ML17123A044

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2017 Clinton Power Station Initial Licensed Operator Examination Form ES-201-2
ML17123A044
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/09/2017
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Shared Package
ML16308A465 List:
References
Download: ML17123A044 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: clinton Date of Examination: 12l5 - 12116116 lnitials Item Task Description a b. c#

W

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N

,l,{ 4. gl b.

R T

I Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all llA categories are appropriately sampled.

'ø 4 8(

T c. Assss whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics 4 P E

,4 N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or reiected l(A statements are appropriate c qP

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number 2.

S of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients. /

  • tr M

I

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using L

A T

at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. ø +K o

R 3.

c.

a.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks I ¿ tr r

W distributed among the safty functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, mergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form

/ +

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified

13) no more than one task is reDeâted from the last two NBC licensino examinations

ø f K

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the prolected number and mix of aoolicants and ensure that no items are duolicated on subseouent davs. { ly K
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sction. ø q g?

G E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41l43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate d

/ll ¿/ r N c. Ensure that KA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. Al 6r E

R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections ¿y q

û w A

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. A/ (f f . Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ú ry 1 P / Signature , Date,
a. Author iol Aat r u
b. Facility Reviewer (.)
c. NRC Chief Examiner lt,Vt,, b

(#) I t/=g / /¿

d. NRC Supervisor tr/d rU NOTE: # lndependent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required
  • Not âoolicâble for NRC-nrenared examination oullines-ES-201, Page 26of28