ML17037C328

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Letter Responding to the July 5, 1973 Letter to Assistant Secretary Davis Concerning the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Unit 1 and Enclosing Comments from the Federal Railroad Administration and the U.S. Coast Guard
ML17037C328
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/17/1973
From: Price R
US Dept of Transportation (DOT), US Dept of Transportation, Coast Guard, Waterways Oversight Branch
To: Muller D
US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
References
Download: ML17037C328 (4)


Text

AEC DIS UTION FOR PAItT 50 DOCKET MATE L

(TEMPORARY FORM)

CONTROL NO.

6409 PILE:

ent of Transportation ast tuara Was Al.nptonF D. C.

20590

. R. I. Price DATE OF DOC 8-17"73 DATE REC'D 8-2 MEMO RPT

, OTHER TO:

Mr. Muller CLASS UNCLASS XX PROP INFO ORIG l 'si ned INPUT CC OTHER NO C S REC'D SENT AEC PDR X

SENT LOCAL PDR

~

X DOCKET NO:

50-220 DESCRIPTION:

Ltr re our 7-5-73 ltr......furnishing comments on the Draft Enviro Statement for the Nine Mile Point Unit 8 l.......

ENCLOSURES:

PLANT NAME:

Nine Mile Point Unit 8 1

INtfgfUjjjf)

DoDO'ot remove FOR ACTION/INFORMATION 8-23-73

~ BUTLER(L)

W/ 'Copies CLARK(L)

W/

Copies GOLLER(L)

W/ 'Copies KNIEL(L)

W/

Copies SCHWENCER(L)

W/

Copies STOLZ (L)

W/

Copies VASSALLO(L) '

W/

Copies SCHEMEL(L)

W/

Copies ZIZtfANN(L)

W/

Copies DICKER(E)

W/

Copies KNIGHTON(E)

W/

Copies YOUNGBLOOD(E)

W/

Copies

~ REGAN(E)

W/4 Copies W/

Copies W/

Copies W/

Copies INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION REG FIL HAEC PDR

OGC, ROOM P-506A

~!INTZING/STAFF CASE GIAMBUSSO BOYD MOORE (L) (BWR)

DEYOUNG (L) (PWR)

~SKOVHOLT (L)

P, COLLINS REG OPR

~FILE A REGION(3)

MORRIS STEELE TECH REVIEW HENDRIE S CHROEDER MACCARY KNIGHT PAWLICKI SHAO STELLO HOUSTON NOVAK ROSS IPPOLITO TEDESCO LONG LAINAS

~BENAROYA VOLEER DENTON GRIMES GAMMILL KASTNER MALLARD SPANGLER ENVIRO MULLER DICKER KNIGHTON YOUNGBLOOD REGAN PROJECT LDR

~ HARLESS LIC ASST

~ DIGGS (L)

GEARIN (L)

GOULBOURNE (L)

'LEE (L)

MAIGRET (L)

SERVICE (L)

~SHEPPARD (E)

SMITH (L)

TEETS (L)

WADE (E)

WILLIAMS (E)

WILSON (L)

~AI IND BRAIOMAN SALTZMAN PLANS MCDONALD DUBE INFO C. MILES

~ ZIEMANN

~ 1 - LOCAL PDR Oswe o

N. Y.

~ " DTIE(ABERNATHY) 1' NSIC(BUCHANAN) 1 - ASLB(YORE/SAYRE/

WOODARD/"H" ST.

16 - CYS ACRS HOLDING EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION

~(1) @t+)~NATIONAL LAB' ANL 1-'R. Schoonmaker,OC, GT, D-323 1-R.

CATLIN, E-256-GT 1-CONSULTANT'S NEWMARK/BLUME/AGBABIAN 1-GERALD ULRXKSON...ORNL 1-PDR-SAN/LA/

z 1-GERALD LELLOUCHE BROOKHAVEN NAT. LAB 1-AGMED(WALTER KOESTER BM.-C-427-GT 1-RD.MULLER..F-309 GT

I~

I a

I DEP MENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAILINGADDRESS: (G WS/83 )

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 00SEvE v svREETSW WASHINGTON D C 20590 IHDNE: 202-426-2262 Mr. Daniel R. Muller Assistant Director for Environmental Prospects Directorate of Licensing U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C.

20545

~ V AM1sn 50-220

Dear Mr. Muller:

This is in response to your letter of 5 July 1973 addressed to Assistant Secretary Davis concerning the draft environmental impact statement for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Lake Ontario, Oswego County, New York.

The concerned operating administrations and staff of the Department of Transportation have reviewed. the material submitted.

Noted in the review by the Federal Railroad Administration is the following:

"The Federal Railroad Administration commented, at some length (6 Feb.

1973) regarding the applicants request for licensing of'ine Mile Nuclear Station Unit No. 2.

Our continual concern over the inductive coordination problem with railroad. signal and communication lines is also applicable to this more recent statement for Unit No. l."

The U. S. Coast Guard commented.

as follows:

RIt is noted. that there may"be a necessity to mark the intake and discharge points.

It is recommended. that the applicant contact Commander, Ninth Coast Guard. District (oan) at 1240 E. Ninth Street, Cleveland.,

Ohio, 44199, for further amplification."

The Department of Transportation has no further comments to offer on this draft statement.

We have no obgection to the prospect, nor to its implementation.

The final statement,

however, should address the concern of the Federal Railroad Administration and the Coast Guard.

C The opportunity for the Department of Transportation to review this draft environmental impact statement for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 is appreciated.

Sin

~ f PBtt',p Ac'gCJlicf Omceof (fan

~~le/'Olllgogf g~tJ g>>~

6409

Regulatory FHe Cy.

e'0-~

I I"

E E

i N