ML17157B392

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Missouri University of Science & Technology, Submittal of Annual Progress Report 2016-2017
ML17157B392
Person / Time
Site: University of Missouri-Rolla
Issue date: 06/01/2017
From: Bonzer W
Missouri Univ of Science & Technology
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML17157B392 (35)
v • d • e


Text

MISSOURI

&f MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Formerly University of Missouri-Roi/a June 1, 2017

Dear Sir:

Please find enclosed the Annual Progress Report 2016-2017 for the Missouri Science and Technology Reactor (License R-79, Docket No. 50-123). This report is being filed under the reporting requirements of our Technical Specifications. A copy of this report is also being sent to our NRC Project Manager, Mr. Spyros Traiforos.

mh Sincerely, William Bonzer Reactor Manager Enclosure cc:

Mr. Spyros Traiforos (NRC)

/

Document Control Desk (NRC)

American Nuclear Insurers, c/o Librarian University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor (MURR)

Interim Chancellor Dr. Christopher Maples (MST)

Michelle Bresnahan, Radiation Safety Officer (MST)

Dr. Hyoung Lee, Chair of Nuclear Engineering Dept. (MST)

Dr. Mark Fitch, Chairman, Radiation Safety Committee (MST)

Dr. Braden Lutz, Chair Mining and Nuclear Engineering Dept. (MST)

PROGRESS REPORT 2016-2017

.MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY REACTOR l

  • I

!1_

~ '

~

, <* Reactor:

.. J., *, -

'>' *. 1

    • . ';*.:: *** >/ _.,,-.. _. : ': * * ~

PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (FORMALL.Y THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ROLLA)

NUCLEAR REACTOR FACILITY April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017 Submitted to The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission And Missouri University of Science and Technology

11 Table of Contents

SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................*.............................................*....................................................*... 1

1.1 BACKGROUND

INFORMATION...................................*................................................................................... 1 1.2 GENERAL FACILITY STATUS************************************************************************************************************************* 2 2.0 REACTOR STAFF AND PERSONNEL.................................................................................*........................ 3 2.1 REACTOR STAFF............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.2

  • LICENSED OPERATORS........................................................................,........................................................ 3 2.3 RADIATION SAFETY COM1"IITTEE.......*..*.......................................................................*.............................. 4 2.4 HEALTH PHYSICS........................................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 REACTOR OPERATIONS................................................................................................................................ 5 4.0 EDUCATIONAL UTILIZATION............*........................................................*.............................................. 10 5.0 REACTOR HEAL'.fH PHYSICS ACTIVITIES.............................................................................................. 12 5.1 ROUTINE SURVEYS....................................................................................................................................... 12 5.2 BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL RELEASE SURVEYS............................................................................................. 12 5.3 ROUTINE MONITORING.....................................................................................................*.......................... 13 5.4 WASTE DISPOSAL......*.............*.......................*...*......................................................................................... 13 5.5 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATIONS....................*.................................................................................................. 14 6.0 PLANS................................................................................................................................................................. 14 6.1 RISTRICTED AREA CREATED OUTSIDE REACTOR BUILDING........................................*............................ 14 6.2 REPLACING CONTROL ROOM EQUIPMENT................................................................................................. 14 6.3 REACTOR OPERATOR TRAINING.................*............................................................................................... 15

111 APPENDIX A: STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES CHANGED DURING THE 2016-2017 REPORTING YEAR LIST OFT ABLES TABLE3-1. CORE 122WTECHNICALDATA............................................................................................................... 6 TABLE 3-2. UNSCHEDULED SHUTDOWNS................................................................................................................... 7 TABLE3-3. MAINTENANCE......................................................................................................................................... 8 TABLE 3-4. REACTOR UTILIZATION........................................................................................................ :..*..*.*.*..*..*. 9 TABLE3-5. EXPERIMENTALFACILITYUSAGE........................................................................................................... 9 TABLE 4-1. MISSOURI S&T CLASSES AT REACTOR FACILITY................................................................................. 10 TABLE 4-2. REACTOR SHARING PROGRAM.............................................................................................................. 11 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 3-1. MSTR CORE 122W CONFIGURATION................................................................................................... 6

lV

SUMMARY

During the 2016-2017 reporting period, the Missouri University of Science and Technology Reactor (MSTR) was in use for 285.42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br />. The major part of this time, about 90%, was used for class instruction, research, and training purposes.

The MSTR operated safely and efficiently over the past year. No significant safety-related incidents or personnel exposures occurred.

The reactor facility supported several Missouri University of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T) courses and operator training over the year for more than 5,800 student-hours.

More than 2,600 visitors visited the reactor during the past year. More than 535 participants, mostly high school students, were in the U.S. Department of Energy Reactor Sharing Program.

The reactor produced 8,791.63 kilowatt-hours of thermal energy using approximately 0.556 grams of uranium. A total of 214 samples were neutron irradiated in the reactor with the majority being analyzed in the reactor counting laboratory.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This progress report covers activities at the Missouri University of Science and Technology Reactor (MSTR) Facility for the period April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017.

The reactor operates as a University facility. It is available to the faculty and students from various departments of the University for their educational and research programs. Several other college and pre-college institutions also make use of the facility. The reactor is also available for the training of personnel from commercial concerns with legitimate interest in our facility use.

