ML17083B524

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Approves Util 850311 Request for Deletion of Radiation Surveys at 90% Power from Initial Test Program,Per Condition 2.c.(3) of License DPR-80.Approval Based on Recommended Radiation Surveys in Reg Guide 1.68
ML17083B524
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/1985
From: Beckham D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Novak T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16341C292 List:
References
NUDOCS 8503270224
Download: ML17083B524 (2)


Text

gg% K/gI 4

P C

n0 a%i;

+ w++~

Docket No. 50-275 UNITEO STATES NUCLEAR RECULATbRY CONIIVIISSION WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 Harch 12, 1985

$)Ppg ~~/sgllAY

.~ 7/ 0'D MEMORANDUM FOR:

TIIomas N. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing FROID:

SUBJECT:

Don H. Beckham, Acting Deputy Director Division of Human Factors Safety DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNIT 1

TEST PROGRAH CHANGES - LICENSE CONDTTION 2.C. (3}

The licensee requested a change to its initial plant test prograIII by letter dated Harch ll, 1985, from J.

D. Shiffer (PGIIE) to G.

M. Knighton (NRC},

The change is requested for Power Ascension Test No, 5.2, Radiation Surveys and Shielding Effectiveness.

The licensee has requested that radiation surveys at 90% power be deleted from their power ascension prooram on the basis that adequate radiation survey data has been taken at 30K, 50K, and 761 power to confidently predict radiation levels at lOOX power.

Furthermore, additional surveys >iill be made at 100K powe~ to complete the test requirements.

The licensee also points out that repeating the radiation surveys at 90K power would add unnecessarily to the radiation exposure of test personnel.

Therefore, pursuant to License Condition 2. C.(3) of License DPR-80, we hereby approve the deletion of radiation surveys at 90~'power from the Initial Test Program of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Unit 1.

The reviewer for this change was Sam NacKay (X28147)/PSRB.

The reviewer is not aware of any "Differing Professional Opinions" relating to this review.

c ~='~'-:)'=

Don H. Beckham, Acting Deputy Director Divi s ion of Human Factors Safety S030-BP-N00jq~g cc; G. Knighton H. Schierling R. Gruel, PNL

~~

l <<

~l acme Regulatory Guide 1.68, Power Ascension Test Vo. B.b.b, recommends radiation surveys only at 60K and 100~ power.

Based on this guidance and the predictability of radiation levels at full power, the staff concludes that

-.. the -deletion of radiation surveys at 90K power is technically-acceptable.

~

~

~

~