ML17037C205

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Letter Responding to the October 4, 1974 Letter Requesting Information Concerning a Schedule for Submitting the Analysis of the Consequences of Anticipated Transients Without Scram and Advising of a Delay in the Submittal ...
ML17037C205
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/17/1974
From: Raymond P
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
To: Giambusso A
US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
References
Download: ML17037C205 (6)


Text

AEC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL (TEMPORARY FORM)

CONTROL NO:

FILE

.'F ROM. Niagra Mohawk -Power DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER Syracuse, NY 13202 Phili D. Ra ond 10-17-74 10-21-74 TO: ORIG CC OTHER SENT, AEC PDR Mr Giambusso 1 signed SENT LOCAL PDR CLASS UNCLASS PROP INFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO:

1 50-220 DESCR IPTION: ENCLOSURES:

Ltr re our 10-4-74 ltr....furnishing info concerning analysis of AT'rfS...............

A.CKKOV(Ipi,DgT$ 0,: .,

DO NOT RZ~gOyg ..

PL'ANT NAIVIE: Nine Mile Pt /Pl FOR ACTION/INFORMATION 10-11-74 ehf BUTLER (L) SCHVi/ENCER (L) Zl EMANN (L) REGAN (E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies CLARK (L) STOLZ (L) DICKER (E) ~EAR (L)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/QCopies PARR (L) VASSALLO (L) KN I G H TON (E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies KNIEL (L) PURPLE (L) YOUNGBLOOD (E)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION TECH REVIEW DENTON LIC ASST A/T IND AEC PD GRIMES B RAITMAN OGC, ROOM P-506A SCHROEDER GAMMILL DI GGS (L) SALTZMAN MUNTZI N G/STA F F <MACCARY KASTNER GEAR IN (L) B. HURT CASE KNIG HT BALLARD GOULBOURNE (L)

G 1 AMBUSSO PAWLICKI SPANGLER KREUTZER (E) PLANS BOYD SHAO LEE (L) MCDONALD MOORE (L) (BWR) COSTELLO ENVI RO MAIGRET (L) CHAPMAN DEYOUNG (L) (PWR) HOUSTON MULLER REED (E) DUBE w/input KOVHOLT (L) V NOVAK (3) DICKER SERVICE (L) E. COUPE GOLLER (L) JOSS KNIG HTON SHEPPARD (L)

P. COLLINS ii IPPOLITO YOUNGBLOOD SLATER (E) D. THOMPSON (2)

A

~

DENISE EDESCO BEGAN MITH (I ) KLECKER PROJECT LDR TEETS (L) EISENHUT

~t FILE 5.

REG OPR LONG REGION (3) LAI NAS WI LLIAMS (E)

MOR R IS BENAROYA HAR LESS WI LSON (L)

STEELE VO LIMER EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION g LOCAL POR~~swe o, NY

- TIC (ABERNATHY) (1)(2)(10) NATIONALLABS ~ PDR-SAN/LA/N>

W ASLBP(E/W Bldg, Rm 529) 1 BROOKHAVEN Nh I LAB W NSIC (BUCHANAN) 1 W. PENNINGTQN, Rm E-201 GT 1

G. ULRIKSON, ORNL 1 ASLB

'1 1

.'I Newton Anderson 1 B&M SWINEBROAD, Rm E-201 GT 1 AGMED (RUTI i GUSSMAN)

W~ -.ACRS HGL'01NG SZZT XO 1 COMSUJ TANTS Rm B-127 GT LID ASST7e.c.(s'EWMARK/J3LUME/AG BABIAN 1 R. D. M,UELLER, Rm E-201 GT

0 C' gl I'l'

(

L

)<T( l ~

tf'q,,

r e

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION

)lit NIAGARA +) MOHAWK 300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST c SYRACUSE. N. Y. 13202 cl SOCKETEO IISAEO u OCT23. 7974 5 REGULATORY October 17, 1974 SECTION 6'AIL POCIIET CLEIIK Mr. A. Giambusso

-, .'eputy Director for Reactor Projects Directorate of Licensing United States Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Docket No. 50-220

Dear Mr. Giambusso:

In your letter of October 4, 1974, you requested information concerning a schedule for submitting the analysis of the consequences of anticipated transients without scram. We plan to submit this analysis by April 15, 1975.

The delay in the submittal is caused by severe manpower limitations at General Electric Company, the nuclear steam supply vendor. That organization was. not able to,proceed on the analyses for Category C plants, such as Nine Mile Point Unit 1, until analyses for the Category B plants were complete.

ly CC',

k

r Mr. A, Gg.ambusso Page Two U. S. Atomic Energy Commission October 17, 1974 General Electric is currently evaluating alternative methods of accommodating anticipated transients without scram.

This information will be sent to us by November 15, 1974. Our review of these alternatives will require about two weeks.

General Electric will initiate the transient analysis based on the selected alternative by December 1, 1974, and complete results will be available to us by April 1, 1975.

Our review of the analysis will require an additional two weeks resulting in the submittal date to you of April 15, 1975.

Philip D. Raymond Vice President-Engineering

lf