ML16342D043

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards RAI Concerning Proposed Change to Psvs at Plant Re Insp Rept 50-275/94-25.Requests Response by 950930
ML16342D043
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  
Issue date: 08/07/1995
From: Stone J
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Rueger G
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 9509110204
Download: ML16342D043 (8)


See also: IR 05000275/1994025

Text

Hr. Gregory

M. Rueger

Pacific Gas

and Electric Company

NPG Hail Code AlOD

P.O.

Box 770000

San Francisco,

California

94177

SUBJECT:

REQUEST

FOR

INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED

CHANGE TO PRESSURIZER

SAFETY VALVES AT DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS

1

AND 2

Dear Hr. Rueger:

The

NRC staff has

become

aware of modifications to the pressurizer

safety

valves

(PSVs)

being proposed

by Pacific

Gas

and Electric

(PG&E) (see

Inspection

Report 50-275/94-24

and

LER 94-009-01).

In addition, the

NRC staff

discussed

the issue with members of your staff on August 24,

1995.

In an

attempt to improve set point drift performance of the

PSVs, it is our

understanding

that

PG&E is considering installing redesigned

internal parts

(i.e.,

upper spring washers)

in the valves.

In the case of PSVs, extensive qualification testing of the existing valve

design

has

been

performed to assure

adequate

performance of the valves

including adequate

discharge,

stable operation,

and proper reseating for the

required operating

and accident fluid conditions.

In order for the staff to

fully understand

the modifications

and the basis for continued qualification,

the staff requests

a response

to the enclosed

questions.

Because

the

modifications are being proposed to be implemented at Diablo Canyon Unit 1,

during the upcoming outage,

the staff requests

your response

by September

30,

1995.

If you have

any questions

or wish to further discuss this issue with

the staff, please

contact

me at (301) 415-3063.

This requirement affects nine

or fewer respondents

and, therefore,

is not subject to the Office of

Management

and Budget review under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

James

C. Stone,

Senior Project

Manager

Project Directorate

IV-2

Division of Reactor Projects III/IV

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos.

50-275

and 50-323

Enclosure:

Request for Additional

cc w/encl:

See next page

DOCUMENT NAME:

DCPSV.RAI

DISTRIBUTION

Docket

PUBLIC

Information

PDIV-2 Reading

JRoe

EAdensam

WBateman

DChamberlain,

RIV

RWessman

OGC

ACRS (4)

EPeyton

KPerkins,

WCFO

JDyer,

RIV

JStone

OFC

DATE

PDIV-2 LA

ElpeeyPn

9/"1 /95

NRR:EHE

9/

/95

PDIV-2

P

JStone:ye

9

/95

OFFICIAL RECORD

COPY

<< "GC <.3

9509ii0204 950807

PDR

ADQCK 05000275

6

PDR

IlIgg g.~ gKÃtillIItCSII'V

,t

1

September

7,

1995

Hr. Gregory H. Rueger

Pacific Gas

and Electric Company

NPG - Hail Code AlOD

P.O.

Box 770000

San Francisco,

California

94177

SUBJECT:

RE(VEST

FOR

INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED

CHANGE TO PRESSURIZER

SAFETY VALVES AT DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS

1

AND 2

Dear Hr. Rueger:

The

NRC staff has

become

aware of modifications to the pressurizer

safety

valves

(PSVs)

being proposed

by Pacific Gas

and Electric

(PG&E) (see

Inspection

Report 50-275/94-24

and

LER 94-009-01).

In addition, the

NRC staff

discussed

the issue with members of your staff on August 24,

1995.

In an

attempt to improve set point drift performance of the

PSVs, it is our

understanding

that

PG&E is considering installing redesigned

internal parts

(i.e.,

upper spring washers)

in the valves.

In the case of PSVs,

extensive qualification testing of the existing valve

design

has

been

performed to assure

adequate

performance of the valves

including adequate

discharge,

stable operation,

and proper reseating for the

required operating

and accident fluid conditions.

In order for the staff to

fully understand

the modifications

and the basis for continued qualification,

the staff requests

a response

to the enclosed

questions.

Because

the

modifications are being proposed to be implemented at Diablo Canyon Unit 1,

during the upcoming outage,

the staff requests

your response

by September

30,

1995.

If you have

any questions

or wish to further discuss this issue with

the staff, please

contact

me at (301) 415-3063.

This requirement affects nine

or fewer respondents

and, therefore,

is not subject to the Office of

Management

and Budget review under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

James

C. Stone,

Senior Project

Manager

Project Directorate

IV-2

Division of Reactor Projects III/IV

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos.

50-275

and 50-323

Enclosure:

Request for Additional

cc w/encl:

See next page

DOCUMENT NAME:

DCPSV.RAI

DISTRIBUTION

Docket

PUBLIC

Information

PDIV-2 Reading

JRoe

EAdensam

WBateman

DChamberlain,

RIV

RWessman

OGC

ACRS (4)

EPeyton

KPerkins,

WCFO

JDyer,

RIV

JStone

OFC

NAME

DATE

PDIV-2 LA

fPeeySn

9/ "1

95

PDIV-2

P

NRR:EME

JStone:

e

9

/95

9

95

OFFICIAL RECORD

COPY

r

Mr. Gregory

M. Rueger

cc w/encl:

NRC Resident

Inspector

Diablo Canyon Nuclear

Power Plant

c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

P. 0.

Box 369

Avila Beach,.California

93424

Dr. Richard Ferguson,

Energy Chair

Sierra Club California

1100 11th Street,

Suite

311

Sacramento,

Cal iforni a

95814

Ms. Nancy Culver

San Luis Obispo

Mothers for Peace

P. 0.

Box 164

Pismo Beach, California

93448

Ms. Jacquelyn

C. Wheeler

P. 0.

Box 164

Pismo Beach, California

93448

Managing Editor

The Count

Tele

ram Tribune

1321 Johnson

Avenue

P. 0.

Box 112

San Luis Obispo, California

93406

Chairman

San Luis Obispo County Board of

Supervisors

Room 370

County Government

Center

San Luis Obispo, California

93408

Mr. Truman Burns

Mr. Robert Kinosian

California Public Utilities Commission

505

Van Ness,

Room 4102

San Francisco,

California

94102

Mr. Steve

Hsu

Radiologic Health Branch

State

Department of Health Services

Post Office Box 942732

Sacramento,

California

94232

Regional Administrator,

Region

IV

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Harris Tower

& Pavillion

611

Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite

400

Arlington, Texas

76011-8064

Mr. Peter

H. Kaufman

Deputy Attorney General

State of California

110 West

A Street,

Suite

700

San Diego, California

92101

Christopher J.

Warner,

Esq.

Pacific Gas

& Electric Company

Post Office Box 7442

San Francisco,

California

94120

Mr. Warren

H. Fujimoto

Vice President

and Plant Manager

Diablo Canyon Nuclear

Power Plant

P. 0.

Box 56

Avila Beach, California

93424

Diablo Canyon

Independent

Safety

Committee

ATTN:

Robert

R. Wellington,

Esq.

Legal

Counsel

857 Cass Street,

Suite

D

Monterey, California

93940

E UEST

FOR

INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED

DESIGN

CHANGE TO

RESSURIZER

SAFETY VALVES AT DIABLO C

0

UCL

R

0

L

UNITS I AND

Licensee

Event Report 94-009-01 for Diablo Canyon Unit I describes

a planned

modification to the Unit I and

2 pressurizer

safety valves

(PSVs).

Based

on

a

telephone

conversation

between the

NRC staff and

PG&E staff,

we understand

that this modification is to be implemented during the next refueling outage

at Unit I, currently scheduled

to begin September

30,

1995,

and during the

next Unit 2 outage.

We also understand

that the modification involves the

installation of redesigned

upper spring washers

in the

PSVs for the purpose of

reducing

PSV setpoint drift.

While the reduction of setpoint drift.is one

important consideration

in the overall performance of the

PSVs,

the

NRC staff

seeks

assurance

that the proposed

new upper spring washer design will not have

an adverse effect on the capability of the plant

PSVs in performing their

safety function.

One possible effect is the apparent

increase

in frictional

effects of the

new washer design

along the sides of the valve spring

and along

the valve stem

as the valve disk travels to its fully open position, for

required discharge.

Specifically, it appears

that the design of the

new upper

spring washers

includes

new surface

areas

where friction could occur (i.e.,

between the washer inside collar and the stem surface

and

between

the washer

outside collar and the spring coils).

There are specific regulatory

requirements

which address

certain

PSV safety issues.

The following questions

pertain to these

issues

in relation to the proposed

change of the upper spring

washer design for the plant

PSVs:

The

NRC transmitted

a safety evaluation

(SE) dated January

27,

1986,

regarding the

NUREG 0737,

Item II.D.I requirements

for safety

and relief

valve testing.

The

SE documented

the staff's findings regarding,

among

other items, the qualification of the plant

PSVs.

Specifically, Crosby

model

HB-BP-86

6M6 PSVs representative

of the plant model valves were

tested

at the Electric Power Research

Institute

(EPRI) test. facility to

demonstrate

their capability to adequately

open to the full'pen

position,

develop required discharge

in a stable

manner,

and adequately

reseat

to prevent excessive

loss of reactor coolant.

These tests

were

conducted

under full temperature,

full pressure,

full flow fluid test

conditions representative

of the plant design operating

and accident

conditions.

Provide the basis,

used

by Pacific

Gas

and Electric, that

provides

assur ance that the plant

PSVs, with the

new upper spring washer

modification, continue to meet the

NUREG 0737,

Item II.D.I requirements.

2.

The American Society of Mechanical

Engineers

(ASME), Boiler and Pressure

Vessel

Code,

Section III provides requirements for the design,

construction, certification and inspection of safety

components

including the

PSVs.

Provide information which assures

that the

ASME

Code requirements

continue to be met regarding the plant

PSVs with the

proposed

new upper spring washers.

Specifically, include information

which documents

the compliance with:

the

Code material quality

requirements;

the

Code design requirements;

the requirements of the

Code

N and

NV Certificate Holder for design,

construction,

and capacity

certification;

and the requirements

of the Authorized Observer (or third

party) in inspecting

and assuring

the compliance of the Certificate

Holder.

e'>