ML17173B033

Notifies That Review of Safeguards Contingency Plan Involves Consideration of Safeguards Issue Requiring Payment of Class III Fee.Plans Should Be Submitted by 790823

ML17173B033
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	07/03/1979
From:	Diggs R NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 7908130159
Download: ML17173B033 (4)

Text

I ~

I I

I

-.e DOCKET NOS. 50-10/50-237/50-249

~

Comnonwealth Edison Company ATn~: Mr. -Corde 11 Reed

• Assistant Vice Presi4ent

• P.O~ Box 767 Chicag6, Illinois 60690 Gentlemen:

. REGUlATOR~ O\\)CKlT fUI COP~

JUL 0 3 1979

• l This office has-received a copy of your -letter dated ilarch 23, 1979, which transmitted your Safeguards Contingency Plan to th2 Office of Nuclear Reactor*

Regulation for revie\\l*l and approval as required by 10 CFR 50.J!'r(d) and 73.40(b)

• of the Com;ili ssi on' s regulations.

The Pl an is for the Dresden Station Uni ts l, 2 and 3 under Facility Licenses DPR-2, DPR-19 and DPR-25.

The submittal was not accompanied by an approval/ai.iendment fee as required by Sectfon 170.22 of 10 CFR Part 170.

Requests for approvals and/or license amendments such as idn.f!tified.above should be classified in the mannGr set forth in Section 170.22~ Section 1J0.12(c) requires that your company provide a proposed deter-*

m1nation of the amendme~t (approval) class, state the basis therefor, and submit the fee. ~dth your application for *the ~µproval or amendment.

• Based on a preliminary reviev1 of your Plun, vm have deterr~ined that it involves '

consideration of a safeguards i~sue requiring a Class III fee of $4,000.for one of th~ units and duolicate fees of $400 each for the other t\\-10 units.

You shouhi pror:\\ptly fontard. to this office fees totalli\\lCJ $4,DOO~ If after the

• • final evaluation of your plQn is c6mpleted it is detbrmined that it was in-

. correctly classified, you will be.refunded any overpayment or.billed for any

• additicn~l noount due.

• Althouqh it is recoanized that Dresden Unit 1 is not essentially identical to Units.. 2 and 3, bec~~se of the nature of the item b~ing:

• considered and the fact that all units are on tha sa~e site with one ;~ajor re-view covering all L:nits, w2 have determined tlut for this ite::1 your Crn;1pany should pay a single Class III fee and two duplicate fee~ rather than two Class III fees and one duplicate.

Your current Contingency Plan~ and the Guard-Training Plans which are t6 be submitteJ by August :?3, 1979, for review and u.pproval are not considered appli-cations or.* filin::is requ12sted by the Commission for its conveniePce for the purpose*

of simplifyinq or clarifying a license or its appended Technical Specifications.

Some of the items now required to be submitted for review Jnd approval are as a result of re'..JUL~.ti ons villi ch were prm:P.11 gated prior to the March 23, l 97D n~-

vi sion of Part 170 which added the new Section 170.22.

Even though a requlation

\\

--***. *- *---*-- ***-* *'r-.. -

• ~I

.i

I

~r~r

.Cormnongyealth Edison Company 2

JUL 0 3-1979 If we CBll be *of assistance to you,. call 301/492-7225 *.

DISTRIBUTION:

PDR LPDR LH1B Reactor File* ( 3}. */

Reg. Reactor File (3)v-

. LFMB R/F (2)

• DKunihiro, RSLB PO'Conner, ORB-2 HSmith, ORB-2 RBevan, ORB-3 *

• . SSheppard, ORB~3 R~*1Di ggs, L FMB

/

. Sincerely, Original signed by:

Reb~ 14. Diggs.

Reba M. Diggs Facilities Program Coordiriator License Fee Management Branch Office of 1;d:ninistration LFMB:ADM LFMB:ADM RSLB*

OELD*

• S~e 50-331 for

.. I

!'f OP'P'ICir~

R~ *

• i. 9 9,~ *=* 5 ;-c: * * *..

• c:HtiXlJbway * * * * *

• ik ;*a r: i< ** * * * * * * * * *.. ii Fonner*******.. * * *.. con*e:*u-rre*r1c*c

• i>> :* * * * * * * * * * * * ** * *..

l~~~~~-~----********* **'.*******-~ J.t...............................................................

