ML17174A283
| ML17174A283 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Quad Cities, Zion  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1979 |
| From: | Ippolito T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Peoples D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912270063 | |
| Download: ML17174A283 (7) | |
Text
Docket Nos. 50-101.llZQ54/249 2~/295 Mr. D. Lou1s Peoples Director of Nuclear Licensing Comnonwea1 th Edison Ccmpany P. 0. Box 767 Chicago. Illinois 60690 Distribution
~,.
~ocket EReeves
-ORB #3 SN~wicki NRR Reading CP~rrish Local PDR Atty, OELD N~C PDR OI&E (3)
DEisenhut DZiemann RTedesco ASrlhwencer BGrimes JRBuchanan, RVollmer TERA LShao ACRS (16)
JMiller 1*
BGrimes I
WGammill T~ppolito
\\
DZiemann HSmith
\\
SSheppard
Dear Mr. Peoples:
RBevan j
I I
By letter dated October 10, 1979, we requested* that you submit upd~ted emergency plans using the fonnat o.f Regulatory 6u1de 1.101**
We stated that the staff would evaluate.these updated ~rgency plans aga1ns~ the requirements of Appendix E to JO.CFR Part 50, the regulatory positions set forth in Regulatory Guide 1.101, and the a¢ceptance criteria cqn-tained 1n Emergency Planning Review Guide11nes:Nurnber One - Rev1s1tjn One, dated September 7, 1979 (an enclosure to our October 10, 1979 i
- letter). Subsequently, the staff met with Corm,ionwealth Edison Com~any (CECo) representatives on October 30 and 31 and November 2, 1979 to discuss our review of the CECo Generating Stat1on Emergency Plans GGSEP).
The enclosure to this letter identifies the specific items that s1l9uld be addressed in updating your GSEP to meet the currently applicable requirements.
I I
As discussed with you in our recent meetings a~d subsequent teleph~ne discussions. you should submit your revised emergency plans incorp0,rat1ng the 1tems in the enclosure to this letter. w1th1n five (5) weeks o~
receipt of this letter.
. I Encloiure:
Comnonwealth Edison Emergency Plan Review Results cc w/enclosure:
See page 2 Sincerely, OrighwJ Signed by T. A, Ippolito I
I Thomas ~* Ippolito, Chief I
Operatfrig Reactors Branch 131 Division of Operating Reactors I
- * :r"iili>.oi i.fo * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * '* * * *
- SNowicki
. OFFICE **..* _q~~. ~-~......... ~~~. ~~.....,
SURNAME~.:. -~~~.~~~-=.n:iJ~... -~~-~~y~~-.....
...... i.. 'ii9'.....................................
I
/79 DATE~....
1
.~ (.. !?~..........
1
.~ (_.. (?~..
- -~-----~-----~------.-'-------..__ ____
~----'--'------
Mr. D. Louis Peoples Commonwealth Edison Company cc:
Mr. D. R. Stichnoth President Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company 206 East Second Avenue Davenport, Iowa
~2801 Mr. John W. Rowe Isham, Lincoln & Beale Counselors at Law One First National Plaza, 42nd Floor Chicago, Illinois 60603 Mr. Nick Kalivianakas Plant Superintendent Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 - 206th Avenue - North C6rdova, Illinois 61242 Anthony Z. Reisman Natural Resources Defense Council 917 15th Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20005 Moline Public Library 504 - 17th Street Moline, Illinois 61265 S~san N. Sekuler As~istant Attorney General Envir6nmental Control Division
- 188 W. Randolph Street Suite 2315 Chi~ago, Illinois 60601 Mr. N. Chrissotimos, Inspector US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Box 756 Bettendorf, Iowa 52722 Mr~ 13. B. Stephenson Plant Superintendent Dresden Nuclear Power Station.
Rural Route #1 Morris, Illinois 604$0 Morris Public Library 604 Liberty Street Morris, 'Illinois 60451 I.
J imn1y L. 13arker U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co1111nissio11 P. 0. Box 706 Morris, Illinois 60450 Robert J. Vollen, Esquire
" 109 North Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 Dr. Cecil Lue-Hing Di rector of Research and Devel opme1;t Metropmlitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago 100 East Erie Street
- Chicago, Illinois* 60611 Zion-Ge.nton Public Library Distric!
2600 Emmaus Avenue Zion~ Illinois 60099 Mr. Phillip P. Steptoe Isham, Lincoln and Beale
, Counse 1 ors. at La1v
- One First National Plaza
- 42nd Fl oar
'Chicago, Illinois 60603
\\,
- e.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON EMlRGENCY PLAN REVIEW RESULTS
- 1.
Describe the orisite technical support center.
See Section 2.2.2.b of Reference 1. *
- 2.
Describe the onsit~ operational support center.
