ML17053C824

Forwards Ofc of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Evaluation Input for Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance from Jul 1980 to June 1981.Licensee Performance Adequate

ML17053C824
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	09/03/1981
From:	Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8109150048
Download: ML17053C824 (6)

Text

SEP 0 3198)'.O Docket No.

50-410 MEMORANDUM FOR:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

V Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch 0 2, DL Division of Licensing SALP-2 INPUT ON NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2

~ 0 Attached is the NRR Performance Evaluation for SALP Cycle 2 for the subject plant.

This evaluation iras prepared by Ken Kiper who was the Proiect Manager for most of the period for this post CP-plant.

I

~

Attachment:

As stated ni strihution:

nocket File LBJ' Readina nEisenhut/RPurnle RTedesco RSchwencer KKiner MService

'nLynch IZE (S)

.aces (rt )

bcco Jn o

NuC DnR Local PllD Nsrr.

TERA TIt:

Original slgne'd bV:..

A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No.

2 Division of Licensing

~1$

~

< ir~W Q2 8

Q~O 9

'8109150048 810903 PDR ADOCK 05000410 PDR OFFICE/

SURNAME$

L

.".Ilpc nLv 'ch'grI'

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~

~ ~

n/

/

DATE II NRC FORM 318 n0-80) NRCM 40 0/

/$ 1

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 sco

~

~

~ ~

ittO ~i~

n/g /~l OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USQPO: 1081~WO

I

~

ff PV

Facility:

Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 Utility: Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appraisal Period:

July 1, 1980 to June 30, 1981 Project Manager:

Dave Lynch 1.

Performance Elements a) b)

c) e)

equality of Responses" and Submittals Based on a very few"s'ubmittals, the applicant seems to be adequate in quality of responses.

Efforts Required to--Obtain an Acceptable Response or Submittal Applicant seems willing to response acceptably when they understand the staff's requests.

Morking Knowledge of Regulations,

Guides, Standards, and Generic Issues Average Technical Competence The licensing organization seems to be lacking in technical understanding.

Not enough contact was had with the enginee'ring staff to judge.

Conduct of Meetings With NRR Applicant came to meetings prepared to address the issue at hand, with adequate support from the A/E.

Long Standing Open""Items Mark II Containment Organizational and Management Capabilities The applicant is modifing its organizational structure.

However, except for gAB approval, the capabilities of the management with the new structure is unknown.

Results of Operator. l.icensing Examinations Conducted During the Appraisal Period Not applicable Performance on Specific Issues OFFICEI SURNAME/

DATE P NRG FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 er w an adequate res revved its-us -cartdtef5nal onse.

The staff IAS.l.ly..az

~ ~ ~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ \\ ~

OFFlClAL RECORD COPY The applicant requested approval to use a special rebar in a specific application.

The staff asked for detailed information on prope'rties and testing.

The ao 1

~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~ 0 VSOPO: 1981~5-960

"~

9 F

i A

h V

R, 1

~

sc

2.

Observed Trends in Performance Insufficient data 3.

Notable Strengths and Weaknesses a)

Strengths Operational and construction experfence on Unit 1 b)

Meaknesses

ill, Licensing organization 4.

Overall Summary Since Nine Mfle Pofnt, Unfit 2 fs fn the post CP Stage.

the contact with HRR is minimal.

The app1fca'nt has performed adequately where they ha've been observed.

OFFICE P SURNAME%

DA7E$

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

NRG FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL R ECOR D COPY USG PO: 1aI1~960

I

~

~

NW

~

~

~

- ~

A ~ ~