ML17037B873

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Letter Regarding a Breakdown in the Dravo Pipe Fabrication Division QA Program and an Enclosed Report
ML17037B873
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/30/1978
From: Rhode G
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
To: Grier B
NRC/IE, NRC Region 1
References
Download: ML17037B873 (10)


Text

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEN (RIDS >

DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOI1ING NATERIAL 50-4IO REC: GRIER 8 H ORG: RHODE G K DOCDATE: 0i/30/78 NRC NIAGARA NOMAWK PWR DATE RCVD: 02/08/78 DOCTYPE: LETTER NOTARIZED: NO COPIES RECEIVED

SUBJECT:

LTR 0 ENCL i CONSISTS QF INFO. CONCERNING A BREAKDOWN IN THE BRAVO PIPE FABRICATlON DIVISlQN QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAN.

PLANT NAI"IE: NINE NILE PQ1NT UNIT 2 REVIEWER INITIAL: XRL DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL:

DISTRIBUTION OF THIS NATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCY REPORT ( iOCFR50. 55(E).

(DISTRIBUTION CODE BOOED)

FQR ACTION: ASST DIR VASSALLO++LTR ONLY BRANCH CHIEF VARGA>>LTR ONLY PROJ -, ++LTR ONLY LIC ASST SERVICE4<LTR ONLY INTERNAL: EG FILE+<W/E NRC PDM~W/ENCL GGOSSICK 8(

NCL STAFF++W/ENCL QELD~We ENCL NIPC++W/ENCL

~

BOYD'~W/ENCL DEYOUNG++W/ENCL HELTEMES+<W/ENCL R. NATTSON+4W/ENCL KNIGHT~~~W/ENCL RQSS+~ld/ENCL TEDESCQ++W/ENCL EI SENHUT++W/ENCL STANDARDS DEV. ++W/ENCL EXTERNAL: LPDR S OSWEGO> NY++lJ/ENCL TIC++W/ENCL NS IC+4 W/ENCL ACRS CAT B+4~W/i6 ENCL DISTRIBUT1ON: LTR 39 ENCL 35 CONTROL NBR: 780390027 SIZE: iP+3P THE END

~,

~

f P

II t'

KNMTO!I'IKIllKTHK MPlf, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION/300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST, SYRACUSE, N.Y. 13202/TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 January 30, 1978 OD

~aSs A1 f

/yQ

@8 CO~) Ctn.

/~i~so<~~

Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I Attn: Mr. Boyce H. Grier, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission g 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410

Dear Mr.'rier:

On December 29, 1977 your staff was notified of a

'reakdown in the Dravo Pipe Fabrication Division Quality Assurance Program. Dravo is fabricating the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 downcomers. The enclosed information is provided in accordance with Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 50.55(e)(3).

Very truly yours, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION r

Gerald K. Rhode, Vice President System Project Management 780390027 NLR/szd E closure c: 1h. Ernst Volgenau Washington, D. C.

BOO<

0 I

~0 '

L

'h J h

'td

Deficienc During a December 6 to 9, 1977 audit at the Dravo Plant, Stone and Webster Procurement Quality Control Staff found the following deficiencies:

A. Contrary to 10CFR50 Appendix B Criterion IX, dywncomer welds were not liquid penetrant tested correctly. The welds were not being prepared properly for penetrant examination. Also, liquid penetrant test indications which were thought to be non-relevant were not retested. /

B. Contrary to 10CFR50 Appendix B Criterion IX, non-destructive examination instructions were not in accordance with the latest edition of the AS'ode (Winter 1975).

C. Contrary to 10CFR50 Appendix B Criterion IX, nondestructive examination procedures were not controlled as required by procedures. Shop inspectors had not been issued nondestructive examination information by appropriate .

notations on shop procedure sheets.

D. Contrary to 10CFR50 Appendix B Criterion XVII, non-destructive examination rejected work records were not maintained. Also records of examination of cavities

'ere.not maintained.

E. Contrary to 10CFR50 Appendix B Criterion XVIII, the authorized inspector approved certain welds before "

completion of the liquid penetrant test. (Four welds were identified as incorrectly approved.)

Safet Anal sis The downcomers and their function are described in Section 5.0 of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. The downcomers form an integral part of the pressure suppression design of the primary containment. This design includes a drywell which houses the reactor pressure vessel and interconnecting piping, the pressure suppression chamber which stores a volume of water and the drywell floor which separates the drywell and suppression chamber.

~~

In the unlikely event of a loss of coolant accident, reactor water and steam would be released within the .drywell. The resulting increased drywell pressure would force a mixture of noncondensable gases, steam and water through the downcomers into the suppression chamber. Steam would rapidly condense in the suppression chamber water.

The pressure suppression design is intended to withstand the pressure and temperatures of the postulated loss of coolant accident to maintain primary containment integrity. In conjunction with other engineered safeguards systems, the primary containment is designed to limit leakage during a postulated loss of coolant accident and prevent off-site doses from exceeding the guideline values in 10CFR100.

If the deficiencies identified above (Items A through E) were to have gone undetected, the downcomer;design function could have been jeopardized.

In the worst case, this could have resulted in the primary containment design pressure being exceeded with a subsequent potential for loss of primary containment integrity.

Corrective Action The Stone and Webster Procurement Quality Control Audit resulted in a "stop work order" being issued on December 13, 1977. Stone and Webster has directed that:

A. Those welds previously liquid penetrant tested be retested and. witnessed by Stone and Webster Procurement Quality Control personnel. These examinations are now underway.

B. Dravo, update the n'ondestruction examination instructions to comply with the Winter 1975 edition of the ASME Code. The update is expected to be complete about January 31, 1978.

C. Dravo-utilize and control issuance of nondestructive testing procedures. This has been completed. Stone and Webster plans to perform another audit to assure compliance.

D. Dravo establish and use appropriate procedures for nondestructive examination of rejected work and cavities.

These are being prepared and will be complete about March 1, 1978.

~J

)

f ~ II 1 ~

. ~ I,lt is E. Dravo ensure that the authorised inspector is the last person to "sign off" inspection sketches. Stone and Webster plans to perform another audit, to assure compliance.

RECL'IVFb aOCut<Eq~i O'O'IfROL CESN

",)(g PL) / pg g I4

~.S. tlRC DISTfIIBUTIOHSEA VICES BfiAt(CII