ML17053A670
| ML17053A670 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point, Susquehanna, Columbia, Limerick, LaSalle, Zimmer, Shoreham, Bailly File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 04/13/1979 |
| From: | Anderson C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7905040316 | |
| Download: ML17053A670 (88) | |
Text
Distribution:
Docket Filesv NRR Reading CSB Reading H, Denton R. Mattson S.
Hanauer R..Fraley, ACRS (16)
R.;,Boyd R.<DeYoung D.; Vassall o D.i Skovholt R. Tedesco D. Ross r8,E (s)
NRC PDR W. Butler F. Schauer R. Bosnak T.
Su R. Trevino J. Kudrick L. Ruth F. Eltawila A. Hafiz C. Grimes G. Lainas R. Cudlin C. Anderson rPR13 j979
~Q RE0(
P0 Cy p
IVlp i+
+***+
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION WASHINGTON, D, C. 20555 APR I g. i979 Docket Nos.:
50-358, 50-352/353 50-367,'- 50-373/374, 50-387/388, 50-4
, 50-322, 50-397 APPLICANT:
Members of Mark II Owners Group
SUBJECT:
MEETING WITH MARK II OWNERS GROUP TO DISCUSS INTERMEDIATE PLANT PROGRAM TASKS (MARCH 21, 1979)
Back round The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the status of several of the Mark II Owners'ntermediate Program Tasks.
This included:
an indepth preview of several new tasks (i.e., the condensation oscillation test task and the Bechtel improved chug load definition task); preliminary observations from the ongoing CREARE multivent subscale steam tests; and preliminary observations from the corn'pleted in-plant CAORSO SRV quencher tests.
An attendance list and a copy of the meeting handouts are enclosed.
Several new tasks were recently identified as a part of the Hark II owners supporting pr ogram; In addition significant progress was made in several existing tasks
'in the supporting program.
A summary of the status report provided to the staff by the Mark II owners relative to these
'rograms is provided below.
1.
Task A. 17, 'Condensation 'Oscillation Test 'Program
. The Hark II owners proposed additional full scale steam tests in the 4T facility at the 'February 13-14, 1979 Mark II owners meeting with the staff.
These new tests are directed towards obtaining a better understanding of LOCA related condensation oscillations in the downcomers.
Modifications in the fill sca1e test facility vent length will allow a more conclusive assessment of vent length effects
'han is possible in subscale tests.
'. The purpose of this presentation
Mark II Owners Group APR I 3 1579 7
I was to provide the staff with a description of the proposed test including:
objectives, instrumentation, test matrix, and piramotar control.
In addition a description of the preliminary facility design was provided.
The original 4T facility included a non-prototypical vent.
In the new tests, the facility will be modified so that vent length would be prototypical of the Mark II plants.
In addition, provisions will be made to incorporate a removable vent riser and jet deflector in the drywell.
The original 4T instrumentation system has been expanded to allow an indepth study of the steam condensation phenomena in the vent and at the pool boundary.
New measurement techniques will be employed in these tests to enable accurate determination of vent air content.
These tests, which are still in the planning stages, are scheduled for completion in the second quarter of 1980 with reports to be issued in the fourth quarter of 1980.
The tests are considered to be confirmatory by the Mark II owners.
They will provide information to establish the conservative nature of the current lead plant steam loads..
The Hark II owners stated that the thrust of these'ests was to studycondensation oscillation loads at the pool boun'dary.
No attention is to be given, in these tests, to the furth'er study of lateral loads on the vents.
2.
Task A. 11 Multivent Subscale'Testin Representatives of the Har k II Owners Group and Creare, Inc. reported on the preliminary results of Phase I of the 1/10 scale multivent tests.
These tests consist of steam tests conducted with 1, 3 and 7 vents.
These tests wer'e'irected at multivent phasing investigations.
A'resentation was made of the types of phasing data and studies of the 3 vent tests that are being conducted.
Preliminary results from these tests confirm that the use of a 'lead plant multivent multiplier of one is conservative.
In addition, results of the tests show a reduction in the multivent multiplier with increasing number of vents.
Single vents tests conducted by Creare since November 1978 wer e also discussed.
These tests were conducted to address questions rel'ative to the repeatabi lity of earlier single vent tests under conditions of varying vent air content.
Improved repeatability was observed in these most recent tests.
Mark II Owners Group APR ] 3 lg7g To complete the first phase of the Creare test program, additional multivent tests at 1/6 scale are to be conducted with 1
and 3 vents.
In addition, single and multivent tests are to be conducted to investigate the effect of pool size, vent location and drywell vent phasing.
3.
Task A. 16 Improved Chug Load Oefinition Several different fluid structure studies of the 4T steam tests were discussed with the staff during the past year in an attempt to better define a more realistic chug source that can be applied to Mark II facilities.
The current lead plant chugging load specification involves the direct application of the measured 4T wall pressures to Mark II containment walls.
The Mark II owners have selected this most recent chugging load improvement program developed by Bechtel, as the generic methodology for the Intermediate Program.
The discussion included:
studies of the 4T data to establish categories of condensation events encountered; numerical studies of the 4T tests using the K-FIX computer program; and acoustic model studies of the 4T tests.
" This presentation was the staff's first exposure to this program.
The. program is stil'l in its early stages of development.
'Pre'liminary results of the program indicate that with selected source functions it is possible to reproduce typical experimental pressure time histories and power spectral densities observed in the 4T tests.
Additional work remains to establish a conservative chug specification, based on the existing data, for application to individual Nark II plants.
The Mark II owners indicated that this chugging methodology would be discussed further at the next Mark II Owners Group meeting with the staff in about two months.
4.
Task B.5, Caorso Tests The results of the Caor so in-plant GE cross quencher SRV tests were discussed.
These tests including single.and multi-valve tests were completed in February 1979.
A total of 104 tests were conducted.
The specific areas of interest addressed by this test program are:
A.
Suppression pool boundary pressures; B.
Containment dynamic response;
Nark II Owners Group 4-APR l,) p)gg C.
SRV discharge line clearing and reflood transients; D.
quencher structural response; E.
Suppression pool thermal mixing; F.
Submerged structure loads; and testing in December 1979.
G.
Containment liner and downcomer vent structural response.
A preliminary assessment of the available Caorso test data indicates that, in general, observations either compare well or are conservatively bounded by test predictions based on existing design load methodology.
In certain areas (i.e.,
suppr ession pool boundary pressures) the test results indicate that the DFFR Rev.
2 cross quencher load specifications are very conservative.
The current plans are for issuance of a final report on the first phase T
of testing in Nay 1979, followed by a final repor t on the second phase of
Enclosure:
As Stated Distribution:
See attached pages Task Manager Clifford J. Anderson, A-8 Containment Systems Sranch Division of Systems Safety
Mark II Meeting March 21, 1979 San Jose, California A. E.
W. J.
P.
W.
R. J.
M. R.
J.
A.
B.
R.
Roger s Bilanin Marriott Elwood Walenciak Block Patel Name Clifford Anderson Herb Brinkmann Bob O'Mara H.
Chau C. Lin E.
M. Mead P.
D. Hedgecock T. Jozkowski R. Guizar E.
R. Klein W.
P.
Hennessy F.
E.
Ogden Ivan Catton K.
