ML17037C012
| ML17037C012 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/01/1974 |
| From: | Bender P US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) |
| To: | Office of the Federal Register |
| References | |
| Download: ML17037C012 (6) | |
Text
r
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION WhSHINGTON. O.c.
205I5 ONovember 1,
1974 Director Olfice of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Service Washington, D. C.
20408
Dear Sir:
,Attached for publication in the Federal Register are an original and two certified copies of a document entitled:
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION (Docket No. 50-410 Order.
Publication of the above document at the earliest possible date would be appreciated.
S incere ly,'
Paul C. Bender Secretory of the Commission
Enclosures:
Ori.o,inal-an'd 2
certified copies hcc: Mocket Clerk (Dir. of Reg.)
Information Services Legal Files (OQC)
Offic. of Congressional Relations GT Files (SECY)
Public Proceed!ngs Branch (SECY)
~
65RM~M~>>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD William C. Parler,, Chairman Dr.
W.
Reed Johnson, Member Richard,S.
- Salzman, Member In the Matter of NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION (Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2)
)
))'
Docket No. 50-410
)
)
)
)
ORDER October 31, 1974 Oral argument on the exceptions filed to the June 14, 1974 initial decision of the Licensing Board in this construction permit. proceeding will be heard at 10:00 A.M. on Wednesday, December 4, 1974, in the Main Courtroom (second floor), The U. S. District Court, and Post Office Building, Erie Boulevard and Genessee
- Street, Syracuse, New York 13201.
Counsel should arrange to be present in the courtroom no later than 9:45 A.M.
The intervenors (Suzanne Weber and Ecology Action) are allotted one and one-half hours for their argument; the applicant, the State of New York Atomic Energy Council, and the AEC regulatory staff are allotted a
ql
total of. one and one-half hours for their arguments, to be divided among them as they deem appropriate.
Of course, a party need pot use all of the time allotted.
The Secretary to this Board should be advised by letter, no later than November 22, 1974, of the name(s) of counsel who will present argument on behalf of each of the respective parties, and on the allocation of time agreed upon.
While, in accordance with its established
- practice,
'I the Board will review the entire initial decision and the full record underlying it, the oral'rgument will be confined to the issues which have been raised by the exceptions and the briefs filed in support or in opposition
- thereto, unless advised otherwise by later Board ord'er.
Counsel should be totally familiar with the portions of the record which bear upon those issues.
In their prep-aration and presentation of oral argument,,
counsel may assume that the Board will have carefully examined all.
briefs on file with it and will therefore be familiar with the positions of the respective parties.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD
.>,>PC re~ i ?.. ~~WF:~, i Romayne M. Skrutski
.Secretary to the Appeal Board
O~(
l