~

..... --.i"-"""---....;:

-.:.;r

. DATllJ> IP..1?31. 7.9........... ~

/. :v: :i<l.$...............!...../7.9...............!.....!. 7 9........................................................*

BC -l'OllM 318 (9*76) NRCM 0240

• u.*. GOVllRNMllNT PRINTING OP"P'ICK: 1171... z** *. 711

i

1.

I.

I I

I.

.,,.:i"~.

. -- ""'),,,.

• ....:..ia::.

I I

'. ~.. *~'

-,~E~~lAJORV DOC!!ET ~ll£ ~O?V JUL 0 3 1979

• DOCKET rms. 50-lOA@~

Conm10nv1ea 1th Edi son Company ATTl*':

Mr *. Corde 11 Heed

• Assistant Vice President P.O~ Box 7G7 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Gentlemen:

. I This office has-received a copy of your *letter dated March 23, 1979, which transraitted your Safeguards Contingency Plan to the.Office of Nuclear Reactor*

Regulation for review, and approval as required by 10 CFR 50. 31'r(d) and 73.40{b)

• of the Comiilission 1 s regulations. The Plan is for the _Dresden Station Utiit':'s l, 2 and 3 under Facility Licenses DPR-2~ DPR-19 and DPR-25.

The submittAl was not accompanied by an approval/ai:iendment fee as required by Sectfon 170.22 of 10 CFR Part 170.

Requests for approvals and/or license amend~ents s~ch as identifieJ above should be classified in the/rTiannGr set forth in Section 170~22~

Sectio~ lJ0.1~(2) requires that your company provide a proposed deter-*

mination _of the amendment (approval) cla~s~.state the basis therefor, and submit the fe~ with your application for 'the appro~al or amendment.

'7..

Based on a preliminary review of your Plan, we have determined that it involves consideration of a safeguards issue requiring a Class III fee of $4,000.for one of the uni ts and dup 1 i cute fees of $400 each for the other tvm un.its.. You should promptly* fon1ard to this office fees totalliWJ $,1,~~00; If after the final evaluation of your plan is completed it is det~rmined that it was in-

• correctly classified, you will be.refunded any overpayment of billed for any

-additional ~eount due. *Although it is recog~ized that Dresden Unit 1 is not essentially identical to U;1its 2 and 3, because of the nature of the item b2ing.:-

. considered and the fact that nll units are on the sa~e site with one major re-view covering all units, we have determined tlDt for this item your Cor;1pany should pay a single Class III fee and two duplicate fees rather than two Class III fees and one duplicate.

Your current Contingency Plan, and the Guard-Training Plans which are to be*

s:.ibmitted by August 23, 1979, for review and approval ar8 not considered appli-cations or filin9s requested by the Corrnission for its conveniE'PC(~ for the pLlrpose*

of simplifyinq or clarifyirlfJ a license or its appended Tech11ica.l Specifications.

Some of the iteE;s nmv required to be submitted for review and approval are cfa a result of re~;ulations v1ilich v12re pronul~ated prior to the March 23, 197G re-vision of Part 170 which added the new Section 170.22.

Even though a regu~ation

.... -~---*-** ----,....... -***

• ~*

.7908130159'

. ~.

CorrnnontJea 1th Edi son Company

_~-1;1

~:~ _,.'.

2

_:71

~;

JUL 0 3-1979 became effective prior to March.23, 1978, this does not mean that submittals now received and requiring *review and approva 1 are exempt from fees.

If we cnn be of assistance to you, call 301/492-7225 *.

DISTRIBUTION:

PDR LPDR LH1B Reactor File (3) **

Reg. Reactor File (3V.

LFMB R/F (2)

DKunihiro, RSLB PO~Conner, ORB-2 HSmith, ORB-2 RBevan,.ORB-3 *

. SSheppard, ORB-3 RMDi ggs,.LFMB

. Sincerely, Original Signed by:

• Reb~ M *. Diggs.

Reba M. Digqs Facilities Program Coordtnator License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration,

_./.

.=.**:.,

. 11..

I I OPPICBf>

Rtr.~1~~~~~;-c... ***cJk.~~~~y*** ***R~~~~~**********.. RF~~~~;......... *--~~~~-c:~-~~~-~L {:-'.................

I DURtlAMlli>o

~P~********** **~***~,.... -2.......... **************************..........................................................................

. OATllf>

~.!?3.17.9.............. l.::r::"J?.~.............../.... 17.9...............I.:..179.................... :........-............ -................

1

• Nae FO"RM 318 (9-76) NRCM 02.CO

'tr u.*. OOV*RNMBHT P'"INTINO o~~*ca: 1171. Zll., **