ML17054B874
| ML17054B874 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/05/1985 |
| From: | Haughey M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8509110077 | |
| Download: ML17054B874 (10) | |
Text
Docket No. 50-410 SPP 5
1985 NOTE TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
File Mary F. Haughey, Project Manager Licensing Branch No.
2 Division of Licensing NINE MILE POINT 2 CHAPTER 14 REVIEW A copy of the enclosure was provided to Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation to assist them in preparing for a meeting on September 14, 1985.
The enclosure contains a list of staff concerns to be discussed at that meeting following the staff review of the proposed revision of Chapter 14.
This revision was submitted to the staff on August 7, 1985.
Enclosure:
As stated Original signed by Noted:
R cc PDR LPDR Mary F. Haughey, Project Manager Licensing Branch No.
2 Division of Licensing DISTRIBUTION:
LRRRR RR R
RR RR LB82 PM MFHaughey:mk 9/W/85 EHylton MHaughey,PM LB82/DL/BC WRButler 9/+/85 8509l 1 0077 8509004 l0 PDR ADOCK 0~
DR
V, U
<p,8 AEC~+
(4
~o Cy n0
++*++
t UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 PEP 5
1985 Docket No. 50-410 NOTE TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
File Mary F. Haughey, Project Manager Licensing Branch No.
2 Division of Licensing NINE NILE POINT 2 CHAPTER 14 REVIEW A copy of the enclosure was provided to Niagara Nohawk Power Corporation to assist them in preparing for a meeting on September 14, 1985.
The enclosure contains a list of staff concerns to be discussed at that meeting following the staff review of the proposed revision of Chapter 14.
This revision was submitted to the staff on August 7, 1985.
Enclosure:
As stated Noted:
a ter R. But er Nary F. Haughey, Project Manager Licensing Branch No.
2 Division of Licensing cc PDR LPDR
r
NINE MILE POIPZ 2 REVIEW OF PRDPOSED CHAPTl& 14 REVISION 9-85 Subsection 14.2.18.3, Sub-item 8, should be reinstated, or the subsequent items should be renumbered.
2 ~
Table 14.2-34 should be edified to reinstate reference to Section 18.4.5 for test acceptance criteria.
3 ~
Table 14.2-38 should be modified to reinstate reference to Table 9.2-3 for test acceptance criteria."
4.
Table 14.2-46 should be mxlified to reinstate testing of the reactor vent valves (RG 1.68, App. A.l.a(2)(h)).
Table 14.2-67, Test Procedure Item 3, should be reinstated, or the subsequent itans should be renumbered.
6.
Table 14.2-69 should be expanded to include tests and appropriate acceptance criteria for safety-related HVAC systems described in Section 9.4.1.
7 ~
Table 14.2-74 should be mdified to reference appropriate parts of Section 9.4.1 for test acceptance criteria.
8.
9.
A test abstract should be provided for the Service Water Pump Bays'VAC System (previously part of Table 14.2-74).
Table 14.2-78 should be modified to reinstate reference to Section 6.2.5 for test acceptance criteria.
Table 14.2-79 should be modified to reinstate reference to Section 9.3.3 for test acceptance criteria.
Table 14.2-88 should be modified to reinstate reference to Section 9.3.3 for test acceptance criteria.
12.
13.
Table 14.2-81 should be edified to reinstate reference to Section 9.3.3 for test acceptance criteria.
Table 14.2-82 should be expanded to reference Section 9.3.3 for all applicable drain systems.
14.
Test abstracts should be provided which demonstrate proper operation of the normal onsite power distribution system (RG 1.68, App. A.l.g).
This should include, but not be limited to, the following distribution systems and their appropriate supporting systems:
a.
13.8 kV AC b.
688 V AC d.
248 V AC e.
128 V AC f.
125 V DC
r
l5.
Table 14.2-181 should be modified to provide acceptance criteria for Test Procedure Item 5.
16.
Table 14.2-182 should be modified to reinstate testing of the normal lighting system, or Test Objective Item 1 and Table 14.2-1 reference to this abstract should be appropriately modified.
