ML17157A082
| ML17157A082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 03/16/1990 |
| From: | Thadani M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Keiser H PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17157A083 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-55345, TAC-55346, NUDOCS 9003260448 | |
| Download: ML17157A082 (3) | |
Text
March 16, 19 Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 DISTRIBUTION:l NRC PDR Local PDR PDI-2 Rdg.
SVarga
'Boger WButler MThadani/J Stone
Dear Mr. Keiser:
MO'Brien OGC
SUBJECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA POWER
& LIGHT COMPANY'S.
PROCEDURES GENERATION PACKAGE (TAC NOS.
55345 AND 55346)
EJordan ACRS(10)
Mr. Harold W. Keiser Senior Vice President-Nuclear Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Al 1 entown, Pennsy 1 vani a 18101 RE:
SUS(UEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 In the near future, a team of NRC inspectors will audit your Integrated Plant Emergency Operating Procedures (IPEOPs).
The staff recommends that you consider both the enclosed discussion and the results of the EOP in inspection as appropriate, and use the information to guide the next major revision to your PGP and EOPs.
The staff recognizes that your PGP may have been revised since the submittals, and requests that you maintain records of all revisions to your PGP and EOPs in an auditable form.
No further submittals are required.
The staff has completed its review of your Procedures Generation Package (PGP) for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, submitted in a letter dated May 13, 1985.
The enclosed safety evaluation discusses programmatic improvements which will enhance your ability to develop and maintain consistently high quality Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs).
The majority of the findings are related to the writer's guide.
The staff concludes that your PGP needs to be reviewed to address these programmatic improvements.
For items you deem inappropriate, no longer applicable, or unnecessary for inclusion in your PGP, you should develop and maintain documented justification in an auditable form.
c 9003260448 9'00316 PDR ADOCK 05000387 P
PaC
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure:
See next page t'SU LTR 55345/46]
Sincerely,
/s/
Mohan C. Thadani, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of.Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Pg P
Thadani:bid 63 0
03/f$/90 PDI-2/D WButler 03/1(p/90 foi I
'pP
1 ll
'll 1
1
'I 1
I I
I
a gpR REgy
~C Wp
+
O~
Cy L~
1 0
"o4 W**g4 Docket Nos.
50-387 and 50-388 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, O. C. 20555 March 16, 1990 Mr. Harold W. Keiser Senior Vice President-Nuclear Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101
Dear Mr. Keiser:
SUBJECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY'S PROCEDURES GENERATION PACKAGE (TAC NOS.
55345 AND 55346)
RE:
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1
AND 2 The staff has completed its review of your Procedures Generation Package (PGP) for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, submitted in a letter dated May 13, 1985.
The enclosed safety evaluation discusses programmatic improvements which will enhance your ability to develop and maintain consistently high quality Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs).
The majority of the findings are related to the writer's guide.
The staff concludes that your PGP needs to be reviewed to address these programmatic improvements.
For items you deem inappropriate, no longer applicable, or unnecessary for inclusion in your PGP, you should develop and maintain documented justification in an auditable form.
In the near future, a team of NRC inspectors will audit your Integrated Plant Emergency Operating Procedures
( IPEOPs).
The staff recommends that you consider both the enclosed discussion and the results of the EOP inspection as appropriate, and use the information to guide the next major revision to your PGP and EOPs.
The staff recognizes that your PGP may have been revised since the submittals, and requests that you maintain records of all revisions to your PGP and EOPs in an auditable form.
No further submittals are required.
Sincerely,
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure:
See next page Mohan C. Thadani, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation