ML17158B047
| ML17158B047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1995 |
| From: | Poslusny C NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Byram R PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9512110276 | |
| Download: ML17158B047 (6) | |
Text
December 5,
1995 Hr. Robert G.
Byram Senior vice President-Nuclear Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, PA 18101
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE REINVEST BY PENNSYLVANIA POWER
& LIGHT COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF FUEL TOPICAL REPORT TR Pl-NF-90-001, SUPPLEMENT 2, "APPLICATION OF REACTOR ANALYSES METHODS FOR BWR DESIGN
& ANALYSIS"
Dear Hr. Byram:
In a letter dated August 1,
- 1995, Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company (PP&L) submitted a request for review of the above referenced topical report.
The staff has completed its review of the document and has identified some information which must be provided in order to complete its evaluation and approval of the report.
Accordingly, I have enclosed the request for additional information.
Please provide your responses within 30 days of receipt of this to support timely completion of the review process.
This requirement affects nine or fewer respondents and, therefore, is not subject to the Office of Management and Budget review under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely,
/s/
Chester
- Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.
50-387/388
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl:
See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket File PUBLIC PDI-2 Reading SVarga JZwolinski OFFICE PDI JStolz CPoslusny HO'Brien OGC ACRS PDI-2 PH
- WPasciak, RGN-I RIngram P
-2/D NAME HO'Bri CPoslusny:rb JS z
DATE
/ 'f/9>
5/
/9>
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME:
SU84770.RAI 9512ii027h 95i205 PDR ADOCK 05000387 P
PDR (og
~ ~8 REgy
~o O
9 r 0
gO
++*++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
, WaSHIWeVOH, O.C. 20SSS-OOO~
December 5,'995 Mr. Robert G.
Byram Senior vice President-Nuclear Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company 2 North Ninth Street
'llentown, PA 18101
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE REQUEST BY PENNSYLVANIA POWER
& LIGHT COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF FUEL TOPICAL REPORT TR Pl-NF-90-001, SUPPLEMENT 2, "APPLICATION OF REACTOR ANALYSES METHODS FOR BWR DESIGN
& ANALYSIS" (TAC NOS.
M93267 AND M93268)
Dear Mr. Byram:
In a letter dated August 1,
- 1995, Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company (PP&L) submitted a request for review of the above referenced topical report.
The staff has completed its review of the document and has identified some information which must be provided in order to complete its evaluation and approval of the report.
Accordingly, I have enclosed the request for additional information.
Please provide your responses within 30 days of receipt of this to support timely completion of the review process.
This requirement affects nine or fewer respondents and, therefore, is not subject to the Office of Management and Budget review under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, Docket Nos.-50-387/388
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl:
See next page Chester
- Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Mr. Robert G.
Byram Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 5 2 CC:
Jay Silberg, Esq.
- Shaw, Pittman, Potts
- 5. Trowbridge 2300 N Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20037 Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.
Assistant Corporate Counsel Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. J.
M. Kenny Licensing Group Supervisor Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mrs. Maitri Banerjee Senior Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.
Box 35 Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603-0035 Mr. William P. Dornsife, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources P. 0.
Box 8469 Harrisburg,,Pennsylvania 17105-8469 Mr. Jesse C. Tilton, III Allegheny Elec. Cooperative, Inc.
212 Locust Street P.O.
Box 1266 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-1266 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Harold G. Stanley Vice President-Nuclear Operations Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Pennsylvania Power and Light Company Box 467 Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603-Mr. Herbert D. Woodeshick Special Office of the President Pennsylvania Power and Light Company Rural Route 1,
Box 1797 Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603 George T. Jones Vice President-Nuclear Engineering Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown; Pennsylvania 18101 Dr. Judith Johnsrud National Energy Committee Sierra Club 433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16803 Chairman Board of Supervisors 738 East Third Street
- Berwick, PA 18603
RE UEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RAI SUS UEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (1)
Provide more complete information on the range of fuels which have been validated by Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company for use in CASMO-3G, and provide more information on the validation methodology to be used at Susquehanna for new fuel types.
(2)
Describe the new fuel design validation process for the ANF-8 correlation.
Provide a complete list of fuels for which the correlation is currently valid.
(3)
Have Supplements 3 and 4 of XN-NF-80-19 been previously reviewed and approved by the staffs If so, provide the date of approval.
(4)
Provide more information on the extent to which CASMO-3G has been benchmarked against the guad Cities gamma scan data.
(5)
Explain the reasons for extreme values of nodal RMS (larger than 10X).
(6)
Mill other reload analyses be affected by these
- changes, particularly analysis of standby liquid control performance, shutdown. margin and the-ASME overpressurization events How will reload-specific accident
- analyses, including LOCA, rod-drop accident and fuel/equipment handling accidents be affected by the change to CASMO-3G?
(7)
Explain the relatively large difference between output of CASMO-CPM and actual data for the first Peach Bottom turbine trip test.
This difference for the second and third turbine trip tests is considerably smaller.
ENCLOSURE