L7.
Table 14.2-185 should be modified to reinstate reference to Section 12.3.4 for test acceptance criteria.
18.
Table 14.2-118 should be mxlified to reinstate reference to Section 9.1.4 for test acceptance criteria.
L9.
Question F648.84 response regarding RG 1.28 references Section 14.2.7.
Section 14.2.7 states that testing willbe conducted on the basis of a non-prototype, Category I plant.
Section 3.9.2.4B states that testing willbe conducted on the basis of a non-prototype, Category IV plant.
a.
Section 3.9.2.4B or Section 14.2.7 should be edified to resolve this discrepancy.
b.
Table 14.2-113 should be expanded to demonstrate conformance with the appropriate RG 1.28 regulatory position.
28.
Table 14.2-116 should be modified to reinstate reference to appropriate acceptance criteria.
21.
Table 14.2-125 should be modified to reinstate the follcwing tests in accordance with RG 1.188:
a.
Functional capability at full-load temperature conditions (RG 1.188, C.2.a(5) and FSAR Section 14.2.7).
b.
Consecutive valid starts (RG 1.188, C.2.a(9)).
c.
Redundant starts (RG 1.188, C.2.b).
22.
Table 14.2-126 should be mxlified to reinstate the following tests in accordance with RG 1.188:
a.
Functional capability at full-load temperature conditions (RG 1.188, C.2.a(5) and FSAR Section 14.2.7).
b.
Consecutive valid starts (RG 1.188, C.2.a(9)).
23.
Table 14.2-138 should be reinstated or ccmpletion of the RPV hydrostatic test should be noted either as a prerequisite to an appropriate preoperational test abstract or in an appropriate FSAR Section 14.2 subsection.
24.
Table 14.2-132 (previously part of Table 14.2-77) should be modified to reinstate reference to the response to Question F488.25 for test acceptance criteria.
The response to Question F488.25 should be mxlified to reference the appropriate test abstract.
A
~
~
4 II
~
.5.
Table 14.2-287 should be modified to provide Level 2 acceptance criteria.
.!6.
Table 14.2-213 references Figure 14.2-215-1.
This figure should be provided, or Table 14.2-213 should be mxlified to reinstate reference to Figure 14.2-213-1.
7 ~
.'8.
!9.
Table 14.2-221, Level 2 acceptance criteria Items 2 and 3 on page 3 of 3, should be deleted as they are redundant.
Table 14.2-222 should be reinstated.
Only page 3 of 3 was deleted by Amendment 16 (also see Question F648.34, Item 5.s).
Table 14.2-225 modifications (if any) should be made on the revised (Amendment 17 and 18) test abstract (see Question F648.18, Additional
Response
2a).
Tables 14.2-228, 14.2-231, and 14.2-248 should be modified to reinstate testing of the lcm-lear set pressure logic relief functions.
31.
Table 14.2-232 was not provided for review.
Table 14.2-233 references both Figures 14.2-233-1 and 14.2-234-1.
These references should be clarified.
33.
34.
Table 14.2-236 references Figure 14.2-236-1.
This figure should be provided, or Table 14.2-236 should be modified to reinstate reference to Figure 14.2-239-1.
The response to Question F648.1 should be revised as appropriate.
Table 14.2-241 should be modified to reinstate verification of the acceptability of reactor main steam and RCIC piping vibration.
35.
Table 14.2-245 should be reinstated (RG 1.68, App. 5.e.e)
~
36.
Table 14.2-381 should be provided (see Question F648.18, Additional
Response
2b).
37.
38.
39.
Test abstracts that derrnnstrate adequate ventilation of ESF system areas should be provided in accordance with the response to Question F648.13.
The response to Question F648.34, Item l.d(4), should be modified to provide a revised reference for verification of SRV open/closure setpoints, or Table 14.2-25 should be edified to reinstate this testing.
The response to Question F648.34, Item l.n(3), should also address testing of the control building chilled water subsystem.
48.
The response to Question F648.34, Item 5.g.g, should additionally reference Table 14.2-128.
4' h
~I