ML17159A499

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Review of the Spring 2016 Steam Generator Tube Inspections During Refueling Outage 36
ML17159A499
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/2017
From: Mahesh Chawla
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Coffey R
Point Beach
Chawla M L/4158371
References
CAC MF8401
Download: ML17159A499 (3)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 8, 2017 Mr. Robert Coffey Site Vice President NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241

SUBJECT:

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - REVIEW OF THE SPRING 2016 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTIONS DURING REFUELING OUTAGE 36 (CAC NO. MF8401)

Dear Mr. Coffey:

By letter dated September 20, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16264A202), and supplemented by letter dated February 23, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17054C310), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (the licensee),

submitted information to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), summarizing the results of their steam generator tube inspections performed during the spring 2016 refueling outage at Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.

The NRC staff has completed its review of this report and concludes that the licensee provided the information required by their technical specifications. No additional follow up is required at this time. The staff's review is enclosed.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-8371 or via e-mail at Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Mahesh Chawla, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch Ill Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-266

Enclosure:

Staff Assessment cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ

STAFF ASSESSMENT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REVIEW OF THE SPRING 2016 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTION REPORT NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-266 By letter dated September 20, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16264A202), and supplemented by letter dated February 23, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17054C310), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (the licensee),

submitted information summarizing the results of their steam generator (SG) tube inspections performed during the spring 2016 refueling outage (RFO) at Point Beach Nuclear Plant (Point Beach), Unit 1.

Point Beach, Unit 1, has two Westinghouse 44F SGs each containing 3,214 thermally-treated Alloy 600 tubes. These SGs were installed during RFO 11 in 1983. The tubes have a nominal outside diameter of 0.875 inches, a nominal wall thickness of 0.050 inches. The tubes are supported by six stainless steel tube support plates and a baffle plate. The tube support plate holes are quatrefoil shaped. The U-bend region of the tubes in rows 1 through 8 was stress relieved after bending.

The licensee provided the scope, extent, methods, and results of their SG tube inspections in the documents referenced above. In addition, the licensee described corrective actions (i.e., tube plugging) taken in response to the inspection findings. The tubes in both SGs A and B were inspected this outage.

After reviewing the information provided by the licensee, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has the following comments/observations:

  • Discoloration was observed inside the channel head near the primary manway during previous inspections in RFO 30 and RFO 34. The licensee stated that no rust coloration was observed during RFO 36.
  • The licensee stated that the combined primary-to-secondary leak rate from both SGs is in the range of 0.0 to 0.4 gallons per day (compared with the 150 gallons per day operational leakage limit) and that the operational leakage remains at a constant low level and was evident prior to the spring 1991 outage.

Based on a review of the information provided, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee provided the information required by their technical specifications. In addition, the staff concludes that there are no technical issues that warrant follow-up action at this time since the inspections appear to be consistent with the objective of detecting potential tube degradation and the inspection results appear to be consistent with industry operating experience at similarly designed and operated units.

Enclosure

ML17159A499

  • Via Memorandum OFFICE DORULPL3-1 /PM DORULPL3-1/LA DE/ESGB/BC(A)* DORULPL3-1 /BC NAME MChawla SRohrer AJohnson DWrona DATE 06/08/17 06/08/17 5/22/17 06/08/17