ML17156A055

2016 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Initial Licensed Operator Examination ES-403-1

ML17156A055
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	05/31/2017
From:	David Reeser NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Nuclear Management Co
Shared Package
ML15274A427	List: IR 05000263/2016301 ML17156A053 ML17156A055 ML17156A791 ML17156A796 ML17157B719
References
Download: ML17156A055 (2)

Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Monticello Nuclear Date of Exam: 11/18/16 Exam Level: RO [8J SRO [8J Generating Plant Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading f.~ (f~ .7l.-

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented ""e~ ~f ~

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) ~ pf ~

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail ~ PP oz_

5. All other.failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f\2_& ~(J ~

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants

~~ ef ~ -

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader --:(p.,_,~"\) ~~~~ ~ Q_::j1L__ I:1. j.n)..l'/1"7

b. Facility Reviewer(*) Sr-u(,,e. d:tlt:A '/ I ~~- r:i/Z 7/!?.o/,/;;

c. NRG Chief Examiner(*) 'Jft.,~0 (A\/(ees~.__:t.[Z'i}Zdl-7

d. NRC Supervisor(*) lb.u*\-\S ()r\~t>,./:~<. ,r/ j;;~

1

~ ~ ~<), lOl~

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: rn ~n tic t /f4 Date of Exam: 1Jj,t/t1, Exam Level: RO 00 SRO 00 Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading lb ~

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented lb

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 6

~

\\\

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, \:

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail lb ~

-'0

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified ~ iy '*

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants b r--

Printed Name/Signature Date

%mtt&&d4~ 1/-.J4!-/t;,

r ,_ /\

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*) J*><rt.. 'h,rhr-tl/ l/~l1- /'1

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) /\)o/G

d. NRC Supervisor (*) r\} 6T£

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.