ML17053A290

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Re Niagara Mohawk Pwr Corps Proposal to Install a Low Level Waste Incinerator at Subj Facil.Informs That No Decision Has Been Made by NRC Re EIS Preparation,Fed Register Notice, & Pub Hearing
ML17053A290
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/1978
From: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Resnikoff M
Sierra Club
Shared Package
ML17053A292 List:
References
NUDOCS 7812270003
Download: ML17053A290 (13)


Text

1 OPg 15 1978 Docket No. 50-220' Nr. Narvin Resnikoff, Chair Nuclear Subcommittee of the Energy Policy -Committee Sierra Club Box 64, Sta; G

Buffalo, New York 14213

Dear Hr..Resnikoff:

, Distribution

~ocket, ORB ¹3, Local PDR NRC PDR EDO Reading NRR Reading WDircks LGossick TRehm HShapar HDenton ECase DBunch RDeYoung RNattson CSmith BGrimes TIppo1 ito PPolk SSheppard EPeyton

Attorney, OELD GErtter (EDO-04827)

VStello We have received your letter of October 30, 1978 regarding Niagara Hohawk Power Corporation's proposal to install a low level waste incineratOr at the Nine Nile Point 1 facility.

You indicated a con-cern that we have already made a decision to not prepare an EIS, to not file a Federal Register Notice, and to not allow a public hearing.

We have not yet made decisions on these matters.

I The NRC staff is now reviewing Niagara mohawk s submittal of September.

1, 1978.

This includes a review of safety aspects-and an appraisal of environmental impacts.

Upon completion of this appraisal, a decision will be made, in. accordance with 10 CFR 51.5 and 40 CFR 1500.,6 on whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be issued.

Should an EIS not be issued, a Negative Dec'laration accompanied by an Environmental Impact Appraisal will be issued with our Safety Evaluation on this matter.

These decisions as well as the decision regarding oppor-,

tunity for public hearings will be made public at such time as they are made.

I trust this is responsive to your concerns.

Sincerely, QriEinal Sigaoil lite

=H. K Benton Ry~l Harold R. Denton, Director I/I/II' ~

Office of Nuclear Reactor Re

  • SEE PREVIOUS YELLOW FOR CONCURRENCES V

O II ~

lation Ass. ul>gs f Or< ICC~

OUIINAMCW DATCW ORB ¹3 Po1 k/Ippolit 11/13/78 AD:ESP

  • BGrimes 11/13/73 OELD D:DOR 11/15/78 11/16/78
  • ECase 11/17/78
  • H 11/W/78 NR, ~P NRC PORM 518 (9-76) NRCM 0240 6 II,Ce OOVCRNMCNT RRINTINO ORRICCI I ~ T ~

NO 1 ~ 0

aC' I

PI

)'gg.,<<4i P

t>,l

i

~I'a"p~P Distribution

+ocket ORB 0'3 Local PDR NRC PDR EDO Reading NRR Reading LGossick

. lJDircks TRehm HShapar HDenton ECase DBunch Nr. t1arvin Resnikoff, Chair RDeYoung Nuclear Subcommittee of the RMattson Energy Policy Committee CSmi th.

. Si'erra Club BGrimes Box 64, Sta.

G TIppol ito Buffalo, New York -14213 PPolk SSheppard Dear Hr.

snikoff:

MGroff xn w.M He have receive our letter of Sbg&iber-R5, 1978 regarding Niagara Mohawk Power Corpo ~tion's proposal to install a low level waste

'ncinerator at the Nsnj Nile Point 1 facility.

You'ndicated.

a con-cern that vie have already made a decision to not prepare an EIS, to not file a Federal Registeryf otice, and to not a] low a public hearing.

He have not yet made decisions these matters.

EPeyton

Attorney, OELD GErtter (EDO-04827)

VStello Docket No. 50-220 Sincerely, The NRC, staff is now reviewing Niaga Mohawk's submittalof September 1,

1978.

This includes a review of safety spects and an appraisal of environmental impacts.

Upon completion o

this appraisal, a decision will be made, in accordance with 10 CFR 51.5 hqd 40 CFR 1500.6 on whether an Environmental Impact Statement (E?S) should be issued.

Should an EIS not be issued,

.a Negative Declarationuccompanied by an Environmental Impact Appraisal will be issued with ourMafety Evaluation on this matter.

These dec'isions as well as the decision regarding oppor-

tunity for public hearings will be made public at such time ws they are made.

I trust this is responsive to your concerns.

ORB g3

  • PPolk/*Ippolito ll 13 78 Leo Gossi ck Execut e

irector for Op

<I

".SEE PREVIOUS Y gPW CONCURRENCES orrlce~

OVAIIAI4CW OATC~

,, AD:ESP,

  • BGrimes l/13/78 OELD 11/15/78 (D

~ ~

~ i

\\

Ste lo 11/ i 78 R

~ ~

~ ~

se 11/f)/78 n on

.1 1/[7/78 EDO LGossick 11/

/78 mC PORN 328 (976) NRCM 0240 Q U,C OOVCIIIIMCIITrlIIIITIIIOOrrICCI ~ ~ T ~

e ~ e T ~ e

d I

II

1'istribution

'ocket ORB 83 Local PDR NRC PDR EDO Reading NRR Reading LGossick WDircks

'Rehm HShapar HDenton ECase DBunch RDeYoung RMattson CSmith BGrimes '

TIppolito PPolk SSheppard MGroff EPeyton

Attorney, OELD.

GErtter (EDO-04827)

VStello tl Docket No. 50-220 t

issued, a Negative Declaration accompanied by an Appraisal will be issued with pur Safety Evaluation

'e decisions as well a's the decision regarding oppor-arings will be made public at such time as they are Environmental Impac on this 'matter.

Th tunity for public h

made.

V I trust this is responsive to your concerns.

Sincerely, 7

Mr. Marvin Resns off, Chair nuclear Subcommi ee of the Energy Policy Comm tee Sierra Club Box 64, Sta.

g Buffalo,New York 14213 C

Dear Mr. Resnikoff:

I We have received your letter of September 25, 1978 regarding. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's proposa) to install a low level waste'ncinerator't the Nine Mile Poipt 1 fqcility.

You indicated a con-cern that we have already, made p decision to not prepare an EIS, to not file a federal Register Notice, and-to not allow a public hearing.

We have not yet made dec'isio s on these matters.

The NRC staff is now reviewing Niagara Mohawk's submittal of September 1,

1978.

This includes a r view of safety aspects and an appraisal of environmental impacts.

Upon completion of this appraisal, a,decision

'ill be made, in accor ance with 10 CFR 51.5 and 40 CFR 1500.6 on whether an Environme al Impact Statement (EIS) should be issued.

Should an EIS not b Harold Denton, Director ffice of t'uclear Reactor Regulation J

ORPIOC~

cccRccAcec~

OATC~

11/g/78 11/P'78.

0 e

~

~

~ ~

olk/I 1 to OELD

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~ ~ ~

..5.1c'..9~l18~1 11/ ~.(/78 D:DOR VStel 1 o 11/

/78 NRR ECase'1/

/78 NRP.

HDenton "i'1'/'""/'N-'c xemt 3ie

<Wvd> NECM OWO

'gt'cc.e. oovaoccacaccv ecccccecao e c caac cece eee -eee

II I

/

/

N 4

I,

FROM:

v'L'v'Ii)A. Rcs A)RQII't S)en~ 4'tub TO:

Qf'flea of Cha Cernfssfotevs ACTION CONTROL COMPI DEADLINFj'CKNOWLEDGMENT INTERIM REPLY FINALREPLY FILE LOCATIO

, ~ DATES jAI 7 04827 DATE OF DOCUMENT A URE PREPARE OF:

Q CHAIRMAN

'JP EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR OTHER:

DESCRIPTION LETTER Q MEMO Q REPORT Q OTHER P>zyasad )es 'lave) baste )ac)nemtor aC V)m kH)c> Palok I

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARQUE

., /

'-'~ 'Z i I

C)t'i&)

51Q t:0~~%)ss40ii p} 30@ Co rBsplcch DOCUMENT/COPY NO.

NUMBER OF PAGES POSTAL REGISTRY NO.

CLASSIFIED DATA CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY Q

NSI QRD Q FRD SEC% 78 'ISN ASSIGNED i

/

i j DATE INFORMATIONROUTING cross)ek 9)ccRs Rake

%)ih SllcapI'8F LEGALREVIEW Q

FINAL Q

COPY ASSIGNED TO:

DATE NO LEGAL OBJECTIONS NOTIFY:

Q EDO ADIVIIN& CORRES BR

EXT, COMMENTS, NOTIFY:

EXTi JCAE N TIFICATIONRECOMMENDED:

Q YES Q

NO NRC FORM 232 I11-75I EXECUTIVEDI/ECTOR FOR OPERATIONS PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL DO NOT REiÃOVE THIS COPY

r

~

~

FROM:

jlenh~ QesaQ~N hfdf>'~a G]eh S&WFFAMSCOI tKII1'ff ACTION CONTROL COMPL DEADLINE-ACKNOWLEDGMENT INTERIM REPLY DATES 04827 DATE OF DOCUMENT I'

TO:

FINALREPLY" Cff'k~ of Ki~0 Co~'Ass)GQ@f'5 FILE LOCATION g,f I

1'REPARE FOR SIGNATURE OF:

Q CHAIRMAN gQ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OTHER:

DESCRIPTION Q LETTER Q MEMO Q REPORT Q OTHER Proyes& 'le~ lcm.'i ~asks fudnej.ahem eC h)gc aMQ F6'JAt l SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS gogy g)gi ge Cazdssfej p'for A dfspatc4 DOCUMENT/COPY NO.

NUMBER OF PAGES POSTAL REGISTRY NO.

CLASSIFIED DATA C LASS IF ICATION CATEGORY 0

NSI QRD Q FRD SiKV 7G-)~74 ASSIGNE WO:

DATE INFORMATIONROUTING LEGALREVIEW Q

FINAL Q

COPY

'tJ058)Ck No:Ks

'8e'a~a Safkk Na,'>>or NO LEGAL OBJECTIONS NOTIFY' EDO ADMIN& CORRES BR EXT.

COMMENTS, NOTIF'f.'XT ASSIGNED TO:

DATE JCAE NOTIFICATIONRECOMMENDED:

Q YES Q NO NRC FORM 232 I11 75I EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL DO NOT REQOI/E THIS COPY

FROM:

(lamia Rasa)xcrkt'.

Sk~ @ah SGA 'FPMc$ $cQg CQE$ t~

TO:

office e4 C)u~ Ce'~$ as4e@era ACTIONCONTROL DATES COMPI DEADLINE ACKNOWLEDGMENT INTERIM REPLY FINALREPLY FILE LOCATION

'ONTROL NO.

DATE OF DOCUMENT r

PREPARE FOR SIGNATURE OF:

Q 'HAIRMAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OTHER:

DESCRIPTION Q LETTER Q MEMO Q REPORT Q OTHER FPQ~Q$ i

/PA l@miol 'MSCQ

$QC)fiM'QtN'~

4)n~ I.'-5)S FefOK )

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS DOCUMENT/COPY NO NUMBER OF PAGES POSTAL REGISTRY NO.

CLASSIFIED DATA C LASS IF ICATION CATEGORY Q

NSI QRD Q FRD ASSIGNED TO:

r 1

DATE INFORMATIONROUTING Goss)cf:

@feels Pal' Mcw aha;aW LEGALREVIEW 0

FINAL Q

COPY ASSIGNED TO:

DATE NO LEGAL OBJECTIONS NOTIFY; Q

EDO ADMIN& CORRES BII EXT.

COMMENTS, NOTIFY:

EXTr JCAE NOTIFICATIONRECOMMENDED:

0 YES Q

NO)

NRC FORM 232 I11 751 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL DO /L/OT REi//OI/E THIS COPY

p

. ~

l t

~=

l f

H l

'~

I H

IU E'1 "h

>.No. 78-1570 Logging Date NRC SECRETARIAT TO:

Commissioner Exec. Dir./Oper.

0 Cong. Liaison CI Public Affairs C3 Date 0

Gen. Counsel 0-Solicitor C3 Secretary Incoming:

From:

S ierra Club To:

Comments on the low-level 9.neinerat'c Prepare reply for signature of:

EI Chairman 0 Commissioner EDO GC, CL, SOL, PA, SECY 0

Signature block omitted date due Commission:

0 Return original of incoming with response 0

For direct reply' Forappropriateaction 0

For information 0

For recommendation Cy to RF

.5 Sec

~'~m3~

For the Commission:

Send three (3) copies of reply to Secy Mail Facility NRC42 ACTIONSLIP

~

~

~,,

~ SIERRA CLUB ssonustis~reu s.nFnncisco,caiiror'nial>08 (415)981-8634 October 30, 1978 Office of the Commissioners U.S., Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Gentlemen:

The enclosed letter was mailed Sept.25, 1978, but has been inexplicably lost.

We have therefore attached a copy, and would appreciate a response.

The matter of concern is the low level incinerator proposed by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation at the Nine Mile Point Unit 1 reactor at Scriba, New York.

Thank you for your attention.

enc.

Sincerely yours, arvin Resnikoff, Chair Nuclear Subcommittee of the Energy Policy Committee Sierra Club Box 64, Sta.G Buffalo, New York 14213

~

~

(