C. Hazifotis J.
A. Weyandt T.
R. -McIntyre W.
C.
Saxena John C.
Lane J;
R. Martin Or anization NRC/CSB CG&E S&W Lilco S&W PP&L WPPSS Burns
NRC/ACRS Consultant General Electric Bechtel GE GE NRC/SEB GE GE GE GE GE GE Creare Creare
Name A. R. Smith W. M. Davis G.
W. Fitzsimmons R.
U. Muzzy L. J.
Sobon R. L. Tedesco T.
M. Su John Lehner C.
Tung C.
Economos J.
R. Fitch H.
W. Vollmer D.
M. O'onnor Sydney Miner K. J.
Green J.
Abel Or anization GE GE GE GE GE NRC/DSS NRClDSS BNL BNL BNL GE P.E.
Co.
Bechtel NRC S&l, CECO
Hr. Earl A. Borgmann Vice President - Engineering The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company P. 0.
Box 960 Cincfnnatf, Ohio 45201 CC:
Troy B. Conner, Jr.,
Esq.
- Conner, Moore 8 Corber 1747 Pennsyanfa
- Avenue, N. M.
Mashfngton, D.
C.
20006 Nr. William J. Noran 6eneral Counsel The Cfncfnnatf Gas and Electt fc Company P. 0.
Box 960 Cfncfnnaft. Ohio 45201 Nr. Hfllfam G. Porter, Jr.
Porter, Stanley, Arthur and Platt 37 Nest Broad Street
- Columbus, Ohio 43215 Nr. Peter H. Forster, Vice President Energy Resources The Dayton Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 1247 Dayton, Ohio 45401 J.
Robert Newlin, Counsel The Dayton Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Nr; James D. Flynn Manager, Licensing
'nvironmental Affairs The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company P.
0."
Box 960 Cincinnati. Ohio 45201 Hr. J.
P. Fenstermaker Senior Vice President - Operations Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company 215 North Front Street
- Coulubus, Ohio 43215 David B. Fankhauser, PbD 3569 Nine %le Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45230 Thomas A. Luebbers, Esq.
Cincinnati City Solicitor Room 214, City Hall Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Hr. Stephen Schumacher Mfami Valley Power Project P. 0.
Box 252 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Ns. Augusta Prince, Chairperson 601 Stanley Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
\\1 1
l
Mr. Norman W. Curtis Vice President - Engineering and Construction Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsy1 vanf a 181 01 cc:
Mr. Earle M. Mead Preject Manager Pennsylvania Power 5 Lfght Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Jay Sflberg, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts 5
Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. M.
Mashfngton, D. C.
20036 Mr. Wfllfam E. Barberich, Nuclear Licensing Group Supervisor Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Edward M. Nagel, Esquire General Counsel and Secretary Pennsylvania Power 4 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Bryan Snapp, Esq.
Pennsylvanfa Power h Light Company 901 Hami lton Street AHentown, Pennsylvania 18101
Mr. Byron Lee, Jr.
Vice President Caanonwea1th Edison Company P. 0. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 cc:
Richard E. Powell, Esq.
Isham, Lincoln 8 Scale Pne First National Plaza 2400 Chicago, Illinois 60670 4
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ccs:
Arvin E. Upton, Esq.
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 6 MacRae 1757 N Street, N.
H.
Mashington, D. C.
20036 Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.
Natural Resources Defense Council 917 15th Street, N-M.
Mashington, D. C.
20005.
ter. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University College of Law E. I. Mhite Hall Campus
- Syracuse, New York 13210 T. K. DeBoer, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Swan Street Building Core 1 - 2nd Floor Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ATI5:
Mr. Gerald K. Rhode, Vjce Presideht System Project Management 300 Erie Boulevard -West
- Syracuse, New York 13202
Northern Indiana Public Service Coriiny ccs:
Neredith Ben@hill, Jr. Esq.
Assistant General Counsel Bethlehem Steel Corporation 701 East Third Street Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18016 Northern Indiana Public Service Coapany NTN:
Mr. H. P. Lyle, Vice President Electric Production 5 Engineering 5265 Hohman Avenue Haaxmnd, Indiana 46525 William8. Eichhorn, Esq.
Eichhorn, Horror 6 Eichhorn 5243 Hohaan Avenue
- Banaend, Indiana 46320 Eoward W. Osann, Jr., Esq.
Wolfe, Butbard, Leydid, Voit 6 Osann, Ltd.
Suite 4600 One IBH Plaza Chicago, Illinois 6u611 Robert J. Vollen, Esq.
109 North Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 Porter County, Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.
Box 438 Chesterton, Illinois 463U4 Michael I. Su@gert, Esq.
25 East
-Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 Richard L. Roobins, Esq.
Lake Nichigan Federation 53 Nest Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 Maurice Axelrad, Esq.
Lmreristein, He~, Reis a Axelrad 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
Washington, O. C. 2u036 James H. Cahan, Esq.
Russell Eggert, Esq.
Office of the Attorney General 188 Randolph Street Chicago, Illinois 60602
Long Island Lighting Company ccs o
I Edward M. Barrett, Esq.
General Counsel Long Island L.jghting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 Edward J. Walsh, Esq.
General Attorney Long Island Lighting Ccmpany 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 J. P. Novarro Project Manager Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P. 0. Box 618 Wading River, New York 11792 Jeffrey Cohen, Esq.
Deputy Conmissioner,and Counsel New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Howard L. Blau Blau and Cohn,.P.
C.
380 North Broadway
- Jericho, New York 11753 Irving Like, Esq.
Reilly, Like and Schnieder 200 West Shin Street
- Babylong, New York 11702 NB Technical Associates 366 California Avenue Suite 6 Palo Alto, California 94306 Long Island Lighting Company NTN:
Mr. Andrew W. Wofford Vice President 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801
Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.
Vfce President h General Counsel Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Penn~lvanfa 19101 ceo Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
- Conner, Moore 5 Corber 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. M.
Mashfngton, D. C.
20006 M. Milliam Anderson, Esq.
Deputy Attorney General Room 512, Nafn Capitol Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Frank R. Clokey, Esq.
Special Assistant Attorney General Room 218, Towne House Apartments P. 0. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 Honorable Lawrence Coughlin House of Representatives Congress of the United States Mashfngton, D. C.
20515 Roger B. Reynolds, Jr., Esq.
324 Swede Street Norrfstown, Pennsylvania 19401 Millard C. Hetzel, Esq.
312 Hain Street
~ East Greenvf 1 le, Pennsyl vanf a 18041 Lawrence Sager, Esq.
Sager 4 Sager Associates 45 High Street Pottstown, Pennsylvania 19464 Joseph A. Stttyth Assistant County Solicitor County of Montgomery Courthouse morristown, Pennsylvania 19404
Nr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.
cc:
Eugene J. Bradley Ph)ladelphia Electr)c Company Assoc)ate General Counsel 2301 Market Street Ph)ladelph)a, Pennsylvania 19101
t Washington Public Power Supply System ATTN:
Mr. Kneil 0. Strand Managing Director 3000 George Washington May Richland Washington 99352 Joseph B. Knotts, Jr.,
Esq.
Oebevo/se 4 Liberman 700 Shoreham Building 806 Fifteenth Street, N. M.
Mashington, D. C.
20005 Richard g. guigley, Ksq.
Mashington Public Power Supply System P. 0.
Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352
NARK I I CONDENSATION OSCILLATION TFST 21 NARCH 1979 e
OVERVI EM e
FEST SESCRIPTIOtf I",
SPEC I)F I C QBJECT IVES
~
TEST EQUIPMENT (FACILITY/'IJNSTRUNENTATI ON) e T~EST PARANET'ERS ANB RATRIX
~
PARANDER CONTROL
~
PRELIIMINARY FACILITY DESIGN
'r e
APPROACH BASED ON.'REQUIREt)ENTS e
STATUS OF CURRENT WORK e
PLANNED NODIFICATIONS!N W 4'a
CaeESSATIX OSCILVTION 4T DATA SPECIFICATION POTENTIAL VENT LEN6TH EFFECTS SUBSCALE TEST AND ANALYSIS
'RESOLTU ION OF V,,L, EFFECT ABD IT IONA L ANALYSIS AND SUBSCALE RATA PILL SCAtE Rl %ST
CONDENSATION OSCILLATION o
NRC QUESTION STATED IN LOADS EVALUATION REPORT POTENTIAL VENT 'LENGTH EFFECT ON C.O.
LOAD BELIEVED NOT TO BE CONTROLLING o
TESTING SCALED APPROACH o
RESULTS I'NCONCLUSIVE o
CLOSURE WITH NRC APPEARED l ENGTHY FULL SCALE APPROACHI o
FASTER AND MORE DIRECT CLOSURE o
FULL SCALE SELECTED MINIMIZES MODELING REQUIREYiENTS DIRECT MEASUREMENT MORE CONVINCING TO NRC TEST FACILITY RESOURCES AVAILABLE MORE DIRECT COMPARISON POSSIBLE NO IMPACT ON l'IULTIVENT TEST PROGRAM o
FULL SCALE TEST GENERIC TEST '(4T) 0 APPLIES TO ALL PLANTS o
CONSERVATIVE OUTPUT o
FOCUSES ON C,O,
qT {;g{) TEST SCHEDULE 1979
)g 2g 30 19 1980 yg 20 3Q 4<
PRELIPIINRY DESIGN FACILITYMIFICATION TKSTI%
(s
~%~
~
~
I
~~ l~a g ~
)o
$ ~
) ~
t
~NOPOSEO NSLflCATEN lO 4T FlClLPY ooooooo J
840 o Rt~
St4P>>
%OP SP Ct'
%'4
$ ~
$o
$ o
~ 4 el I
~oet og ol
~o ~
~ g ooo
~o
~t+
ear
~o'
~rr
~0 ~ +
~O 04'r
~g
+I+
NARK II FULL SCALE 4T CONDENSATION OSCILLATIOfl (C/0)
TEST TEST DESCRIPTION e
CONDENSAT ION OSC ILLATION PHENOl'lENA e
NEED FOR FULL SCALE TEST o
TEST OBJECTIVE o
TEST REQUIREMENTS e
NEASURENENT OBJECTIVES 3/21/79 PWM
NARK II FULL SCALE 4T C/0 TEST CONDENSATION OSCILLATION PHENONENA o
OBSERYED PRIOR TO ONSET OF CHUGGING IN FULL SCALE BLOMDOWNS, (MEDIUN NASS FLUX MITH STEAN AND AIR BOTtj PRESEt'1T) e CHARACTERIZED BY CONTINUOUS CONDENSATION, OSCILLATING MALL LOAD, STEA1'i/MATER INTERFACE RENAINS ATTACHED TO END OF YENT, 3/21/79 PWM
NARK II FULL SCALE 0T C/0 TEST NEED FOR FULL SCALE TEST e
NEED FULL SCALE NARK II PROTOTYPICAL DATA, C/0 FREQUENCY CONTENT tiAY DEPEND ON VENT LENGTH.
NONPROTOTYPICAL VENT LENGTH IN PREVIOUS 0T TESTS (ABOUT TWICE THE TYPICAL NARK II VENT LENGTH),
SCALED TESTS INCONCLUSIVE ON VENT LENGTH
- EFFECT, o
FACILITY NODIFICATION FOR NEW QT C/0 TEST
- UNDERWAY, (NOST APPROPRIATE WAY OF ADDRESSING THIS SPECIFIC ISSUE),
5/21/79 PWN
NARK II FULL SCALE 4T C/0 TEST TEST OBJECTIVE 0
CONFIRN THE CURRENT NARK II C/0 SPECIFICATION (DFFR, REV, 3) e SPECIFICALLY, ADDRESS VENT LENGTH EFFECT PROVIDE DATA TO REFINE C/0 SPECIFICATION, IF NECESSARY 3/21/79 PWN
NARK II FULL SCALE 0T C/0 TEST TEST REQUIREt";ENTS e
tiARK I I PROTOTYPICAL SINULATION VENT LENGTH (WITH DEFLECTOR PLATE)
GEOMETRY BREAK TYPES AND SIZES SYSTEN TRANSIENT RESPONSE AT TIE BACK DUPLICATE SELECTED PREVIOUS 0T TESTS FOR DIRECT COYiPARISON FOR VENT LENGTH EFFECT,
~
ESTABLISH KEY PARANETER EFFECTS VENT SUBYiERGENCE INITIAL POOL TENPERATURE AIR CONTENT f1ASS FLUX 5/21/79 PNM
l'",ARK II FULL SCALE 4T C/0 TEST t1EASURENENT OBJECTIVES o
POOL HALL PRESSURES o
PRESSURES INSIDE VENT s
TENPERATURES IN VICINITY OF VENT EXIT e
SYSTEI"l THERlltlODYNANIC/HYDRODYNANIC CONDITIONS e
VENT AIR CONTENT e
SELECTIVE IhSTRUfIENTS FOP'IE BACK TO PREVIOUS 4T DATA 3/21/79 PWN
VACUU>
QR E ARE R VAI.VE VEHT LIHE QRACE DOWHCOME R TES'I SECT IOh QRACE rY-
-)
~
RUPTURE DISC ASSEMBLv fLOW REST RICTOR ILOWDOWh L IHE ELOa.
TEST TAHE 0'4" DRrWE I,L h
SEREHCE GRADE STEAV ER*TOR.