See Se~tion 2.2.2.c, Reference 1.
- 3.
Identify the onsite capability and resource to properly access and cate-gorize accidents.
Specifically address th~ instrumentation for detection of inadequate core cooling (see Section 2.1.3.b, Ref. 1) and radiation monitoring capability (see Sectfon 2.1.8.b; Ref. 1).
- i
- 4.
Describe provisions that have been made for dissemination of educational information to the public within the plan ~xposure Emergency Planning Zone regarding the warning procedures to be used in the event of a serious accident and the possible protective actio~s that may have to be takin by th~ public.
- Reference 1:
Haro1d R.. Denton letter to all operating nuclear po'"'er plant~,
11 Di scuss ion of Lessons Lear.ned Short-Term Requi.rements, 11 dated October 30, 1979.
.~..
_~*
- ' r
- 5.
Describe the resources that ~ill be used i~ necessary to provid2 early warning and/or protective action instructi?ns to the populace within the Emergency Planning Zone associated with the plume exposure pathway within 15 minutes following notification from the facility operator to the offsite authorities.
- 6.
Ldentify the onsite capability and resources to provide valid and continuing assessment through the course of an accidemt including (see alsc item 3):
- a.
Post accident sampling (see Section 2.'1.8.a, Ref. 1)
- b.
In-plant iodine instrumentation (see Section 2.1.8.c, Ref. 1)
- 7.
What agencies will allocate resources, i.e., manpower and equipment tc perform real-time radiological field assessments of accidental radiological releases?
Describe the methods and equipm~nt to be employed in determinin~.
the magnitude and locations of any radiological hazards following radio-active releases.
- 8.
Describe how the* public wi 11 be notified of evacuation or other protective*
measures within the Em~rgency Planning Zone, associated with the plume exposure pathway.
(See also item 5.)
- 9.
The site emerg~ncy pla~s must provide, in a~dition to the drills and exercises identified in Regulatqry Guide i.+01, a joint exercise involving Federal, State, and local response organizati~ris.
~* -
The scope of such an exercise should test 'as much of the emergt:rKy p*lans as is reasonably achievable without involving ful) public participation.
Def~nitive performance criteria should be.:established for all levels of
.i participation to assure an objective evaldatioh.
This joint test exercise wi 11 be scheduled about* once every 5 years'.
I*
- 10.
The site emergency plans must incorporate ~he e~ergency classes, the 1*
initiating conditions, and the immediate actions identified in NUREG-0610.
The example initiating conditions for each class should be supplemented, where possible, by the specific plant inst~umentation readings which will initiate the emergency class.
- 11.
Identify by meaQs of a block diagram the interfaces between the oniite center for emergency activities, licensee ryeadquarters support, local services support, and State and local gove~nment response organizations.
The diagram should also identify the types:of communication available I
between the variaus organizations and emergency operating cehters.
- 12.
Identify the predetermined location of the *Emergency Operations Center that ~ill be used for the coordination of ~~l qffsite emergency su¢port activities.
. i,
- 13.
Describe provisi~ns for immediate declaration of a general emergency f
directly from the.plant ~o the designated o~fsite authority(ies) r~sponsible for implementing protective measures.
r
. ~.
ti.-
- 14.
The GSEP generic plan concept must be signifi~antly modified if i: is to provide the ~ite specific information needed to provide reascnJble assurance that the emergency plan meets the new NRC acc~ptance criteria.
Examples of site.specific information include:
- a.
Normal Plant Organization, including day':and night crews.
- b.
Onsite emergency organizations with special attention to th2 ons~te health physics organization for all 'shifts.
- c.
Plant Staff Assignment as per RG 1.101, i.e., operations, radiation survey and monitoring, shift technical ad~isor, communicators, and security.
- d.
Site map indicating site evacuation routes,.site personnel relocation and accountability, and monitoring of ~itk evacuees.
- e.
Roadway/traffic control measufes of roads under the control of the licensee.
- f.
O'nsite communications system (block diagr~m) to State, local and off's i te EOC, ons i'te techni c~ l support center and on~ i te support group center.
5
- _!1
- g.
Indicate the onsite dedicated commuriitati~n to be established a1d maintc;iin.ed during, t~e erperg~r:icy.
- h.
As built di a gram \\i ndi cat i ng types or' instrumentation anj emergency equipment at the ~nsite technical support and operation~l support group centers an~ the offsite EOC.
- i.
Location of offsite fixed radiation ~nvironmental monitors, including the new rings of ~LD's.
- j.
Tables of EAL's as per NUREG-0610.
- k.
List of onsite a~ailable emergency e~uipment used to monitor offsite releases.
- i.
List of site emergency procedures* thit will be used to im~lernent this plan as periRG 1.101, Annex B.
~
. r:
-\\.\\
. 'Ii