ML17146A942
| ML17146A942 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 09/08/1987 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17146A941 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-387-87-12, 50-388-87-12, NUDOCS 8709150006 | |
| Download: ML17146A942 (4) | |
Text
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Susquehanna Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos.
50-387
& 50-388 License Nos.
NPF-14 & NPF-22 During an NRC inspection conducted on July 1, 1987 - August 15, 1987 two viola-tions of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions",
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (NRC Enforcement Policy), the violations are listed below:
A.
10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion XVI states that measures shall be estab-lished to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected.
The measures shall assure that the cause.of the condition is determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition.
Operational Policy Statement OPS-S, Deficiency Control System, states that the deficiency control mechanisms shall provide for determining the cause of the deficiency and establishing the corrective action to preclude recurrence.
Nuclear Department Instruction NDI-QA-8.1.5, Nonconformance Control and Processing, requires nonconformances to be documented on a Nonconformance Report (NCR)
Form and that for significant or recurring nonconformances, the disposition shall include a statement of action to be taken to prevent recurrence.
Contrary to the
- above, as of July 13,
- 1987, a
nonconforming condition concerning loosening of Anchor Darling globe valve anti-rotation devices, which had been identified in August
In addition, the corrective action to prevent recurrence had not been adequately completed.
Specifically:
fourteen Anchor Darling valves with anti-rotation devices were omitted from the original NCR and not reworked as required, although the plant staff was notified of their omission on October 16, 1984 by the licensee's engineering organization; and the plant maintenance procedures were not revised to reflect the additional information for securing anti-rotation devices'n valve stems.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
7Q4P f~ 006 8~~~00387 ADQCN. OSOOpg~
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY IR SUS 87-12 0003.0.0 09/03/87
Appendix A Technical Specification 3.7,7 states that all sealing devices in fire rated assembly penetrations, including fire doors, shall be operable at all times.
Technical Specification 4.7.7.2.a states that each required fire door shall be verified operable by verifying the position of each closed fire door at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Surveillance Procedure SO-200-007 Attachment D,
Fire Door Daily Check, which is used to assure the operability of the fire
- doors, requires that either the door be
- closed, latched and/or locked or that the door be
- open, free of obstruc-tions from closing and a
fuse link installed on the automatic door closure.
Contrary to the
- above, on August 13, 1987, Fire Door No. 420, ESS Switch-
'ear
- Room, was inoperable in that the door was not latched due to deforma-tion of the door.
In addition, this condition was not identified during the performance of daily surveil lance SO 200 007 on August 14, 1987.
This is a Severity Level V Yiolation (Supplement I) applicable to Unit 2.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Pennsylvania Power and Light is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted; (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (3) the corrective steps
~
~
~
~
~
~
which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is
- shown, consideration will be given to extending this response time.
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY IR SUS 87-12 0004.0
~ 0 09/03/87