ML16341G771
| ML16341G771 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1992 |
| From: | Reese J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Rueger G PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16341G772 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9212010110 | |
| Download: ML16341G771 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000275/1992026
Text
pga IlfOy~
C4
V&
r
0
i+
ClO
IlO0
+)0*<<+
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION
REGION V
1450 MARIALANE
WALNUTCREEK, CAUFORNIA94596-5368
NOV 13 iNR
Dockets
50-275
and 50-323
Licenses
DPR-80 and
Pacific Gas
and Electric Company
77 Beale Street,
Room 1451
San Francisco,
California 94106
Attention:
G. H. Rueger
Senior
Vice President
and General
Hanager
Nuclear
Power Generation
SUBJECT'OTICE
OF VIOLATION
NRC
INSPECTION
REPORT 50-275/92-26
AND 50-323/92-26
During the weeks of September
16 22,
1992
and October
5 9,
1992, Hr. H.
Chancy
and Hr. L. Coblentz of this office conducted
a routine inspection of
activities authorized for your Diablo Canyon
Power Plant.
On September
22,
Hr. H. Chancy discussed
the findings of the first week of inspection with
members of your staff.
At the conclusion of the inspection,
on October 9, Hr.
Coblentz discussed
the findings of the second
week of inspection with members
of your staff.
Meeting attendees
are identified in the enclosed report.
Areas
examined during this inspection
are described
in the enclosed report.
Within these
areas,
the inspection consisted of selective
examinations of
procedures
and representative
records,
interviews with personnel,
and
observations
of activities in progress.
Based
on the results of this inspection,
certain of your activities appear to
be in violation of NRC 'requirements,
as described
in the enclosed
Notice of
Violation (Notice).
Your overall control of radiological
hazards
encountered
during steam generator
work in the Unit
1 outage
appears
exemplary;
however,
we are concerned
by the recurrent generation of unanticipated
airborne
radioactivity resulting from the failure to establish
and implement procedural
controls during shot peening operations.
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed
Notice when preparing your response.
-In your
response,
you should document the specific actions taken for each violation
and any additional actions
you plan to prevent recurrence.
After reviewing
your response
to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions
and
the results of future inspections,
the
NRC will determine whether further
NRC
enforcement
action is necessary
to e'nsure
compliance with NRC regulatory
requirements.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790(a) of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"
a copy of
this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
The responses
directed
by this letter and the enclosed
Notice are not subject
92i20iOifO 92iii3
.PDR
ADOCK 05000275
8
to the clearance
procedures
of the Office of management
and Budget
as required
by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980,
Pub.
L.96-511.
i
am
s H. Reese,
C ief
Facilities Radiological Protection
Branch
Enclosures:
Inspection
Report 50-275/92-26
and 50-323/92-26
cc w/enclosure:
J.
A. Sexton,
J.
D. Townsend,
Vice President/Plant
Manager,
C. J. Marner,
Esq.,
D. A. Taggart, Director, equality Assurance,
B. Thomas,
News Service,
T. L. Grebel,
Regulatory Compliance Supervisor,
State of California
B. Hendrix, County Administrator
cc report only:
Sandra Silver
bcc w/o enclosures:
M. Smith
J. Zollicoffer
LCobl
z
u /iy/g~
aney
/)>/e~
ggy p s 89R
bcc w/enclosures:
Docket File
Resident
Inspector
Project Inspector
G.
Cook
R.
Huey
B. Faulkenberry
J. Hartin
3
FHue
~/l~~
ii /~/gZ
E
NO
TO
E
NO
NO
NO
NO