ML17157B878
| ML17157B878 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna |
| Issue date: | 06/23/1992 |
| From: | Chris Miller Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Keiser H PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17157B879 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-89-04, GL-89-4, TAC-M82617, TAC-M82618, NUDOCS 9207060033 | |
| Download: ML17157B878 (7) | |
Text
Cy Vl0
/p I"o O
Cy
~O
++*++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555 June 23.
1992 Docket Nos.
50-387 and 50-388 Mr. Harold W. Keiser Senior Vice President-Nuclear Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101
Dear Mr. Keiser:
SUBJECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE INSERVICE TESTING (IST)
PROGRAM RELIEF
- REQUEST, SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1
AND 2 (TAC NOS.
M82617 AND M82618 By letter dated December 31,
- 1991, Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company (PP&L) submitted Revision 7 (Unit 1) and Revision 4 (Unit 2) of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Inservice Testing Program.
Revisions 7 and 4 incorporated NRC guidance contained in Generic Letter (GL) 89-04, "Guidance on Developing Acceptable Inservice Testing Programs,"
in order to comply with the PP&L response to GL 89-04 dated October 3,
- 1989, and the implementation status provided in their February 7,
1991, letter.
NRC's letter of August 12,
- complete, but that approval of the inservice testing program was neither intended nor implied.
Therefore, the review performed for Revisions 7 and 4 included a determination of the status of each relief request.
The enclosed Safety Evaluation (SE) was prepared by the NRC to provide the results of the staff review.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g),
certain Class 1,
2, and 3 pumps and valves in water-cooled nuclear power facilities are required to meet the inservice testing requirements stated in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (Code),
Section XI:
specifically Subsection
- IWP,
" Inservice Testing of Pumps in Nuclear Power Plants,"
and Subsection
- IWV,
" Inservice Testing of Valves in Nuclear Power Plants."
Guidance on acceptable alternatives to Code requirements has been provided for certain aspects of inservice testing by NRC in GL 89-04.
Licensees were requested to review their IST programs against the guidance provided and make revisions as necessary to address the NRC positions in GL 89-04.
PP&L responded for Susquehanna on October 3, 1989.
Table 1 of the SE provides the status of each relief request.
Section 3.0 of the SE identifies concerns identified by the staff which require action by the licensee.
PP&L should address these concerns by the schedule requested in the specific item, or within one year from the date of this SE if no schedule is
- stated, and respond with info'I"mation on the resolution for each within one year of the date of this SE.
For relief requests that have been denied, the licensee's testing should comply with the Code requirements or GL 89-04 withi 90 days of the date of. the SE.
9207060033 920623 PDR ADOCK 05000387 ImI: I'm CI:I">>BII:O'V
Hc. Harold W. Keiser June 23.
1992 I
The licensee is required to comply with the IST Program defined in Revisions 7
and 4 where relief has been granted by GL 89-04 and the enclosed SE.
IST Program changes such as additional relief requests or changes to approved relief requests should be submitted for staff review, but should not be implemented prior to review and approval by the NRC.
New or revised relief requests meeting the positions in GL 89-04 should be submitted to the NRC staff, but can be implemented provided the guidance in GL 89-04, Section D, is followed.
IST Program changes that involve additions or deletions of components from the IST Program should be provided to the NRC.
The review performed did not include verification that all pumps and valves within the scope of 10 CFR 50.55a and Section XI are contained in the IST program.
Additionally, for the components included in the IST program, no determination was made to ensure all applicable testing requirements were identified.
Therefore, the licensee is requested to provide the NRC with a description of the process used in developing the IST program.
The submittal should include, as a minimum, details of the documents
- used, the method of determining if a component requires inservice testing, the basis for the testing required, the basis for categorizing valves, and the method or process used for maintaining the program current with design modifications or other activities performed under 10 CFR 50.59.
If a description of this process is not already available from existing documentation, the staff envisions that this request could be answered in 2 to 4 pages.
It should be incorporated into the IST Program in appropriate sections.
The information should be included with the licensee's response to the action items, or within one year of the date of this SE.
This action completes the work to be performed by the staff under TAC Numbers H82617 and H82618., If there are any questions regarding this letter, please contact me on (301) 504-1447 Sincerely,
!S!
Charles L. Hiller, Director Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure:
See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC and Local PDRs PDI-2 Reading
- JPartlow, 12G-18
- Previousl Concurred SVarga JCalvo CHiller JRaleigh HO'Brien(2)
- EJordan, 3701
,GHill(8)
ACRS(10)
OPA OC/LFHB
- RLobel, 17G-21 EWenzinger, RGN-I
- JWhite, RGN-I PLCampbell/CYates, 7E-23
- JNorberg, 7E-23 OFFICE P
p p
PDI-2 D
OGC*
NAME 1
H n
JR lei b:rb CNiQAI JHull 92 tI /+/92
/~/92 06/17/92 DATE OFFICIAL EC RD COPY DOCUMENT NAME:
SU82617.GEN
0 C
June 23.