1.1 Background Information The Missouri University of Science and Technology Reactor (MSTR) (formally University of Missouri-Rolla Reactor) attained initial criticality on December 9, 1961. The MSTR was the first operating nuclear reactor in the State of Missouri. The Bulk Shielding Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is the basis for the reactor's design. The reactor is a light water, open pool reactor cooled by natural convective flow. The fuel is MTR plate-type fuel. The initial licensed power was 10 kW. The licensed power was up-graded to 200 kW in 1966. During the summer of 1992, the reactor fuel was converted from high-enriched uranium fuel to low-enriched uranium fuel.

The facility is equipped with several experimental facilities including a beam port, thermal column, three pneumatic rabbit systems, and several manual sample irradiation containers and systems.

The facility also contains a counting laboratory that has both gamma and alpha spectroscopy capabilities.

The gamma spectroscopy system includes germanium and sodium-iodide detectors, associated electronics, state-of-the-art data acquisition, and spectrum analysis software. The alpha spectroscopy system consists of a surface barrier detector and data acquisition equipment. Additionally, there is a liquid scintillation counter, thermos-luminance dosimeter reader, digital neutron radiography imager, and x-ray imager for student and faculty usage.

1

1.2 General Facility Status The MSTR operated safely and efficiently over the past year.

No significant safety-related incidents or personnel exposures occurred.

An independent auditor from the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) audited the reactor facility on November 30, 2016.

There were no significant areas of concern.

There is an agreement between MSTR and MURR to audit each other. This has been a very beneficial arrangement for both facilities involved.

The reactor staff has continued to review the operation of the reactor facility in an effort to improve the safety and efficiency of its operation and to provide conditions conducive to its utilization by students and faculty. An "outreach" program, implemented over the past few years, has been continued in order to let both students and faculty in a number of departments across campus know that the reactor could be used to enhance course work and research. As a result, additional classes have been using the reactor facility to augment their programs, including:

1. Chemistry 2, 'General Chemisty Laboratory' 2 Civil Engineering 310, 'Senior Design Class'
3. Engineering Management 386, 'Safety Engineering Management'
4. Mechanical Engineering 229, 'Energy Conversion'
5. Life Sciences 352, 'Biological Effects of Radiation' 6 Physics 107, 'Modem Physics'
7. Physics 207, 'Modem Physics II'
8. Physics 322, 'Advanced Physics'
9. Materials Science & Engineering 348, 'Energy Materials'
10. Materials Science & Engineering 448, 'Advanced Energy Materials' 2

SOPs were revised, over the past year in order to improve and keep current the operations and efficiency of the MSTR. The following is a list of SOPs revised during the reporting period:

1. SOP 112 Fuel Management
2. SOP 311 Receipt of Licensed Materials
3. SOP 501 Emergency Procedures for Reactor Building Evacuation
4. SOP 501 Emergency Procedures for Reactor Building Evacuation
5. SOP 702 Irradiation Request Forms 2.0 REACTOR STAFF AND PERSONNEL 2.1 Reactor Staff.

Dr. Hyoung-Koo Lee Mr. William Bonzer Ms. Maureen Hemy Mr. Craig Reisner Mr. Anthony Alchin 2.2 Licensed Operators Name

1. William Bonzer
2. Craig Reisner
3. Anthony Alchin

. 4. Cody Stuchal 1.

5. Jonathan Scott
6. Andrew Bingham Reactor Director Reactor Manager & Senior Operator Office Support Assistant III Senior Reactor Operator Electronic Technician III & Senior Operator License Senior Operator Senior Operator Senior Operator Reactor Operator Reactor Operator Reactor Operator 3
7. Garrett Jones 1 Reactor Operator
8. Steve Wagstaff Reactor Operator
9. Wesley Tucker1 Reactor Operator
10. Matthew Caddell1 Reactor Operator
11. Jacob Stueck Reactor Operator
12. Justen Vinyard1 Reactor Operator
13. Kelly Jacobs2 Reactor Operator
14. Philip Rexing2 Reactor Operator
15. Laura Pirrone3 Reactor Operator
16. Alexander Watson3 Reactor Operator
17. David Clark3 Reactor Operator 1 Termination Date May 18, 2016 2

Effective Date August 10, 2016 3 Effective Date February 23, 2017 2.3 Radiation Safety Committee The Radiation Safety Committee meets quarterly. The committee met on 6/9/2016, 9/16/2016, 12/15/2016 and 3/23/2017 during the reporting period. The committee members are listed below.

Name Department

1. Dr. Mark Fitch Civil Engineering
2. Ms. Michelle Bresnahan Environmental Health and Safety Services
3. Mr. William Benzer Nuclear Reactor
4. Mr. Randy Stoll2 Business Services
5. :Sr. David Wronkiewicz Geological Sciences & Geology
6. Dr. Shoaib Usman Mining & Nuclear Engineering
7. Dr. F adha Al F alahi Environmental Health and Safety Services
8. Dr. Yue-wem Huang Biological Sciences
9. Dr. Amitava Choudhury Chemistry
10. Dr. Carlos Castano Mining & Nuclear Engineering
11. Mr. Tony Hunt Environmental Health and Safety Services 4
12. Dr. Muthanna Al Dahhan1 Chemical and Biological Engineering
13. Dr. Joseph Graham 1 Mining & Nuclear Engineering
14. Mr. John Mollenkamp3 Business Services Joined the committee on September 2016 2

Retired from the committee on December 2016 3

Joined the committee on January 2017 2.4 Health Physics The Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Department provides the health physics support for the Missouri S&T Reactor. The EHS Department is organizationally independent of the Reactor Facility operations group. Health Physics personnel are listed below

1. Ms. Michelle Bresnahan
2. Tony Hunt
3. Dr. Fadha Al Falahi
4. Mr. Alex Swearingen
5. Mr. Brandon Ochterbeck 3.0 REACTOR OPERATIONS Director of Environmental Health and Safety Assistant Director of Environmental Health and Safety Health Physicist Health Physics Technician (part time)

Health Physics Technician (part time)

Core Confirmation 122W is presently in use. The "W" mode core is completely water reflected and used for normal reactor operations. The "T" mode (core positioned near graphite thermal column) may be used for various experiments, including beam port and thermal column experiments.

Table 3-1 presents pertinent core data and Figure 3-1 shows the core configuration of core 122W.

The excess reactivity, shutdown margin, and rod worth's were measured in cold, clean conditions.

5

Table 3-1. Core 122W Technical Data Parameter Value Rod 1 3.958% L1k/k Rod2 3.239% L1k/k Rod3 1.778% ~k Reg Rod 0.232% L1k/k Excess Reactivity 0.640%~k Shutdown Margin*

4.377% L'.1k/k

  • Assumes Rod 1 (highest worth rod) and Reg Rod are fully withdrawn.

A B

c D

E F

F-4 F-9 CR C-4 F-8 C-3 F-15 s

F-5 F-14 F-12 HC F-11 F-17 C-1 F-10 F-1 C-2 F-7 F-3 F-13 BR F-6 Figure 3-1. MSTR Core 122W Configuration F - Standard Elements BR - Bare Rabbit S - Source Holder KEY TO PREFIXES C - Control Elements CR - Cadmium Rabbit HF - Half Element HC - Hot Cell Rabbit 6

Table 3-2: Unscheduled Shutdowns Date Type of Rundown/Cause and Corrective Action Taken RUNDOWNS 04/20/2016 Action: 120% Demand Rundown Cause: Operator downscaled too early.

Corrective Action Taken: No corrective action taken.

SRO on Duty granted permission to continue decrease in power.

11/08/2016 Action: 120% Demand Rundown Cause: Student did not upscale at the proper time.

Corrective Action Taken: Student informed to pay attention to all instrumentation.

SRO on Duty granted permission to restart reactor.

01 /17/2017 Action: Reg Rod on Insert Limit Rundown Cause: Trainee went into auto without raising the Reg Rod to 15 inches.

Corrective Action Taken: No corrective action needed other than to remind trainee to follow SOPs.

SRO on Duty granted permission to restart reactor.

UNPLANNED SHUTDOWNS Date Type of Unplanned Shutdown, Cause and Corrective Action Taken Unplanned Shutdowns 11/18/2016 Action: Power Outage Corrective Action Taken: None. Power Restored.

7

SRO granted permission to restart reactor.

12/01/2016 Action: SCRAM after Fire Alarm Corrective Action: None. Reactor secured for rest of day following cessation of fire alarm incident.

12/0S/2016 Action: Power to half of campus cut during response to a fire in Electrical Engineering Building.

Corrective Action: None. Reactor secured for rest of day.

Table 3-3:

Maintenance Date Type of Maintenance OS/09/2016 Issue: Log N Drawer Linear output stuck at 9.S%.

Corrective Action: Troubleshooting narrowed it down to the Log Ampl, CIC card PCA 100500-103. Op Amps US was found to be malfunctioned. Replacing US created a new problem due to the very sensitive nature of the board that could not be fixed. New board was ordered. Upon arrival the boards were swapped and the Log N drawer worked as expected. Calibration was done to ensure proper operation and the reactor was returned to operation on 10/26/2016.

12/01/2016 Thermocouple 2 (Outlet Temp) reinserted after being removed due to an issue with channel 2 of the Recorder reading abnormally high.

Corrective Action: Recorder Channel 2 was found to be faulty. Temp recorder and CAM recorder were swapped. Programs reinstalled. Weekly check was performed to ensure trips operated as expected.

s

9 Table 3-4. Reactor Utilization

1.

Reactor use 258.42 hrs.

2.

Time at power 186.07 hrs.

3.

Energy generated 8,791.63 kW/hrs.

4.

Total number of samples, neutron irradiated 214

5.

U-235 Burned 0.385 g

6.

U-235 Burned and Converted 0.454 I

Table 3-5. Experimental Facility Usage I

I Facilitv Hours Bare Rabbit Tube 39.81 hrs.

Cadmium Rabbit Tube 0.00 hrs.

I Beam Port 0.0 hrs.

I Thermal Column 0.0 hrs.

I Other Core Positions 12.58 hrs.

Hot Cell 0.0 hrs.

Gamma Exposures 0.0 hrs.

Total 52.39 hrs.

10 4.0 EDUCATIONAL UTILIZATION The reactor facility supported several Missouri S&T courses in the past year for a total of 2,824 student-hours. The number of Missouri S&T students utilizing the facility was 533. Additional usage of the reactor facility included operator licensure training adding a minimum of 3,000 student~hours of activity. This usage is a direct result of an aggressive and continuing campus wide "outreach" program.

The reactor facility provided financial support for two students with hourly wages. Additionally, students from several universities, colleges and high schools have used the facility.

Table 4-1 lists Missouri S&T classes taught at the facility along with associated reactor usage for this reporting period.

Table 4-1 Missouri S&T Classes at Reactor Facility Semester CLASS

  1. OF Time at the Students NUMBER/TITLE STUDENTS Reactor (hrs.)

Hours SP 2016 NE 4438 12 42 504 SP 2016 NE 2406 30 12 360 SP 2016 NE 1105 35 1

35 SP 2016 NE 4312 50 2

100 SP 2016 Chem Labs 218 2

436 PS 2016 NE 1105 33 1

33 PS 2016 NE 2406 24 18 432 FS 2016 NE4428 32 7

224 SP 2017 NE 1105 25 2

50 SP 2017 NE 4312 34 5

170 SP 2017 NE 4438 20 15 300 SP 2017 NE 2406 20 9

180 The Reactor Sharing Program, previously funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, was established for colleges, universities, and high schools that do not have a nuclear reactor. This past year, more than 540 students and instructors from at least 100 institutions participated in the program. Table 4-2 lists those schools and groups that were involved in this year's Reactor Sharing Program. The majority of participants were high school students. MSTR coordinates with the Missouri S&T Admissions Office to schedule high school students to see other items of interest at Missouri S&T after they have visited the reactor facility. The students visited the Missouri S&T Chapter of American Nuclear Society, the

Computer Integrated Manufacturing Lab, the Foundry, Ceramics Engineering, Mineral Museum, Computer Center, Experimental Mine, Solar Car, Electron Microscope, and Stonehenge. The Reactor Sharing Program serves as a strong campus-wide recruiting tool by attracting high school students to the university and hopefully sparking some interest in nuclear engineering, science, and technology.

Table 4-2 Reactor Sharing Program DATE EVENT VISITORS TIME (hrs.)

4/2016 Visitor Tours 10 5.5 Lebanon High School 24 1

5/2016 Visitor Tour 8

3.5 Rolla Police Department 9

1 6/2016 Visitor Tours 9

1 J ackling Camp 92 3.5 Nuclear Engineering Camp 33 5

7/2016 Visitor Tours 28 5

Police Safety Meeting 5

1 Jackling Camp 67 3.5 Fort Leonard Wood 20 3

8/2016 Visitors Tours 8

1.5 Ozark Groups 15 1

9/2016 Visitor Tours 9

3.5 St. Charles Community College 8

1 10/2016 Visitor Tours 2

0.5 Open House 27 1

Boy Scouts 33 1.5 11/2016 Elton High School 23 1.5 East Central College 13 2

12/2016 University of Illinois 6

4.5 1/2017 Visitor Tours 3

0.5 2/2017 Visitor Tours 8

1 Boy Scouts 38 1.5 Marketing Commission Tour 18 1.5 Out of State Counselors 22 2

3/2017 Visitor Tours 7

14

11.

The reactor staff continues to educate the public about applications of nuclear science. Over 2,600 persons visited the facility during this reporting period.

Tour groups are typically given a brief orientation and/or demonstration by a member of the reactor staff.

5.0 REACTOR HEALTH PHYSICS ACTIVITIES The health physics activities at the Missouri S&T Reactor facility consist primarily of radiation and contamination surveys, monitoring of personnel exposures, airborne activity, pool water activity, and waste disposal. Releases of all by-product material to authorized, licensed recipients are surveyed and recorded. In addition, health physics activities include calibrations of portable and stationary radiation detection instruments, personnel training, special surveys and monitoring of non-routine procedures.

5.1.

Routine Surveys 12 Monthly radiation exposure surveys of the facility consist of direct gamma and neutron measurements. No unusual exposure rates were identified. Monthly surface contamination surveys consist of 20 to 40 swipes counted separately for alpha and beta/gamma activity.

No significant contamination outside of contained work areas was found.

5.2.

By-Product Material Release Surveys There were no shipments of by-product material released off-campus. There were no by-product releases on campus.

13 5.3. Routine lVIonitoring Thirty-six reactor facility personnel and students involved with the operations in the reactor facility are currently assigned Mirion Technologies, Thermo-Luminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Three of the Reactor Staff have beta, gamma, neutron dosimeters and a three TLD rings which are read twice monthly. There are five area beta, gamma, neutron dosimeters which are also read twice monthly. There are three environmental TLDs outside the reactor building which are read quarterly. There are also five other beta, gamma, neutron dosimeters used by the health physics personnel and four other area beta, gamma, neutron dosimeters that are read monthly.* The remaining dosimeters detect beta and gamma radiation only and are read monthly. In addition, seven digital, direct-reading dosimeters are used for visitors and high radiation work. There have been no significant personnel exposures during this reporting period. Visitors are monitored with direct reading dosimeters. No visitors received any reportable or significant exposure.

Airborne activity in the reactor bay is monitored by a fixed filter; particulate continuous air monitors (CAM). Low levels of Argon-41 are routinely produced during operations.

Pool water activity is monitored monthly to ensure that no gross pool contamination or fuel cladding rupture has occurred. Gross counts and spectra of long-lived gamma activity are compared to previous monthly counts. From April 2016 through March 2017 sample concentrations averaged 4.38x10-6 µCi/ml.

Release of gaseous Ar-41 activity through the building exhausts is determined by relating the operating times of the exhaust fans and reactor power during fan operation to previously measured air activity at maximum reactor power. During this period, an estimated 26,890.67 µCi of Ar-41 was released into the air.

5.4.

Waste Disposal Solid waste, including used water filters, used resins, and contaminated paper/gloves is stored and/or transferred to the campus waste storage area for later shipment to a commercial burial site. Water is analyzed for radioactive contamination and approval is required before the water is released. During this period there are only one waste picked up from the reactor facility.

5.5.

Instrument Calibrations During this period, portable instruments and area monitors were calibrated annually.

6.0PLANS The reactor staff will be involved in several major projects during the next reporting period; 1) creating a restricted area outside the reactor building, 2), replacing control room equipment and 3) continuation of the reactor operator training program.

6.1 Restricted Area Created Outside Reactor Building The reactor building's east wall on the exterior side has levels of radiation approaching the 10 CFR 20.1301(a) (1) limit of 0.1 rem in a year for an unrestricted area. Options for reducing these levels of radiation within the reactor building have been very limited. The Radiation Safety Officer for the Missouri University of Science and Technology is requiring a restricted area created at the reactor building's exterior east side to eliminate this issue. The restricted area will be fifteen by thirty feet, adjacent to the east wall and enclosed by a tall chain link fence. The public will not have access within the fenced area.

6.2 Replacing Control Room Equipment A process of replacing individual control room instrumentation is starting in 2017. Equipment to be replace will be selected on a priority basis of what needs replaced sooner than later. Control room equipment replacement will have a thorough analysis of a 10 CFR 50.59 review process. The reactor staff will present the completed 10 CFR 50.59 review to the Radiation Safety Committee as required by MSTR Technical Specifications.

14

6.3 Reactor Operator Training The MSTR had five students obtain their license of Reactor Operator. The reactor staff is limiting operator training to only ten students with a very strong desire to obtain the license and assist reactor staff with reactor operations. The new training program has proven to be effective in keeping the students that want the license and work with reactor staff. At the end of the reporting period, six students were training for an operator's license to take in the fall of 2017.

15

APPENDIX A.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES CHANGED DURING THE 2016-2017.

REPORTING YEAR 16

  • 'r.* MISSOURJ S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES***

Rev SOP: 112 TITLE:

FUEL l'Y1ANAGEMENT Revised: June 29, 2016 Page 1 of 1

1.

An individual ~..vill be designated in writing as the fuel custodian. He will be responsible for the reactor fuel and special nuclear materials. His duties will be to take physical inventory as requir~d by the NRC (annually) and to report production and consumption of /

special nuclear material as required by DOE (annually).

Rev

2.

A physical inventory will be made at intervals prescribed by the NRC (at present, yearly).

The custodian or his designee shall satisfy himself (preferably by direct examination) that the report contains all elements on previous inventory plus items received less items /

shipped.

Rev

3.

Records of the reactor power history will be maintained in such a manner t4at the total kilowatt-hpurs for the reactor core can be calculated, using the Excel spread that was I created to calculate Fuel Burn-up.

Rev

4.

'R11rn-11n

~nrl.nrnrl11rtirvn rvf' ""'"'";.,.]

-*r ----

r......... ---.................

v.t"-.................

prescribed by the DOE (annually).

Revised By: Craig Reisner

/

....-,1

.I'

£1 /.'

/_",,..,zy-J

.-,./':,*,,.,.-:.--;//.*

.. /~-

.. \\ ;,,,,v-:-*...

.** /

/

nuclear rr1aterial ",.;11 h=

YY.J..L.l UV

,...c:a,,....,,,.........-foo.~

J.\\,,rJ:-'V.lt.VU.

,-,+

~-+,...._.,,Trol,...,

U.t.

l.J..LLVJ. V U..L.)

a..;:,

Approved By: William Bonzer

i.

/

/

Rev

      • lVITSSOURl S&T REACTOR STAL'IDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES ***

Rev SOP:

311 TITLE:

RECEIPT QF LICENSED 1VIATER1AL Revised: June 6, 2016 Page 1 of 3 A.

PURPOSE To assure compliance with Licensed Materi8.l. quantity limits at the Reactor Facility.

B.

PRECAUTIONS, PREREQUISITES, Al'ID LiiVIITATIONS

1.

This procedure is not intended to serve as sole guidance for receipt of licensed materials.

The scope of this procedure is limited to assuring compliance with inventory limits specified in the license.

2.

This procedure should be performed. prior to the receipt of any licensed material.

Licensed materials include enriched uranium (e.g. fuel, fission chamber, flu,'< foils)

~d se3.led P11 Re so~ses.-

C.

PROCEDURE

1.

Complete the Receipt of Licensed Material Approval Form as follows:

a.

Determine the amount of licensed material onsite by examining the latest DOE/NRC 742, 742C and 74iC forms.

Record this information in the "Present Onsite Inventory" column of the approval form.

b.

Specify the amount of licensed material to be received in an incoming shipment in the "Inventory of Proposed Shipment" column of the approval form.

c.

Project the total amount of licensed material that will be present after the incoming shiprrient is received by summing values in the "Present Onsite Ir+:ventory" and "Inventory of Proposed Shipment" columiis.

Revised By: vVilliam Bonzer Approved By: William Bonzer

/)

[_, ;_) '.~Crk 0

vv-**

. *~,;)__;r*~ ~;; -~?

      • :MISSOURl S&T REACTOR STAJ.'IDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES ***

/ Rev SOP:

311 TITLE:

RECEIPT OF LICENSED MATERIAL Revised: June 6, 2016 Page 2 of3_

d.

Compare the projected total amount of licensed material calculated in Step 1.c. Vlfi.th current license limits to assure that the projected total Vlfi.11 comply Vlfi.th 'license limits,

e.

Record the anticipated date of the shipment.

2.

Have the Reactor Director or Reactor Manager review and approve the form prior to receipt of any licensed material shipment.

Revised By: 'vVilliam Bonzer

c. t~...

