05000237/LER-1977-015, Forwards LER 77-015/03X-1

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML17173A336)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards LER 77-015/03X-1
ML17173A336
Person / Time
Site: Dresden 
Issue date: 10/27/1978
From: Stephenson B
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML17173A338 List:
References
NUDOCS 7811090116
Download: ML17173A336 (3)


LER-1977-015, Forwards LER 77-015/03X-1
Event date:
Report date:
2371977015R00 - NRC Website

text

CommonweA Edison Dresden NuclearWwer Station R.R. #1 Morris, Illinois 60450 Telephone 815/942-2920 BBS Ltr. #78-1447 James G. Keppler, Regional Din:~ctor

  • October 27, 1978
  • Directorate of Regulatory Operations - Region III.*

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 79-9 __ Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL : 60137.

Reportable Occurrence "Update" Rep~rt 77.,-.015/03X-l, Docket i/050-237 i.s hereby submitted ~o your office to update the cause description and final corr~ctive actions taken to. prevent recurrence.. Th:Ls event was reported* to your office under Dresden Nuclear Power. Stat;ion Techni.cal Specification 6.6.B.2.(b), ~onditions leading to operat~on ~n a.*

degraded mode permitted by a limiting condition for operation or plant shutdown required by a limiting c.ondition for operatiOn.

  • ens on Superintendent Presden Nuci~ar Power*Station.

BBS/deo*

Enclosure cc:. Director. of Insp~ction' *& Enforcement

    • Director* of Management Informad.on &

File/NRC Program Control

.. ~.~ '.

.REGULATORY DOCI\\ET FILE COPY 1

_7811()~0\\\\b

~ **:~~.. (~~ !:-;:*;,..: *."~ ::_-;* _:.,'. *,' :

. :, *... ~.. ~ ~-:~;~. -,:_...... ~

i~~**. - ~:.

. '":<~:;" ;~:~_ '<~~i.. :~ /:*~:;;_.,,,:;-;:,~ii~)';~*~:~:~~::::{~!::.:~:-_.... _

I

.:;,* -.*_, -~ ;

(*.

. *..,,'f',*.. *.

.. *me fOi'Hvl 3G'G

. (7-77)

,...... *~*..

e LICENSEE EVENT REPORT UPATE REPORT:.

P~OUS REPORT DATE 4/29/77 CONTROL BLOCK:

I I I f0 L---'-~-'-~'--_._~_._---:!_6\\.:./

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION)

CITi]* Ir IL In IR Is I 2 IG)lo lo I-lo lo lo lo lo I-lo lo 101 4111 1111 1101 I 10 7

8 9

LICENSEE CODE 14 15 LICENSE NUMBER 25 26 LICENSE TYPE JO.