1992 The licensee is required to comply with the IST Program defined in Revisions 7
and 4 where relief has been granted by GL 89-04 and the enclosed SE.
IST Program changes such as additional relief requests or changes to approved relief requests should be submitted for staff review, but should not be implemented prior to review and approval by the NRC.
New or revised relief requests meeting the positions in GL 89-04 should be submitted to the NRC staff, but can be implemented provided the guidance in GL 89-04, Section D, is followed'ST Program changes that involve additions or deletions of components from the IST Program should be provided to the NRC.
The review performed did not include verification that all pumps and valves within the scope of 10 CFR 50.55a and Section XI are contained in the IST program.
Additionally, for the components included in the IST program, no determination was made to ensure all applicable testing requirements were identified.
Therefore, the licensee is requested to provide the NRC with a description of the process used in developing the IST program.
The submittal should include, as a minimum, details of the documents
- used, the method of determining if a component requires inservice testing, the basis for the testing required, the basis for categorizing valves, and the method or process used for maintaining the program current with design modifications or other activities performed under 10 CFR 50.59.
If a description of this process is not already available from existing documentation, the staff envisions that this request could be answered in 2 to 4 pages.
It should be incorporated into the IST Program in appropriate sections.
The information should be i'ncluded with the licensee's response to the action items, or within one year of the date of this SE.
This action completes the work to be performed by the staff under TAC Numbers M82617 and M82618.
If there are any questions regarding this letter, please contact me on (301) 504-1447
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure:
See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket Fil e NRC and Local PDRs PDI-2 Reading THurley, 12G-18 FHiraglia, 12G-18
- JPartlow, 12G-18
- Previousl Concurred SVarga JCalvo CMiller JRaleigh HO'Brien(2)
- EJordan, 3701 GHill(8)
Sincerely,
/s/y Charles L. Miller, Director Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ACRS(10)
OPA OC/LFHB
- RLobel, 17G-21 EWenzinger, RGN-I
- JWhite, RGN-I PLCampbell/CYates, 7E-23
- JNorberg, 7E-23 OGC*
PDI-2 D
p p
JR lei h:rb OFFICE p
CNi'L760 JHull NAME M
n 4 /~/92 DATE
/
92
/
/92 06/17/92 OFFICIAL EC RD COPY DOCUMENT NAME:
SU82617.GEN
Ir yCr
Mr. Harold W. Keiser June 23, 1992 The licensee is required to comply with the IST Program defined in Revisions 7
and 4 where relief has been granted by GL 89-04 and the enclosed SE.
IST Program changes such as additional relief requests or changes to approved relief requests should be submitted for staff review, but should not be implemented prior to review and approval by the NRC.
New or revised. relief requests meeting the positions in GL 89-04 should be submitted to the NRC staff, but can be implemented provided the guidance in GL 89-04, Section D, is followed.
IST Program changes that involve additions or deletions of components from the IST Program should be provided to the NRC.
The review performed did not include verification that all pumps and valves within the scope of 10 CFR 50.55a and Section XI are contained in the IST program.
Additionally, for the components included in the IST program, no determination was made to ensure all applicable testing requirements were identified.
Therefore, the licensee is requested to provide the NRC with a description of the process used in developing the IST program.
The submittal should include, as a minimum, details of the documents
- used, the method of determining if a component requires inservice testing, the basis for the testing required, the basis for categorizing valves, and the method or process used for maintaining the program current with design modifications or other activities performed under 10 CFR 50.59.
If a description of this process is not already available from existing documentation, the staff envisions that this request could be answered in 2 to 4 pages.
It should be incorporated into the IST Program in appropriate sections.
The information should be included with the licensee's response to the action items, or within one year of the date of this SE.
This action completes the work to be performed by the staff under TAC Numbers M82617 and M82618.
If there are any questions regarding this letter, please contact me on (301) 504-1447 Sincerely,
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure:
See next page
~ farl~
Charles L. Miller, Director Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Mr. Harold W. Keiser Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1
8 2
CC:
Jay Silberg, Esq.
- Shaw, Pittman, Potts
- 5. Trowbridge 2300 N Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20037 Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.
Assistant Corporate Counsel Pennsylvania Power
- 5. Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. J.
M. Kenny
'icensing Group Supervisor Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. Scott Barber Senior Resident Inspector J.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.
Box 35 Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603-0035 Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection
~ Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania P. 0.
Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. Jesse C. Tilton, III Allegheny Elec. Cooperative, Inc.
212 Locust Street P.O.
Box 1266 Harri sbur g, Pennsyl vani a 17108-1266 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Harold G. Stanley Superintendent of Plant Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. Herbert D. Woodeshick Special Office of the President Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 1009 Fowles Avenue Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603 Mr. Robert G.
Byram Vice President-Nuclear Operations Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101