ML17056A545

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enforcement Conference Rept 50-220/89-80 on 891030.Major Areas Discussed:Findings of NRC Insp Rept 50-220/89-80 Re Use,Since Jul 1981,of Radwaste Processing Bldg sub-basement as Liquid Waste Retention Facility
ML17056A545
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/1990
From: Ronald Bellamy, Pasciak W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML17056A544 List:
References
50-220-89-80-EC, NUDOCS 9001160025
Download: ML17056A545 (40)


See also: IR 05000220/1989080

Text

U. S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report

No.

Docket no.

License

No.

50-220 89-80

50-220

DPR-63

Priority

Category

C

Licensee:

Nia ara

mohawk Power Cor oration

ann ie

oa

racuse

ew

or

13212

Facility Name:

Nine Nile Point

Unit

1

Meeting At:

NRC Re ion I

Kin of Prussia

Penns lvania

Meeting Conducted:

October 30

3989

Inspector:

.~

ascla

le

acl

1 les

a

1a

10n

P,otection Section, Facilities Radiation

Safety

and Safeguards

Branch

yC

Approved by:

~ iriVso

e

amy,

>e,

>>es

a ia

>on

a

e

Safety

and Safeguards

Branch

Meetin

Summar

Enforcement

Conference

at

NRC Region I, King of Prussia,

ennsy vanya,

on October 30,

1989, to discuss

the findings of NRC Inspection

Report

No. 50-220/89-80.

The topics discussed

related to your use,

since July

1981, of the Radwaste

Processing

Building sub-basement

as

a liquid waste

retention facility.

The meeting

was attended

by NRC and licensee

management

and lasted for

approximately

two hours.

900iih0025 900i02

PDR

  • DOCK 05000220

DMIl

1.0 ~Pi i

t

DETAILS

1. 1

Nia ara

Mohawk Power Cor oration

NHPC

L. Burkhart, III, Executive Vice President,

Nuclear Operations

J. Willis, General

Superintendent,

Nuclear Generation

R. Abbott

Station Superintendent,

Unit 2

N. Spagno/etti,

Manager of Corporate Health Physics

C. Gerber,

Supervisor of Radwaste

Operations

G. Wilson, Senior Attorney,

NHPC

S. Wilczek, Jr.,

Manager Nuclear Technology,

NHPC

1.2

NRC Personnel

H. Knapp, Director, Division of Radiation Safety

& Safeguards

(DRSS)

J.

Greeves,

Acting Deputy Director,

DRSS

R. Bellamy, Chief, Facilities Radiation Safety

& Safeguards

Branch

W. Pasciak,

Chief, Facilities Radiation Protection Section

J. Wiggins, Chief, Division of Reactor

Projects,

Branch

No.

1

G. Heyer, Chief, Division of Reactor Projects,

Section

1B

W. Cook, Senior Resident

Inspector

NHP

1

& 2

K. Christopher,

Enforcement Specia)ist

2.0

~Por ose

The Enforcement

Conference

was held at the request of NRC Region I to

discuss

the apparent violations

and findings of an Augmented Inspection

Team (AIT) inspection

conducted

at Nine Mile Point Unit

1 on August 22-28,

1989.

The AIT inspection

was conducted to evaluate

the facts

and safety

implications associated

with your use,

since July 1981, of the Radwaste

Processing

Building sub-basement

as

a liquid waste retention facility.

The

discussions

at this meeting focused

on the identified apparent violations,

the root cause of the flooding event,

and the licensee corrective actions

to prevent recurrence.

3.0

Licensee

Presentation

The licensee

began their presentation

by stating that,

except for the

apparent violations,

the findings noted in NRC Inspection

Report

50-220/89-80

were essentially correct.

The licensee

stated that they had

additional

information which would clarify and address their concerns with

regard to the apparent violations.

The licensee

presented

the

NRC with

several

handouts

which are enclosed with this report.

The licensee

emphasized

that their position was that the flooding of the

sub-basement

was not safety significant,

and that the building was

used in

accordance

with its design.

The licensee did not agree with the

10

CFR

50.59 apparent violation because

they felt that the building was initially

designed to accommodate

the type of flooding that occurred

sn July,

1981.

The licensee

stated that no

10 CFR 50.59

ha6

been

done before the flooding.

The licensee

stated that they disagreed

with an apparent violation in the

area of 10 CFR 20.403.

Their position was that the flooding event

increased

contamination of the room, but not to the extent that

contamination

costs

were substantially

increased

over what they already

were.

They also presented

some examples

which they felt indicated

ambiguity in the requirements of this regulation.

They suggested

that

NRC

guidance

indicates that the regulation applies to costs

associated

with

equipment loss rather than costs to decontaminate.

They stated that the

room was not being

used

as

a drumming facility and that the equipment that

was in there at the time of the flooling was ultimately to be removed

and

discarded,

and

as

such there were

no fiscal losses

related to equipment

damaged

from the flooding.

The licensee

presented their cleanup plan.

This involved the acquisition

of a remotely operated

robot that would enter the room and handle the major

cleanup

and decontamination

tasks.

The robot was expected to star t being

used in early 1990.

The robot was expected

to save approximately

100

person-rems.

4.0

Concludin

Statement

NRC Region

I management

acknowledged that the cleanup actions

presented

appeared

to be responsive

to the HRC's concerns.

NRC Region I management

stated that the licensee

would be informed of the need for and the nature

of appropriate

enforcement

action relative to this incident at

a later

time.

EHFORCENEHT CONFERENCE

RELATING TO

HRC REGION

I

AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM (AIT)

INSPECTION (50-220/89-80)

OF THE

NINE NILE POINT UNIT 1

RADWASTE BUILDIHG

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION

OCTOBER 30,

5989

AGENDA

RADNASTE EHFORCENENT

CONFERENCE

OPENING REMARKS

BACKGROUND AND CHINNOLOGY

DESCRIPTION

OF

EVENT

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

RESPONSE

TO NRC

CONCERNS

CLEANUP PLAN

SIINMARY

L. Burkhardt III

Executive Vice President

Nuclear Operations

J.

L. Hillis

General

Superintendent

Nuclear Generation

R.

B. Abbott

Hine Nile Point Unit 2

Station Superintendent

H. A. Spagnoletti

Nanager - Corporate Health

Physics

H. A. Spagnoletti

Manager - Corporate Health

Physics

C. A. Gerber

Nine Nile Point Unit 1

Supervisor

Radwaste Operations

J.

L, Hillis

General

Superintendent

Nuclear Generation

By pass

Take up

Switch cogectin

Floor plan

shows

route

taken

by

drum when it cn-

tcrr cncloscd <<or.

age

area.

Truck

will take

it from

cast clcvator to fll-

llng stanon.

Then

fOlcd

drum

will

move

lo

storage

room

on

onc

of

lhrcc separate

lcv-

cis.

IVcst

clcva-

tor

will toke

lt

to any Icvyj.

East

litt

Filling

stations

nsole

~ Copping unit

West

litt

Switch

distributIng

42

MAtERIAL HAHOLIHG EHGIHEERIHG

~

~

F

~

.N~~

N

i

jT'h

'A'e

Nt

i

I

la

~h

~ Ag

~p

TN'

~ ~

N

~

I

r.r

l

r

a4

'

/

S

TVNI

~ ~

~

~ 4

~\\

h ~

T

lh

It

'AG

O: i'

~ 14

I

~

~

~

'I

I'

I

poiizb

N

~

h

~ h

~.:...'

't

~

- Mtwafe.hmCliiiyot,iad oacthe ~stes at ae

'.. Novfng amootQ~~iv4hfs'ndes

" ..The".ayatear compr5fea. an extrefnely

-, ':" groundconfdor fs'aseafoddrumofradfo-;

.'coraplex netvvork of overhead'.traddng

"-'ctivedobrfs-ahalqdouacarigohandfed"-.:

c'omponents, custom canter units, dmtor

vftftoutrisfc by one'matr at'a console.. ', drives, sensing and moaitorfng

~

ftia ~~ of ~ au~+'-

aadautomatfcandelectrfcffmftsvvf

Designed to vvorfc for decades 'shout

~ power Con

ration a Nine Mffe poi,t.

maf toaance, the remotely cont

fled

Nuclear Statioa at Oavvego, N.Y. De-

p',pe~~~"~ n'

g

~

~

signed to meet tho criticalspecifications

~y p~

s)'

d 4~to Wp

df

tod b

th

h

dfb

f

df ~ment for dfsposaf of radioactive wastes

~e

the e.tem ~ ~~ ~ m'.

ia comPlete ~sty.

stalled by the Automated Handling Sys-

~ The oatiro oporatfon fs controlled from a

toms DivisionofEatoa Yale S Tome fnc.

remote console outside protective con.

I

m atomic yarner yiaat

crete Kaffs. The specfaBy modfffed

haadlfag system itself fa protected by

faferfccfca anangod

on a logic basfs'-

no action can tahe place until predator.

mined conditions are met.

This single-source, complete turnfcoy

system dramatfcalfy illustrates our en-

gineering capabilities.

Write us for the free illustrated bro.

churo. "Turnkey Systems

for Moving

Materials"t Automatocf Handling Sys-

tems Division. 1815 Connecticut

Ave-

nue. N.W., Washington. D.C. 20009.

~ ATONI AUTOMATEDHANDLINGSYSTEMS DIVISION

hlATERIALSHANDLINGGROUP

<',e

if'

~

t

r p

~ 1

(

plants;nat

are

ur:ven

ny ~tomic

energy.

These

tuels

re like no othe.

matenais

used

in other energy conver.

uon

systems.

F:rst ut all. the:

are .adioacnve

so thev

, must

be

nandleci

remote!y.

This

means

not

only

the

uei

itseit. but

iso

tne debris

that accumulates

in the

eac;or

water.

The

water

circuiates

througn

a

closed

'.oop:ircuit und is;urned

to steam.

Then it is

.fed into

ihe turbines

which turn

a generator

at the

end of the

main shatt.

It is this

huge

generator

that

provides

an

electncal

transmission

gnd with 345.000

voits ot'ower.

The water.

once ii is deployed

as

steam

in the tur-

bine.

is cooled

and

returned

to

a

series

ot

nlters

and

c!eanup

demineralizers.

The matenal

tiltered out even-

tually precipitates

into a solid

waste.

This includes

the

resins that are involved in ion exchanges

in the demineral-

izers.

The contaminated

material

is accumulated

in an

enclosed

storage

area under the reactor. When enough

is

on nand. it is mixed with cement.

dumped into 55-<talion

drums.

and stored

in isohted

chambers

where

a decay-

ing action

takes

phce.

The decay

time depends

on

the

half-life or'he

radio

nuceli that

are involved. When

a

reasonably

safe

level is reached.

the barrels

are removed

and buried in a dump some mites away. The ume period

could be anywhere

from l0 days

to two years.

Removal of the radioactive debris

at Niagara 3lonawk

Corporation's

<<line-Mile Point

Power Phnt

at

Oswego.

V. Y..

is

done

with

a

specially

modified

Astroveyor

system

created

by

Automated

Handling

Systems.

Inc.

a

subsidiary

of

Eaton

Yale

4,

Towne.

Despite

the

straightforwardness

of

the

overall

concept.

the

entire

system

with

its

remote

controls

and

carriers

is

very

complex.

But most imponant

is that the enrire installa-

tion

is

enclosed

in

three foot-thick

walls.

One

man

standing

at a console behind a concrete wall controls the

operauon.

i

7

~ 11 attr mate r a 'roitt 'h r rractr) ~ is rpiixcd

'<'.'th era<rift

und.

at

command.

pnurs

<to<en

into

one

of

two filling

stations.

Then

the drum

<rill be

ordered

to ntove

to

the

capp<lip tt<itl<iit,

~ .

i

~

~

rt

'I

I

Fail-safe

reqviremen]s.

-Once

the conveyor

system

is installed.

there

must

be

no routine maintenance

re-

quired

within

the

enclosure."

That

is

the

statement

foui.d in:he Atomic Ence~

ommission

specifications

handed

to Automated Handling Systems

<<ngineers.

The

power

people

had

to

be

sure

that

once

the

system

started

up. there

woWd be

no breakdown.

i<or should

a man have to enter

the deadly interior ot'he

storage

area

to make

adjustments.

Therefore,

the sys'em

is de-

signed

to work for decades.

rather than years.

It meets

all specifications

of the Atomic Energy

Commission.

It Is difficult to

picture

an

installation

that

would

fulfill these

requirements,

It is also equally ditficult to

picture the remoteness

of the conveyor components

once

they are operating

behind

the concrete

wa<.'s.

They are

so

near.

yet so far.

Thev might as well be in Ahska

when it comes

to routine maintenance.

Sanding

repair

men

into

the

insta!htion

would

require

the

~earing

of

protective

clothing,

removing

drums

curremly

in

I:crage.;vashing

down

the

ent."re

area

with high pres-

sure

hoses,

and

taking readings

to see if any

residual

radioacuvity were

present.

The

operation

within the

enclosure

is intriguing to

say the least.

Everything that moves

is controlled from

the

remote

console

outs!de

the

thick

protective

con-

crete wal!s. The operator

is never exposed

to any radio-

activity. either direct or retlected.

All storage

is within

four

levels

beneath

the

surface.

Any

stray

emission

is impossible.

D"<<<ns rrina>>i ttn,'hrir cr:rr<rr dtinn: vora.r prriud in r>>nms

tt'sr

(i<ii iinr. ii liril

1 tranlithrtl dr< ay

timr>>i

radi>>active

<1 ~ '.<tc h<at hrra

r< acli<'d, rh<<'riaii <s <<'t iau r>> a li>a<line urru.

Storing procedure.

Starting oif. the empty drums are

placed

ori

an

elevator

at

the

storage

level

which

is

located

just abo~e

the

second

level filling station.

This

AMg<<<l. tilde

di

UHIT COMMERCIAL

BACKGROUND AND CHRONOLOGY

NINE NILE POIHT UNIT 1

RADWASTE 225

ELEVATION

CONTAMINATION OVERVIEW

DECENBER 1969

STOPPED

USING WASTE PILLING STATION 225

SPILL OCCURRED

RADWASTE BUILDING EL, 229 and EL. 225

CLEANUP AND DECOR

STARTED

INITIALCLEANUP AND DECON STOPPED

DUE TO

HIGH EXPOSURE

RISKS TO STATION PERSONNEL

RECIRCULATION SYSTEM PIPING REPLACEMENT

ADDITIONAL SURVEYS ELEVATIOH 225

NEW RADWASTE BUILDING IN SERVICE

RADWASTE TANK AND PIPiNG MODIFICATIONS

DESIGN STUDIES

HMPC RESEARCH

AND DEVELOPNENT DEPARTMENT

ASSISTANCE REOUESTED

1978

JULY 1981

JULY 1981

OCTOBER 1981

MARCH 1982-JUNE

1983

DECENBER 1983

1983-19Iti

BACKGROUND AHD CHRONOLOGY (CONT'Dj

ADDITIONAL SURVEYS ELEVATIOH 225

RADWASTE TANK AND PIPING NODIFICATIOHS

JULY 1985

1985-1987

ROBOT USED TO PERFORN

SURVEY OF ELEVATION 225

SUNNER 1986

R & D SERVICES

REQUESTED

FOR CLEANUP

PLAN/BUDGET SUBNITTED TO PSC

NARCH 1987

1987

REQUEST

FOR QUOTES

FOR ROBOTICS EQUIPNENT WRITTEN

NARCH 1988

IHPO EVALUATION CONCURRING CLEANUP PLANS

CONTRACT WRITTEN REDZOHE ROBOTICS

FOR

BUILDING OF ROBOT

NEDIA INTEREST

AUGNENTED INSPECTION TEAN INSPECTION

DELIVERY OF

ROBOT AHD START CLEANUP

OF ELEVATION 225

CONPLETE CLEANUP RADWASTE 225

NARCH 1989

JULY 1989

AUGUST 20,

1989

AUGUST 21,

1989

DECEHBER 1989

OVERVIEW

CAMERAANDLIGHTS

DRIVENCARRIFR

GRIPPER

.

CAMERAANDLIGHTS

..

IIYOnnUI.IC

POWER SUPPLY

-L

ELECTRONICS

ENCLOSURE

SLAVE

MANIPUALTOR

STIFFLEG

TETIRER

MANAGEMENTSYSTEM

DESCRIPTION OF

EVENT

PROBLEMS

ENCOUNTERED

4

MAINTENANCE OF CATION TANK LATERALS

REACTOR BUILDING CLOSED

LOOP COOLING OUT OF SERVICE

4

IMPACTED WASTE EVAPORATOR OPERATION

POOR

EVAPORATOR PERFORMANCE

PIPE

LEAK

4

CROSS

CONTAMINATION OF

LOW CONDUCTIVITY STREAM

4

HIGH INVENTORY OF SLUDGE/HIGH CONDUCTIVITY WATER

OPTIONS/ACTIONS COHSIDERED

ZERO DISCHARGE TO LAKE ONTARIO PHILOSOPHY

SUSPEND/DELAY UNIT STARTUP

PROCESS

INVENTORY WITH EXTERNAL SYSTEMS

RADWASTE BUILDING ELEVATIOH 225'ONSIDERATIONS

DESIGNED TO HOLD WATER/SLUDGE

NEAHS AVAILABLETO PROCESS/RECOVER

WATER THROUGH

RADWASTE SYSTEN

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

DESIGN OF RADWASTE BUILDING SUB-BASENEHT AREA

EVALUATION OF SUB-BASENENT AREA

PAST PRACTICE

USE

OF SUB-BASENEHT AREA

REASON

FOR

LEAVING LIQUID ON RAOWASTE ELEVATIOH 225'

'

'ESIGN

OF RADWASTE BUILDING SUB-BASENENT AREA

DESIGN CONTROL FOR SPILLED LIQUIDS IS TO ALLOW FLUID TO SEEK

LOWER LEVEL

DESIGN BASIS OBJECTIVE IS TO RETAIH RADIOACTIVE WASTE IF

THEY ACCIDENTALLY LEAK FROW THE SYSTENS

DESIGNED TO RESIST HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE

AND UPLIFT DUE TO

EXTERNAL FLOODING

DESIGNED TO HANDLE ESSENTIALLY UNLINITED LIVE LOADS ON FLOOR

4

DESIGNED AS A CLASS

I

STRUCTURE

REINFORCED

CONCRETE WALLS PROVIDE ISOLATION AND RADIATION

SHIELDIHG

PRESENCE

OF WATERSTOPS

IN BUILDING'S CONSTRUCTION JOINTS

4

FLOORS

AND WALLS HAVE EPOXY COATINGS

4

FLOOR COVERED WITH 1

TO 2

INCHES OF HIGH STRENGTH

FLOOR

TOPPING

4

AIR SUPPLY TO

LOW COHTANINATIOH AREA, EXHAUST DUCTS LOCATED

IH HIGH AIRBORNE POTENTIAL AREA

PERINETER DRAINAGE SYSTEN COLLECTS NOUND WATER

'

'VALUATIONOF SUB-BASENEHT AREA

COHFIRHED

HO RISK TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF SITE WORKERS

AND

PUBLIC

BASED

OH BUILDING FEATURES PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED

HO

INDICATION OF

LEAKAGE OUTSIDE SUB-BASENEHT AREA

CONCLUSION CONSISTENT WITH NRC AIT CONCLUSIONS

'

'AST PRACTICE USE

OF SUB-BASEMENT AREA

WATER ACCUMULATIOH ON FLOOR DURING 19TO's

NOT A SAFETY PROBLEM

CONSISTENT WITH DESIGN

WATER RETENTION TO MINIMIZE DISCHARGES TO LAKE

'

'EASN

FOR LEAVING LIQUID ON 225'

REDUCE POSSIBILITY OF AIRBORNE CONTANINATION

REDUCE WORKER EXPOSURE

IN AREA

RESPONSE

TO NRC CONCERNS

IN INSPECTION

REPORT 50-220/89-80

FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE NRC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REPORTING

REQUIRENEHTS

OF 10 CFR 20.403

10

CFR 20.403

NOTIFICATIONS OF

INCIDENTS

a)

INNEDIATE NOTIFICATION.

Each licensee shall

immediately report

any events

involving byproduct,

source,

or special

nuclear

material

possessed

by the licensee

that

may have caused or

threatens

to cause:

(4) Damage to property

in excess

of S200,000.

b)

TWENTY-FOUR HOUR NOTIFICATION.

Each licensee shall within 24

hours of discovery of the event,

report any event involving

licensed material

possessed

by the licensee that

may have caused

or threatens

to cause:

(4) Damage to property in excess of S2,000.

RESPONSE'.

IT IS NIAGARA MOHAWK'S POSITION THAT NOTIFICATION OF THE NRC WAS NOT

REQUIRED UNDER TOCFR20.403.

DAMAGE FROM THE SPILL WAS NEGLIGIBLE.

THE

SUB-BASEMENT AREA WAS DESIGNED TO STORE

AND HANDLE RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

AHD BE SUBJECT

TO PERIODIC CONTAMINATION AHD DECONTAMINATION AS REQUIRED,

ALSO,

THE CLEANUP/DECONTAMIHATIOHCOSTS

ARE NOT MATERIALLYAFFECTED BY

SPILL.

JUSTIFICATIW

ACTUAL PROPERTY

DAMAGE LESS

THAN $2,N ,

THE SUB-BASEMEHT AREA WAS DESIGNED

FOR PERIODIC CONTANINATION AND

DECONTAMINATION

IE INFORMATION NOTICE 81-03

VIEW CONSISTENT WITH IHDUSTRY PRACTICES

SPILL HAD MINOR EFFECT

ON CLEANUP PLANS

DRUNS UNACCEPTABLE FOR BURIAL

STNED

FOR

FUTURE PRXESSIHG

PRXESSING

TECHNIQUE BEING EVALUATED

PART 2O STATEMEHTS OF COHSIDERATIOH (JULY 29) 1983)

EVACUATIOH OF

ROOMS

OR BIIILDINGS"