MU Utlt.. Of, Kev. u A 1 u-u.:16, Rev. o A I U-01111, Kev. ;l*

IAI u-u~53, Rev. 1 r~

Significance and Trending Matrix Accurate.. Organized Usable Complete Technical Legible 2:'

.9 B

c..

Gl cu

.~-

!I C:

E c

Q.

E

• ~

cu c

.Q

e.

Q.

8.

E cu cu 8

If*

~

0

.., - <l E

'1:

• s;

~

(.)

c

~

Remarks

(.)

cu i5 c

c

~ :;

0 c

~

0.

~

c

~

(.)

f

]

~

is

~

JI oO t e

Q.

• 2

• g l

~

~

.=

oO

~

• ~

.!ii

~

~

oO -

c oO l

tl l!

i

.\\!

~

en

.2' 1i c

• e i c

~

Q.

cu cu E

~

.2' c

.ll!

ti*

a.

en E

E iii

~

• a.

£j e E

~

a*

_§'

c

.s

a.

0 0

cu

~

c cu

~

cu 0

.c 0

z

(.)

(.)

u en

0.

0.

0 0:

w 0:

u.

(.)

(.)

0:

0:

<.;omtd ues1gn <.;ontro 1-'rocess Au!!' -

x u

NIA IND 1.;omments.

NIA IND 1.;omments N/A IND 1.;ommen1s NIA INo Comments N/A IND <.;omments NIA IND 1.;omments x

x x

x x

3 11.;a1c Kev1sea 6 1ssuea x

x x

x_

x 1

Documentation x

1 Documentation x

x x

1 Grapn revised Dy <.;omtd x

x x

x x

3 Uuke Kev1sing Hase 1.;a1c x

x x

2 1.;a1c Deing rev1sea Dy :;a.L x

x x

• X-l 1uocumen1a11on x

1 1uocumentauon.. ca1c 1>e1ng superseded by S&L x

x 1

uocumentauon, ca1c rev1sea by S&L NIA No Comments x

x x

• X 1

Documentation x

, uocumentauon X* X.-

_x x

x.

• 2 No 1unner acuon requ1rea 0 NIA NO Comments

• x x x

x x

x 3

<.;ale voided Dy :S&L per Com Ed uocumentatlon. Cale revised x

1 by S&L, conclusion unaffected x

3 11.;a1c revised Dy :>&L, conclusion unaffected

-..~-... ;.

......... }:';.

'~*

ComEd Audit Findings DRESDEN STATION

• CAR AE-96-17-02

~

• 11 of 24 Sargent & Lundy Calculations were Found to Hav_e *Deficiencies Needing PIFs * *

• CORRECTIVE ACTIONS*..

~ Calcul_ations.~evised or Voided *as Appropriate

- _Matrix Developed for Trehding_and Significance

- Procedures Revised

- Satgent_ & Lundy Additional Calculation Reviews (3/17 /97)

(;.

\\~..

I l

~

.11

~,*

'ComEd

• Audit Filldings

~

. ~\\

1; DRESDEN STATION

• .CAR AE-96-17-03:

- Sargent & Lundy Independent Review Process was Ineffective**

• CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.. * *

- A:wareness Training Performed* on Issues

/

~

• ~.*Training *on Review_er Exceptions

~

~

- Calculations Revised or Voided

- *Developed _Engineering Assurance Program

ComEd Audit Findings DRESDEN STATION

• CAR AE~96-17*-04.

~ Sargent & Lundy Audits were Programmatic in Nature

• CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.

. - *Increased Use of Technical Specialists Review/Revise Content of Audit Checklists

- PIP Process Used for Tracking/Trending Weaknesses Identified

• r.t

~..

'/,1 1,

ComEd Audit Findings..

DRESDEN STATION

~~t-IJ~&fmi1lliJH~EiW~~~!flilit.~~~1~Ml\\X[!G~ti:\\~i-FJI£~ig~;g~~~~jJMX~i&~!-fi~:~J~&1t;~:*:!J~~~~,~~Rf~~~J'~f!ml

'1*

,t I

~,I I

./'

• CAR AE~96-l-7.

• ~ Sargent &*Lundy_Calculation *Not Distributed for Microfilming

.

• CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• - Review of Calculation Index Perf armed

- Awareness Tr,aining Perf armed *

• ~*,...

• ** c<>

~,;

'Audit Findings DRESDEN STATION

• CAR AE~96~ 1 7-06

-* Sargent & Lundy PIPSYS Software Missing Range of Applicability

• CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.

• ~ Review Method for Describing. System Limitations

(

111 I

Jli I

DRESDEN STATION Additional Sargent & Lundy Actions/Improvements CornEd

• Develop S.elf Assesstnent Process

• ** Develop Engineering Evaluation Process

• Revised Engineering Evaluation Procedure

.~

• Developed Procedure on 3rd Party Reviews

• Revised Procedures for NEP Precedence

• Special Training on Formality

"{

' I I

... ti:'

• 1 J

DRESDEN STATION Nuclear Oversight/SQV *

.** IMPROVEMENTS ComEd

.

• Implement Industry Peer Assessment Function.

~

o I

.f I

~

f...-

(12/97)..

.

• Vertically Integrate Audits/ Assessments of

• Engineering Services (O_nsite & Offsite) (12/97)

• Assessment of the NUPIC Process (12/97)

• Increased Monitoring to Proyide Real Time '*

Assessments of Engineering Deliverables (Begins 2/97). '..

• Audit Primary AEs, NSSS, and Fuel Suppliers in 1997

. ')

ComEd' DRESDEN STATION Corporate Initiatives to Improve Quality and Accessibility of Design Information

- Robert Renuart

• Chief Engineer,. Configur.ation Management and Engineering Assurance

J

)

ComEd.

DRESDEN STATION

• ~

. Inter/ ace Control with

• **.* Vendors rem1M:mE-~~'~1~m;,;;~~&~9$mrm~m;~~~~Eft.11.::L"~Dl:~~rm1~1i;;~~~~~

• 9

• CAR AE~96-l 7-07 Failure to Control the

~

• • If

-;i

' fl

• c. '

Safety Related Design Activities of AEs"

- Issue is Considered Generic in that the :Established Nuclear Design Information Transmittal (NDIT)

Process is not Strictly Adhered _to Between ComEd and Vendors.for ALL Design Activities

~ J:ech Alert Issued to All Stations * *. *

-.Dual Accountability Established with S&L.

-*EA Group will Provide Process Oversight

• - Ve_ndor Audits will *Measure Effectiveness.

J' l

~,

, *::t.

c '

• **ti'**

ComEd Status o/Short.Term Actions DRESDEN STATION Letter T. Maiman to A. Bill Beach, November 12, 1996

• Establish Engineering Assurance Groups At ALL Six Sites by 2/1/97.

- Completed All Six Sites

- Established Corp. Sponsored* Peer_Gr.oup

• Develop NEP on.How To *Handle C.onflicts with the USF AR and Design Documents and the_ Physical Plant by 2/1/97 * *

- NEP Issued and Training in Progress

ComEd. Status ofLong Term Actions DRESDEN STATION

• Co!J-dUct Engineering Safety System

• Functional Inspections in 1997

- Dresden, *LaSalle.Complete

- Byron, Zion In Progress * * *

- Complete *All Six Sites by *4;97

~ _Cross Station A*sse.ssment of Findings due 6/97

• Corp. EA Group wiJl Support Audits of Vendors with *subject Matter Experts

,1*

• ComEd/ Status of Long Term Actions J

"t-.. l i*

1. )

DRESDEN STATION

• Establish a 3-Y ear Plan to Improve the Quality and Accessibility of Design Information,.

- Plan Establishe*d 12/30/96

- Issued Letter to A. Bill Beach with Plan 1/30/97

- Hired Bechtel to Project Maria*ge; ComEd

. Participation from All Six Sites

\\-

.. /

. ComEd Status of Long.Term Actions DRESDEN STATION*

• Plan Affects All Six Sites *

~

~...

For *Dresden_ *

- Complete Remaining DBD Topicals (27/37 done)

- Complete Validation o*f All DBDs * *.

- Review UFSAR Against Procedures, DBDs, other*

. Design Inf orm~tion -.*....

• l

- Validate/Reconstitute "Critical Calculations"

- Improve Indexes *of Design Information with_ Cross References, Dependencies, Parameters, etc:...

51.~,, **.-...

... }

""'