57 CAT 58

~~~~; l~i 1©1-cfJ~I o Io Io 12 I 3 17 101 o 14 Io 12 17 17 l©l 1 Io 12 I 7 I 7 I 8 IG) 60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 G9 EVENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBAB~E CONSEQUENCES@

!During routine startup operations, CRD*L-5 uncoupled and overtraveled when withdrawn

@ill. I to pos. 48.

L-5 immediately inserted and disarmed; Startup operations resumed after [QITI_jdeterminai::ion that L-S's pos. and core location did not adversely affect core symmetry~

[ill] jFollowing_startup overtravel check of L-5 proved satisfactory, verifying it was re-l

~

I coupled and operable.* Because uncoupling occurred only when drive was fully with-fOT7l ! drawn, safety implications were ininimal.

CRD uncouplings have occurred previously.

  • ~

[ill]

7 8

9 80 CUij' 3

SYSTEM

- CODE IRjB l@

9 iO *

~

LE R/RO fE'iENT YEl'.R VJ* REPORT.LI 7 I 7 I NUMBER 21 22

CAUSE

CAUSE CODE SUBCODE.

COMPON.ENT CODE.

L~J@ LU@

CIRiDjRIVIEI@

11 i2.

. i3 18 SEQUENTIAL OCCUR REN CE REPORT.NO.

COD.E*

1 * !

I 0 I 11 s 1 I /I I 0 i 3 I 23 24 2..

2 7 23 29 COMP.

SUB CODE LU 19.

. REPORT TYPE.

l_U._

30 VALVE*

SUBCODE.

w@

20, 31 R.EVISiO_N NO. w 32

  • ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWN.

.<l.TTACHMENT TAKEN

,.;CTION ON PLANT.

'METHOD.

HOURS.~

su~~~ITTEO N;>RD-4 FORM $UB.'

. Pf31ME C0~1P.

SUPPLIE8 COMPONENT MANUFACTURER 1£J@LU 'LJJ@

~ 10 IO l 01 01 L!J@

3'.l 34 35 36

37.
  • 40 4 r
  • l..!J@

~J@ 1 c 1 o 1 8 1 a i@r CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS_@

42.

43 44 47

!Unlatched inner filter and abnormally long uncoupling rod resulted in unc0upling of QJJJ I CRD L-5 during startup; Since earlier overhaul" of CRD L-5 on-Jan. 1975. *a i:mll.:test*

I_

DTIJ I on inner filter has been inco!'.'porated in overhaul & assembly procedure.

Revised

    • I GJ]J I procedure and improved QA coverage is believed adequate to prevent future CRD un.,.-.

CITIJ I tol,lplings, 8

9 FACILITY.

STATUS

% POWER OTHER STA.TUS

'METHOD OF A

I I...

so*

ITEi W".1 01 01 01@..... I _N_A ___ ___.I

-_"._a-.9

- -.---10

.. 12.*.*11 DISCOVERY*

DiSCOVERY DES_(;RIPTION * '3J. *

~@

... !"_*.-_O~p_e_r_a_t_i_o_n_a_l_E_v_e_n_t.,--------:---:-....____,

ACTIVITY

  • c'ONTENT

(;";;\\

RELEASED OF RELEASE.

AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY~

G:E)

  • u_j@ LlJ(§.....,l_N_A _______ _.

3 9

lU 11

. 45

46.

44 44 45 NA LOCATION O~ RELEASE @

80 80 PERSONNEL EXPO:>URES Q

NUM!!ER r:;;-., TYPE DESCRIPTION~

[II?] IOI OIOJ~~@).__ ____

N_A ________________ __,. __ __.

a 9

  • 11 12 13 BO PERSONNEL INJURIES Q

NUMBER DESCRIPTION6

~

I 0 I 0 I 0 l@

NA I

8 9

11 ---'-~----~~~---~-~--------~-~~----~-,--~-,---.-8-'0 LOSS ()F OR DAMAGE.TO FACILITY r:;.::-1 TYPE DESCntPTION

~

NA

1liJ L~@

a 9 1~0----~~~--~~~-~---'~~~-_;_-~----~~~~~~-~""""'"---~~-__,._-..J 30 1ssu=~6~;;CRIPTtON@'. _*7* <i)/._lO'crN6A/ J 4

. NRCUSEONLY

-;]TI] W~I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~

i 8

!)

'.":10~-__,.-----------==-----'--'-------_;_-------'68 69 80*;;.

_: :*::~i,~i~~\\~ts~l~~~~~,-~4~~~~~.i~~, ::~~:L~.L~~:,; ~~~~~

1

~~;a_.,. **<. --~"* --~, _.:~~~~~'- ~~;~;~~,~~,~ ~-~..,P.:~-~~ ~:~--~.-._.-~-

2

-,~..,.~--~ _-*---.,-_.-.. _-.*___,----,-~~--~,-----:ii~~5~

i ATTACHMENT TO LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 77-0l5/03X-l

  • COMHONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY (CWE)

DRESDEN UNIT-2 (ILDRS-2)

DOCKET ii 050.:...237 During routine start.:...up operations, control rod drive (CRD) t-5 was found to uncouple and overtravel when withdrawn to position 48.

L-5 was immediately inserted. and electrically disarmed.

Reactor start...:.up operations were resumed after.it had been determined that *the position and core location of the-L-5 control rod did not adversely affect core symmetry; At a reactor power level of approximately 30%, L-5 was withdrawn t~ position 48 and checked for overtravel.

The overtravel :

check proved s~tisfactory,' verifying that CRD. L-5 was recoup led and operaole.

Control rod drive/blade uncoupling incidents had occurred several times *in the past.

Symptom and performance evaluations indicated that: a loosened CRD inner.

filter could have caused the blade and drive to. uncouple at the fully withdrawn position.

Loosening of the filter could have resulted from a comoination of improper.installation and latching spring fatique.

It was aiso determined that a. loosened filter could not exert. sufficient

  • pres*sure.to uncouple: the olade except when* the drive was fully withdrawn to position 48; upon insertion, the f>lade and drive automatically..

recoup led, Because the potential for uncoupling the blade existed. only*

  • wfi.en tiie drive -t.ras. fully withdrawn, the.saf~ty irp.plications of this event were minimal.

As a precautionary measure, an operating order was. issue.cl to ~nsure that.*

  • a coupling check was* performed. whenever drive L-5.was withdrawn to
  • position* 48
  • On Novemf>er 30, 1977.CRD L-5 was disassemoled and inspected: p~~ Control Rod Drive Inspection and Maintenance Procedure DMP 209,
  • To assure. a.

comprehensive inspection a special operating procedure (SOP 216) was

  • *:.."/
    • is:;~ ;,~:;L;,,~;,.,,..Pf.~~~~*~,<l..,,~P:~.... fo_l,l()Y7~? '.:*:I- ' :. '*...

\\*~:_*.*.".. *.;.*:.1:.'.*.;>,'.':i.*~,:.i.\\;.. :.':*-*.~.. *.*_,;,:J.:.f._*.,:.,~.'.*_:._,'.';:.'.;1i:::~.;~.'*;.. *.

C,

,.:-<<;.:~*.*:~*"-'.;.,,.;.7:,~*:'..-:.....,-... ;.,,: '*,.,:,.. -~.;;;., '.. *"

-,~;

~~uh*~r~f~1~~1,:::~;:;~El(.\\~~-~l:~-i};i~~~-~-~.*~.~~J~:i?:.' ~;.~ ~:*).
  • . ~~~:f.;: ~~ *:;v;*".... : *?. ;

.. ".t M-~ * *~~.~ * ~-.

  • * ~*

~ ~:: **

  • :~
  • *.~ :

t~;. * ~.: ~i~l:: ".* '~-= ~~~! ~ .. 3~ t:: :*~~~-~~.~ :'. *- :~: ~~ ~;

}~~~~~
~~~7
      • .*,: *c**,:....

Upon inspection it was found that the inner filter was unlatched. *:"tri"' *-*.' ~',;! addition the* distance between the CRD flange and the end of the fully.

  • seated uncoupling rod was af>normally long (173.406 + 0.750").* The abnormai length coupled with an unlatched inne.r filter resulted.in the uncoupling of the CRD.

CRD L-5 had oeen overha.uled in January; 1975. Since May, 1975 a 20 to 30 pound pull test on the inner filter has been incorporated in the overhaul

  • and reassembly procedure, Control Rod Drives overhauled and reassembled*
  • under this revised procedure have not experienced uncoupling.

The revised procedure coupled with improved Quality Control coverage of CRD overhaul and reassembly are believed to be adequate to prevent. future* similar ev*ents. ... ;_... :.* (~',_ '** ~.'

  • ~..
  • ~..... ~-:*

}}