~ AACg
0 STFN VESSEL 0
YOLUME 0
BREAK TYPE 1EO FT LIauIO L STEAM BLONIOO LINE 0
TEST INITIATION 0
LENGTH 0
FLOW RESTR ICTOR RUPTURE DISK PAIR
&ME
~ 15FT
~ 90FT YENTURI SAME 0
DRYNELL 0
VOLUME 6
POSITION 0
PREHEAT CAPABILITY 1900 Ft GROUND lEVEL YES ABOVE H~LL YES 0
VENT e
DIAMETER 0
LENGTH 0
BRACING JET DEFLECTOR 0
RISER 20 AND 24 INCH
~ 90FT 8 AND 24 FT NONE NONE 24-INCH PROTOTYt' CAL OPTIONAL 0
>ENELL 0
POOL AREA/VENT AREA 0
VENT DISCHARGE ABOVE BOTTOM 0
NOMINAL SJBMERGENCE 0
FREESPACE VOLUME (NmINAt )
11,6 12 FT ll FT 1010 4 SAME SAME GM=
S/16/79
6 BLMOO LINE 0
CAPABILITY TO PREHEAT 0
IDGE ENOUGH TO NAINTAIN=CHOKED NOZZLE 0
SMALL ENOUGH TO AVOID PLUG OR SLUG FLOW 0
DRYL'lELL 0
NINIMIZE lk)LDU~ VOLUME WITH NO RISER 0
PROVIDE FOR PEDUCED INITIALAIR NASS 9
REMOVABLE RI SER g
y' $
~ 0 I, g',
GNF 5/16/79
t",ARK II FULL SCALE 4T C/0 TEST NEASURENENT OBJECTIVES o
POOL WALL PRESSURES o
PRESSURES INSIDE VENT o
TENPERATURES IN VICINITY OF VENT EXIT 0
SYSTEf'1 THERtiODYNAYiIC/HYDRODYNANIC COND ITI ON S o
VENT AIR CONTENT
'.o SELECTIVE INSTRUfsENTS FOR TIE BACK TO PREVIOUS 4T DATA, 3/21/79 UCS
Location Instrument T
e INSTRUMENTATION Measurement Real Time (100 Hz/sec)
Replay (1000 Hz/sec)
Filt Fre
. (Hz)
Wetwell Suppression Pool Downcomer Flush Mount Press.
xdcr Accel erometers Strain gages Thermocouples Flush Mount Press.
xdcr Cavity aP xdcr Cavity press.
xdcr Level probe Accelerometers Thermocouples Pool Boundary Press.
Wetwell airspace press.
Facility Response Local Wall Response Lncal wall Response Pool temperature Freespace temperature Vent acoustics Vent flow Vent flow CO duration CO duration Vent flow & temp.
10 1
1 3
4 12 1
10 10K 30 30 30 10K 10K 10 10 10K 30 so 10K 10 Drywell Blowdown Line Steam Vessel Flush Mount Press.
Cavity press.
xdcr Cavity aP xdcr Level Probe Thermocouples Cavity press.
xdcr Thermocouples Cavity aP xdcr Cavity press.
xdcr xdcr Dynamic pressure Static press.
Liquid retention Liquid retention Drywell temperature Blowdown flow Nozzle temp.
& blowdwn line exit temp.
Liquid blowdown flow Vessel pressure 10K 30 30 10 30 10 30 30 Vacuum Breaker Micro Switch Valve opening Note:
Instrumentation plan also includes a downcomer grab
" sampler to measure vent flow air content Totals 64 27
Nu CLEAR E N E R GY t
G E N E R A L E L E C T 8%
BUSINESS G ROUP REV SH NO.
"P REL IMINARY" TEST MATRIX TEST BREAK SIZE BREAK INITIAL (XDBA)
TYPE POOL TEMP.
('F)
SUBMERG.
(FT.)
DRYNELL INITIAL EFFECT UNDER AIR MASS (X)
INVESTIGATION 100 Steam 70 120 100 Temperature 70 Submergence
- 13. 5 70 Vent Flow Rate 30 100 50 Air Content 70 30 10 100 100 Repeat 70 120 100 Temperature'2 13 15 100 Liquid 70 120 70 120 100 50 Temp L'IQUID p
il Air Content 16 17 70 30 Liqui d 70 Liqui d 120 100 100 Vent Flow Rate Vent Flow Rate 18 20 Re eat test -- Parameters to be established later e eat test --
arameters to e esta ss e
ater Re eat test -- Parameters to be estab ished later (CONT'D)
NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS GROUP GENERAL ELECTRIC REV SH NO.
"PRELIMINARY" TEST MATRIX TEST BREAK SI ZE BREAK INITIAL SUBMERG.
DRYWELL INITIAL EFFECT UNDER (gDBA)
TYPE POOL TEMP. (
F)
(FT.)
AIR MASS
('X)
INVESTIGATION ADDITIONAL TESTS WITH VENT RISER 100 100 30 Steam Liquid Liquid 70 70 70 100 100 100 Vent Riser (L'oss Coeff.)
Vent Riser Vent Riser NEBG 807
EVALU ION OF T S PREVIOUS 4T DATA NEW 4T DATA ANALYSIS INTERPRETATION FINAL TEST REPORT EFFECT OF VENT LENGTH DONINANT VARIABLES PHENONENA EXPLANATION NOT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT FINISH EVALUATE WHETHER SIGNIFICANT RELATIVE TO DFFR REV.
3
TEST OBJECT IVES TEST REQUIREMENTS FACILITY FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION FACILITY DESIGN FAC ILITY CONSTRUCTION TEST PLAN TEST PROCEDURES DATA ACQUIS ITION SOFTWARE QJALIFICATION DATA REDUCTION SOFfWARE @CALIFICATION INSTRlNENT CALIBRATIONS AS-HUILT DRAWINGS FACILITY ACCE>TANCE TESTS FACILITY Ot'ERATIONAL LIMITS 0>ERATIONAL READINESS REVIEW OPERATOR TRAINING 8 CERTIFICATION TEST CONDUCT QJICK LOOK DATA EVALUATION FINAL DATA REDUCTION DATA REPORT DATA UTILIZATION HFN 5/19/79
FACILITYDESIGN STEAN GENERATOR O
0T NVWELL DOWNCOMER RUPTURE DISC SYSTEM 9
DATA ACQUIS ITION SYSTEM HARDWARE I
DATA ACQUI S ITION SOFlWARE
~
CONTROL SYSTEM
~
HATER TRANSFER L TREATMENT SYSTEM e
FOUNDATIONS
~
DRYWELL R O'OOL PIECE
~
BLOWDOWN LINE P
EXTEND P
YENT RIsER e
INsTRUMENTATIQN R (ABLE BFk 5/L9/79
reWCXW I;
rr<G IC al ~ I
~
~
(
~
I Q~
Qa g
s I
soli csir<<r n sc'cry~
vgVswa ~r e err>r~
i 4S<<lIVt Oaf
~
~
Ir Et Mwwt lU-4 'r<<SS i>f fl~i1;>IIIC~
'rslssrisso cssIM
~tfrl r yrrCS. err'-1P aCP8'~
vSvk'<<
aSvl'AgSTCA<<
<<Cv iSCirtSAC
(
I I
I II 1
~
I I
I I
~
I i
~
~
I gIliVIht:ISC rvlillIrZS I
I I
I I
I
~
I I
. ~
i
~, ir/t i
I 1
I
~
I L
I P
I',
<<, I)SS ')
/JA' IrC~CJ Ieger L-
~
'.Jp" I ',.~
~
I
+
~
I I
i~
I II I
SS I ~~<<I'rSS ISW irSIiIS ~
jhow iverrr&t
.I,r rSSO V
<<vCP. l'a I
/vv IktV~lfL
~ sl,I',
i P(
.rare I trit/ E4f IVP b1 Ii I
y ~
I ~i ~I I
I I
I t+
I.
1..csiSs'r crrl MC ivsc s
~
i ie I
~ ~
I t
>>IS'S I
~ ~
(?
