ML17059B807

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SALP Repts 50-220/97-99 & 50-410/97-99 for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2,for Period 960602- 971108.Mgt Meeting Scheduled for 980109 at Nine Mile Point Site to Discuss Assessment & Address Weaknesses Identified
ML17059B807
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/30/1997
From: Miller H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Sylvia B
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
Shared Package
ML17059B808 List:
References
50-220-97-99, 50-410-97-99, NUDOCS 9801090241
Download: ML17059B807 (10)


See also: IR 05000220/1997099

Text

C'ATj'(iUKY

4

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9801090241

DOC.DATE: 97/12/30

NOTARIZED: NO

FACIL:50-220 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Niagara

Powe

50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Niagara

Moha

AUTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFIL1ATZON

MILLER,H.J.

Region

1 (Post

820201)

RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SYLVIA,B.R.

'iagara

Mohawk Power Corp.

SUBJECT: Forwards

SALP repts 50-220/97-99

5: 50-410/97-99 for Nine

Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units

1

& 2 for period 960602-

971108.Mgt meeting scheduled for 980109 at Nine Mile Point

site to discuss

assessment

R address

weaknesses

identified.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE40D

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTR

ENCL Q

SIZE:

TITLE: Systematic

Assessment

of Licensee

Perfo

ance

(SALP) Report

DOCKET

05000220

05000410

C

A

NOTES:

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD1-1 LA

HOOD,D

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

1

1

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD1-1

PD

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

G

0

R

INTERNAL: ACRS

DEDRO

NRR/DRCH/HHFB

NRR/DRPM/PECB

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS3

EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD

NOAC

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

ON

ILE CE

RCH HOLB

NRR/DRPM/PERB

OE DIR

RGN1

FILE

01

LITCO BRYCE, J

H

NRC PDR

5

5

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NOTE TO ALL "RZDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS

OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL

DESK

(DCD)

ON EXTENSION 415-2083

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

23

ENCL

23

December 30, 1997

Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia

Executive Vice President

and Chief Nuclear Officer

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Nuclear Learning Center

450 Lake Road

Oswego, NY 13126

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATICASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP) REPORT

NOS. 50-220/97-99 AND 50-410/97-99 FOR NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR

STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2

Dear Mr. Sylvia:

This letter forwards the SALP report for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units No.

1 and 2,

for the period June 2, 1996, through November 8, 1997 (Enclosure 1). This assessment

was conducted using the SALP process that was implemented by the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission (NRC) on July 19, 1993.

In this process, the NRC staff evaluates

the performance of licensees

in four functional areas: Operations, Engineering,

Maintenance, and Plant Support.

The Plant Support area is composed of radiological and

effluent controls, chemistry, security, emergency preparedness,

fire protection, and

housekeeping.

Performance of the Nine Mile Point Station during this period was generally good; however,

continued management attention is needed to address

issues in several areas.

The Unit 1

plant trip and reactor vessel overfill event revealed weaknesses

in the management

oversight of operations and engineering support activities.

Lapses in management

oversight also resulted in weak performance in other areas such as maintenance

rule

program development, and implementation of the radioactive waste and transportation

program.

Personnel performance errors occurred in all functional areas.

Although the

threshold for identifying problems was appropriately low, on many occasions the root

cause analyses

and corrective actions were weak.

While initiatives were taken and

improvements were made in some of these areas, there was a lack of consistent

performance and improvement.

Performance in the operations area declined to a Category 2 rating.

Operators generally

performed well during plant startups and shutdowns,

and in response to events.

Conservative decision making was evident in the operation of both units.

However,

personnel performance errors were noted throughout the period.

Also, several weaknesses

were identified with the licensed operator initial and requalification training programs.

980i090241

97i2SO

PDR

ADQCK 05000220

9

PDR

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

OFFICIAL RECORD

COPY

IEr40

B. Ralph Sylvia

Performance

in the maintenance

area was rated Category 2. Management involvement and

oversight in the planning and performance of maintenance activities, particularly during

outages, were evident.

Routine maintenance

and surveillance activities were generally well

planned, coordinated, and executed.

Significant corrective maintenance

in response to

emergent issues was also performed well. Personnel performance errors occurred

throughout the period; however, the frequency and consequence

of the errors decreased

in

the latter half of the period.