_,/v_c.~-*~-**~-:,~

I

~;_p***:}/*.l Approved By: \\Villiam Bonzer

1-------- ---

      • NilSSOURl S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERA.TING PROCEDURES***

SOP:

311 TITLE:

RECEIPT OF LICENSED iVIATERIAL Revised: June-6, 2016 RECEIPT OF LICENSED MATERIAL APPROVAL F'ORJ.vI Material Description

1. U-235 (< 20%

Enrichment)

2. Sealed Sources (Pu-239)
3. Fission Chambers and Flux Foils (D~235)

License

. Limit 5.50 kg 0.200 kg 0.050 kg Present**

Onsite Inventory Inventory of Proposed Shipment Projected Inventory After Shinment

4. Does Projected Material Inventory Meet License Limits?

Yes No

5. Approximate Anticipated Date of Shipment ________ _

Performed by: Title ___________ _

Date: ______ _

Signature _________ _

Approved by: Signature _________ _

Date: -------

(Reactor Director or Reactor -Manager)

Page 3of3 Revised By: \\Villiam Bonzer Approved By: vVilliam Bonzer

/

Rev Rev j

.... ~.

  • '.~. : _,. J2 !::_*~-~' > ~--.. \\-;~.. ;--:*1J :~~:,:'
      • MISSOURI S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES***

.SOP: 501 TITLES: EMERGENCY PROCEDURES FOR REACTOR BUILDING EVACUATION Revised: Jm1e 9, 2016 Page 7of7 lVIlSSOURI S&T El\\!IERGENCY PHONE LIST Reactor Staff William Bonzer, Manager, SRO Craig Reisner, Senior Reactor Operator Anthony Alchin, Electronics Technician III Maureen Henrv. Office Support Ast. III University Administrative Staff CELL 578-9463 573-247-7557 816-274-1771 201-7275 HOME 368-0318 573-729-7277 Michelle Bresnahan, EHS Director, Radiation Safety Officer 314-23 9-7751 Doug Roberts Director Missouri S&T Police 202-3689 Dr.Cheryl B. Schrader, Chancellor 201-7392 341-7141 Walter Branson, VC Chancellor Finance & Adm.

260-402-0117 James Packard, Director Physical Facilities.

578-8167 Dr. Goodman DO, Director Student Health Services Dr.Hyoung Lee, Chair of Nuclear Eng, Reactor Director 573-202-4665 Dr.Ralph Flori Jr, Interim Chair of Mining and Nuclear 578 -3130 Fadha Ahmed, Health Physicist EHS-Missouri S&T 314-960-9211 636-223-2054 Local Missouri S&T Police Rolla City Police Rolla Fire Department Phelps County Hospital Rolla Emergencv Management Acrencv State Agencies Missouri Highway Patrol Missouri State Emergency Mgt. (24 hr.)

Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources (24 hr.)

Missouri Bureau of Environmental Epidemiology Federal Agencies NRC, Operations Center

. NRC Duty Officer (24 hr.)

American Nuclear Insurers Radiation Emergencv Assistance Center (573) 751-6160 (865) 576-3131 WORK 341-4384 341-4291 341-6617 341-6016 341-4305 341-4300 341-4116 341-1! !22 341-4252 341-4284 341-4585 341-7583 341-7014 341-4300 911 911 911

. 911 (573) 368-2345 (573) 751-2748 (573) 634-2436 (573) 751-4674 (24hrs)

(301) 951-0550 (301) 816-5100 (860) 682-1301 (865) 576-1005 (24hrs)

Revised By: Maureen Henry Approved: William Bonzer I Rev I.Rev

      • MISSOURJ S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES *'~"""

SOP: 501 TITLES: ElYIERGENCY PROCEDURES FOR REACTOR BUILDING EVACUATION Revised: September 1, 2016

  • Page 7.of7 iVIISSOURI S&T ElVIERGENCY PHONE LIST Reactor Staff William Bonzer, Manager, SRO Craig Reisner, Senior Reactor Operator Anthony Alchin, Electronics Technician ill Maureen Henry, Office Support Ast. ill University Administrative Staff CELL 578-9463 573-247-7557 816-274-1771 201-7275 HOlVIE 368-0318 573-729-7277 Michelle Bresnahan, EHS Director, Radiation Safety Officer 314-239-7751 Doug Roberts, Director Missouri S&T Police 202-3689 Dr.Cheryl B. Schrader, Chancellor 201-7392 341-7141 Walter Branson, VC Chancellor Finance & Adm.

260-402-0317 James.Packard, virector 1'hys1cal Facilities 578-8167 Dr. Goodman DO, Director Student Health Services Dr.Hyoung Lee, Chair of Nuclear Eng, Reactor Director 573-202-4665 Dr. Braden Lusk, Chair of Milling and Nuclear 620-960-1645 WORK.

341-4384 341-4291 341-6617 341-6016 341-4305 341-4300 341-4116 341-4122 341-4252 341-4284 341-4585

. 341-4174 Fadha Al Falahi. Health Physicist EHS-MS&T 314-960-9211 636-223-2054 341-7014 Local Missouri S&T Police Rolla City Police Rolla Fire Department Phelps County Hospital Rolla Emergency Management Agency State Agencies Missouri Highway Patrol Missouri State Emergency Mgt. (24 hr.)

Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources (24 hr.)

Missouri Bureau of Environmental Epidemiology Federal Agencies NRC, Operations Center N"R.C Duty Officer (24 hr.)

American Nuclear Insurers Radiation Emergencv Assistance Center Revised By: Maureen Henry (573) 751-6160 (865) 576-3131 341-4300 911 911 911 911 (573) 368-2345 (573) 751-2748 (573) 634-2436 (573) 751-4674 (24hrs)

(301) 951-0550 (301) 816-5100 (860) 682-1301 (865) 576-1005 (24hrs)

Approved: William Bonzer

/Rev Rev

!(\\ /1

.... \\

( f

\\

_t

\\

!::;: L-t..- i_.. i---*:....---*--

{

P(/i:'L L,c//

n

{~,~ _.zs--,,;~L)

  • ..,1

____ J---*

    • MISSOURI S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES***

SOP: 702 TITLE:

IRRADIATION REQUEST FORMS Revised: August 9, 2016 Page 1of7 A.

PURPOSE To provide for the thorough Reactor Staff review of all experiments to be irradiated by neutrons from the MSTR. The review evaluates potential 1) reactivity effects, 2) dose hazards to the experimenter, and 3) hazards to the reactor.

B.

PRECAUTIONS, PREREQUISITES OR LIMITATIONS

1. All sample irradiations must be performed under an approved Irradiation Request Form (IRF) with two approval signatures.
2. All materials to be irradiated are to either be corrosion resistant or encapsulated in corrosion resistaht containers.
3. Approved IRFs remain valid for future irradiations.
4. IRFs will be numbered sequentially following the last two digits of the current year (e.g. 95-1, 95-2, etc.).
5. Radiation Safety Committee approval is required for
a. experiments worth more than 0.4% ~k/k,
b. explosive materials,
c. fueled experiments, or
d. untried experiments.
6. The total of the absolute values of all experiments is limited to 1.2% ~k/k.
7. Experiments having moving parts shall not have an insertion rate greater than 0.05%

~k/k per second.

8. Cooling is to be provided as needed to prevent the surface temperature of an experiment being irradiated from exceeding the boiling point of the pool.

Revised By: Craig T Reisner Approved By: William Bonzer 0?'~

I Rev

    • MISSOURI S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES***

SOP: 702 TITLE:

IRRADIATION REQUEST FORMS Revised: August 9, 2016 Page 2 of7 C.

PROCEDURE - IRRADIATION REQUEST FORM The IRF should be completed according to the following steps:

1. IRRADIATION REQUEST - This section of the IRF should be completed by the experimenter.
a. Sample Description - Describe the sample material to be irradiated (e.g. dried tobacco leaves, powdered milk, gold foil, etc.)
b. Physical Form - Specify the physical form of the sample material ( e.g, powder, ash, liquid, etc).
c. Encapsulation - Check the box marked "Poly-vial" or check "other" and describe.
d. Irradiation Location - Specify the irradiation facility to be used. More than one facility may be authorized on a single IRF. If "Other" is specified, describe the irradiation location (for example: "wire stringer in Grid Position C-3").
e. Irradiation Limits - Specify the irradiation limits as follows:
1) Power - Specify the maximum reactor power for irradiation. Samples may NOT be irradiated at powers higher than specified.
2) Time - Specify the irradiation time for the sample(s) at the maximum power. Samples may be irradiated at lower powers for times longer than the specified irradiation time as long as the total fluence (i.e. kW-hrs) does not exceed the product of the specified maximum power and irradiation time.
3) Mass - Specify the maximum sample mass (grams) to be irradiated in any single irradiation.

Handwritten revisions to the limits are allowed bsed on the measured dose rate from the initial irradiation. Assume dose rate is a linear function of power, irradiation time, and sample mass.

Revised irradiation limits require the review and approval of either the SRO on Duty, Reactor Manager, or Reactor Director as signified by their initials with dates.

Revised By: Craig T Reisner

~-;~

p Approved By: William Bonzer

    • MISSOURI S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES***

SOP: 702 TITLE:

IRRADIATION REQUEST FORMS Revised: August 9, 2016 Page 3 of7

f.

Expected Dose Rate - Specify the expected 1 foot dose rate when the sample comes out of the reactor based on one of the categories below:

Experience - The expected dose rate may be based on measurements made during previous similar irradiations. In such instances, record the IRF number of the previous similar irradiation.

Calculations - The expected dose rate may be calculated using the DR=6CE rule (or other appropriate method) where DR is the 1 foot dose rate in mrem/hr, C is the expected activity in mCi, and Eis the gamma energy in Me V. The expected activity can be calculated using A =

Na<p(1 - e-A.tirr)where N is the number of target atoms, cr is the cross section, cp is the neutron flux, 'A is the decay constant and tirr is the irradiation time.

Completely Unknown - A trial irradiation is required if the expected dose rate is completely unknown.

The irradiation limits for a trial irradiation are normally reactor power :S 2 kW, irradiation time :S 1 minute, and sample mass :S 1 gram.

The reviewers may approve different trial irradiation limits at their discretion. Dose rates for higher powers, masses and times can then be linearly extrapolated based on the measured dose rate resulting from the trial irradiation.

g. Reactivity Worth - Estimate the reactivity worth of the sample based on one of the categories below:

Default - A default reactivity worth of <0.05% ~k/k may be used for the rabbit facilities if the sample mass is less than 7 grams. A default reactivity worth for core periphery stringers of <0.1 % ~k/k may be used for holders with a volume of 35 cm3 or less and a sample mass of 7 grams or less. (Note: The default mass and location values are based on a report by Wagner, 1992.) Beamport and thermal column irradiations have a default reactivity of 0.0%.

Experience - The estimated reactivity worth based on previous "experience" may be specified along with the applicable IRF number. If no previous experience exists, estimate the reactivity worth using SOP 306.

Completely Unknown - If reactivity worth is completely unknown and not easily calculated, it must be experimentally determined.

Revised By: Craig T Reisner Approved By: William Bonzer c:pr~

  • ** MISSOURI S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES ***

SOP: 702 TITLE:

IRRADIATION REQUEST FORMS Revised: August 9, 2016 Page 4 of7

h. Comments - Provide additional comments, if any.
i. Request Completed By - The person completing items a through h above should sign their name in the blank provided.
2. REVIEW AND APPROVAL - This portion of the IRF is to be completed by one of the reviewers and approved by both of the reviewers.
a. Analysis of Potential Hazards - Reviewers shall analyze potential hazards associated with the experiment with regard to following:
1) Reactivity - Review the expected reactivity worth information. Assure that the Technical Specification Section 3.7 requirements are met. Check the box marked "None" or "Other" as appropriate. If "Other" is specified, explain.
2) Dose Rate - Review the expected dose rate information and assess potential dose rate hazards. Check the box marked "None" or "Other" as appropriate. If "Other" is specified, explain.
3) Reactor Equipment - Verify that no corrosion problems exist. Verify that no explosive materials or fueled experiments are to be irradiated without Radiation Safety Committee approval.

Verify that proper provisions for cooling have been made. Evaluate the experiment with respect to potential hazards to the reactor or reactor operations (for example, detector "shadowing").

Check the box marked "None" or "Other" as appropriate. If "Other" is specified, explain.

4) Other - Evaluate the experiment for any other types of conceivable hazards to personnel or equipment.
b. Additional Restrictions/Requirements - The reviewers are to specify cµiy additional restrictions or requirements deemed appropriate.
c. Approvals - Reviewers shall signify approval of the experiment by signing and dating in the appropriate blank. Two signatures are required from either the Director, Manager, SROs, or the Health Physicist.

Revised By: Craig T Reisner Approved By: William Bonzer

~--r~

    • MISSOURI S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES ***

SOP: 702 TITLE:

IRRADIATION REQUEST FORMS Revised: August 9, 2016 Page 5 of7 D.

PROCEDURE - SAMPLE IRRADIATION LOG A Sample Irradiation Log will accompany each IRF to document sample irradiation information. An entry shall be made on the Sample Irradiation Log for each sample irradiated.

1. Date - Specify the date of the sample irradiation.
2. Sample ID - Specify the sample identification number or name.
3. Experimenter's Name - Provide the name of the experimenter responsible for the sample.
4. Location - Specify the irradiation location.
5. Power - Specify the power level at which the irradiation is performed.
6. Time In - Specify the console time at which the irradiation began.
7. Time Out - Specify the console time at which the irradiation ended.
8. Total Time - Specify the total time of the irradiation.
9. Dose Rate @ 1 foot - Record the 1 foot dose rate from the sample at the time of initial sample handling.
10. Decay Time - Specify the approximate decay time between the end of the. irradiation and the time of the dose rate measurement.
11. Initials - Either the console operator (licensed operator, student, or trainee) or the experimenter will provide their initials signifying that sample irradiation information is complete.

Revised By: Craig T Reisner 71~

Approved By: William Bonzer

    • MISSOURI S&T REACTOR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES ***

SOP: 702 TITLE:

IRRADIATION REQUEST FORMS Revised: August 9, 2016 Page 6 of7 IRRADIATION REQUEST FORM

  • ~:...
1. IRRADIATION REQUEST
a.

Sample

Description:

b.

Physical Form: _____ _

c. Encapsulation () Poly-Vial () Other ________ _
d.

Irradiation Location: ()Bare Rabbit () Cad Rabbit ()Beam Port ()Thermal Column

e.
f.
g.

()Other----------

Irradiation Limits: 1) Power: ____ _

2) Time: ____ _
3) Mass: _____ gm Expected 1 Foot Dose Rate: _____ mrem/hr Based on:

( ) experience (IRF# ----

() calculations (attached)

() completely unknown Expected Reactivity Worth: ____ % k/k Based on: ()default

() experience (IRF# ___ ~

()SOP 306 calculations (attached)

() completely unknown

h.

Comments:-------------------------------

i.

Request Completed By:----------------

2. REVIEW AND APPROVAL
a.

Analysis of Potential Hazards:

1.

Reactivity

()None ()Other _________ _

2.

Dose Rate

()None () Other----------

3.

Reactor Equipment

.()None ()Other _________ _

4.

Other

()None ()Other----------

b.

Additional Restrictions/Requirements _____________________ _

c.

Irradiation Request Reviewed and Approved (two signatures required):

Director _________ Date ___, Manager _________ Date __ _

SRO Date

, SRO Date __ _

Health Physicist _________ Date ___ _

Revised By: Craig T Resiner Approved By: William Bonzer w~G,~

~

S.

en 8..

to

\\\\' !

\\~

r

~

s*

~

i 0 <

(1) 0..

to t §

~!

ti

~ r" Date SAMPLE IRRADIATION LOG Irradiation Information Sample Experimenter's Time Time Total ID Name Location Power In Out Time Page# __ _

Dose Rate Decay Time 1

ft (Approx.)

Initials (mR/hR)

>-ri U) *

,,,... 0 *

~- ~ ~

en (1)

......:i U) 0.. 0 U)

.. N 0

i::

c:::

~

~

~

U)

"°.___) Ro

~

~ ~

N ~ Id 0

t'""' tn

~~>

'"'d

~

(1)

......:i 0

>-+,

......:i n

~

>--( 0

~~

>--( ~

> t:l

J >

~§

~p~

,0 tr1 Cj ~

M~

~z

~o 0 '"'d

~ E3 rr.i n 0

~

U)

  • * *
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17157B392&oldid=5136360"