'1 ii ICi JC 0
.76' P$
)
II
)2' 1
J U
I C
- r. a e e Ec.52'-6 CaB jv/re 7'-lO g
/"4 mns (PEP) 34 g/A
/- 7//K g I
I I
I I
I 24 ZCH K P/Pf g) z~ 4eoirr (O'P Z PICA) 2Bp "DIP
'ured Crrr) 2 EEGTAIE h
24-fCd'2./. S//P'dQ 24'SCH.2AC. S O'PEISEl AAEE 'VO E~EE.
DIISTG ZI ISd E SVAEV"ITS..
'4"O.O.
~&4~~c
I tFST REQLIIRPENTS SPECIFICATII 1
FACILITYFUNCTIWL SPECIFICATION 9
PRELININARY DESI6N PACKA6E e
PAID 0
EQUIMENT AGGT DEWING 0
PIt'ING DRAWING INSTRUMENT/EQUIMENT LIST e
FAcILITY St'EGIFIcATIQN e
LONG LEAD ITEM DEsIGN (DRYwELL)
I PLACE DRYIKLLORDER 1
OTfKR ITENS
~
DAS REVIEW (DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEYi)
~
SITE CLEARANCE PERMIT e
INSTRUMENTATIoN ORDERS HR't 3/L9/79
MULTIVENT TEST PROGRAM PRELIMINARY 1/10 SCALE MULTIVENT DATA FRov j., 5, 7 VENT TEsTs Creare Inc.
3/14/79
TABLE 1 PHASE I MULTIVENT SCOPING TESTS GEOMETRIC CONFIGURATIONS Number Vent Wetwell Drywell Vent Test Geometry of Diameter Diameter Volume Offset Matrix Number Vents (in. )
(in. )
(ft3)
(in. )
Type <<) '
2 3
5 (a) 6 7 (b) 8 (a) 9 10ll 12 13 14 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 3
3 3
7 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2,5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 10 18 18 18 18 30 30 30 18 18 18 30 30 28 2.5 2.5 7.3 32 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 11 7.3 32 33 93 17.3 0
0 0
0 0
10 0
ZI ZZ IZIIII ZI IZ IZ NOTES:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Same vent to wall spacing as geometry 1
Same vent to wall spacing as geometry 2
See Table 3 for definition of Test Matrix l
I
~
I
~ I
~
~
~ '
SUNARY GF RESULTS TO DATE 3J10 scALK srNGLK vKNT 0ATA coNslsTKNT ldrTN PRKvlovQ
$ 1NGLK VENT TESTS'NK
~LTrVKNT mLTrPLraR ls LKss THAN ONK THK NJLTlVKNT NULTiPLrKR MCRKASKS llrTH rNCRKAsrNG NQQKR( OF VENTS'REARE 1NCe 5/10/79
Drywell Pressure Yp C
Vent Static Pressure Pool Hall Pressure Coupled Conducti,vity Probes Si nal Traces Durin a Chu Creare Inc.
3/14/79
P8ASING PHASING DATA TO BE OBTAINED FOR THREE VENT GEOMETRIES ONLY e CRITERIA FOR A CHUG TO HAVE OCCURRED AT A VENT IN THE MULTIVENT GEOMETRY NO WATER IN THE VENT (DETERMINED FROM COUPLED CONDUCTIVITY PROBES)
- RAPID CONDENSATION AT VENT EXIT (DETERMINED FROM STATIC PRESSURE IN THE VENT)
- PRESSURE SPIKE OCCURRING AT THE POOL WALL (DETERMINED FROM POOL WALL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER)
(
i Creare Inc.
3/14/79
TYPICAL PHASING DATA PERCENTAGE OF VENT CHUGGING DURING A POOL CHUG (K OF TIME lp 2, OR 3 VENTS CHUGGED)
TIME WINDOW STATISTICS (MEAN TIME WINDOW AND STANDARD DEVIATION)
Creare Inc.
3/14/79
RENINlt)G PHASE 1 TESTS FhLTIVENT TESTS AT 1/6 SCALE (1, 3 VENTS).
THESE TESTS WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONALHULTIVENT DATA FOR CG%'ARISON WITH 1/10 SCALE DATA'INGLE VENT AND MULTIVENT TESTS TO DETERNINK KFFECT OF POOL SIZE ON WALL PRESSURKS EFFECT OF VENT LOCATION IN THE POOL ON WALL PRESSURE KFFKCT OF DRYWELL ON VENT PHASING THKSK TESTS WlLL PROVIDE THK PHYSICAL INSIGHTS NEEDED TO KXPLAIN THK REDUCTION IN POOL 'MALL PRKSSURES OBSERVED lN
%ALTIVENT CHUGGING o CREARE INCo 3/10/79
CHUGG It/G YEIHODOLOGY.
5/2579 1 o INTRODUCTION
- 6. K. ASHLEY II 2,
4T BATA INVESTIGATIONS i"le Ns HOWARD 5,
NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE 4T (BUGGING PROBLEM 6
K ASHLEY II
'COUSTIC NODEL E. WIN 5
VERIFICATION OF THE ACOUSTIC l'bDEL
'I Ei PABIN 6
APPLI CATION TO YiKII ANNULAR GEOMETRY ACOUSTIC thDEL APPLICATION G, K, ASHLEY II E.
i@BIN G. K. ASHLEY II SUl NARY 6.
K. ASHLEY II
P V
oF M, +Q)
W Q
(n)
P) OUT, W~ 0 f2 OUT P)
(Q)
(nl FLEXIBLE CO?BETAINE R
FORCING SIGNAL Al'PLIEDWITHIN FLUID RIGID CONTAINER FORCING SIGNAL APPLIED %'ITHIN F LUID FLEXIBLE CONTAINER INCIDENT P R ESSUR E WAVE (P)) APPLIED AT FLUID STRUC.
TURE INTERFACE (v) + p+ v e
p
+.p2 I(
g (v) + p v
p>
p2s N
v (<, + yz)
~
> (0> + 0z)'
C C
(p> + pz)
=
p(0> + 02) p~
=
P02~
8$ )
]
8 S
n 8/2]
=
v n
(pg + p2) ](
Pt F
p~ ]
= pi F
p2 ]~F (p +p )
p
]~
=
Os
C~a:e or I
Classical ugs Shape:
damped sinusoidal Predominant Frequencies:
20 to 30 Hz Peak Pressure Amplitude:
34 to 138 kPa positive (5 to 20 psi) 28 to 96 kPa negative
(-4 to -14 psi)
Shape:
sinusoidal Predominant Frequencies:
5, 13, 21 Hz Peak Pressure Amplitude:
34 kPa positive and gh kPa negative
(+5 psi)
Shape:
damped and undamped sinusoidal Predominant Frequencies:
5, 13, 21 and 20 to 30 Hz Peak Pressure Amplitude:
103 kPa positive and 103 kPa negative
(+15 psi)
C~ate orv IV Other Events Shape:
irregular Predominant Frequencies:
mixtu're, of 5, 13, 21, 30, 35 to 40, 45 to 50 Hz Peak Pressure Amplitude:
34 kPa
{<5 psi) or very low amplitude 2-3
CHIJ0
~ (a) 1
(
0H(l Z
M ~
1 ~
(>
~l lfa(
l'
,i aI( i
~V "(UStu ih (aN
~ON NN
+5 N NN
)OPP T ZraC (ra(a.a. 1 SCCA)
~(P'
~tr
~ '%N NW 5H AN
) ZraE (ra(a.a. ZS(C(&S)
~ ~)P I~N C~
~ )Z CHVG i)96 t
ra ~
0H(l Z
4 ~
5 (l
~
5o l
1/)PE~
0H Z
U ~
t ~
)ON NN AN NN
)ON ZZ)aC (ll(l.(.ZSCCC)i()S)
~)P PN
)SN ION
~SN NN
~ON
't (tan (rl(l.l ZSCCC74)S)
~)P Figure,.2-1 Examples of Category.I Chugs 6)C( ~.',I
-0;
Ceca
~ 1 1 I
~
c ic e51 1
'I C
0H 4
U ~I 3
CC ~
4"
~ 4,
~r ce ee eer
~e ee ee ee F'lr eer TI>4 C~IC.C. 15tC4745) elO
~ ee
~
~er eer esr rr
'1 I'CF C <IC.C. IMC CHAOS )
e lO C ccU('r e 9 e Cecum e95 n0 CC Cl I3n V!
4 ~
0
/II 4
V ~
1 C ~
k
~r
~er eer csee eeoc Cer TIK CecZC.C.15FF~S) e lO CIer ee ee
~er eer cer 1 IHF C Ce IC. C, I'iFC(PNPe 1
e 1 O Figure 2-2 Examples of Category II Chuqs
(I a ig I 9
0 J
f ZZ a)f OO OC
~0 ~ 1
~ 0 ~
00 ~ I (OZS+)
3aarlSS3aeca 00 OC
~0 OC
~0 ~ 'l
~0 ~
00 ~ 'l (4ZSO) 3aanSS 3aca II LC 9
Ia n
!(
l~
I'(
~0 ~ 1
~0 ~
00 01 (OZSO) 3ashSS3aea
~0 OC OO ~ 1 00 ~
00 ~ I (OZSal) 3aar)SS3aaao
~0 OC
CHgQ
~ 4 CHuG SP6 0H0 U ~
3n
~I ~
O ~
g ~t 0H 4'U ~
LI ~
3 Ti ~
II ~
II ~
IL "
T
~0 I'5~
% er
+ IN NA P1%
T1HC IHILLIS@'COHENS) r IO
~ OO
~
I5W lO&
o1 M SO eO t'I OO I lW IHILI15CC~S I IO
(;HEI; O 34 CHIR
~ I 0 I T
7 T
0H IV ~
Jl ~
II 0fI L
0Hn V g IU ~
II.IIIII ~
ILI 1 j7 ~
~ N
~ 0 OO
~'500 WOO l8 10 I IHE CHILI 15E(04r>)'O' r
~
f
~ OV L'I OO
)0 OO
~ Q 01 EO W I I>>
I ~ r C><ILLII I ~ I>rCISI
+ aO Figure 2-4 Examples of Category IV Chuas
I.
CLASSICAL No, oF
~~vs FRAc.
ToTAL PRlttc!PLE ItoRt".
Kvmrs 5, 13, 21,
)24.15 22 to
>1
- FRAC, TOTAL
~w~
0.20 PowER/FvENT 8.87 II.
C.O.
71
.518 20 314,46 0.50 4.43 III.
MtxED 25
.182 5
)3 21 173 28
=22 To 30 0.27 6.93 IV.
OTHER 27 137
.197
],0,'t;l 5, l3, 21, 22.08 30, 3v-40, 4ti.li8 633.97 0.05 1.00 0.82
ODl 1~
I) 1(
I l
l I
](
iI III I
o 0
10 20 50 70 G 1002820 10 FREQUENCY {HZ)
Figure 2-10 Composite PSD for Category I, II, IIIand IVChugs
K'iT PIPE FR'.93.NCI".S IN 4T F = ( 2N - 1 ) c / 4 L,
N = 1,2,3,...
c = 078.5 e's (1570 FPS)
L = 28.65 m
(9l FT)
OBSERVED 0.18 Hz 5Hz 20,88 21, 29,23
, 37.58 39 45.93
%.28 CATEGORY 11 AND CATEGORY IV CH'JGS
FOOL RI-."ircst FPEQiFSCIES N 4T FN = (2N - 1)
C / 4 L, N = 1,2,3...,
C Cp /
1 + B D / Y E Cp soN Ic vELocITY 1524 ru's B
= BULK MODULUS = 2.18X10 PA
.Y
= YOUNG S t%DULUS = 19.5X101 PA D
= 4T DI~ETER = 2.13 ~
7 E
= 4T wALL THICKNESS = 1,59 m C = C / 1.58 = 965 e's (3164 as)
L = 7.01 M
(23 FT)
FN OBSERVED 34,4 Hz 36.1, 32.2 Hz 103.2 110 172,0
EFFCT OF P~lTRAINH AIR N POOL SO.'<IC KLOCITY CASE SONIC VELOCITY F1
% REDUCTION PURE WATER 1524 e's (5000 FPs) 4 T FLEXIBIL;ITY 965 N/S (3164 'FPS) 34.4 Hz 37 07 ENTRAINED AIR 659 Ns (2162 FPS)
,23.5;Hz PM~K OF CATEGORY I CHUGS AVERAGED PSD
(NN'I LjSImS OF, 4T DATA BNLNTIN CHUGGING INCLUDES A VARIETY OF BELATEDLY BUT DIFFERENT PHENOMENA 8 CATEGORIES)i CATEGORY I CHUGS DEPEND UPON POOL RINGOUT.FREQUENCY (C/ IL) AND HAVE TWICE THE PO1"ER PER EVENT AS CATEGORY II
- CHUGS, CATEGORY II CHUGS DEPEND UPON VENT ACOUSTICAL FREQUENCIES (ddL),
THE SONIC VELOCITY IN THE POOL IS MODIFIED BY TANK FLEXIBILITY AND ENTRAINED AIRi
MUiiEL;;C 'E HGL'l)i.j[GHOF.7 CHUGGii~G FHGBLEEI PURPOSE Ui,'DEB<ST>""ZIDPhr SICS GF 4T CHUGGIICG P~. SPGI'~HE APPPiGI BIATEZ.SSUI'iPTIGI~S TO DEVELOP SII'IPLE MODEL (ACOUSTIC)
E'"5UI'PTIONS I;ALGIDTsihI'. (LATI,"Pa I'lELATED)
I O',."TGNIANFLUIDS (STEPJ'I EQ"ID VZATER)
FLUID FIELD EQUATIOIIS CC'IHERVATIQIIQF I,IASS: ap/at
+ v.(pv) =
o CCI;=ERVATIOI"< OF I'/Ior.~EICTUX p[Bv/Bt + (v.C')v] = Vp
[Fi:]'
pg CONSERVATION OF ENERGY p [Be/Bt + v.5e]
= -6.q - p6.v
[t:Vv]
EQU=".TIGVS QF STATE STEAI'I p,
= p,R,>
V"ATE [ p
= ~ [~-p /p ]
VENT LINE 31'.5.1/2" OOW!4CG HER TEST SECTIO.
23' 12a 8'4" r",
t i
t I
I I I (
~&~
4'-6" EL 0'0 TEST TANK OR Y'IV I.}.
ELO'-
REFERENCE GRADE STEAM GENERATOR Figure 3-1
'4T Test Facility Sch.matic
/
G1002820-11 3-2
cv I
TANK BOTTOM PRESSURE (Pci)
Figure 3-3, 4T Bell Jar Test C0 CO G1002$ 20 13 1) 3\\ 7
STEAM 13.72m P~O WATER
'ALCMESH OA3m 0.15m 0, "tV'gtP hl H~0' O'Wt'~AWVCtW
~gpss VWE ~ (p *N *~(y h Q
)
- lA)7m Figure 3-2 K-FIXModel of 4T Facility 05OCM255 52 P,
3-5
i~
~
~
P [kPa)
Pq Yg Z2 Figure 3-4 Estimated 4T.Chug Source Pg) 01002820 53 3-9
3.20 3.00 Bottom Center Vent Midpoint
.04
.08
.12 TIME (SEC)
.16
.20
.24 Figure 3-5 K-FIK Chug Simulation r.002020 46
BOTTOM CENTER VENT MIDPOINT
.50
.15
.12 o.30 T
0DI-
.20 o
.09 Ql O
I 0-.05
.10
.03 0
10 10 10 FREQUENCY (MZ) 10 10 10 10 FREQUENCY (HZ)
Figure 3-6 K-FIXPower Sp'ectral Densi'.ies 3-11 C1002820 54 '
~
sl I~UliiEP-.JCE~K. HQK.V'1'ION co~!cj.USIOifS
~
G CT CIIUQ SQUPiCE CAN BE "MGDELED" AS BUBBLE CGLLAPSE G PQQL IS ACGUSTICALLVDECGUPLED FPiGI'I VEHT a VE"'T ~HVE"'S LOIlG TERN SQUPCE FQLLGV/IKGIMPULSE I
r 1
O'LUIDHESPQI<SE'LINEAR (v - amis <<c)
~
Q
~
c PI'QIlLEMCAIl-:BE SGLVED ACGUSTICALLV (c)2p =. g~z) 1 C
o PGQL PiH".'~GUT FI'iEQUEIICYREDUCED
~370/o (FLH)iIBLEV/ALL)
PH~~SUHE i "'-L<TUDEHEDUCED ~I0%
(FLEXIBLEV/ALL)
o AIIALYTI"ALSOLUTION BETT7." UNQEPSTiY~DIX'TG GF PH'ZS:CH LGW CGMPUTEPi CC'ST STM.IGHT-FGHWAHDE:~TEI".SIGN TG MAHDIII USEFUL TOOL FOH SGUPCE DEFINITION
6 CHUGGIiIG,RESPONSE'S HMHONIC VEI'fTDECQUPLED FBOWL POOL o
SIr<PI."= POIIIT SOUZCZ NEGLECT SQUHC'-/'i7AVE H,"JT'.=.HACTIOPJS
s>
r.~L s.s p
~a 0 Or rIp 0
Bz
, ~
t(sIILSSUflL ItlVASUIls.MfNT POINT" a
I Figure 4-'coustic Moc 1 Geometry
10 SOURCE FUNCTION x
I 0
I-
-10 0
.01
.02 TIME, SEC
.03
.04 (a) Source 20 IWEGS SIMULATIONOF 4T VENT Ill 0
C'1 LJJ CL
-20
.10
.20
.30 TIME, SEC
.40
.60
.60 (b) Pressure Time-History IWEGS SIMULATIONOF 4T VENT 40 I-Ch 3
R Lll CI 24
'l6 lU CO 8
20 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FREQUENCY, HZ (c) PSD Figure 5-2 IWEGS Results for a 36 ms Impulse in the Vent 5-4 010'. 820~
SOURCE FUNCTION ~ CATEGORY I CHUG
.20
.30 TIME, SEC
.r
.40
.50 Figure 5-3 Category I Chug. Source
WEGS SIMULATIONOF CATFGORY I CHUG IWEGS SIMULATIONOF CATEGORY I CHUG - C 70l VIS 68 Y
UJ o
D ill CL
-69 40 30 20 10
-138 0
.10
.20
.30
.40 50
.60 TIME, SEC (a) Predicted Pressure Time-History 0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 F R EQUE NCY, IIX (b) Predicted PSD 20 CHUG NR. 30 GE CHUG NR. 30 - T ~ 0.341-0.7GB SFC
'IO 0
W o
D Cll COIll
-10 I-4 CI 3
D CL I
-20
~30
.40
.50
.60
.70
.80
.90 TIME, SEC (c) Experimental Pressure Time-History 0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FREQUENCY, HZ (d) Experimental PSD Figure 5-5 Comparison of IWEGS Results with Chug tI30
IVIIEGS SIMULATIONOF CATEGORY I CHUG 138 69 bC W
0 D
K 0- -89 60 o
60 X
40 COz Ul 30 D.
0 20 I-VIll CL 10 I(VEGS SIMUI.ATIONOF CATEGORY I CIIUG Cr701 M/S
'L
-138 0
10 20 30 40 60 60 TIME, SEC (a) Predicted Pressure Time-History 0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FREQUENCY, HZ (b) Predicted PSD GE CHUG NR. 71 GE CHUG NR. 71 T 0.341 0.7GII SEC.
12 10 UJ 0
LU 0.
-10 10 z
C/l O
6 K
O 4
2 20 80
.90
.30 AO
.60
.60
.70 TIME, SEC (c) Experimental Pressure Time-History.
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FREOUENCY;HZ (d} Experimental PSD Figure 5-6 Comparison of IWEGS Results with Chug fI71
II la V, y 0'J fl ~~~/
w I, ~lg C, oWSJ:PQf AP'-.-i.l. Ai!QN FG;; B:-SlGid LQAG 3-9 ACC'UST)G fv".QG"-L B)G!Q-MfPiLL lQAG P.)Gl94VALL LOAN STPaU CYVRAL FSl CGNTNP)MEWY MGBEL MARK l1I - UN!QUE CGNTA)ÃMENT BESPGNSE u twit,iO 57 Jv ~
CAORSO SAFETY/RELIEF VALVE LOADS TEST PHASE 2 QUICK-LOOK TEST RESULTS REVIEl",
REFERENCE
,'1, CAORSO SRV TEST PLAN REV 2
ADDENDUN 2 APRIL 1978 2,
TEST SPEC NO, 22A4381 AX, REV, 2, TABLE 6,1 TEST MATRIX (COPY ATTACHED)
TESTS PERFORNED o
NULTIPLE VALVE ACTUATIONS 2i 3i 4
ASYMMETRIC' SYMMETRIC, 8 SYMMETRIC o
SINGLE VA'LVE ACTUATIONS NORHAL REACTOR PRESSUPE SUBSEQUENT ACTUATIONS WITH' 10-IN VACUUM BREAKERS REPEAT PHASE 1
SUBSEQUENT ACTUATION TESTS LEAKY VALVE TEST OF REMOTE VALVE V REPEAT SINGLE-VALVE ACTUATION 0
SINGLE VALVE ACTUATIONS REDUCED REACTOR PRESSURE 0
EXTENDED BLO'L'IDOl,iN e
ALL TESTS CONPLETED.
NO ADDITIONALTESTS ARE PLANNED, MET 3/79
Test Type Ini.tial Pi Conditions (3)
Discharge
~Time Sec.
Valve Closed Time CVA,Sec Pi e Coolin Hrs.
14ol 1402
~;-'/403'..
1404 14 15 16 17 18 SVA SVA SVA SVA F
F
'19 SVA U
20 S
SVA CP,
- NWL, WP ~ TWL, WP t TWL, HP t TWL~
HP TWL 10" va
] Oee 10" VB 10" VB 10" va CP, NWL, 10" VB CP NWL 10" VB CP~
NWL~ 10" VB CP NWL 10 -VB CPt NWL~ 10" VB CP NWL 10" VB CP NWL 10" VB 20 2 (15) 2 (15) 2 (15) 2 (15)
>2
>2
>2
>2
>2
>2
>2 Ch I
Col 2201 2202 2203 2204 SVA CVA CVA CVA CVA A
A A
A A
CP~
NWL, 10" VB HP, TWL~ 10" VB Hp, TwL, lo" va HP, Twr lo" va
'P Twr, lo" va 20 (8) 5 5
5 5
lo(4) lo (4) lo(4) lo (4)
>2 Retest of Tests 1 Throu h as Re uired 24 27 28 29 lrvA Pi/c A,F MVAr,'-a 'o A,F~EtU NfA A,FtE,U MVA A~F~E~U MVA AFEU CP ~
NWL ~ 10" VB CP~
NWL, 10" VB CPi NWL~ 10" VB Cpq NWL, 10" VB CP NWL 10" VB 5,10 (9) 5 10 9 51 159 5 J log 15'0 (9) 5,10, 15,20 (9) 5tlot15~20 (9) 5 10 15 20(9)
>2
>2
>2
>2
>2
>2 31 32 MVA&
tc;B C D L CP, NWL, 10" VB NVA 1V>'/<~/ITAtBt D~H'P ~
NWL ~ 10 VB A~Us v
5 10,15,20(9) 5,10,15 '0,25t 30 35 40 9
>2 J'1$ RM g
s ~ ~ f
Test Type Test ()(1) (21(10) (13)
Valve 33 50 psi.a Reactor A
Pres (10)
SVA 100 psia Reactor A
Pres (10)
SVA 35 200 psia Reactor A
Pres (10)
SVA 36 400 psia Reactor A
Pres (10)
SVA 37 600 psia Reactor A
Pres (10)
SVA 38 800 psia Reactor A
Pres (10)
SVA V
34 Initial Pi Conditions (3)
CP/
NWL, 10" VB CP, NWL, 10" VB CP, NWL, 10" VB CP, NWL/ 10"- VB CP, NWL, 10" VB CP, NWL/ 10" 'VB CP NWL 10" VB NWL 1
LV, NWL, 10" VB A
LV, NWL, 10" VB LV NWL 10" VB 41 SVA (13) 42 SVA VA LV, NWL, 10" VB Lv, TwL, 10" vB LV/ TWL, 10" VB LV, TWL, 10" VB LV TWL 10" VB 4401 SVA (13) 4402 CVA 4403 CVA 4404 CVA 440 45 Retests of Tests 24 Throu h 41 as Re uired Discharge Time See.
20 20 20 20 20 20 20ll 12 5
5 5
5 5
2 2
> 2 2
2 10(4) 10 (4) 10 (4) 10 (4) 10 (4) 2 2
2
> 2 2
Optional Optional Optional Option'al Optional Optional Optional Optional Valve Closed Time CVA Sec Pi e Coolin Hrs.
2 2
m m
t7 C/l O ~
h)
O O
(D CQ M
pg
TABLE 6.1 Test Matrix Additions and Retest Description TEST TEST NO.
TYPE VALVE INIT. PIPE CONDITION D'ISCH TIME,SEC.
VALVE CLOSED TIME CVA,SEC PIPE COOL,HR Repeat 601-605 Repeat 1401-1405 Repeat 2201-2202 22A01 SVA U
22A02 CVA U
22A03 CVA U
22A04 CVA U
22A05 CVA U
2301 SVA A
2302 CVA A
2303 CVA A
2304 CVA A
2305 CVA A
2311 SVA A
2312 CVA A
2313 CVA A
2314 CVA A
2315 CVA A
2321 SVA
,A 2322 CVA A
2323 CVA A
2324 CVA A
2325 CVA A
CP,NWL,2 10" VB WP,TWL,2 10" VB WP,TWL,2 lo" VB HP,TWL,2 10" VB HP,TWL,2 10" VB CP,NWL,10 IN.VB WP,TWL,10 IN.VB WP,TWL,10 IN.VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB CP,NWL,10 IN,VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB CP,NWL,10 IN.VB
. HP,TWL,10 IN.VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB HP,TWL,10 IN.VB 20 5
5 5
5 20 5
5 5
5 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
> 2 2
2
> 2 Additional Tests 44FOl - 44F05 - Same as 4401 - 4405 Except No PCM Data For 44FOl Repeat 27-30 4501 MVA A,F,E,U 4502 MVA A,F,E,U
- 26 V 'SVA -,
"V
'26-A SVA A,
. CP,NWL,10 IN.VB CP,NWL,10 IN.VB CPgNWL,2 ]0"IN.VB CP,NWL,'10 IN.VB C
5,10,15,20 5,10,15,20
- 120, 60 2
2 2
> 2
- Tests performed 2-16-78 in conjunction with STI-26, SRV Flow Capacity'est MET 3/79
C, MULTIPLE VALVE TIMING 25 29 45-1 9
1 2
6 7
8 24 0
26 A
F 0
21 F
A 26 0
62 101 A
E F
27 0
67 178 217 F
A E
U
-28 0
100 144 165 F
A E
U 0
31 40 62 F
E A
U 30 0
52 79 92 U
E F
A 0
5 6
21 U
E F
A 45-2 0
9 70 72 A
F U
E 51 P
52 87 12.6 52 0
61 68 69 111 194 2/2 H
R B
D K
V L
VALVE ACTUATION SWITCH D.
CONTAINMENT DYNAMIC
RESPONSE
~
RANGE OF ACCELERATION 0.04G TO 0,20G (RPV HEAD FLG,)
o PEAK A'CCELERATION FOR 8-VALVE MVA TEST = 0.15G (RPV HD, FLG,)
NO'RENDS EASILY IDENTIFIABLE FROM REAL-TINE DATA
~
PROPER CONCLUSIONS TO BE DEVELOPED FROM DETAILED COMPUTER ANALYSES MET 3/79
E, EXTENDED BLOMDONN o
SRV DISCHARGED FOR 13'MIN, 6 SEC, BLOWDOWN TERMINATED WHEN PLANT TEMPERATURE SENSOR
(¹302)
AT PEDESTAL NEAR QUENCHER A REACHED CAORSO TECH s SPEC
~ LIMIT (39 C = 102,2 F) e LOCAL-TO-BULK TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE PROBABLY WITHIN RANGE OF 10 TO 20F
~
THE AYERAGE PLANT TEMPERATURE SENSORS DATA GAYE REASONABLE INDICATION OF BULK POOL TEMPERATURE MET 3/79
OVERALL CONCLUSIONS e
OBJECTIVES OF CAORSO SRY TEST PROGRAN HAVE BEEN SATISFIED
~
TEST RESULTS CONFIRM THE CONSERVATISN IN SRV QUENCHER DISCHARGE SUPPRESS'ION POOL DESIGN LOADS MET 3/79