Several deficiencies with the technical adequacy of

surveillance procedures,

and with the scheduling of some tests, were noted throughout the

period.

Also, the Unit 1 maintenance

rule program was poorly developed.

Performance

in the engineering area was rated Category 3.

Early in the period,

management oversight provided to some important engineering activities was ineffective

and the quality of engineering work varied significantly, To address those issues,

management,

organizational and program changes were made.

Later in the period, some

improvements were noted in engineering activities,

For example, improvements made to

the motor-operated valve testing program were sufficient to permit closure of Generic Letter 89-10. Also, some significant technical problems were identified and addressed

through engineering activities such as the Unit 1 core shroud inspection and repair

program.

However, throughout the period, a number of equipment problems challenged

the operating organization, some of which resulted in the need for unit shutdowns.

Also,

staff attrition and turnover, particularly in the system engineering and environmental

qualification groups, presented

a continuing management challenge.

Performance

in the area of plant support area was rated Category 2. The radiological

protection program was effectively implemented with radiological exposures maintained as

low as reasonably achievable, while radiological effluents, environmental monitoring, and

chemistry programs remained strong.

Also, performance in the emergency preparedness,

security and fire protection areas was good.

However, problems were noted in the

radiological waste handling and transportation area.

We have scheduled

a management meeting with you at noon on January 9, 1998, at the

Nine Mile Point site.

The meeting is open to the public. At the meeting, you should be

prepared to discuss our assessment

and any initiatives you have ongoing or plan to take to

address the weaknesses

detailed in our assessment.

B. Ralph Sylvia

Enclosure 2 provides the schedule of NRC inspections of your facility planned for the next

year.

We willinform you of any changes.

The routine resident inspection effort is not

included in this schedule.

We appreciate your cooperation.

Hubert J. Miller

Regional Administrator

Docket Nos.

50-220

~ 50-410

Enclosures;

1.

SALP Report Nos. 50-220/97-99 and 50-410/97-99

2.

Inspection Plan for Nine Mile Point Units

1 and 2

cc w/enclosures:

R. Abbott, Vice President & General Manager - Nuclear

C. Terry, Vice President- Safety Assessment

and Support

J. Conway, Vice President - Nuclear Engineering

K. Dahlberg, Vice President - Nuclear Operations

D. Wolniak, Manager, Licensing

J. Warden, New York Consumer Protection Branch

G. Wilson, Senior Attorney

M. Wetterhahn, Winston and Strawn

J. Rettberg, New York State Electric and Gas Corporation

P. Eddy, Electric Division, Department of Public Service, State of New York

C. Donaldson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, New York Department of Law

J. Vinquist, MATS, Inc.

F. Valentino, President, New York State Energy Research

and Development Authority

J. Spath, Program Director, New York State Energy Research

and Development Authority

Chairman Jackson

Commissioner Dicus

Commissioner Diaz

Commissioner McGaffigan

Institute for Nuclear Power Operations

(INPO)

1

B. Ralph Sylvia

Distribution w/encls:

H. Miller, RA/W. Axelson, DRA (1)

J. Lanning, DRM

D. Screnci, PAO (2)

Region

I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

PUBLIC

NRC Resident Inspector

J. Wiggins, DRS

L. Nicholson, DRS

DRS Branch Chiefs

M. Oprendek, DRP

L. Eckert, DRS

L. Cheung, DRS

L. Doerflein, DRP

R. Junod, DRP

Distribution w/encl: (VIAE-MAIL)

M. Leach, Rl EDO Coordinator

S.

Collins, NRR

R. Zimmerman, NRR

J. Lieberman, OE (2) (OE MAIL)

B. Norris - Nine Mile Point

S. Bajwa, NRR

D. Hood, NRR

M. Campion, Rl

Inspection Program Branch (IPAS)

R. Correia, NRR

F. Talbot, NRR

DOCDESK

Distribution via E-Mail:

Region

I Staff (Refer to SALP Drive)

DOCUMENT NAME: G:iBRANCH1iNMPSALP.LTR

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without

attachment/enclosure

"E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure

"N" = No copy

OFFICE

.

NAME

DATE

RI/DRP

LDoerflein

1 2/I4 /97

RI/0RA

RI/DRS

HMille

JWiggin

2/ 0/97

12/

/97

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY