ML17055C366
| ML17055C366 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/1986 |
| From: | Adensam E, Haughey M NRC, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mcknight J NRC |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8609100458 | |
| Download: ML17055C366 (8) | |
Text
~p,8 AE0y, 0
Cy I
0O O~
Y/+~
qO
++*++
1 UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SeptembeI 4,
1986 Docket No. 50-410 NOTE TO:
Jim McKnight, Document Control FROM:
Mary Haughey, Project Manager for Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 BWR Project Directorate No.
3 Division of BWR Licensing
SUBJECT:
DRAFT INFORMATION PROVIDED TO NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION ON NINE MILE POINT, UNIT 2 The enclosed information was provided to Niagara Mohawk on September 4
19B6 to assist them in responding to NRC concerns on Nine Mile Point, Unit 2.
By copy of this note the enclosed information should be placed in the PDR and the LPDR.
Mary Haughey, Proje nager BWR Project Directorate No.
3 Division of BWR Licensing cc:
PDR LPDR Noted:
E.
ensam 86091004S8 860904 P PDR ADOCK 0500041'0
]
E
. PDR
C.
I
'I R t
4 STAFF RESPONSES TO NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION COMMENTS N THE NINE M I
L NTS 1 AND 2 I
Section II
/-4 <<S~+.
1 Accepted.
2 Accepted.
4 Accepted.
5 Accepted.
58 59 87 92 93 102-I Accepted.
Accepted'.
Not accepted.
High density storage racks are racks which contain boron poison which is described in the last paragraph in SER page 9-3.
Accepted.
Ze" <<<<<<4 Accepted.
+KM w~'P 6<
I Rejected.
FSAR page 9.4-2a referenced in this comment indicates that "outdoor air is supplied to the control building through four 100% capacity, missile and tornado protected, air intakes."
This is contrary to applicant's comment which states the SER should be changed from 4 to 2.
This is an open item.
I 103 -.All accepted except for initiation signal for HVAC operation.
An open item is initiation signals for the
'eactor building and spent fuel pool area HVAC system because the applicant indicates it will only operate following a LOCA, and not also for a fuel handling accident.
This item requires resolution 104 -
Accepted.
Il"
~EN cd //
"w 4
105 - Accepted.
112 - Accepted.
~pc-SE~~, I ( hW r~u
~~~ ~,'I/ ha re<1'M 113 - Accepted first change on reference to Section 9.5.5 hI h
t d t S
tf II.5.6. 1~BI gage-9'-.
Procedures for alternate filling bf the fuel oil storage tanks by pumping the oil into the day tank drain line to fill the be1ow groun tank havei~ d, c J'scuse&
been reviewed by Region I'and in SERn Supplement This evaluation c oses out this issue and no further changes are necessary.
115 - Accepted.
116 - Accepted.
117 - Accepted.
119 - Accepted.
~~~ ~,'//gw revisetN egg'Zl lM
~ // gc'c'v'tW
~cg ~ // d4 IPvt&1 ~
120 - Rejected.
In Amendment 18.to the FSAR the applicant identified penetrations and doors that are potential.flood paths to Safety
related equipment following a potential rupture 'of the-Circulating Water System.
~ The applicant is depending on the water tight characteristics of these doors and penetrations to prevent flood damage to safety related equipment.
In order for these doors and penetrations to be acceptable water seals, it is our position that the applicant provide alarms and administrative controls to assure that the doors are closed and periodic testing of the seals on the doors and penetrations is undertaken to assure their water tight integrity".'W This is aq open item."
iI 121 -.The applicant indicated aIchange in feedwater valve type and refers to FSAR Figure 10.1-63 (Amd. 26).
This figure does not exist.
Clarification~of comment was'requested from applicant on August 25, 1)86.
The response was received on August 28, 1986.
However, information was inadequate to resolve comment.
This is,'an open item
, since it is no clear whether the eedwater system can produce unanalyzed transients.
The
'irst part of this comment relating to quality group changes j5 Ek(/ 6'<A <C Vi 84d, I
142 - Accepted.
~g/ g,c HPPws8d(,
I 147 - Rejected.
FSAR amendment~26 was issued after SSER-I was published.
This amount of unqualified paint was revised by applicant's letter dated July 16, 1986.
SSER will address this latest submittal.
An
V
S
~
~
I lf I
~
~
~gp/n~;I( hw re>/~~
K++ ~.'// ha re u'I'os 105 - Accepted.
112 - Accepted.
Ii 113 - Accepted first change on reference to Section 9.5.5 which was corrected to Section 9.5.6.
See attached SER page 9 51.
Procedures for alternate fillingbf the fuel oil storage t'anks by pumping the oil into the day tank drain 1ine to fill the below groun tank have
~ @a g;<<nanoid been reviewed by Region Ii'and in SER~
~'upplement This evaluation c oses out this issue and no further changes are necessary.
+CZ car,'//dc'ev~SP
~/// d+ ~HAM
> // gw rvviW
~~~// dH /a Vi~
115 - Accepted.
116 - Accepted.
117 - Accepted.
119 - Accepted.
120 - Rejected.
In Ainendment 18 to the FSAR the applicant identified penetrations and doors that are potential.flood paths to Safety'elated equipment following a potential rupture 'of the-Circulating Mater System,
', The applicant is depending on the water tight characteristics of these doors and penetrations to prevent flood damage to safety related equipment.
In order for these doors and penetrations to be acceptable water seals, it is our position that the applicant provide alarms and administrative controls to'ssure that the doors are closed and periodic testing of th'e seals on the doors and penetrations is undertaken to assure their water tight integrity"." W This is a~I open item."
121 - The applicant indicated alehange in feedwater valve type.and refers to FSAR Figure 10.1';63 (Amd. 26).
This figure does not exist.
Clarification'of comment was requested from applicant on August 25, l)86.
The response was received on August'28, 1986.
However,i information was inadequate to resolve comment.
This is,'an open item
, since it is no clear whether the eedwater system ca'n produce unanalyzed transients.
The first part of this commentI relating to quality group changes sk)( u~X rex,e~.
I 142 - Accepted.
r+z i~,b'd~ ~e~ 'W, a
I 147 - Rejected.
FSAR amendment~26 was issued after SSER-1 was published.
This amount of unqualified( paint was revised by applicant's letter dated July 16, 1986.
SSER will address this latest submittal.
An
f 0
~
~