ML17157A794

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22
ML17157A794
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/09/1991
From: Raleigh J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML17157A793 List:
References
NUDOCS 9108200103
Download: ML17157A794 (2)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AND ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE~INC.

DOCKET NOS.

50-387 AND 50-388 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION FOR AflENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE 7590-01 The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Pennsylvania Power and Light Company and Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. (the licensees) to withdraw its January 14, 1991, application for proposed amendments to Facility Operating License Nos.

NPF-14 and NPF-22 for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, located in Berwick, Pennsylvania.

The proposed amendments would have revised the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station technical specifications, to incorporate the addition of isolation signals for Containment Isolation Valves for CRM Panel and Wetwell Panel Sample Lines for Units 1 and 2.

The Commission has previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on April 3, 1991 (56 FR 13667).

However, by letter dated August 1, 1991, the licensee withdrew the proposed changes.

For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendments dated January 14, 1991, and the licensee's letter dated August 1, 1991, which withdrew the application for these license amendments.

The above documents are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public 9i08200i03 9i0809 PDR ADOCK 05000387 P

PDR Document

Room, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.,

and the Osterhout Free Library, Reference Department, 71 South Franklin Street, Wi lkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 9th day of August 1991.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY CONt1ISSION James J. Raleigh, Project Nanager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation